closing out this thread:
the long scan times i was experiencing are resolved. i was testing this new
server from home, where i have an excellent, low-latency wireless broadband
connection; nevertheless, after putting the new server in my colo cabinet,
the scan times dropped from being 15 second
I sent this one last week, but it was rejected because I sent from the
wrong account (I think Paul received it though since I also replied
directly to him). Not very successful venture my first post on the list
:) Anyway, here it is again.
--
There appears to be a bug in the way
At 14:40 -0500 2-04-2004, CertaintyTech-Ed wrote:
> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: e_v_r:
email_quarantine_report took
0.052252 seconds to execute
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/pravda.smileglobal.com108092703357446026/
/var/spool/
At 01:23 PM 4/2/2004, CertaintyTech-Ed wrote:
Are both scanning the message with SpamAssassin? Remember that local
messages (where RELAYCLIENT is set) do not get scanned by SA and
therefore go thru much quicker. Could that be it? On my system its
about 10 times faster if not scanned by SA.
no, t
>
> here's some of the 'all finished' lines from one of my
> existing proxies -
> obviously solaris, as you can see from the '%z' on each line ;^)
>
>
>
> side by side, there's not a huge difference i suppose. but
> again - i would
> have expected the new server to be much, much faster with
here's some of the 'all finished' lines from one of my existing proxies -
obviously solaris, as you can see from the '%z' on each line ;^)
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:27:31 %z:6249: --- all finished. Total of 16.853178 secs
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:27:32 %z:6218: --- all finished. Total of 20.053003 secs
Fri,
> >Looks like most of the scanning time takes place when removing file.
> >*OR* the date/time is not getting updated until the last
> line is written
> >so it misleads you to think that a large time jump happens
> at the end.
> >This is what I bet it is...
>
> i wish that were the case. the mes
At 11:40 AM 4/2/2004, CertaintyTech-Ed wrote:
> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: e_v_r:
> email_quarantine_report took
> 0.052252 seconds to execute
> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf
> /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/pravda.smileglobal.com108092703357446026/
> /var/spool/
> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: e_v_r:
> email_quarantine_report took
> 0.052252 seconds to execute
> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf
> /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/pravda.smileglobal.com108092703357446026/
> /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/pravda.smileglobal.c
