One of the things I find annoying about Python is that when you make a
change to a method definition that change is not reflected in existing
instances of a class (because you're really defining a new class when
you reload a class definition, not actually redefining it). So I came
up with thi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret schrieb:
> > One of the things I find annoying about Python is that when you make a
> > change to a method definition that change is not reflected in existing
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Hendrik van Rooyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ron Garret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > One of the things I find annoying about Python is that when you make a
> > change to a method
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Hendrik van Rooyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Ron Garret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > A straightforward, Pythonic way to do it would be to create an
> > intermediate representation that understands both the existing class
>
If I do this:
def f(self): print self
class c1: pass
setattr(c1, 'm1', f)
Then f is automagically transmogrified into the appropriate sort of
method depending on how it is used:
>>> c1.m1
>>> c1().m1
>
>>> c1().m1()
<__main__.c1 instance at 0x51ec60>
Note that m1 gets passed a self argument
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
> > The reason I want to do this is that I want to implement a trace
> > facility that traces only specific class methods. I want to say:
> >
> > trace(c1.m1)
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michele Simionato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan Booth wrote:
> > Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I want to say:
> > >
> > > trace(c1.m1)
> > >
> > > an
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The principle behind this is pretty much "it was just a language design
> decision".
Yes, and I'm not taking issue with the decision, just pointing out that
the desire to do things differently is not necessarily perverse.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michele Simionato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
> > One of the things I find annoying about Python is that when you make a
> > change to a method definition that change is not reflected in existing
> >
Actually, Python has the distinction of being both a great tool
language *and* a great Zen language. That's what makes Python so cool
;-)))
Ron Stephens
Python411
www.awaretek.com/python/index.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s2):
d = dict(zip(s2,s1))
s1[:] = (d[n] for n in sorted(d.keys()))
It's faster on my system because d.keys() is already sorted. But that
may not be the case on other versions of python.
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Your solution Steven Bethard looks very intelligent, here is a small
>>> speed test, because sorting a list according another one is a quite
>>> common ope
assert len(d) == len(s1)
s1[:] = (d[n] for n in sorted(d.keys()))
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>> Considering the number time I sort keys after getting them, It's the
>> behavior I would prefer. Maybe a more dependable dict.sortedkeys()
>> method would be nice. ;-)
>
> sorte
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>> Python 2.4.1 (#65, Mar 30 2005, 09:13:57) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]
>> on win32
>>
>> I was a bit surprised by them being sorted. I just happend to try
>> d.keys() in place of s2, and it sped up. I wa
Ron Adam wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>> Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>...
>>> Considering the number time I sort keys after getting them, It's the
>>> behavior I would prefer. Maybe a more dependable dict.sortedkeys()
>>> method
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>> Ron Adam wrote:
>> This probably should be:
>>
>> def psort11(s1, s2):
>> d = dict(zip(s2,s1))
>> assert len(d) == len(s1)
>> s1[:] = list(d[v] for v in sorted(d))
>
> You could d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Following Ron Adam solution (and using [] instead of list() in the last
> line), this may be a possible solution of the problem, that is often
> quite fast:
>
> def psort16(s1, s2):
> try:
> d = dict(izip(s2, s1))
> except TypeE
Xah Lee wrote:
> Let me expose one another fu
Hello Xah,
I think you will continue to have difficulty getting respect on this
matter as long as you show disrespect to those who have come before you.
When you refer to the documentation as being f'ing stupid, and other
disrespectful terms, y
James Stroud wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> If "__call__" allows anobject() and "__getitem__" allows anobject[arange],
> why
> not have "__brace__" (or some other, better name) for anobject{something}.
> Such braces might be useful for cross-sectioning nested data structures:
>
> anary = [[1,2,3],[4,
StepH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not able to install BLT on my Python 2.4 (upgraded to 2.4.1)
> distibution...
>
> I'v try to download btlz-for-8.3.exe, but when i try to install it, i've
> a msgbox saying to the file is corrupt...
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> StepH.
Have you tried blt2.4z-for-
Kenneth Miller wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am new to Python and i was wondering what graphing utlities would be
> available to me. I have already tried BLT and after weeks of unsuccesful
> installs i'd like to find something else. Anything someone would recommend?
>
> Regards,
> Ken
BLT does
StepH wrote:
> Ron Adam a écrit :
>
>>StepH wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm not able to install BLT on my Python 2.4 (upgraded to 2.4.1)
>>>distibution...
>>>
>>>I'v try to download btlz-for-8.3.exe, but when
StepH wrote:
> Ron Adam a écrit :
>
>>StepH wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ron Adam a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>StepH wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
>>Mike> Given that Python hides the difference between user-defined
>>Mike> objects and built-in objects, it's not clear to me that anything
>>Mike> other than the current system, with all the classes/types in one
>>Mike> place, make
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>What I would like to see is something like the following for each item:
>>
>>0. reference @ sequence code
>>2. "Builtin" | "import "
>>3. Type/class: Name/Syntax
>>4. Description with ex
StepH wrote:
>>
>> A little googling found the following which may give you a clue or
>> ideas of further searches. Also run a virus scanner on the file
>> before hand.
>>
>> http://www.noteworthysoftware.com/composer/faq/90.htm
>
>
> Argg... I always find me stupid when i don't have find my
Does anyone have suggestions on how to improve this further?
Cheers,
Ron_Adam
def getobjs(object, dlist=[], lvl=0, maxlevel=1):
""" Retrieve a list of sub objects from an object. """
if object not in dlist:
dlist.append(object)
if lvl200:
s = object[0:
I'm trying to understand exception handling better and have a question I
haven't been able to find an answer too. Which probably means It won't
work, but...
Do exceptions that take place get stored in a stack or list someplace?
For example in:
try:
try:
try:
riskyf
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>Do exceptions that take place get stored in a stack or list someplace?
>
> [snip]
>
>>I know I can catch the error and store it myself with,
>>
>>except Exception, exc:
>>
>>or possibly,
>
tiissa wrote:
> Steffen Glückselig wrote:
>
>1.0 + 3.0 + 4.6
>>
>>8.5996
>>
>>Ehm, how could I get the intuitively 'correct' result of - say - 8.6?
>>;-)
>
>
> You may find annex B of the python tutorial an interesting read:
> http://docs.python.org/tut/node16.html
In addition t
I think this deserves a little more of a description than I gave it
initially.
The routine in the previous message does a little more than just print
out __doc__ strings. It outputs a formatted alphabetical list of objects
in a module with each objects, name, class or type, and then tries to
John Machin wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>Does anyone have suggestions on how to improve this further?
>
>
> Not functionally (from me, yet). However if you can bear a stylistic
> comment, do read on :-)
>
>
>> elif (isinstance(object,str)
>>
Ron Adam wrote:
> tiissa wrote:
>
>>Steffen Glückselig wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>1.0 + 3.0 + 4.6
>>>
>>>8.5996
>>>
>>>Ehm, how could I get the intuitively 'correct' result of - say - 8.6
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Althought object is a horrible name for your own value (there is a builtin
> object which you use for defining new-style classes), you probably want:
Good point, I agree. It's a bad habit to start, sooner or later it
would cause a problem. I'll find something else
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>Do you have any feature suggestions, additional information that could
>>go in, something that would extend the content in some way and make it
>>more useful?
>>
>>As it stands now, it could be just a module,
Michele Simionato wrote:
>>Do you have any feature suggestions, additional information that
>
> could
>
>>go in, something that would extend the content in some way and make
>
> it
>
>>more useful?
>
>
> I have written something similar which I use all the time. It generates
> ReST
> output w
Michele Simionato wrote:
> Ron Adam:
>
>
>>Sound great! Adding a command line parser, I'm going to add a brief
^---^
That part should have been deleted, I meant your whole program sounded
good, not just that part. :-)
>>
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>> ...What would be the advantage of using StringIO over list.append with
>> ''.join()?
>
> The advantage is more in using a function that prints as it goes
> rather than building up a large string to print.
John Machin wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2005 17:38:30 -0500, Terry Hancock
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>What do you do when a date or time is
>>incompletely specified? ISTM, that as it is, there is no
>>formal way to store this --- you have to guess, and there's
>>no way to indicate that the
Michele Simionato wrote:
> Ron Adam:
>
>>Thats part of what I'm trying to resolve, the doc strings a lot of
>
> time
>
>>isn't enough by itself or is missing. So I'm trying to build up a
>>complete enough record so if there is no doc string, at
Philippe C. Martin wrote:
>>Another way would be to merge the three lists into one of 3-tuples, sort,
>>and unmerge, similarly to the DSU pattern -- which raises the question:
>>why are you using three lists in the first place?
>
>
> :-) Thanks, the lists will evolve and are also stored in 'csv'
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>>grades.sort(lambda x,y: cmp(students[x[1]][0], students[y[1]][0]))
> Assuming that students[x[1]][0] is what you want to sort on, this may
> also be written as:
>
> grades.sort(key=lambda x: students[x[1]][0])
Fernando M. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i was just wondering about the need to put "self" as the first
> parameter in every method a class has because, if it's always needed,
> why the obligation to write it? couldn't it be implicit?
>
> Or is it a special reason for this being this way?
>
> Thanks.
Here'
Elliot Temple wrote:
> I want to write a function, foo, so the following works:
>
> def main():
> n = 4
> foo(n)
> print n
>
> #it prints 7
>
> if foo needs to take different arguments, that'd be alright.
>
> Is this possible?
It is possible if you pass mutable objects to foo such
fore.)
Changing the for-else is probably a problem... This might be a 3.0 wish
list item because of that.
Is alif too simular to elif?
On the plus side, I think this contributes to the pseudocode character
of Python very well.
Cheers, Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
k of having an also. I was
parsing and formatting doc strings at the time, and also would allow it
to become.
if :
BLOCK1
elif :
BLOCK2
also:
BLOCK3
Which is much easier to read.
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
John Roth wrote:
>
> "Ron Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Currently the else block in a for loop gets executed if the loop is
>> completed, which seems backwards to me. I would expect the else to
>> compl
Andrew Dalke wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>It occurred to me (a few weeks ago while trying to find the best way to
>>form a if-elif-else block, that on a very general level, an 'also'
>>statement might be useful. So I was wondering what others woul
Terry Hancock wrote:
> On Monday 13 June 2005 11:09 pm, Ron Adam wrote:
>>My suggestion is to use, also as the keyword to mean "on normal exit"
>>'also' do this.
>
>
> Unfortunately, "also" is also a bad keyword to use for this, IMHO.
&
or counter behavior is when a break statement executes.
Thus the 'else' block is the normal result, and the skipping the 'else'
block becomes the abnormal counter behavior.
So while the logic is consistent, the expected context is reversed.
Why is e
w load and return it.
module = imp.load_module(modname, None, modname, \
('', '', type))
return 0, module, { }
# not found
# return None
None of these are big or dramatic changes of the sort that I couldn't
live without. Finding examples in the library is more difficult than I
expected, so while this seems like a good idea... I'm not convinced yet
either. But that is why I posted is to find out what other thought.
Regurds, Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>
>>So the (my) confusion comes from the tendency to look at it in terms of
>>overall program flow rather than in terms of the specific conditional
>>logic.
>>
>>In a for loop the normal, as in terminating normally
ink these are sufficiently explicit as to avoid being non-intuitive.
The endloop might be generalized into a endblock or endsuite statement
possibly. I'm not sure if that would have any uses's in the proposed
"with" statements or not. (?)
Regards,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>> It occurred to me (a few weeks ago while trying to find the best way
>> to form a if-elif-else block, that on a very general level, an 'also'
>> statement might be useful. So I was wondering what others would thin
ould get '4' printed but instead get the above error. What am I
doing wrong?
Thanks,
Ron--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Has anyone been able to download idestudio? Any link I find on google is
broken.
Thanks,
Ron--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
one...
def groupdata(data, fn):
start = 0
for n in range(1, len(data)):
if fn(data[n]):
yield data[start:n]
start = n
yield data[start:]
print list(groupdata(l, lambda x: x & 0x80))
Cheers ;-)
Ron
>
> seqs = [# Original:
>
ups.append(seq[start:])
return groups
This passes all the tests and runs about the same speed.
Cheers,
Ron
>
> def gengroups7(seq):
> iseq = iter(xrange(len(seq)))
> start = 0
> for i in iseq:
> if seq[i]&0x80:
> s
seq[start:]
(I also wanted to compare this to Georges solution, maybe later.)
Now if there is some way to generalize this so it can be used in a broader
range of situations without loosing too much of it's efficiency. Of course
then maybe group by would be better.
Cheers,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Here's my code. It's a teeny weeny little HTTP server. (I'm not really
trying to reinvent the wheel here. What I'm really doing is writing a
dispatching proxy server, but this is the shortest way to illustrate the
problem I'm having):
from SocketServer import *
from socket import *
from sele
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bjoern Schliessmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The only difference I can discern is that the browser send \r\n
> > for end-of-line while telnet just sends \n.
...
> > But I don't see why that should make any difference.
>
> Easy. If you only accept "\r\n
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Irmen de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
> > Here's my code. It's a teeny weeny little HTTP server. (I'm not really
> > trying to reinvent the wheel here. What I'm really doing is writing a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my code. It's a teeny weeny little HTTP server. (I'm not really
> trying to reinvent the wheel here. What I'm really doing is writing a
> dispatching proxy server, but t
I think I've figured out what's going on.
First, here's the smoking gun: I changed the code as follows:
class myHandler(StreamRequestHandler):
def handle(self):
print '>>>'
while 1:
sl = select([self.rfile],[],[],1)[0]
print sl
l = self.rfile.readline()
i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The answer is obvious: select is looking only at the underlying socket,
> and not at the rfile buffers.
Here is conclusive proof that there's a bug in select:
from socket import *
from select
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
>
> > So this is clearly a bug, but surely I'm not the first person to have
> > encountered this? Is there a known workaround?
>
> It's hard to see
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
>
> > Geez you people are picky. Since I ran this several times I ran into
> > the TIM_WAIT problem. Here's the actual transcript:
>
> It's not abou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, on WinXP, Python 2.4, with
I should have specified: I'm running 2.5 on unix. (I've reproduced the
problem on both Linux and OS X.)
rg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Irmen de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
> > I don't understand why socketserver calling select should matter. (And
> > BTW, there are no calls to select in SocketServer.py. I'm using
> > Python
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:33:22 -0300, Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
> > I have not been able to find a proxy server that can proxy to unix
> > socket
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Twisted does this out of the box, for what it's worth.
Thanks. I will look at that.
rg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Donn Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The answer is obvious: select is looking only at the underlying socket,
> > and not at the rfile bu
#x27;t in __all__. This is probably what you are seeing.
I'm currently rewriting pydoc, so what behavior would you like to see?
Cheers,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
k
as long as they don't overlap more than one group.
It seems I can get some of these fairly easy with the inspect module, but
others I need to test in multiple ways.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> Ron,
>
> Consider using epydoc if you can. Epydoc will sort the methods and it
> will also let you use custom CSS style sheets for the final HTML
> output. Check out the documentation of my PyDBTable module.
> http://www.psipy.com/PyDBTable
>
&g
Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Ron. I had no idea pydoc was that powerful!
> -Nick
Change *was* to *will be*.
It really needed to be re factored. ;-)
Cheers,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The wsgiref module in Python 2.5 seems to be empty:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Sites/modpy]$ python
Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Mar 1 2007, 10:09:05)
[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import wsgiref
>>> dir(wsgi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stargaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Garret wrote:
> > The wsgiref module in Python 2.5 seems to be empty:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Sites/modpy]$ python
> > Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Mar 1 2007, 10:09:05)
> >
> import webbrowser
>>> webbrowser.open('http://www.python.org')
True
>>>
It opens firefox as expected, but the url is ...
file:///home/ron/%22http://www.python.org%22
Which of course doesn't do what is expected.
Any ideas?
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On May 24, 5:03 pm, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is anyone else having problems with the webbrowser module?
>>
>> Python 2.5.1c1 (release25-maint, Apr 12 2007, 21:00:25)
>> [GCC 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)] on linux2
>>
Brian van den Broek wrote:
> Ron Adam said unto the world upon 05/25/2007 12:28 PM:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On May 24, 5:03 pm, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Is anyone else having problems with the webbrowser module?
>>>>
>>
Steve Holden wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On May 24, 5:03 pm, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Is anyone else having problems with the webbrowser module?
>>>>
>>>> Python 2.5.1c1 (release25-maint, A
Paul Boddie wrote:
> On 25 May, 00:03, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is anyone else having problems with the webbrowser module?
>>
>> Python 2.5.1c1 (release25-maint, Apr 12 2007, 21:00:25)
>> [GCC 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)] on linux2
>> Type &qu
Ron Adam wrote:
> Paul Boddie wrote:
>> On 25 May, 00:03, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is anyone else having problems with the webbrowser module?
>>>
>>> Python 2.5.1c1 (release25-maint, Apr 12 2007, 21:00:25)
>>> [GCC 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1
Ron Adam wrote:
> Got it.
>
> It looks like the problem started when I told firefox to make itself
> the default browser. That changed the way webbrowser.py figured out the
> browser to use. So instead of trying them in order, it asked the gnome
> configure too
Paul Boddie wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>> Reseting the default browser with the gnome default application window
>> confirmed this. The browser selection can either have the quotes around
>> the args "%s" paremteter, or not depending on how and what sets it.
>&g
anyway because three of the files are actually
automatically generated.
Thanks,
Ron--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Is there a way to change the default string encoding used by the
string.encode() method? My default environment is utf-8 but I need it
to be latin-1 to avoid errors like this:
>>> 'Andr\xe9 Ramel'.decode()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
UnicodeDecodeError: 'a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If all else fails there's
>
> >>> sys.setdefaultencoding("latin1")
> >>> "Andre\xe9 Ramel".decode()
> u'Andre\xe9 Ramel'
>
> but that's an evil hack, you should rather talk to the maintainer of the
> offending code to upda
g) so that I can determine if my current drag position (potential drop
position) is above, below or as a child of some other item in the outline. The
easiest way to do this is to get the bounding box of the nearest items.
Thanks,
Ron--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
an be submitted and a final discussion can take place on the
python-dev list at a later date.
Thanks and Regards,
Ron Adam
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have a fairly large web app written in Python as a CGI fairly
elaborate CGI. All of the requests go through a single CGI script which
does authentication and session management and then dispatches to one of
a number of handlers that generate the various pages.
There is one page that is a per
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does
> anyone know of a straightforward way to get Apache to "forward" requests
> to a given path to another HTTP server running on a different port?
Never mind, I think I figured it out.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Luis M. González" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 8:44 pm, Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Ron Garret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
Colin J. Williams wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>> If anyone is interested in participating in discussing the details of the
>> PyDoc rewrite/refactoring I've been working on, a discussion is being
>> started on the doc-sig list.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
dify and/or introspect how things work. This allows more choices
on how I might solve a particular problem.
I also think there a lots of improvements that could be made to other parts
of python such as the libraries that would be of much more practical benefit.
Regards,
Ron
--
http://m
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Ron Adam a écrit :
>>
>> TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
>>
>>> I am not talking about the way it does it, but rather, the way it
>>> could do it or... could have done it. That requires no knowledge of
>>> how the int
t.
Of course he'll figure out all this sooner or later anyway. You can't be
an engineer without a fair amount of brain cells committed to processing
abstract concepts.
Cheers,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
401 - 500 of 772 matches
Mail list logo
