Peter Maydell writes:
> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master.
>>
>> URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
>> http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
>>
>> Blue Swirl (6):
>> arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c
>> arm: move saturating arithmetic to helper.c
>> arm: move other arithmetic to helper.c
>> arm: move cpsr and banked register access to helper.c
>> arm: move exception and wfi helpers to helper.c
>> arm: move load and store helpers, switch to AREG0 free mode
> The patches themselves look OK, but do we really want to take
> a 5% performance hit for this cleanup?
I was also wondering this. Is there any plan for recovering that 5% afterwards?
Thanks,
Lluis
--
"And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
-- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
Tollbooth
