On Apr 16, 9:27 am, "Littlefield, Tyler" wrote:
> >And who pissed in Guido's punch bowl anyway? Why is he such an elitist
> >now? Why can he not come over once and a while and rub shoulders
> withhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMEe7JqBgvg
He he -- Bravo!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/list
On Apr 16, 9:13 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Based on the comments here, it seems that emacs would have to be the
> editor-in-chief for programmers. I currently use SciTE at work; is it
> reasonable to, effectively, bill my employer for the time it'll take
> me to learn emacs?
It takes a day or tw
On Apr 17, 3:19 am, John Bokma wrote:
> rusi writes:
> > On Apr 16, 9:13 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> Based on the comments here, it seems that emacs would have to be the
> >> editor-in-chief for programmers. I currently use SciTE at work; is it
> >>
On Apr 17, 4:12 am, Krzysztof Bieniasz
wrote:
> > It takes a day or two to learn emacs.
>
> > It takes forever to set it up.
>
> Remember, Emacs is THE way. It's the light in the darkness, it'll save
> your soul and bring you happiness. Isn't it worth the trouble? :)
>
> Seriously though, when I w
On Apr 17, 8:22 am, John Bokma wrote:
> rusi writes:
> > On Apr 17, 3:19 am, John Bokma wrote:
> >> rusi writes:
> >> > On Apr 16, 9:13 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> >> Based on the comments here, it seems that emacs would have to be the
> &g
On Apr 15, 3:22 pm, Aldo Ceccarelli wrote:
> On 15 Apr, 11:54, frankcui wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 04/15/2011 05:00 PM, Aldo Ceccarelli wrote:> Hello All,
> > > in my specific problem I will be happy of a response where possible
> > > to:
>
> > > 1. distinguish different operating systems of answering n
On Apr 17, 9:37 pm, wrote:
> Hi Sturla...
>
> > You'll need to mmap or valloc a page-alligned memory
> > buffer (for which the size must be a multiple of the system
> > page size), and call mprotect to make it executable.
> > Copy your binary code into this buffer. Then you will
> > need to do som
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 06:51 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
emacs * 3
On Apr 19, 9:17 am, Westley Martínez wrote:
vi * 3
This would be a competition except for viper:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ViperMode
IOW emacs can be morphed into vi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 19, 9:32 am, Ben Finney wrote:
> Alec Taylor writes:
> > Please continue with your recommendations.
>
> At some point you need to act on these recommendations by picking one
> for the time being.
>
> If you're so tight for time, why are you still evaluating editors after
> several days of
On Apr 19, 9:44 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM, rusi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 06:51 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > emacs * 3
>
> > On Apr 19, 9:17 am, Westley Martínez wrote:
> > vi * 3
>
> > This would be
On Apr 25, 4:49 am, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 4/22/11 7:32 PM, Algis Kabaila wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Saturday 23 April 2011 06:57:23 sturlamolden wrote:
> >> On Apr 20, 9:47 am, Algis Kabaila
> > wrote:
> >>> Are there any modules for vector algebra (three dimensional
> >>> vectors, vector addition, sub
On Apr 26, 9:59 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:28:22 -0700, Gnarlodious wrote:
> > I have an SQLite query that returns a list of tuples:
>
> > [('0A',), ('1B',), ('2C',), ('3D',),...
>
> > What is the most Pythonic way to loop through the list returning a list
> > like this?:
On Apr 26, 7:39 pm, snorble wrote:
> I am aware of tools like version control systems, bug trackers, and
> things like these, but I'm not really sure if I need them,
You either dont want version control
> But if I ever made something worth releasing, and got a request
> like, "I have probl
On Apr 27, 6:44 am, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 01:42 PM, Algis Kabaila wrote:
>
> > Thomas, have you tried bzr (Bazaar) and if so do you consider hg
> > (Mercurial) better?
>
> > And why is it better? (bzr is widely used in ubuntu, which is
> > my favourite distro at present).
>
> Each of
On Apr 27, 10:11 am, Alec Taylor wrote:
> What's an FPU?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fpu
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 27, 11:39 am, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
>
> snorble wrote:
> > I'm not a Pythonista, but I aspire to be.
>
> > My current tools:
>
> > Python, gvim, OS file system
>
> I'm also starting with Python after abandoning idea to use D for our
> desktop
On Apr 30, 8:21 am, CM wrote:
> > A lone developer using such a VCS reaps the benefits of this by getting
> > good merging support.
>
> While we're on the topic, when should a lone developer bother to start
> using a VCS? At what point in the complexity of a project (say a hobby
> project, but >
On May 2, 8:22 am, Ben Finney wrote:
> rusi writes:
> > You may want to look at rcs if you are in the space where you want:
> > -- something better than tarballs
> > -- no pretensions beyond single-user, single-machine, (almost)single-
> > file usage (ie small s
On Apr 30, 11:14 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> For the record, the one true way to implement the Fibonacci series in Python
> is
>
> >>> def fib():
>
> ... a = b = 1
> ... while True:
> ... yield a
> ... a, b = b, a+b # look ma, no temporary variable
On May 2, 12:08 pm, Algis Kabaila wrote:
>
> Actually, Bazaar is more convenient than rcs for a single user,
> as the repository can be the working directory (with a "hidden"
> .bzr directory that stores diffs).
Dont exactly understand...
Is it that you want it specifically hidden?
Otherwise rc
On Apr 30, 12:18 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The number of calls is given by a recursive function with a similar form
> as that of Fibonacci. As far as I know, it doesn't have a standard name,
> but I'll call it R(n):
>
> R(n) = R(n-1) + R(n-2) + 1, where R(0) = R(1) = 1
Changing your definitio
On May 2, 2:53 pm, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
> On 02 May 2011 08:56:57 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
> : I see your smiley, but there are a number of similar series as Fibonacci,
> : with the same recurrence but different starting values, or similar but
> : slightly different recurrences
On May 3, 2:50 am, harrismh777 wrote:
> The thing about this problem that puzzles me, is why we might consider
> recursion for a possible solution in the first place
This can be answered directly but a bit lengthily.
Instead let me ask a seemingly unrelated (but actually much the same)
questi
On May 2, 8:23 pm, Petey wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to programming. I started with php earlier and I dropped it for
> Python.
> I use Eclipse+PyDev for python, html and css.
>
> Which programmes should I start using because they might be useful in the
> future?
> Which functions of eclipse are use
On May 3, 5:21 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 21:02:43 +0100, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
> > The other arguments are valid. And they make me lean more towards more
> > static, compiled languages without the excessive run-time dynamism of
> > python.
>
> If you value runtime eff
On May 3, 10:29 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Doh.
> Usually when someone gives a recursive solution to this problem, it's
> O(logn), but not this time.
> Here's a logn one:
:-) Ok so you beat me to it :D
I was trying to arrive at an answer
On May 3, 3:32 pm, Dave Angel wrote:
> What I'm surprised at is that nobody has pointed out that the logn
> version is also generally more accurate, given traditional floats.
> Usually getting the answer accurate (given the constraints of finite
> precision intermediates) is more important than p
On May 3, 11:19 pm, Anssi Saari wrote:
> rusi writes:
> > I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned rcs so far
> > Not an option if you are not on a *ix system and not something I am
> > specifically recommending.
>
> I actually use rcs in Windows. Needs a li
On May 6, 2:59 pm, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 10:51, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>
> > On Apr 26, 3:39 pm, snorble wrote:
> >> I appreciate any advice or guidance anyone has to offer.
>
> > The 'Python Project HOWTO' gives good advice in terms of setting up a
> > new project, what files and di
There is this nice page of testing tools taxonomy:
http://pycheesecake.org/wiki/PythonTestingToolsTaxonomy
But it does not list staf: http://staf.sourceforge.net/index.php.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 8, 7:17 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 07 May 2011 21:21:45 +1200, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> > Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
>
> >> You cannot reference nor manipulate a reference in python, and that
> >> IMHO makes them more abstract.
>
> > You can manipulate them just fine by moving them
On Apr 26, 7:39 pm, snorble wrote:
> I'm not a Pythonista, but I aspire to be.
>
> My current tools:
>
> Python, gvim, OS file system
>
> My current practices:
>
> When I write a Python app, I have several unorganized scripts in a
> directory (usually with several named test1.py, test2.py, etc., f
On May 10, 8:55 am, "Gabriel Genellina"
wrote:
> En Sat, 07 May 2011 02:21:02 -0300, rusi escribió:
>
> > There is this nice page of testing tools taxonomy:
> >http://pycheesecake.org/wiki/PythonTestingToolsTaxonomy
>
> > But it does not list staf:http://st
Sorry for a silly subject change: A better one will be welcome -- cant
think of a name myself.
There is this whole area of python that may be called the non-
programming side of programming:
Is there some central site where all such is put up?
What if any should such a bundle of things be called?
On May 11, 12:28 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/10/2011 12:41 PM, rusi wrote:
>
> > Sorry for a silly subject change: A better one will be welcome -- cant
> > think of a name myself.
>
> Associated tools. I might separate them into development tools (up to
> the producti
Mathematics has existed for millenia.
Hindu-arabic numerals (base-10 numbers) have been known for about one
millennium
The boolean domain is only a 100 years old.
Unsurprisingly it is not quite 'first-class' yet: See
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD10xx/EWD1070.html
[Lifted fro
On May 13, 1:02 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:46 PM, rusi wrote:
>
> > The boolean domain is only a 100 years old.
> > Unsurprisingly it is not quite 'first-class' yet: See
>
> It is nowadays. Every halfway-mainstream language I can
On May 12, 3:06 am, Hans Mulder wrote:
> On 03/05/2011 09:52, rusi wrote:
>
> > [If you believe it is, then try writing a log(n) fib iteratively :D ]
>
> It took me a while, but this one seems to work:
>
> from collections import namedtuple
>
> Triple = namedtuple(&
I tried to install easy_install (This is on windows)
I downloaded the executable and ran it. It claimed to have done its
job.
But now when I type easy_install at a cmd prompt I get
easy_install is not a command...
[I guess I am a perennial noob to windows, never being able to
comprehend the PATH
On May 13, 11:29 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:40 AM, rusi wrote:
> > I tried to install easy_install (This is on windows)
> > I downloaded the executable and ran it. It claimed to have done its
> > job.
>
> > But now when I type easy
On May 14, 12:39 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 23:46:12 -0700, rusi wrote:
> > Mathematics has existed for millenia. Hindu-arabic numerals (base-10
> > numbers) have been known for about one millennium
> > The boolean domain is only a 100 years old
On May 14, 6:42 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 5:45 PM, rusi wrote:
> > And then we get the interesting result that
> > (True = True) is False
>
> How does this work? In Python, the = sign is illegal there, and if you
> mean True == True, then it'
On May 14, 2:48 am, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> I don't see this (or Hans' version) as cheating at all.
Yeah sure -- cheating is a strong word :-)
> This really *is* the power algorithm, just in a different number system from
> the
> usual one.
Yes that was my point. If we take the standard log
On May 14, 8:55 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:47 AM, rusi wrote:
> > So since
> > [1,2,3] is one way of writing True (lets call it True3)
> > and [1,2] is another (call it True2)
> > then we have True3 == True2 is False
>
> > But sin
On May 15, 4:26 am, Ben Finney wrote:
> rusi writes:
> > [Steven quote]
> > In Python, [1, 2, 3] is another way of writing true, and [] is another
> > way of writing false. Similarly with any other arbitrary objects. The
> > only things that bools True and False are
On May 15, 2:19 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:24 AM, rusi wrote:
> > def fib(n):
> > if n==1 or n==2:
> > return 1
> > elif even(n):
> > return sq(fib (n//2)) + 2 * fib(n//2) * fib(n//2 - 1)
> > else:
> >
On May 15, 10:07 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. Can you explain please, what
> properties of "first class booleans" do you think are missing from Python?
Dijkstra's writings I alluded to, take a logic/math line to this. Let
me try to rephrase Dijkstr
; (implies) or at best <= (follows from)
It is possible to do all this -- traditional logic -- using = (aka
iff, <=>, etc)
The benefit is that logic becomes much more like traditional algebra:
Proofs become of the form:
desideradum
=
:
:
= true
The cost is that bool has to be properly rei
On May 16, 2:36 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/15/2011 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
>
> > On May 15, 10:07 am, Steven D'Aprano > +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>
> >> I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. Can you explain please, what
> >
If I use ipython under emacs on linux it works (at least basic REPL)
ie I can type an expression and I get a result followed by a prompt
On windows ipython works at the shell.
Plain python works in emacs as well.
But inside emacs I dont see a prompt in ipython although I see it in
python.
I have
On May 17, 8:50 pm, RJB wrote:
> I noticed some discussion of recursion. the trick is to find a
> formula where the arguments are divided, not decremented.
> I've had a "divide-and-conquer" recursion for the Fibonacci numbers
> for a couple of years in C++ but just for fun rewrote it
> in Pyth
On May 17, 8:50 pm, RJB wrote:
> I noticed some discussion of recursion. the trick is to find a
> formula where the arguments are divided, not decremented.
> I've had a "divide-and-conquer" recursion for the Fibonacci numbers
> for a couple of years in C++ but just for fun rewrote it
> in Pyth
t; > And increasingly inaccurate from 71 on.
>
> > Yup. That's floating point for you. For larger values you could just
> > add a linear search at the bottom using the 5f**2 +/- 4 rule, which
> > would still be quite fast out to about 10 times that. The decimal
> &
On May 18, 9:51 am, Roland Hutchinson wrote:
> Sorry to have to contradict you, but it really is a textbook example of
> recursion. Try this psuedo-code on for size:
Well and so far this thread is a textbook example of myths and
misconceptions regarding recursion :D
1. 'Recursive' is a meani
On May 18, 11:58 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:06 AM, rusi wrote:
> > 4. Recursion in 'recursion theory' aka 'computability theory' is
> > somehow different from recursion in programming.
>
> Um, it is. Consider the simple functi
On May 18, 11:50 am, Harrison Hill wrote:
> Rusi wrote
> > I could continue down 2,3,4 but really it may be worthwhile if the
> > arguers first read the wikipedia disambiguation pages on recursion...
>
> No need - I have the Dictionary definition of recursion here:
&g
On May 18, 12:05 pm, Sebastien Douche wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 17:27, Jorge Romero wrote:
> > I tried Googling about Python 2.7 on Debian Squeeze, but did not find
> > anything but discussions -.-. Anyone out there that can point me some
> > helpful material or anyone who had luck running
On May 18, 3:31 am, "Ori L." wrote:
> See here for a workaround:https://bugs.launchpad.net/ipython/+bug/290228
>
> First result on Google for the query "ipython emacs windows", BTW.
Thanks -- I did find that before asking.
That link starts by recommending a small change (add -i flag) to
ipython.
On May 18, 12:41 pm, rusi wrote:
> On May 18, 12:05 pm, Sebastien Douche wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 17:27, Jorge Romero
> > wrote:
> > > I tried Googling about Python 2.7 on Debian Squeeze, but did not find
> > > anything but discussions -.-. Any
On May 18, 5:09 pm, Peter Moylan
wrote:
>
> ObAUE: In common parlance, the English word "recursion" means pretty
> much the same as what computing people call "iteration". This might be
> the first time I have ever found a point of agreement with Xah Lee.
Maybe the common usage mirrors the facts
On May 18, 7:32 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:10 AM, rusi wrote:
> >> Um, it is. Consider the simple function (lambda x, y: x + y).
> >> Mathematically, this function is recursive. Algorithmically, it is
> >> not. Do you disagree?
>
&g
On May 18, 7:27 pm, RJB wrote:
> Thank you! Very cool and clear. I
> hoped that there was something that Python made natural I couldn't see
> after 50 years in other languages.
>
> I'd like to work on combining both approaches. It may take a while...
>From the Knuth identity F[n+m] = ..
you p
There have been a number of unrelated discussions regarding recursion
on this list.
I believe that recursion occurs in a wider spread of areas than is
usually recognised.
Heres a list of some such areas.
Please note I am using recursion in a broad and somewhat fuzzy sense.
Narrow specific definiti
On May 20, 2:21 am, Rikishi42 wrote:
> On 2011-05-18, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
>
> > Now Mac OS X has maintained the folder concept of older mac generations,
> > and Windows has cloned it. They do not want the user to understand
> > recursive data structures, and therefore, naturally, avoid t
On May 20, 10:18 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:05 PM, rusi wrote:
> > - data can be code -- viruses
>
> It's not JUST viruses. There's plenty of legitimate reasons for your
> data to actually be code... that's how compilers work! :)
&g
A client wants to 'be lectured' on extending and embedding python on
windows.
I am familiar with this (or was until python2.3 or thereabouts) on
linux -- never done it on windows.
Can some kind soul point me to some link on the issues/pitfalls re
this?
I see three choices:
1. Us MS C for the C ex
On May 20, 1:48 pm, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 06:55:35 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
> : On Thu, 19 May 2011 22:13:14 -0700, rusi wrote:
> :
> : > [I agree with you Xah that recursion is a technical word that should not
> : > be foisted o
On May 22, 1:11 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I agree that the domain of a function should be defined from the start
> (and only expanded in the future).
I dont understand...
I dont always write correct code -- otherwise called 'a bug' -- though
I never let the damn bug lose intentionally.
And when I
On May 22, 8:52 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, rusi wrote:
> > Why is the C library in linux called libc6 and not just libc?
>
> I assume you mean this?http://www.linux-m68k.org/faq/glibcinfo.html
Ha Ha! Thanks for that link! I quote:
> You s
Earlier I asked about a problem with ipython in windows which does not
seem to be there in linux.
Now I find that a similar problem surfaces with turtle -- so it
seemingly is not so much an ipython problem. The problem can be seen
thus:
Lets say I want to try out some turtle commands such as:
--
On May 23, 5:30 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:39:33 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > Stef Mientki wrote:
>
> >>must of us will not use single bits these days, but at first sight, this
> >>looks funny :
>
> > a=2
> > b=6
> > a and b
> >>6
> > a & b
> >>2
> >
.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/4f55b4cb77653115/6543ed65bbb51c09?lnk=gst&q=rusi#6543ed65bbb51c09
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/36e757567f28368e/8737ab250b9f657a?lnk=gst&q=rusi+ipython#8737ab250b9f657a
--
http://mail.python.org/mailm
On May 30, 2:49 am, ray wrote:
> I am using Win7 on a tightly locked down desktop.
>
> Is there an alternative to using PythonPath?
>
> What are the trade-offs?
>
> Thanks,
> ray
Externally:
1. PYTHONPATH
2. .pth files
http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/06/using-pth-files-for-python-devel
On May 30, 7:53 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
> > If I were designing a new floating-point standard for hardware, I would
> > consider getting rid of NaN. However, with the floating point standard
> > that exists, that almost all floating point
On May 29, 1:30 pm, Henry Olders wrote:
> I just spent a considerable amount of time and effort debugging a program.
> The made-up code snippet below illustrates the problem I encountered:
>
> def main():
> a = ['a list','with','three elements']
> print a
> print fnc1(a)
>
On May 31, 9:46 pm, rusi wrote:
> So you then use (something like)
>
> fnc2(c): return c[0:1] + c[2:]
Er sorry -- that should have been
def fnc2(c): return c[0:1] + ('having',) + c[2:]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 1, 7:45 am, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Sunday, May 29, 2011 8:59:49 PM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 May 2011 17:55:22 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> > > Floating point arithmetic evolved more or less on languages like Fortran
> > > where things like exceptions were unheard of,
>
>
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:42:05 PM UTC+5:30, Ferrous Cranus wrote:
> Στις 16/11/2013 6:46 μμ, ο/η YBM έγραψε:
> > You are utterly stupid:
> > 1st: rm does not read its standard input so doing
> > whatever | rm -fr is useless
> > 2st: even if it had worked (i.e. removed the files) they
> > woul
On Friday, November 22, 2013 11:02:43 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> To a fluent Python programmer, that's what semi-colons are like, although
> to a lesser degree. An unnecessary distraction and annoyance, rather like
> people who talk like this:
> "Er, I prefer, um, using the semicolon
On Friday, November 22, 2013 6:22:29 PM UTC+5:30, Bharath Kummar wrote:
> Hello Sir/Mam,
> Could you please help me with my current research ? Am implementing the
> concept in python language.
> My doubts are :
> 1) Is it possible to Retrieve the address of a variable in python ?
> 2) Is it p
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
> And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare why we
> are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his ears)?
And to my (Indian!!) ears when Tim says
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:02:54 PM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
[Last line cut-off by mistake!]
> It is my impression that the arguments that happen in/around
> programming languages are more-heat-less-light than in typical
> art/science because artistic questions masq
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> > "A new home-run record!"
> What is this "home-run" of which you speak? Houses don't generally run.
> Surely you're not using a regional idiom outsid
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:27:52 PM UTC+5:30, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> > Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
> >> On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> >> So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
> >>
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:39:37 PM UTC+5:30, Larry wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
> > rusi writes:
> >> Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
> > As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example C
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:16:50 PM UTC+5:30, Amjad Syed wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a problem (Bioinformatics domain) where all possible
> combinations of input string needs to be printed as sublist
If we take the standard combinations (Pascal triangle) result
nCr + nCr-1 = n+1Cr
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:55:12 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2013-11-27 01:32, rusi wrote:
> > > And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare
> > > why we are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his
> > > ears)?
> >
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 3:05:13 AM UTC+5:30, jm.almeras wrote:
> Hello !
> I wish to develop a database application with a lot of specific
> functionnalities dealing with sound files.
> I have developped an Access prototype and run into a first problem : it
> is not so easy to find code
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:55:55 AM UTC+5:30, larry@gmail.com wrote:
> > Not sure what you mean by malformed. I don't really care for Google Groups,
> > but I've been using it to post to this any other groups for years (since rn
> > and deja news went away) and no one ever said my posts we
This silly google-groups does not reflect changed subject lines!!
That means that GG users who may want to read this may not see it.
So reposting as a new thread:
--
Here's what I do to manage the GG-headaches:
1. Firefox needs to have the "Its all text" addon i
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 7:28:14 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:52 AM, rusi wrote:
> > Here's what I do to manage the GG-headaches:
> Useful tips, I am sure, but they solve the problem only for you.
> Everyone who reads python-lis
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 7:55:52 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:17 AM, rusi wrote:
> > The problems with GG as I understand are
> > 1. Double spacing
> > 2. Long lines
> > As far as I can see both are cured with the method outlined
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:20:39 PM UTC+5:30, Alister wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:08:17 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, rusi wrote:
> >> Its really quite unclear to me why GG is a problem if all the problems
> >> of GG are ob
Here's a 1-click pure python solution.
As I said I dont know how to manage errors!
1. Put it in a file say cleangg.py and make it executable
2. Install it as the 'editor' for the "Its all text" firefox addon
3. Click the edit and you should get a cleaned out post
--
#
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:41:30 PM UTC+5:30, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I'm new to how Google Groups works. I wonder why it lays it out
> like that. Can it not just show quotes like the way that PHPbb does?
>
> I never thought of reading the source code, thanks! :-)
>
> Oh, and the last
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:59:13 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/28/2013 10:23 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > Funny, I thought the sentiment of many here was, "let's just keep this
> > as a newsgroup, why do we need the mailing list also?" but I'll admit to
> > being confused abo
On Friday, November 29, 2013 12:07:29 AM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:59:13 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > On 11/28/2013 10:23 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > > Funny, I thought the sentiment of many here was, "let's just keep this
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 5:34:11 AM UTC+5:30, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Ok, I'll look into the mailing list.
[Assuming you are using GG with firefox on linux]
All you need to do is
1. Install 'Its all text' FF addon
2. Point the 'editor' of 'Its all text' to the below python
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 8:52:03 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, rusi wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 1, 2013 5:34:11 AM UTC+5:30, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> >> Thanks for the help!
> >>
> >> Ok, I'll look into the mailing
On Monday, December 2, 2013 5:11:15 AM UTC+5:30, jade wrote:
> > To: pytho...@python.org
> > From: wlf...@ix.netcom.com
> > Subject: Re: Checking Common File Types
> > Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 18:23:22 -0500
> >
> > On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 18:27:16 +, jade declaimed the
> > following:
> >
> > >Hello
401 - 500 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
