> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: e_v_r: > email_quarantine_report took > 0.052252 seconds to execute > Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf > /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/pravda.smileglobal.com108092703357446026/ > /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/pravda.smileglobal.com1080927 > 03357446026 > Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:57 -0800:46026: --- all finished. > Total of 24.215865 > secs
Just checked mine. Here is an example:
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:58:04 EST:24833: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/gen108093228457424833/ /var/qmail/qmailscan/working/new/gen108093228457424833 Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:58:14 EST:24833: --- all finished. Total of 9.679984 secs
Looks like most of the scanning time takes place when removing file. *OR* the date/time is not getting updated until the last line is written so it misleads you to think that a large time jump happens at the end. This is what I bet it is...
i wish that were the case. the message i scanned was little more than the word 'test'. the reason it seems pretty clearly anomalous is that the same message on one of my existing servers - a netra t1 440mhz - would take maybe two seconds. the new box is a dual pentium III/1ghz. i would generally expect that to run about at least one order of magnitude faster.
Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
