> ... or run the 'mirror' package, and a mirror, and look at the
> (perhaps weekly-- as I recall the RawHide archive is freshened
> on Fridays) mirror run report, which lists each new package as
> it is pulled in, and optionally deleted off ...
Thanks for the idea. (duh). I've always done this
Evandro Fernandes Giovanini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> why is there no images/ directory and some other files used by anaconda in
> the RedHat/ directory of the rawhide distribution?
Because when the rawhide tree was built, the install images didn't
build for one reason or another. Probably so
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, db wrote:
> Or is it more of "query the rpms yourself" to
> find out what the current development status is.
... or run the 'mirror' package, and a mirror, and look at the
(perhaps weekly-- as I recall the RawHide archive is freshened
on Fridays) mirror run report, which lis
why is there no images/ directory and some other files used by anaconda in
the RedHat/ directory of the rawhide distribution?
are you replacing anaconda?
Evandro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTE
I'm probably not looking in the obvious places, but is there a running
changelog for the current rawhides? (Like: "01/06/2001: updated to 2.4.0
proper from -test12", etc.). Or is it more of "query the rpms yourself" to
find out what the current development status is.
I like the comments that so
> make mrproper first.
I do make clean; make mrproper. Call me crazy, but for some reason I have
to have make clean first. (I thought they were redundant though).
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailm
I need the C++ header file files for numeric_limits (#include ), but
they are not packaged with libstdc++-devel-2.96-54.rpm
I managed to get the necessary files by rebuilding the source rpm:
rpm -bi gcc-2.96-54.src.rpm
Note: The sources for libstdc++ include a script (mknumeric_limits) that
ge
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> No need to report this particular bug though, I've fixed it.
... well ... actually, one might report, and then annotate the
report with a comment like Bero's, and then close it. A
Reporter may do this ...
Why? Because Bugzilla entries, when
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
I believe you are incorrect.
I do not work for Red Hat, but ... if a package is listed in
Bugzilla, I file a report, with full version and patch level,
there.
.. Reports in email are too
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
It is for rawhide as well as any release.
No need to report this particular bug though, I've fixed it.
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-devel-list mailin
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Michael Shiels wrote:
> I still can't seem to get a kernel to compile under 7.0.
make mrproper
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Em Sábado 06 Janeiro 2001 19:26, you wrote:
> I still can't seem to get a kernel to compile under 7.0. I am using a
> pristine installation, and the kernel sources etc from the install,
> NOTHING ADDED/CHANGED. But I get the following problem right away.
> Strange thing is that it mentions the
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
There is a Rawhide section in there too :-)
---
Red Hat Raw Hide
For bugs about Red Hat Raw Hide
---
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of d
I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
Regards
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Pekka Savola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: bug in irda-utils from latest rawhide
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Fr
make mrproper first.
Matt
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:26:17PM -0500, Michael Shiels wrote:
> I still can't seem to get a kernel to compile under 7.0. I am using a
> pristine installation, and the kernel sources etc from the install,
> NOTHING ADDED/CHANGED. But I get the following prob
I still can't seem to get a kernel to compile under 7.0. I am using a
pristine installation, and the kernel sources etc from the install,
NOTHING ADDED/CHANGED. But I get the following problem right away.
Strange thing is that it mentions the error as being first reference to
smp_num_cpus, but
On Saturday, January 06 2001, Bill Nottingham said:
> Jeremy Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > tree. RPMs and SRPM at http://katz.linuxpower.org/mesa/. glxinfo
> > > > seems to imply that it's good, but I see the same problem with gears
> > > > that I saw when I compiled DRI CVS (seems t
Jeremy Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > tree. RPMs and SRPM at http://katz.linuxpower.org/mesa/. glxinfo
> > > seems to imply that it's good, but I see the same problem with gears
> > > that I saw when I compiled DRI CVS (seems to block for no apparent
> > > reason and has to be killed rem
On Saturday, January 06 2001, Dax Kelson said:
> Jeremy Katz said once upon a time (Sat, 6 Jan 2001):
> > For everyone's information, this is currently being tracked in bugzilla
> > as well as bug #22578. Anyway, I sat down with this last night and
> > built an updated Mesa RPM with the DRI bits
Jeremy Katz said once upon a time (Sat, 6 Jan 2001):
> For everyone's information, this is currently being tracked in bugzilla
> as well as bug #22578. Anyway, I sat down with this last night and
> built an updated Mesa RPM with the DRI bits pulled out of the 4.0.2
> tree. RPMs and SRPM at htt
On Saturday, January 06 2001, Bill Nottingham said:
> Jeremy Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > tree. RPMs and SRPM at http://katz.linuxpower.org/mesa/. glxinfo
> > seems to imply that it's good, but I see the same problem with gears
> > that I saw when I compiled DRI CVS (seems to block for
Jeremy Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> tree. RPMs and SRPM at http://katz.linuxpower.org/mesa/. glxinfo
> seems to imply that it's good, but I see the same problem with gears
> that I saw when I compiled DRI CVS (seems to block for no apparent
> reason and has to be killed remotely to regain
On Saturday, January 06 2001, Alan Shutko said:
> Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alan Shutko said once upon a time (5 Jan 2001):
> > Here is the changelog for the current rawhide Mesa RPM.
>
> I just pulled down the current Rawhide Mesa SRPM:
>
> [11:41:10] wesley:~ $ rpm -qlp Mesa-
Alan Shutko said once upon a time (6 Jan 2001):
> As you can see, it hasn't been redone for 4.0.2 yet. You won't get
> direct rendering until it is, or you compile libGL yourself and throw
> it in the directory.
I used cvs to snag DRI-CVS, and compiled up everything. First I tossed
libGL.so.1.
where's anaconda's pot file? i would like to translate it to portuguese.
thanks,
Evandro
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alan Shutko said once upon a time (5 Jan 2001):
> > Have the Mesa RPMS been updated with the XF 4.0.2 GL stuff? The Mesa
> > SRPM contains a trimmed down version of the XF libGL, and last I
> > checked it was still using the 4.0.1 stuff.
>
> The RELNOTE
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> Hello RedHat's,
>
> the irda-utils rpm from the latest rawhide contains a bug in
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/irda
> which prevents the script from starting. See the appended patch...
>
> Happy hacking
> Frank
>
> --- irda.org Mon Dec 25 00:45:04 2000
> +++ irda
Hello RedHat's,
the irda-utils rpm from the latest rawhide contains a bug in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/irda
which prevents the script from starting. See the appended patch...
Happy hacking
Frank
--- irda.org Mon Dec 25 00:45:04 2000
+++ irda Fri Jan 5 13:11:47 2001
@@ -36,10 +36,10 @@
[ -f /usr/sb
28 matches
Mail list logo
