On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 10:14:43PM -0400, Adrian Likins wrote:
> >
>
> vim /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/kernel-2.2.spec
>
> go to line 257 or so...
>
> %ifarch i386 i586 i686
> make -j 4 bzImage MAKE="make -j 4"
> %else
>
>
> replace 'make -j 4 bzImage MAKE="make -j 4"' with 'make
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 07:01:11PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> I have posted this problem on several lists but am not getting any
> answers. Sorry if this is not the best place to ask this, but thought
> someone here might at least point me in a good direction.
>
> I am trying to build 2.2.5-2
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 02:05:04AM +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Note the cc1 STATE column and memory/cpu columns. There are 200 or so
> > total processes at this point, most from from the kernel build. What
> > makes cc1 so hungry? It doesn't seem
I have posted this problem on several lists but am not getting any
answers. Sorry if this is not the best place to ask this, but thought
someone here might at least point me in a good direction.
I am trying to build 2.2.5-22 kernel from RH src.rpm on an Intel P166
with 128M ram and 128M swap. My
> On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 05:20:07PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> >
> > > > Get the kernel RPM from 6.1.
> > >
> > > are you sure that there are no strange GLIBC conflicts ?
> >
> > Quite - AFAIR 6.0 uses glibc 2.1.1, 6.1 uses glibc 2.1.2,
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 05:20:07PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
>
> > > Get the kernel RPM from 6.1.
> >
> > are you sure that there are no strange GLIBC conflicts ?
>
> Quite - AFAIR 6.0 uses glibc 2.1.1, 6.1 uses glibc 2.1.2, there's no big
>
I have this exact card in one of my machines. It will not work with the
stock Red Hat kernel. You will have to build a custom kernel to get it
work.
The problem is that the tulip driver included in the official kernel
sources, and hence Red Hat 6.0 is version 0.89H which detects this card
as "un
I think the problem is in the firmware revision. The card has Version 2.0 of
the
firmware. We had this problem with some FreeBSD boxes and got around it by
using
the Mylex driver on the Linksys card. I am new to Linux so I don't quite
know what
is involved...
Do you have any idea what we shoul
Add this option to your gcc or linker line:
-lpthread
Also, add this in the top of your C code before you start including headers:
#define _REENTRANT
Look in /usr/doc/glibc-xx and you will find a file detailing the
pthread support under Linux.
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 10:50:02PM +0800, [E
:)
->
danielle# diff -u zshrc.mozgy zshrc
--- zshrc.mozgy Wed Oct 6 18:39:26 1999
+++ zshrc Wed Oct 6 18:39:34 1999
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
# Some environment variables
export HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname`
-export MAIL=/var/spool/mail/$USER
+export MAIL=/var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
path=($path $
Farid Yavari ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> thank you for the reply. I looked at the web site and could not see any
> Linksys drivers. The codes on the processor of NIC card say:
>
> Linksys
> LNE100TX
> LC82C115
> T4443701
> 37BDX
That should work with the tulip driver.
Bill
--
To unsubscrib
John,
thank you for the reply. I looked at the web site and could not see any
Linksys drivers. The codes on the processor of NIC card say:
Linksys
LNE100TX
LC82C115
T4443701
37BDX
Do you have any ideas?
Farid
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
Anne POSSOZ wrote:
>
> Since some days there is a new update for redhat-6.0:
> updates/6.0/images/i386/install2
>
> Am I suppose to replace it in RedHat/instimage/usr/bin?
>
> Is there a place with comment about diffrences? What is changed
> since may 29?
not sure - but I'd certainly appreciat
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> thank you Robert,
> I think I will try to use RH6.1's binary 2.2.12-rpm on my RH6.0 box,
> with hopefully no conflicts.
> ( murphy's law ... :-) )
Don't worry about murphy's law here... The RH6.1 kernel does *not* install
Windows on your box. ;)
LLaP
Hello,
does anyone know if the VFAT bug is present in the shipped kernel 2.2.5 of
RH6.0 ?
for example mounting a DOS ZIP drive using vfat,
and then making a subdir and then doing
cp -a * subdir
results in an infinite loop which copies all files to subdir
then creates subdir/subdir , makes another
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, Robert Tennent wrote:
> > > I need an kernel 2.2.12 rpm for a Redhat 6.0 box,
> > > but need a kernel supporting IP Masquerading,
> >
> > I regularly build kernels here on a P133. I reckon I can compile one a
> > darn sight faster than I can download it, especially if I
> What does make install do? I've always just done:
>
> make mrproper
> make clean
> make xconfig
> make bzImage
> make modules
> make modules_install
>
> then copy over the bzImage /boot and do all that good lilo and System.map
> ln -s stuff.
make install copies the bzImage /boot and do all tha
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> sometime when the rpm for a new kernel is not yet released, I install the
> regular tar.gz kernel and copy the .config of the redhat's kernel in the tree
> and run make menuconfig.
> but sometime there are options left which remain unactivated on the new
>
> I regularly build kernels here on a P133. I reckon I can compile one a
> darn sight faster than I can download it, especially if I stop to ask
> questions first.
>
> Should take less than an hour, including think time.
Yea, but I have to install this server for a client,
and can sit in
> > I need an kernel 2.2.12 rpm for a Redhat 6.0 box,
> > but need a kernel supporting IP Masquerading,
>
> I regularly build kernels here on a P133. I reckon I can compile one a
> darn sight faster than I can download it, especially if I stop to ask
> questions first.
>
Warning: the v
What does make install do? I've always just done:
make mrproper
make clean
make xconfig
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install
then copy over the bzImage /boot and do all that good lilo and System.map
ln -s stuff.
What am I missing? I've always wondered about the module_info file and
ho
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> > Get the kernel RPM from 6.1.
>
> are you sure that there are no strange GLIBC conflicts ?
Quite - AFAIR 6.0 uses glibc 2.1.1, 6.1 uses glibc 2.1.2, there's no big
difference between those. Besides, the kernel itself doesn't use glibc;
actually the ke
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
>
> > I need an kernel 2.2.12 rpm for a Redhat 6.0 box,
> > but need a kernel supporting IP Masquerading,
>
> Get the kernel RPM from 6.1.
>
are you sure that there are no strange GLIBC conflicts ?
I
> hello,
> I need an kernel 2.2.12 rpm for a Redhat 6.0 box,
> but need a kernel supporting IP Masquerading,
> if I remember there was one on rawhide without.
>
> can someone please point me to a URL to get
> an ip-masquerading enabled kernel-2.2.12 rpm,
> without having to recompile the kernel,
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> I need an kernel 2.2.12 rpm for a Redhat 6.0 box,
> but need a kernel supporting IP Masquerading,
Get the kernel RPM from 6.1.
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear friends,
> I'm trying to port a program from WINDOWS to Linux,
> and I'm trying to use pthread_create(). There is no error
> or warning message when compiling those files( i.e. gcc -c ...),
> but there is a linking error: undefined reference
hello,
I need an kernel 2.2.12 rpm for a Redhat 6.0 box,
but need a kernel supporting IP Masquerading,
if I remember there was one on rawhide without.
can someone please point me to a URL to get
an ip-masquerading enabled kernel-2.2.12 rpm,
without having to recompile the kernel, since I must ins
Dear friends,
I'm trying to port a program from WINDOWS to Linux,
and I'm trying to use pthread_create(). There is no error
or warning message when compiling those files( i.e. gcc -c ...),
but there is a linking error: undefined reference to function
pthread_create().
I'm using RedHat 5.1.
The PAM patch to su is flawed; it makes no sense to insist that stdin be a
tty if the user's PAM-authorised. Here's the offending code:
+#ifdef USE_PAM
+ /* root always succeeds; this isn't an authentication question (no
+ * extra privs are being granted) so it shouldn't authenticate with P
> Hello,
> We are installing RH Linux 6.0 on our PC which has a LINKSYS PINC version
> 2.0 100BT ethernet card in it. The installation program does not recognize
> the card and we cannot select any drivers from the list provided by the
> installation program. When we run the installation program
30 matches
Mail list logo
