Two things I can think off from the top of my head while going over that
document. They are more correctly defined as feature requests...
Instead of using a single regexp to define local domains, you could use any
one of the following:
file, array, hash, or function (function being especially the
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:04:27PM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> So, is there some method to tell perl, if you run out of memory, give me a
> signal so I can fail nicely instead of just exiting.
Not without using malloc - pre-allocating memory before you start filling it.
> Yes, it does, but I
As you know, I am now way into the development cycle of Qmail-Scanner v2.
It is a bigger beast that the v1 tree - more bits to it, and more
configurable. As such, it is also likely to confuse more people :-)
So I need your help. Could people look over the Configuration file I am
working on that
> Oh yes - you're right there. In that case Q-S would crash due to an
> out-of-memory error and tempfail wouldn't get called - so there would be
> debris... I call that a feature ;-)
Sorry, I promise this is my last message on this point!
Is it possible to guard against this scenario ?
ie, let's
I saw a message in the archives concerning this error, but didn't see any
solutions. I am running Sophos Sweep under Qmail-Scanner, and have been for
some time. It has been working well, but in the last few days I've started
seeing a strange error in the logs:
Apr 21 20:35:49 mail qmail: 10194393
Hi all,
Thanks for all the reply!
Now I know that the original message is kept in:
rh179.kncnet.com:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine
and there shouldn't be any in /var/spool/qmailscan/. Maybe this folder is
for temporary use only?
But in what case we will use the following
information, which i
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> But why the following times do not match:
> 22/04/2002 00:53:32:13867:[1019429826]
> and
> 22/04/2002 00:57:06:13867:[1019429826]
Use the source Luke...
[i.e. there is no problem with that]
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information S
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:08:40AM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> BUT, as I said, I haven't looked, but if there is anything in the message
> which is loaded into memory by qmail-scanner (eg, the entire message for me,
> or perhaps just the to/from list) then this might be enough for qmail-scanner
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:43:15 +1200 Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JH> Took 2 seconds to do things and scan it...
JH> > 22/04/2002 00:53:32:13867:[1019429826]:cleanup: /bin/rm -rf /var/spool/qmailscan
JH> > /fw.autoukis.lt101942961240413867/
/var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/fw.autoukis.lt1
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:07:57AM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> > > Q-S doesn't leave the temp files lying around - you'd run out
> > > of disk space in no time! :-)
> > On a tempfail return code, qmail-scanner leaves both the temp
> > files as well as the original in working/new as I discover
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:21:58AM +0200, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> I just changed sub debug:
Great.
> 22/04/2002 00:53:32:13867:[1019429612]:w_c: start dumping incoming msg into
>/var/spool/qmailscan/working/tmp/fw.autoukis.lt101942961240413867 [1019429612.4815]
> 22/04/2002 00:53:32:13867:[10
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:07:57AM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> > Q-S doesn't leave the temp files lying around - you'd run out of disk space
> > in no time! :-)
> >
>
> On a tempfail return code, qmail-scanner leaves both the temp files as well as
> the original in working/new as I discovered
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:09:11 +1000 Adam Goryachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AG> Does any of your filesystems use NFS ?? Did you have a temporary NFS outage or
AG> something ??
No. Simple ext3 (RedHat 7.2).
Regards,
Nerijus
___
Qmail-scanner-genera
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:09:21 +1200 Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JH> I'd suggest changing the debug statement to:
JH>
JH> sub debug {
JH> print LOG "$nowtime:$$:[",time,"]:",@_,"\n" if ($DEBUG);
JH> }
JH>
JH> so that you can see the current time in each debug record. Then ensure there
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:14:56PM +0200, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I sent 3 MB size file named 'asdfg'. qmail-queue.log shows that
> message was delivered 2 times,
> > but recipient got only one. If qmail delivered only message of
> 2nd attempt, why qmail-scanner
> > scanned me
On Monday, 22. April 2002 00:36, you wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:53:09PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > bangert@yatze:~ > rm ./tmp/*; reformime -x./tmp/ < ts.ml ; echo $?
> > ; ls -l ./tmp/
> > ./tmp/isdn exists.
> > 0
>
> Looks fine. So is that ts.ml an actual copy of the message that ha
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:37:42AM +1000, Kenneth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I recently could not find the scanner result
> > files under /var/spool/qmailscan/
>
> It doesn't store it there!
>
> See the Email you would have been sent as the admin - it says the original
> message is stored under
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:53:09PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> bangert@yatze:~ > rm ./tmp/*; reformime -x./tmp/ < ts.ml ; echo $? ; ls
> -l ./tmp/
> ./tmp/isdn exists.
> 0
Looks fine. So is that ts.ml an actual copy of the message that has this
problem? Are you comparing like with like?
Perha
On Sunday, 21. April 2002 23:12, you wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:11:03AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > 21/04/2002 01:02:34:24812: tempfail: X-Qmail-Scanner-1.10: cannot
> > close mimeunpacker -
>
> Hmm, looks OK. I guess you should do as Ed said - what happens when
> you run it manually?
Hi,
It deletes the tmp files and moves flagged emails to
/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new
Regards,
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 5:37 PM
Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]file missing
Hi all,
I re
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:37:42AM +1000, Kenneth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently could not find the scanner result
> files under /var/spool/qmailscan/
It doesn't store it there!
See the Email you would have been sent as the admin - it says the original
message is stored under /var/spool/qmails
Hi all,
I recently could not find the scanner result
files under /var/spool/qmailscan/
It is running normally and rejects any infected mail.
Any idea ?
using trophie 1.06, qmail-scanner-1.10, rh7.2
here are the email results but the file is not there :
---trophie results ---
FILE/DIR INFECTED
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:39:50PM -0400, Vince Worthington wrote:
> I don't currently run maildrop, but I do run 2 other courier mail
> packages on my setup here already - sqwebmail and courier-imap. Both of
> these build a reformime executable during compilation.
Their reformime should be fi
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:11:03AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> 21/04/2002 01:02:34:24812: tempfail: X-Qmail-Scanner-1.10: cannot close
> mimeunpacker -
>
Hmm, looks OK. I guess you should do as Ed said - what happens when you run
it manually? Call in the same thing that you can see in qmail-q
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:14:56PM +0200, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I sent 3 MB size file named 'asdfg'. qmail-queue.log shows that message was
>delivered 2 times,
> but recipient got only one. If qmail delivered only message of 2nd attempt, why
>qmail-scanner
> scanned message of 1s
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:54:30PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> I'm looking for some way to filter messages based upon Return-Path
> header. I'd tryied Virus-Return-Path without success. Is there any way
> to filter out messages based on that header?
I'm afraid it doesn't exist...
Return-Pat
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 05:39:14PM +0200, Alexander Bruns wrote:
> when mail is send so the domain "TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]", then only the
> receipient and the administrator should get a warning-mail.
>
> when mail ist send "FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" then the sender schold be
> informed about the v
Jason Wong wrote:
>
> I've no idea whether the sqwebmail reformime works.
>
> But you don't need to install the whole maildrop package, just untar it,
> configure and make, then copy the reformime binary to somewhere.
That's cool. I was thinking it might just be best to do that, at least
I
On Sunday 21 April 2002 07:39, Vince Worthington wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm just getting started setting up QMS on our Qmail/Vpopmail mail
> server. I noticed in the list of requirements that the reformime util
> from the maildrop package is needed for QMS.
>
> I don't currently run maildr
29 matches
Mail list logo
