> >
> >These bugs are around the gcc-2.95.2 and the kernel behind the 2.2.16, or they
> >are about even the 2.2.16 kernel?
> >What I mean is that many distribution give the gcc-2.95.2, and I have an e-mail
> >from this mailing list that says in the RedHat Linux 7.0 there will be the
> >gcc-2.95.2.
I have a makefile that I am trying to get to build a binary dist
for me, by putting the date and time into the tar filename.
I can't for the life of me get it to work. ONCE I ran it and it
worked, and then I deleted the tar files and tried again without
editing it, and it failed.. go figure..
I have a makefile with the following:
bindist:
@echo Making: bindist
@echo -n"Creating tar archive ... "
@DATECODE=`/bin/date +"%Y-%m-%d-%H%M"`
echo $$DATECODE
tar --exclude-from bindist-excludelist.txt \
-zcvf $(DISTDIR)/mikeweb-$(DATEC
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote:
>One thing I can't find a good document on is *how* these denial of
>service programs (the binaries) got onto the Linux boxes in the first
>place. Were they installed through the "rpc.statd" hole? Is it IRC
>buffer overflow issue (it doesn't sound like it)?
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >I've been using gcc-2.95.3-0.2517 for some time and before that 2.95-2
>> >with nothing more than a few snide remarks here to unsettle me.
>>
>> Jeepers creepers... ;o)
>>
>> This is one of the biggest FAQ's I think in all of Linux
>> land..
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 08:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: kernel-2.2.16 source rpm
>
>I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a
>number of patche
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Mario Torre wrote:
>Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 17:04:16 +0200
>From: Mario Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.2
>
>These bugs are around the gcc-2.95.2 and the kernel behind the 2.2.16, or they
>are a
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:54:51PM -0400, Frank Hale wrote:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
> > What does `glint' do for you that you cannot easily duplicate from the
> > command line?
>
> I have no problem with the command line. However its nice at certain
> times to see things graphically, thats all.
N
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 04:19:38PM -0700, kort wrote:
>
> Reinstalling will fix any currently hacked services, but that
> will just require the vandal to re-infect the system.
Not necessarily. Only a complete wipe and re-install will. Otherwise,
you need to use 'lsattr' to make sure that non
Harry Putnam wrote:
> What does `glint' do for you that you cannot easily duplicate from the
> command line?
I have no problem with the command line. However its nice at certain
times to see things graphically, thats all.
--
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Yet another X11 Window
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote:
> I do understand that, I wasn't trying to imply anything about anyone's
> responsibility as it's obviously our own to secure our own boxes. What
> I'm trying to find out is if there was one particular hole that was used
> to insert the trojan or, as you su
Security Violations
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Sep 8 07:01:06 mail hifsd[375]: Bad number of procs: 731 from mail
Sep 8 07:02:49 mail hifsd[375]: Bad number of procs: 731 from mail
Sep 8 07:07:57 mail hifsd[375]: Bad number of procs: 732 from mail
Sep 8 07:08:07 mail hifsd[375]: Bad number of procs:
I do understand that, I wasn't trying to imply anything about anyone's
responsibility as it's obviously our own to secure our own boxes. What
I'm trying to find out is if there was one particular hole that was used
to insert the trojan or, as you suggest, the trojans were inserted
through numerous
Typically, you are left to secure your own box. The intruder could have
gotten into your box from a misconfigured SSH daemon, or the wrong version
of an FTD Daemon... Any hundreds of holes you may have overlooked.
Best thing to do, is double-check you have the most recent copies of
anything out
One thing I can't find a good document on is *how* these denial of
service programs (the binaries) got onto the Linux boxes in the first
place. Were they installed through the "rpc.statd" hole? Is it IRC
buffer overflow issue (it doesn't sound like it)? How did the trojan
horses get onto the syste
> On 7 Sep 2000, Nasir Mahmood wrote:
>
> > 1. How I check which port services are running except through
> > /etc/inetd.conf.
> >
> > 2. How I can kill harmful port addresses to check above attackes.
> >
> > More info: My system is under Danial of Service Attack Service. It is
> > continuously g
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:13:36AM -0700, Frank Hale wrote:
> >
> > No I wasn't aware of that at all.. I'm getting warm
> > inside now
> > though. ;o) I have a feeling that it will be much
> > more useable
> > in the next release as well. Thanks for the
> > pointer..
> >
What does `glint' d
Oh dear, found one more teeny tiny detail:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ramiel Givergis wrote:
/root/verify-rpms > /root/verify-results 2>&1
^
|
rpm --verify
is w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke C Gavel) writes:
> given the situation. I just wanted to add one tiny
> little correction:
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ramiel Givergis wrote:
>
> rpm -qa|sed "s/^./rpm --verify /g" > /root/verify-rpms
> ^
> |
> You need
>
Sorry to perpetuate this, but I thought it important
given the situation. I just wanted to add one tiny
little correction:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ramiel Givergis wrote:
rpm -qa|sed "s/^./rpm --verify /g" > /root/verify-rpms
^
|
You need
a
> X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 06:09:36 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
> Copyright: Copyright 2000 by Mike A. Harris - All
>
> >
> > No I wasn't aware of that at all.. I'm getting warm
> > inside now
> > though. ;o) I have a feeling that it will be much
> > more useable
> > in the next release as well. Thanks for the
> > pointer..
> >
>
> Are there any other graphical alternatives to GnoRPM?
> I am just not re
Frank Hale wrote:
>
> Are there any other graphical alternatives to GnoRPM?
> I am just not ready to use Gnome all the time. I like
> using just a small Window manager and a minimal
You can use GnoRPM without GNOME, sawfish, or Enlightenment.
It just need the GNOME liraries
The ones I see (for
On 7 Sep 2000, Nasir Mahmood wrote:
> 1. How I check which port services are running except through
> /etc/inetd.conf.
>
> 2. How I can kill harmful port addresses to check above attackes.
>
> More info: My system is under Danial of Service Attack Service. It is
> continuously generating heavy
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:13:36AM -0700, Frank Hale wrote:
> Are there any other graphical alternatives to GnoRPM?
> I am just not ready to use Gnome all the time.
Its perfectly possible to use GnoRPM without "the rest" of Gnome
(which is usually the panel and the session manager, really).
--
Frank Hale wrote:
>
> >
> > No I wasn't aware of that at all.. I'm getting warm
> > inside now
> > though. ;o) I have a feeling that it will be much
> > more useable
> > in the next release as well. Thanks for the
> > pointer..
> >
>
> Are there any other graphical alternatives to GnoRPM?
>
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff Pitman wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> In particular, it gives ugly backtraces if you have a kickstart file that
> worked just fine with RedHat 6.2.
> Incompatible changes are bad enough, but these failures should be more
> graceful and give more clue what's wrong
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
> I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a
> number of patches in there. What are these patches
> for? Are they RH specific. What would be the harm in
> just packaging the kernel source tarball by itself.
> I've never had the need to patch the k
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Harmless Boy wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just upgraded to initscripts-5.44-1 from the one included in
> RH6.1, and was just wondering where the turning on of ipv4 forwarding is
> done now? I couldn't find it anywhere, and turned to taking the
> ipv4_forward_set() function out of
Dear Developers,
I am using REDHAT 6.1. I am getting New "trintry" Danial of Service Attack
from Yahoo & Aol. You may find more info on CNN.com or I may send article copy
on request to avoid huge pile up of list mailing disk. It is a kind of attack
which can be operated through CHAT/IRC systems.
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I have been running RedHat 5.2 (2.0.36 kernel) on this machine for a couple o
> > f months, without problems. Yesterday, I upgraded to 6.2 (2.2.14 kernel) and
> > the machine refuses to start Linux. The installation was uneventful, and I
> > can
>
> No I wasn't aware of that at all.. I'm getting warm
> inside now
> though. ;o) I have a feeling that it will be much
> more useable
> in the next release as well. Thanks for the
> pointer..
>
Are there any other graphical alternatives to GnoRPM?
I am just not ready to use Gnome all the
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Wacek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > After a proper installation of RedHat 6.2 Gnome workstation option on
> > Athlon K7 with A7V mainboard computer, boot crashes (both normal and
> > single option from LILO) with "General protection Fault ".
> > What should I do to
I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a
number of patches in there. What are these patches
for? Are they RH specific. What would be the harm in
just packaging the kernel source tarball by itself.
I've never had the need to patch the kernel with any
nonstandard patches.
Frank
===
These bugs are around the gcc-2.95.2 and the kernel behind the 2.2.16, or they
are about even the 2.2.16 kernel?
What I mean is that many distribution give the gcc-2.95.2, and I have an e-mail
from this mailing list that says in the RedHat Linux 7.0 there will be the
gcc-2.95.2.
I have compiled t
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 09:48:46PM -0600, Jed S. Baer wrote:
> So, if anyone has any other suggestions/solutions, I'd sure like to hear
> them.
Turn off the module support option "Set version information on all symbols
for modules" in "Loadable module support" when you make the kernel config.
Ch
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, identity wrote:
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:59:26 +0200
>From: identity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Subject: Re: Hi
>
>You are both right. I was accually doing C. I only just remembered one book
>about C++.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Svante Signell wrote:
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:19:33 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: ipchains vs iptables
>
>The following ipchains rules are working for kernel 2.2.x. Which ar
Hey, I would like to have that test program as well. Could you please send me a
copy too?
thanks
Remco Nonhebel
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Jim Treadway wrote:
>
> >> reading methods, I have plenty of those allready. I'm wanting
> >> this so I can learn kernel interface fun
You are both right. I was accually doing C. I only just remembered one book
about C++. :))) thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Hi
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Jesse Marlin wro
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> I can't speak for Red Hat, but my observation is that Glint was
>> buggy, and a native GNOME/Gtk app would be much nicer. GNOrpm
>> came along, and is no less stable than glint really.. I got
>> bitten by gnorpm and was angry about it, however I don
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> >int main(void)
>> >{
>> >printf("%ld CPUs online\n", sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN));
^^^
>[root@dugite /root]# man getconf
>No manual entry for getconf
>[root@dugite /root]# getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN
>1
>
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> Last time I checked, it didn't work. You have to include your
>> list password, which means you need to keep track of it in a safe
>> place, and then fumble around to get it. I really wish that the
>> mailing list would just allow unsubscriptions l
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> Uh, you realize that for some architectures it isn't 1-2-3-4 if you
>> store 0x01020304 into a double-word. It might be 2-1-4-3 o
>> something else perverse.
>
>In 30 years, I've only seen two orders of arranging bytes in ints.
>
>There other repres
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Jesse Marlin wrote:
>You mentioned using c++. gcc is the C compiler and g++ is the C++ compiler.
>Since you have files with .c extension then I assume you are doing C. So
>you would want to try:
>
>to compile:
>gcc -c -o blabla.o blabla.c
>
>to link:
>gcc -o blabla blabla.o
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> Personally, I suspect that it's because gcc-2.95.2 can't compile working
>> kernels without a LOT of screwing around. I've yet to make the debian
>> compiler from frozen give me a working kernel. I'm much happier with the
>> WORKING software that R
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am just a newer to Linux operating system. I'd like to know more about
>Linux.
>
> Here I have a question, i.e. how I can debug linux kernel. I think this
>will be helpful for me understanding the underlying mechanism.
The "ikd" patches. Do a
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Jim Treadway wrote:
>> reading methods, I have plenty of those allready. I'm wanting
>> this so I can learn kernel interface functions, and doing it via
>> other methods does not teach what I'm wanting to learn.
>
>I believe that I saw a code example for this in one of "the
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Raghuveera Nanchariah Chalasani wrote:
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 13:50:14 -0400
>From: Raghuveera Nanchariah Chalasani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_NextPart_000_0024_01C01352.635D5180"
>Subject: SMTP Se
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Raghuveera Nanchariah Chalasani wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a SMTP server and I am having problems with figuring out various
>scenarios. I am implementing the version of SMTP as described in RFC 822. I am
>curious if there is any free source code that I can look up for
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > During a normal boot, I get a log message about a general protection fault: 0
> > 000 while "Disabling CPUID Serial number."
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
>
The problem is that the kernel which is copied to the hd was b
The following ipchains rules are working for kernel 2.2.x. Which are
the corresponding rules with ipbables and kernel 2.4.x?
Which modules to load?
2.2.x: working
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
ipchains -P forward DENY
ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.0.4 -j MASQ
2.4.x: my attempt, not working
/sbin/
> >
> > I purchased redhat Linux 6.2 which was released around Apr-June 2000.
> > On this distribution they have egcs and no gcc. Isn't egcs
> > history now?
> >
Yes
> > On October 24, 1999 the GCC team released GCC 2.95.2. All I
> > can find on
> > Redhat pages are rpm's for gcc-2.95.1.
53 matches
Mail list logo
