> 
> here's some of the 'all finished' lines from one of my 
> existing proxies - 
> obviously solaris, as you can see from the '%z' on each line ;^)
> 
> <snip>
> 
> side by side, there's not a huge difference i suppose. but 
> again - i would 
> have expected the new server to be much, much faster with its 
> dual 1ghz 
> compared to the netra t1 at 440mhz (different architecture of 
> course, but 
> still).
> 
> 
> Paul Theodoropoulos
> http://www.anastrophe.com
> 

If you are running Q-S+SA w/network testing enabled then the bulk of the
time is due to network tests.  The time for these tests won't improve
much with a faster server.  The times that you are seeing are similar to
my server which is a dual Athlon 2.4GHz.

Ed.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to