On Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:20:39 PM UTC+5:30, Alister wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:08:17 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, rusi wrote: > >> Its really quite unclear to me why GG is a problem if all the problems > >> of GG are obviated. > > Which is easier, fiddling around with your setup so you can post > > reasonably on Google Groups, or just getting a better client? With your > > setup, you have to drop out to another editor and press F9 for it to > > work. With pretty much any other newsreader on the planet, this works > > straight off, no setup necessary. > > I'm still going to advise people to stop using buggy rubbish. > > ChrisA > Whilst I agree with Chris A's main points I would at least say thankyou > for :- Well thanks for the thanks :-) > A) finding a solution that works for you. > B) Posting it so that others can try it to see if it works for them. > Perhaps the best option is for everybody to bombard Google with bug > reports (preferably typed with extra long lines & double spaced as that > is clearly what they are used to & we would not want to upset them would > we? ) If that has even a small likelihood of succeeding I heartily support it. My impression is its been done with no result -- Usenet is too fringe and obsolete a technology for Google to bother. On a different note your message has arrived 4 times. What client did you use? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
