On 13 Mar 2016 18:01, "Steven D'Aprano" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 03:56 am, lucile.m...@free.fr wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > We would like to get the procedure to launch the software "python.exe".
> > The only options we have acsess are: modify, repair and uninstall.
Thanks
> > for your help, Rgds
On 13 Mar 2016 17:06, "BobFtz--- via Python-list"
wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I have just downloaded and installed a copy of the 3.5.1 programme but
when
> I come to run the programme I get an error message that says that
> .api-ms-win-crt-runtime-l 1-1-0.dll is missing.
>
> I have un-installed and
On 14 March 2016 at 12:07, Arie van Wingerden wrote:
> that is weird. I am using Windows 10 and get exactly the same "warnings"
> when I run PyInstaller.
> But the update you mention is only available for up to Windows 8.1.
>
> What about Windows 10 then??
I'm not sure what you mean. Windows 10 s
On 14 March 2016 at 14:35, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> I would strongly warn anyone against using the zip function
> unless
...
> I meant to say: absolutely, one hundred percent *SURE*, that
> both sequences are of the same length, or, absolutely one
> hundred percent *SURE*, that dropping values is n
On 10 March 2016 at 13:02, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Heli wrote:
>
>> I need to loop over a numpy array and then do the following search. The
>> following is taking almost 60(s) for an array (npArray1 and npArray2 in
>> the example below) with around 300K values.
>>
>>
>> for id in np
I've fixed the quoting below. Can you not top-post please Arie?
On 14 March 2016 at 16:59, Arie van Wingerden wrote:
> 2016-03-14 15:59 GMT+01:00 Oscar Benjamin :
>>
>> On 14 March 2016 at 12:07, Arie van Wingerden wrote:
>> > that is weird. I am using Window
On 14 March 2016 at 17:15, Arie van Wingerden wrote:
> I've fixed the quoting below. Can you not top-post please Arie?
> On 14 March 2016 at 16:59, Arie van Wingerden < xapw...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> 2016-03-14 15:59 GMT+01:00 Oscar Benjamin < oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com &
On 9 March 2016 at 20:09, Drimades wrote:
> I'm doing some tests with operations on numpy matrices in Python. As an
> example, it takes about 3000 seconds to compute eigenvalues and eigenvectors
> using scipy.linalg.eig(a) for a matrix 6000x6000. Is it an acceptable time?
I don't know really bu
On 14 March 2016 at 23:59, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:06 am, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> On 14 March 2016 at 14:35, Rick Johnson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would strongly warn anyone against using the zip function
>>> unless
>>
On 18 Mar 2016 17:42, "Mark Lawrence" wrote:
>
> On 18/03/2016 16:56, nasrin maarefi via Python-list wrote:
>>
>> HelloI installed the python 3.5.0(32bit) on 64bit win10 but I dont know
how to install numpy pakage for this? I did not find something good on
internet. could you please guide me?wher
On 27 Mar 2016 10:56, "Steven D'Aprano" wrote:
>
>
> My C is a bit rusty, so excuse me if I get the syntax wrong. I have a
> function:
>
> void foo(int n) {
> int i = n + 1;
> bar(i);
> }
>
> There's a possible overflow of a signed int in there. This is undefined
> behaviour. Now, you migh
On 27 Mar 2016 17:01, "Ben Finney" wrote:
>
> Hongyi Zhao writes:
>
> > I use the following code the update the os.environ:
> >
> > import os
> > from subprocess import check_output
> >
> > # POSIX: name shall not contain '=', value doesn't contain '\0'
> > output = check_output("source /home/wer
On 27 Mar 2016 23:11, "Ben Bacarisse" wrote:
>
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 05:13 pm, Paul Rubin wrote:
> >
> >> Steven D'Aprano writes:
> >>> For example, would you consider that this isolated C code is
> >>> "meaningless"?
> >>> int i = n + 1;
> >>
> >> It's meaningful a
On 12 December 2014 at 06:22, KK Sasa wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The list comprehension is results = [d2(t[k]) for k in xrange(1000)], where
> d2 is a function returning a list, say [x1,x2,x3,x4] for one example. So
> "results" is a list consisting of 1000 lists, each of length four. Here, what
> I
On 12 February 2014 10:07, Ben Finney wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Ben Finney
>> wrote:
>> > So, if I understand you right, you want to say that you've not found
>> > a computer that works with the *complete* set of real numbers. Yes?
>>
>> Correct. [...
On 19 February 2014 15:30, Mark H. Harris wrote:
> Would it be possible to extend the methods of the decimal module just a bit
> to include atan(), sin(), cos(), and exp() ?
>
> The module has methods for ln() and sqrt(); and that's great!
>
> I have done some rudimentary searching of the pep his
On 20 February 2014 14:27, Piotr Dobrogost
wrote:
> Is there cross-platform way to get default directory for binary files
> (console scripts for instance) the same way one can use sys.executable to get
> path to the Python's interpreter in cross-platform way?
>
> Context:
> There's Python script
On 20 February 2014 15:34, Piotr Dobrogost
wrote:
> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:22:53 PM UTC+1, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> You can find the default location in this roundabout way:
>
> I'm wondering if there's some API to get this info as what you showed is
On 20 February 2014 15:42, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>
> As roundabout and advanced as that code is, it doesn't give the right answer
> for me. It returns None. On my Mac, after activating a virtualenv:
>
> Python 2.7.2 (default, Oct 11 2012, 20:14:37)
> [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang 4.0
On 25 February 2014 22:36, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2014-02-25 22:21, Duncan Booth wrote:
>> > It would save some space if I didn't have to duplicate all the
>> > keys into sets (on the order of 10-100k small strings), instead
>> > being able to directly perform the set-ops on the dicts. But
>> > ot
On 27 February 2014 12:07, Mark H. Harris wrote:
>
> I have created a project here:
>
> https://code.google.com/p/pythondecimallibrary/
>
> I wrote a dmath.py library module for use with the C accelerated decimal
> module, that I would like to see merged into the C Python distribution so
> that
On 27 February 2014 15:42, Mark H. Harris wrote:
> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:42:55 AM UTC-6, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>>
>> Some points:
>
>Thanks so much... you have clarified some things I was struggling with...
>
>> 1) Why have you committed the code
On 27 February 2014 23:00, Mark H. Harris wrote:
> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:24:23 AM UTC-6, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>>>>> from decimal import Decimal as D
>> >>> D(0.1)
>> Decimal('0.155511151231257827021181583404541015625&#x
On 27 February 2014 21:47, Nick Timkovich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> It's unintuitive, but it's a consequence of the way += is defined. If
>> you don't want assignment, don't use assignment :)
>
> Where is `.__iadd__()` called outside of `list += X`?
N
On 3 March 2014 11:34, Mark H. Harris wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> Python Decimal Library dmath.py v0.3 Released
>
> https://code.google.com/p/pythondecimallibrary/
Hi Mark,
Is this available on PyPI? It seems there already is a "dmath" package
on PyPI that was written by someone else some time ago so
On 3 March 2014 15:22, Mark H. Harris wrote:
> On Monday, March 3, 2014 7:34:40 AM UTC-6, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>> On 3 March 2014 11:34, Mark H. Harris wrote:
>>
>> Is this available on PyPI?
>
> Python3.3 Decimal Library v0.3 is Released here:
>
On 4 March 2014 19:58, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Chris Angelico :
>>
>>> As far as I know, there's no simple way, in constant space and/or
>>> time, to progressively yield more digits of a number's square root,
>>> working in decimal.
>>
>> I
On 4 March 2014 21:18, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
>> I don't quite follow your reasoning here. By "cut-and-try" do you mean
>> bisection? If so it gives the first N decimal digits in N*log2(10)
>> iterat
On 4 March 2014 21:05, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Oscar Benjamin :
>
>> To me the obvious method is Newton iteration which takes O(sqrt(N))
>> iterations to obtain N digits of precision. This brings the above
>> complexity below quadratic:
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/
On 4 March 2014 22:18, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
>> On 4 March 2014 21:18, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Oscar Benjamin
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> epsilon = 0.000
On 4 March 2014 23:20, Dave Angel wrote:
>
> One problem with complexity claims is that it's easy to miss some
> contributing time eaters. I haven't done any measuring on modern
> machines nor in python, but I'd assume that multiplies take
> *much* longer for large integers, and that divides ar
On 5 March 2014 07:52, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 23:25:37 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> I stopped paying attention to mathematicians when they tried to convince
>> me that the sum of all natural numbers is -1/12.
>
> I'm pretty sure they did not. Possibly a physicist may have tri
On 5 March 2014 17:43, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:21:37 +0000, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> The argument that the sum of all natural numbers comes to -1/12 is just
>> some kind of hoax. I don't think *anyone* seriously believes it.
>
> Y
On 5 March 2014 12:57, Dave Angel wrote:
> Oscar Benjamin Wrote in message:
>> On 4 March 2014 23:20, Dave Angel wrote:
>>>
>>> On the assumption that division by 2 is very fast, and that a
>>> general multiply isn't too bad, you could improve on New
On 10 March 2014 15:59, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> Does anyone have any good hints for testing interactive code that uses
> raw_input, or input in Python 3?
>
> A simple technique would be to factor out the interactive part, e.g. like
> this:
>
> # Before
> def spam():
> answer = raw_input(promp
On 11 March 2014 11:54, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
>> eventlet has 115k downloads from PyPI over the last month. gevent has
>> 143k. Twisted has 147k. Tornado has 173k.
>>
>> I'd say that a lot of Python users are already doing non-blocking
>> network I/O, in one form or another.
>
> Th
On 12 March 2014 03:25, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/11/2014 10:01 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:18:01 PM UTC-6, Ian wrote:
>>>
>>> x += y is meant to be equivalent, except possibly in-place and
>>> more efficient, than x = x + y.
>
>
> The manual actually says "An
On 17 March 2014 08:44, Mark Summerfield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the correct idiom for getting the path to a top-level module in 3.3
> and 3.4 when the module might be frozen?
>
> At the moment I'm using this:
>
> if getattr(sys, "frozen", False):
> path = os.path.dirname(sys.executa
On 1 August 2013 07:32, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> I know this, and that's not what surprised me. What surprised me was that
>> Fraction converts the float to a fraction, then compares. It surprises me
>> because in other operations, Fracti
On 10 August 2013 12:50, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
>> Given that installing numpy or scipy is generally no more difficult
>> that executing "pip install (scipy|numpy)" I'm not really feeling the
>> need for a battery here...
>
> I just tried installing numpy in a
On 10 August 2013 13:43, Roy Smith wrote:
>
> In article ,
> Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> You should use apt-get for numpy/scipy on Ubuntu. Although
>> unfortunately IIRC this doesn't work as well as it should since Ubuntu
>> doesn't install the appr
On Aug 13, 2013 7:22 PM, "Wolfgang Keller" wrote:
>
> > I am seeking comments on PEP 450, Adding a statistics module to
> > Python's standard library:
>
> I don't think that you want to re-implement RPy.
You're right. He doesn't.
Oscar
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 16 August 2013 17:31, wrote:
>> > I am seeking comments on PEP 450, Adding a statistics module to Python's
>
> The trick here is that numpy really is the "right" way to do this stuff.
Although it doesn't mention this in the PEP, a significant point that
is worth bearing in mind is that numpy
On 16 August 2013 20:00, wrote:
> > > One other point -- for performance reason, is would be nice to have some
> compiled code in there -- this adds incentive to put it in the stdlib --
> external packages that need compiling is what makes numpy unacceptable to
> some folks.
>>
>> It might be
On 21 August 2013 10:24, wrote:
> Hi
> I have a matrix of numbers representing the nodal points as follows:
>
> Element No.Nodes
>
> 1 1 2 3 4
> 2 5 6 7 8
> 3 2 3 9 10
> ...
> ...
> x
On 28 August 2013 16:15, Neal Becker wrote:
> The change in integer division seems to be the most insidious source of silent
> errors in porting code from python2 - since it changes the behaviour or valid
> code silently.
>
> I wish the interpreter had an instrumented mode to detect and report suc
On 31 August 2013 12:16, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:17:23 +0200, candide wrote:
>
>> What is the equivalent in Python 3 to the following Python 2 code:
>>
>> # -
>> for i in range(5):
>> print i,
>> # -
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
On 31 August 2013 16:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> but doesn't solve all the cases (imagine a string or an iterator).
>
> Similar but maybe simpler, and copes with more arbitrary iterables:
>
> it=iter(range(5))
> print(next(it), end='')
> for i in it:
> print('',i, end='')
If you want to w
On Sep 2, 2013 2:31 AM, "Tommy Vee" wrote:
>
> Anyone know where I can get an easy to use Python class or algorithm for
the Simplex optimization algorithm? I've tried the one in the link below,
but I can't figure out if a) I'm using it properly, or b) where to get the
solution. BTW, I tried some
On 2 September 2013 17:06, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have a multi-line string and I need to remove the very first line from
> it. How can I do that? I looked at StringIO but I can't seem to figure
> out how to properly use it to remove the first line. Basically, I want
> to
On 5 September 2013 19:06, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>> You can! Any name will work, functions aren't special.
>>>
>>> from module1 import method1, A, B, C, D, E
>>
>> Better practice is to use:
>>
>> import module1
>> print module1.A
>> print module2.B
>>
>> and so forth since that makes it far more
On 10 September 2013 01:06, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:19:11 +, Fattburger wrote:
>
> But really, we've learned *nothing* from the viruses of the 1990s.
> Remember when we used to talk about how crazy it was to download code
> from untrusted sites on the Internet and execu
On 10 September 2013 03:27, Jason Friedman wrote:
>>
>> OK, you're well inside the "finite" domain. Also, you probably want less
>> than the "natural" randomness. I'd probably shuffle the potential
>> quarterbacks and the others in independent lists, and then pick one half of
>> each to form a tea
On 11 September 2013 14:03, Neal Becker wrote:
> In py2.7 this was accepted, but not in py3.3. Is this intentional? It seems
> to
> violate the 'principle' that extraneous parentheses are usually
> allowed/ignored
>
> In [1]: p = lambda x: x
>
> In [2]: p = lambda (x): x
> File "", line 1
>
On 12 September 2013 07:04, William Bryant wrote:
> Thanks everyone for helping but I did listen to you :3 Sorry. This is my
> code, it works, I know it's not the best way to do it and it's the long way
> round but it is one of my first programs ever and I'm happy with it:
Hi William, I'm glad
On 12 September 2013 10:27, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> More likely, JP Morgan's mail system added that footer to the message
> on the way out the virtual door. My recommendation would be to not
> post using your company email address. Get a free email address.
It wouldn't surprise me if JPMorgan w
On 17 September 2013 05:12, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Unfortunately, i confused and need help... the following code is:
> ###
> ##CheckBox:
> QtCore.QObject.connect(self.checkBox,
> QtCore.SIGNAL(_fromUtf8("toggled(bool)")), lam
On 17 September 2013 11:10, Davide Dalmasso wrote:
> Il giorno lunedì 16 settembre 2013 17:47:55 UTC+2, Ethan Furman ha scritto:
>>
>> We'll need the rest of the traceback, as it will have the actual error.
>>
> Python 3.3.2 (v3.3.2:d047928ae3f6, May 16 2013, 00:03:43) [MSC v.1600 32 bit
> (Intel
On 17 September 2013 13:13, Davide Dalmasso wrote:
>
> You are right... there is a problem with scipy intallation because this error
> arise...
>
from scipy.interpolate import interp1d
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> from scipy.interpolate import interp1d
On 17 September 2013 14:35, Josef Pktd wrote:
>> (As an aside, this is all much simpler if you're using Ubuntu or some
>> other Linux distro rather than Windows.)
>
> scientific python on a stick
>
> https://code.google.com/p/winpython/wiki/PackageIndex_33
Thanks, I've just installed that and I'l
On 17 September 2013 15:52, Josef Perktold wrote:
>
> On the other hand, python-xy comes with MingW, and I never had any problems
> compiling pandas and statsmodels for any version combination of python and
> numpy that I tested (although 32 bit only so far, I never set up the
> Microsoft sdk).
J
On 18 September 2013 03:48, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:06:44 -0400, Susan Lubbers wrote:
>
>> Our group is a python 2.7 which is installed in a shared area. We have
>> scipy 11 installed in site-packages. How would I install scipy 12 so
>> that I used the shared install of p
On 18 September 2013 13:56, Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:12 PM, nikhil Pandey
>> > wrote:
>> >> hi,
>> >> I want to iterate over the lines of a file and when i find certain lines,
>> >> i need another loop starting from the next of that "CERTAIN" line till a
>> >> few (say 20
On 19 September 2013 03:42, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>> For Python 2.7 I think that easy_install will be able to install from
>> the sourceforge binaries, e.g
>>
>> easy_install --user scipy
>>
>> but I may be wrong.
I should add that I meant the above as a suggestion for a Windows user.
> If
On 19 September 2013 08:23, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Roy Smith wrote:
>>
>> I believe by "Peter's version", you're talking about:
>>
>>> from itertools import islice, tee
>>>
>>> with open("tmp.txt") as f:
>>> while True:
>>> for outer in f:
>>> print outer,
>
On 18 September 2013 20:57, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 18/9/2013 09:38, chitt...@uah.edu wrote:
>
>> Thanks - that helps ... but it is puzzling because
>>
>> np.random.normal(0.0,1.0,1) returns exactly one
>> and when I checked the length of "z", I get 21 (as before) ...
>>
>>
>
> I don't use Numpy, s
On 19 September 2013 15:38, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>> While running the above python.exe was using 6MB of memory (according
>> to Task Manager). I believe this is because tee() works as follows
>> (which I made up but it's how I imagine it).
>
> [...]
>
>> However, when I ran the abo
On Sep 21, 2013 7:40 AM, "D.YAN ESCOLAR RAMBAL"
wrote:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "D:\Yan\Documents\Aptana Studio 3 Workspace\DIF1DMEDYER\SOLUCION
NUMERICA PARA LA ECUACION DE LA DIFUSION EN 1D DYER", line 34, in
> C=(Cdifuana(M,A,D,x,tinicial))
> File "D:\Yan\Documents
On 23 September 2013 10:35, rusi wrote:
>> Then, I launch iPython, which can intellisense launch 3 easily. Then I make
>> whatever changes I need to 1-3 to make a baby step forward, close iPython,
>> and repeat.
>
> Hardly looks very ergonomic to me
I'm not quite sure what's meant by intellisense
On 23 September 2013 13:53, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i use a load of lists and often i dont know how deep it is, how can i parse
> that lists elegantly (without a bunch of for loops)
I don't really understand what you mean. Can you show some code that
illustrates what you're doing?
http://sscce.org
On 25 September 2013 09:41, wrote:
> I am a newbie to python.
>
> I have about 500 search queries, and about 52000 files in which I have to
> find all matches for each of the 500 queries.
>
> How should I approach this? Seems like the straightforward way to do it would
> be to loop through each
On 2 October 2013 00:45, Rotwang wrote:
>
> So the upside of duck-typing is clear. But as you've already discovered, so
> is the downside: Python's dynamic nature means that there's no way for the
> interpreter to know what kind of arguments a function will accept, and so a
> user of any function
On 2 October 2013 23:28, Michael Schwarz wrote:
>
> I will look into that too, that sounds very convenient. But am I right, that
> to use Cython the non-Python code needs to be written in the Cython language,
> which means I can't just copy&past C code into it? For my current project,
> this is
On 3 October 2013 18:42, wrote:
> I have some rather complex code that works perfectly well if I paste it in by
> hand to ipython, but if I use %run it can't find some of the libraries, but
> others it can. The confusion seems to have to do with mathplotlib. I get it
> in stream by:
>
>%py
On 4 October 2013 10:30, David Palao wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm in charge of preparing a computer room for the practices of
> "introduction to programming".
> One of the tasks is checking that from all the computers in the room
> one can execute some programs and link (and compile) against some
> libra
On 2 October 2013 23:25, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/2/2013 5:36 AM, Tae Wong wrote:
>>
>> This post is irrelevant from using Python; so it's an Internet server
>> problem.
>>
>> When you try to connect to hg.python.org, the connection takes forever.
>
>
> I believe hg.python.org is on a different
On Oct 8, 2013 2:26 PM, "Steven D'Aprano" <
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:13:48 +0200, Marco Buttu wrote:
>
> > Another question is: where is the place in which this transformation
> > occurs? Is it at the parser level, before the dictionary attribute is
>
On 10 October 2013 15:34, David wrote:
> On 11 October 2013 00:25, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>>
>> I've never been well-up on complex numbers; can you elaborate on this,
>> please? All I know is that I was taught that the square root of -1 is
>>
On 10 October 2013 18:48, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> I guess the "if appropriate" part eluded my eye. When *is* it
> appropriate? Apparently not during an equal test.
>
5.0 == abs(3 + 4j)
> False
If the above is genuine output then it's most likely floating point
error. I wouldn't expect any erro
On 11 October 2013 10:35, David wrote:
> On 11 October 2013 12:27, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:25:27 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
BTW, one of the earliest things that turned me on to Python was when I
disc
On Oct 16, 2013 11:54 PM, "MRAB" wrote:
>
> On 16/10/2013 23:39, Rotwang wrote:
>>
>> On 14/10/2013 06:02, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:13:32 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
>>>
def add(c1, c2):
% Decode
c1 = ord(c1) - 65
c2 = ord(c2) - 65
>
On 18 October 2013 16:36, wrote:
> one more thing.
>
> the problem is not in the last column, if I use it in regression (only that
> column, or with a few others) I will get the results. But if I use all 43
> columns python breaks!
Have you tried testing the rank with numpy.linalg.matrix_rank?
On 18 October 2013 16:52, wrote:
> Interesting!
> rank of the whole minus last row
> numpy.linalg.matrix_rank(users_elements_matrix[:,0:42]) is 42
>
> but also rank of whole is
> numpy.linalg.matrix_rank(users_elements_matrix[:,0:43]) is 42
>
> but what does that mean?!
It means that the additio
On 21 October 2013 08:46, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:35:03 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote:
>
> [Attribution to the original post has been lost]
>>> Is a jit implementation of a language (not just python) better than
>>> traditional ahead of time compilation.
>>
>> Not at all. The
On 22 October 2013 00:41, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:55:10 +0100, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> On 21 October 2013 08:46, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>> On the contrary, you have that backwards. An optimizing JIT compiler
>>> can
On 21 October 2013 21:47, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Manual says "-c
> Execute the Python code in command. command can be one or more
> statements separated by newlines, with significant leading whitespace as in
> normal module code."
>
> In Windows Command Prompt I get:
> C:\Programs\Python33>pyth
On 22 October 2013 13:00, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:14:16 +0100, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> On 22 October 2013 00:41, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting that gcc is not a decent compiler?
>>
>> No.
On 24 October 2013 01:09, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> Now that I think about it, as I recall from the prehistoric era of writing
> lots of assembler and C, if you use shell redirection, stdin shows
> up as a handle to the file
Yes this is true. A demonstration using seek (on Windows but it is the
sam
On 24 October 2013 12:58, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 11:54 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>> we don't welcome ableist (nor sexist) behaviour.
>
> Well now I just feel so very awful ...
Please end this line of discussion. Ben is right: your comment was
entirely unnecessary and could easily offe
On Oct 24, 2013 9:38 PM, "Terry Reedy" wrote:
>
> On 10/24/2013 1:46 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:36:04 -0400, Ned Batchelder wrote:
coverage.py currently runs on 2.3 through 3.4
>
>
> I want to thank you for this package. I have used it when writing test
modu
On 28 October 2013 00:35, Marc wrote:
>>What was wrong with the answer Peter Otten gave you earlier today on the
>>tutor mailing list?
>>
>>--
>>Python is the second best programming language in the world.
>>But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
>>
>>Mark Lawrence
>>
>
>
> I did n
On 8 November 2013 14:23, John Pote wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the task of testing some embedded 'C' code for a small
> micro-controller. Thought it would be a good idea to test it on the PC first
> to make sure the algorithm is correct then perhaps test it on the controller
> via RS232 and an
On 12 March 2015 at 16:52, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 9:58:07 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Rustom Mody wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Say I have a simple yielding function:
>> >
>> > def foo(x):
>> >yield x+1
>> >yield x+2
>> >
>> > And I have
>> >
>> > g = foo(2)
On 17 March 2015 at 08:10, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2015 03:23, candide wrote:
>
> You might like my tab completion and command history module:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/tabhistory/
>
> I've been using it on Linux for about three or four years, and although I
> don't promise
On 18 March 2015 at 00:35, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> I've just come across this
> http://www.stavros.io/posts/brilliant-or-insane-code/ as a result of this
> http://bugs.python.org/issue23695
>
> Any and all opinions welcomed, I'm chickening out and sitting firmly on the
> fence.
It seems fine to me
On 25 March 2015 at 14:20, Larry Martell wrote:
> I have an app that works with 2.6, but in 2.7 it is failing. I traced
> it down to an issue with decimal.Decimal being passed a value of 0.0.
> It 2.6 this is fine, but in 2.7 it throws an exception:
>
> TypeError: Cannot convert float to Decimal.
On 23 March 2015 at 12:52, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I have a numeric value, possibly a float, Decimal or (improper) Fraction,
> and I want the fractional part. E.g. fract(2.5) should give 0.5.
>
> Here are two ways to do it:
>
> py> x = 2.5
> py> x % 1
> 0.5
> py> x - int(x)
> 0.5
>
> x % 1 is sig
On 17 April 2015 at 14:51, wrote:
> On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 6:50:08 PM UTC+5:30, subhabrat...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> I am having few files in default encoding. I wanted to change their
>> encodings,
>> preferably in "UTF-8", or may be from one encoding to any other encoding.
>>
>> I was try
On 21 April 2015 at 16:53, Paulo da Silva
wrote:
> On 21-04-2015 11:26, Dave Angel wrote:
>> On 04/20/2015 10:14 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
>>> I have program that generates about 100 relatively complex graphics and
>>> writes then to a pdf book.
>>> It takes a while!
>>> Is there any possibility o
On 11 May 2015 at 16:22, Tommy C wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I have updated the code as follows, there are no more errors but the images
> will not move at all, as all the images are staying at the upper left corner.
> Please advice, thanks.
>
>
> import sys, pygame
>
> pygame.init()
>
>
401 - 500 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
