Am 26.03.2012 14:46, schrieb Lluís Vilanova: > Peter Maydell writes: > >> On 24 March 2012 18:58, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> v2: fix patch 1, tweak patch 2 and rebase to master. >>> >>> URL git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git >>> http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git >>> >>> Blue Swirl (6): >>> arm: move neon_tbl to neon_helper.c >>> arm: move saturating arithmetic to helper.c >>> arm: move other arithmetic to helper.c >>> arm: move cpsr and banked register access to helper.c >>> arm: move exception and wfi helpers to helper.c >>> arm: move load and store helpers, switch to AREG0 free mode > >> The patches themselves look OK, but do we really want to take >> a 5% performance hit for this cleanup? > > I was also wondering this. Is there any plan for recovering that 5% > afterwards?
Maybe by switching to clang? ;) Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
