On 03/29/2012 11:42 AM, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> That will indeed probably make the real problem, which is that
> this patch increases the size of generated code, less obvious
> on small benchmarks that don't put pressure on instruction
> cache. But the fact is that generated code is larger and
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:40, Laurent Desnogues
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:40, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> [...]
At least stack protector is protecting more code tha
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:40, Laurent Desnogues
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> [...]
>>> At least stack protector is protecting more code than before (for
>>> example TLB miss handler), but could overhead fr
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:40, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> [...]
>> At least stack protector is protecting more code than before (for
>> example TLB miss handler), but could overhead from that amount to 5%?
>>
>> Otherwise there should be just a
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
[...]
> At least stack protector is protecting more code than before (for
> example TLB miss handler), but could overhead from that amount to 5%?
>
> Otherwise there should be just a few extra register moves here and
> there, that should be cheap
Blue Swirl writes:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 13:05, Paul Brook wrote:
>>> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> > v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>>> >
>>> > URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
>>> > http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>>> >
>>> > B
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 13:05, Paul Brook wrote:
>> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>> >
>> > URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
>> > http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>> >
>> > Blue Swirl (6):
>> > arm: mov
> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
> >
> > URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
> >http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
> >
> > Blue Swirl (6):
> > arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c
> > arm: move saturating ar
Am 26.03.2012 14:46, schrieb Lluís Vilanova:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>>>
>>> URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
>>>http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>>>
>>> Blue Swirl (6)
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>>
>> URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
>> http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>>
>> Blue Swirl (6):
>> arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c
>> arm: mov
On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl wrote:
> v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>
> URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
> http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>
> Blue Swirl (6):
> arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c
> arm: move saturating arithmetic to helper.c
On 03/24/2012 11:58 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>
> URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
> http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>
> Blue Swirl (6):
> arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c
> arm: move saturating arithmetic to helper.c
v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
Blue Swirl (6):
arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c
arm: move saturating arithmetic to helper.c
arm: move other arithmetic to helper.c
arm: move
14 matches
Mail list logo
