i wasnt even familiar with the 'strings' command... i just started
messin with linux maybe a year ago and i've learned a lot but i'm
learning it all without any real instruction... most of what i learn is
from google and docs and mailing lists... actually wait.. thats all of
it.. lol... i'm a
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:24:43PM -0400, Doug Monroe wrote:
> based on the results of running 'strings' on the compiled 'qmail-smtpd'
> binary:
> $ /usr/bin/strings /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd |grep QMAILQUEUE
..and then Doug goes and proves I know less about Q-S than I should :-)
Yeah - qmail
Sean D. wrote:
hi all.
I was curious by what criterion qmail-scanner's configure script
determines that qmail has been compiled with guenter's qmailqueue patch?
based on the results of running 'strings' on the compiled 'qmail-smtpd'
binary:
$ /usr/bin/strings /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd |grep Q
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:32:11PM -0500, Sean D. wrote:
> hi all.
> I was curious by what criterion qmail-scanner's configure script
> determines that qmail has been compiled with guenter's qmailqueue patch?
Have you read the configure script? :-)
It simply uses the "strings" command to see if
hi all.
I was curious by what criterion qmail-scanner's configure script
determines that qmail has been compiled with guenter's qmailqueue patch?
I ask this because i have a server that I rent (www.rackshack.net which
uses plesk 6) so I only have remote access to it and did not configure
the ori
check what ?
It is possible with a very large emails (8 megas ) that mails disappears
or eat by scanner ?
thanks
PS I am using qmail 1.03 with last stable realese qmail-scanner-1.16
clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.55.
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:07, Bill Moran wrote:
> Linux wrote:
> > All,
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Jesse,
> >
> > Sorry for sounding like a dummy but can you explain point # 2 for me?
The
> > envelope sender is what a user sees in their email client right?
>
> No. The envelope sender is what the mail server uses when i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> Jesse,
>
> Sorry for sounding like a dummy but can you explain point # 2 for me? The
> envelope sender is what a user sees in their email client right?
No. The envelope sender is what
Bill,
Thanks for the tip. I actually did this a week ago as I though this was the
problem but that didn't fix anything. I am well below the max.
Thanks,
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wedn
Folks,
fsavd is started as qmailq, always has. After upgrade, I now get 5 instances
instead of two and the one instance that the .pid refers to in order to stop
the daemon via 'fsavd stop' isn't in the proc list. This has been running
great until the upgrade today from 4.50 to 4.51. It looks like
* Doug Monroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-16 14:47]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >OK thanks for the clarification. I just want to stop the word "cum" in any
> >case (upper, lower or mixed) from been in the subject. But I don't want to
> >block words with "cum" in them like "document". So here
Hi!
GK> Just upgraded to f-secure 4.51 from 4.50 and now the fsav client can't/won't
GK> connect to the daemon! fsavd is running as qmailq. Anyone run into this?
GK> What did the upgrade break?
Which version of qmail-scanner are you using? Is qmail-scanner-queue.pl
owned by qmailq or qscand? Fsav
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have written (and currently use in production) a python script
> designed to block email addresses and/or domains using a flat file/auto
> generated CDB file.
>
> It differs from the badmailfrom file in that it:
>
> 1.)
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5792940
> Keep in mind the above is just an idea and will flag matches as virii
> and report same to sender (if you report to sender that is)
>
> > I don't mind writing a s
Folks,
Just upgraded to f-secure 4.51 from 4.50 and now the fsav client can't/won't
connect to the daemon! fsavd is running as qmailq. Anyone run into this?
What did the upgrade break?
Rgds,
__
Greg Kelley, Technology Director
Britannic Aviation, US and UK
US Office:
Peas
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 12:27, you wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I have written (and currently use in production) a python script
> > designed to block email addresses and/or domains using a flat file/auto
> > generated CDB file.
>
Hi folks,
i would like to know why the following mail is blocked by
qmail-scanner-1.20rc3 with "Disallowed content found in
MIME attachment". The content is rather harmless.
Received: from pop.gmx.de (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20)
by with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 11:05:59 -
Rece
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
maybe I should clarify. The quarantine-attachements.txt file acts on
headers, and can not be used to "scan" message body. QS is modular and
it can pass the message to utilities like SpamAssassin which d
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> maybe I should clarify. The quarantine-attachements.txt file acts on
> headers, and can not be used to "scan" message body. QS is modular and
> it can pass the message to utilities like SpamAssassin which does
> content scannin
Linux wrote:
All,
I have a problem where some, not all mail, is getting delivered hours
later. Has anybody else ran into this problem? It happens both
internal to internal, and internal to external. Is it something to do
with how it is being handed off to qmail-queue?
Check your concurrency
All,
I have a problem where some, not all mail, is
getting delivered hours later. Has anybody else ran into this
problem? It happens both internal to internal, and internal to
external. Is it something to do with how it is being handed off to
qmail-queue?
Thank you in advance,
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have written (and currently use in production) a python script
> designed to block email addresses and/or domains using a flat file/auto
> generated CDB file.
>
> It differs from the badmailfrom file in that it:
>
> 1.)
22 matches
Mail list logo
