On 18 March 2015 at 00:35, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > I've just come across this > http://www.stavros.io/posts/brilliant-or-insane-code/ as a result of this > http://bugs.python.org/issue23695 > > Any and all opinions welcomed, I'm chickening out and sitting firmly on the > fence.
It seems fine to me. The code in question was rightly put into a sensibly named function to avoid confusion (although the doc-string is a little confusing). The timing comparison with numpy.reshape is unfair though: numpy.reshape is for working with numpy arrays and is vastly more efficient than the zip method when used as intended. Oscar -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
