Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-20 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 07/20/2017 04:37 AM, Jing Liu wrote: > Hi Cleber Rosa, > > > On 2017/7/19 上午5:22, Cleber Rosa wrote: >> >> On 07/18/2017 02:07 PM, John Snow wrote: >>> >>> On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: >>> > [...] >> I see issues here: >> >> 1) The qemu-iotests "runner", that is, "./check", unders

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-20 Thread Jing Liu
Hi Cleber Rosa, On 2017/7/19 上午5:22, Cleber Rosa wrote: On 07/18/2017 02:07 PM, John Snow wrote: On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: [...] I see issues here: 1) The qemu-iotests "runner", that is, "./check", understands that a file number is a test. No further granularity is (curren

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-19 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 07/18/2017 05:47 PM, John Snow wrote: > > > On 07/18/2017 05:22 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: >> >> >> On 07/18/2017 02:07 PM, John Snow wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: Hi all, Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu up

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-19 Thread Jing Liu
On 2017/7/19 上午2:07, John Snow wrote: On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: Hi all, Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu upsteam? I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because I have different results with two machines. Thank

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-18 Thread Jing Liu
Hi Eric, On 2017/7/18 下午10:57, Eric Blake wrote: On 07/17/2017 10:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: Hi all, Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu upsteam? I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because I have different results with two machine

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/18/2017 04:22 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > +++ 087.out.bad 2017-07-18 17:01:37.736038689 -0400 > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > Testing: > QMP_VERSION > {"return": {}} > -{"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "aio=native was specified, > but it requires cache.direct=on, which was not specified."}}

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-18 Thread John Snow
On 07/18/2017 05:22 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > > > On 07/18/2017 02:07 PM, John Snow wrote: >> >> >> On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu >>> upsteam? >>> >>> I just wondered if it has something wrong

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-18 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 07/18/2017 02:07 PM, John Snow wrote: > > > On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu >> upsteam? >> >> I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because >> I have different results

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-18 Thread John Snow
On 07/17/2017 11:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: > Hi all, > > Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu > upsteam? > > I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because > I have different results with two machines. > > > Thanks. > > Jing > > Pr

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/17/2017 10:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote: > Hi all, > > Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu > upsteam? > > I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because > I have different results with two machines. It might help to show the ./check co

[Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087

2017-07-17 Thread Jing Liu
Hi all, Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu upsteam? I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because I have different results with two machines. Thanks. Jing