In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, rh0dium wrote:
> if os.fork() == 0:
> os.setsid
> sys.stdout = open("/dev/null", 'w')
> sys.stdin = open("/dev/null", 'r')
I don't know if it's the cause of your problem, but you're not doing
the backgrounding right, it should be:
if o
gt; thanks..
>
> -bruce
Assuming you're familiar with the basics of IRC.
In mIRC, File->Select Server->Add, enter "Freenode" as description,
enter "irc.freenode.net" as server. Leave the port as 6667, then change
it later if server supports other ports.
Click c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Nelson wrote:
> This is exactly what I want to do: every time I encounter this kind of
> value in my code, increment the appropriate type by one. Then I'd like
> to go back and find out how many of each type there were. This way
> I've written seems simple e
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Hugh wrote:
>> Sorry, here's an example...
>>
>> 5+7=12
>>
>> added without carrying, 5+7=2
>>
>> i.e the result is always less than 10
>
>> I've been thinking some more about this and my brain is starting to
>> work something out...
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> So I think the default for the second argument to cgi.escape should be
>> changed to True. Or alternatively, the second argument should be removed
>> altogether, and quotes should always be escaped.
>
> you're con
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Attributes can be quoted with either single or double quotes. That's what
>> the HTML spec says. cgi.escape doesn't correctly allow for that. Ergo,
>> cgi.escape is broken. QED.
>
> A function is broken if its implementation doesn't match the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> Making cgi.escape always escape the '"' character would not break
>> anything, and would probably fix a few bugs in existing code. Yes,
>> those bugs are not cgi.escape's fault, but that's no reason not to
>> be helpful. It's a minor improveme
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> maybe you haven't done software long enough to understand that
> software works better if you use it the way it was intended to be
> used, but that's no excuse for being stupid.
So what's your excuse?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> If you're really serious about making things easier to use, shouldn't
> you look at the whole picture? HTML documents are byte streams, so
> any transformation from internal character data to HTML must take both
> escaping and encoding into ac
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> (still waiting for the "jon's enhanced escape" proposal, btw, but I guess it's
> easier to piss on others than to actually contribute something useful).
Well, yes, you certainly seem to be good at the "pissing on others"
part, even if you have
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Duncan Booth wrote:
> It is generally a principle of Python that new releases maintain backward
> compatability. An incompatible change such proposed here would probably
> break many tests for a large number of people.
Why is the suggested change incompatible? Wha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> There's nothing to say that cgi.escape should take them both into account
>> in the one function
>
> so what exactly are you using cgi.escape for in your code ?
To escape characters so that they will be treated as character data
and not cont
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> I'm sorry, that's not good enough. How, precisely, would it break
>> "existing code"? Can you come up with an example, or even an
>> explanation of how it *could* break existing code?
>
> Is that so hard to see? If cgi.escape replaced "'" with
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Duncan Booth wrote:
> I guess you've never seen anyone write tests which retrieve some generated
> html and compare it against the expected value. If the page contains any
> unescaped quotes then this change would break it.
You're right - I've never seen anyone do
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max M wrote:
>> I'm sorry, that's not good enough. How, precisely, would it break
>> "existing code"? Can you come up with an example, or even an
>> explanation of how it *could* break existing code?
>
> Some examples are:
>
> - Possibly any code that tests for str
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max M wrote:
> Oh ... because you cannot see a use case for that *documented*
> behaviour, it must certainly be wrong?
No, but if nobody else can find one either, that's a clue that maybe
it's safe to change.
Here's a point for you - the documentation for cgi.esca
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm sorry, that's not good enough. How, precisely, would it break
>> "existing code"?
>
> ('owdo Mr. Ribbens!)
Good afternoon Mr Glover ;-)
> URI= 'http://www.oreilly.com/'
> html= cgi.escape(text)
> html= html.replace('O\'R
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> Sorry, that's still not good enough.
>
> that's not up to you to decide, though.
It's up to me to decide whether or not an argument is good enough to
convince me, thank you very much.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Filip Salomonsson wrote:
>> Here's a point for you - the documentation for cgi.escape says that
>> the characters "&", "<" and ">" are converted, but not what they are
>> converted to.
>
> If the documentation isn't clear enough, that means the documentation
> shoul
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> It's up to me to decide whether or not an argument is good enough to
>> convince me, thank you very much.
>
> not if you expect anyone to take anything you say seriously.
Now you're just being ridiculous. In this thread you have been rude,
e
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Quinlan wrote:
>> Now you're just being ridiculous. In this thread you have been rude,
>> evasive, insulting, vague, hypocritical, and have failed to answer
>> substantive points in favour of sarcastic and erroneous sniping - I'd
>> suggest it's you that needs
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Here's a point for you - the documentation for cgi.escape says that
>> the characters "&", "<" and ">" are converted, but not what they are
>> converted to.
>
> It says "to HTML-safe sequences". That's reasonably clear without the need
> to re
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> You're proposing two separate functions:
>
> 1) quoting of non-wildcard specials
> 2) quoting of wildcard specials
Lawrence, you're wrong in this thread for the same reason you were
right in the cgi.escape thread. Escaping gener
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Holden wrote:
>> I would have hoped that people don't treat that as a licence to be
>> obnoxious, though. I am aware of Fredrik's history, which is why I
>> was somewhat surprised and disappointed that he was being so rude
>> and unpleasant in this thread. He i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> the same documentation tells people what function to use if they
> want to quote *every-thing* that might need to be quoted, so if
> people did actually understand everything that was written in a
> reasonably clear way, this thread wouldn't ev
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Holden wrote:
>> Why do you say that? I have confined myself to simple logical
>> arguments, and been frankly very restrained when presented with
>> rudeness and misunderstanding from other thread participants.
>> In what way should I have modified my postings?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> It's a pity he's being rude when presented with well-informed comment
>> then.
>
> since when is the output of
>
[snip code]
>
> well-informed? heck, it doesn't even pass the turing test ;-)
Since when did that bear any resemblance to wha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>>> the same documentation tells people what function to use if they
>>> want to quote *every-thing* that might need to be quoted, so if
>>> people did actually understand everything that was written in a
>>> reasonably clear way, this thread wou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> This has nothing to do with character encodings.
>
> it has *everything* to do with encoding of existing data into HTML
> so it can be safely transported to, and recreated by, an HTML-aware
> client.
I can't tell if you're disagreeing or not
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Quinlan wrote:
> A summary of this pointless argument:
Your summary seems pretty reasonable, but please note that later on,
the thread was not about cgi.escape escaping (or not) quote
characters (as described in your summary), but about Fredrik arguing,
somewh
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> I know the answer. I'm pretty sure everyone else who's actually
> read my posts to this thread might have figured it out by now, too.
> But since you're still trying to "win" the debate, long after it's
> over, I think it's safest to end this
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Quinlan wrote:
>> Your summary seems pretty reasonable, but please note that later on,
>> the thread was not about cgi.escape escaping (or not) quote
>> characters (as described in your summary), but about Fredrik arguing,
>> somewhat incoherently, that it shou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>
>>> does the word "information set" mean anything to you?
>>
>> You would appear to be talking about either game theory, or XML,
>> neither of which have anything to do w
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> What do XML Information Sets have to do with escaping control
>> characters in HTML?
>
> figure out the connection, and you'll have the answer to your "substantial
> point".
If you don't know the answer, you can say so y'know. There's no sha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Quinlan wrote:
> Well, there are dozens (hundreds?) of templating systems for Python.
I know, I wrote one of them ;-)
> t = Template("test.html")
> t['foo'] = 'Brian -> "Hi!"'
> assert str(t) == 'Brian -> "Hi"'
>
> So how would you test our template system?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Quinlan wrote:
> If, in the example that I showed, the less-than character was not
> correctly escaped, then it might not manifest itself frequently in a
> typical application because the less-than character is seldom used in
> English prose.
OK, but effect
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gabriel G wrote:
> By example, I do not validate a "page". I validate that all methods
> that make up pieces of a page, build them the way they should - these
> are our "unit tests". Then, it's up to the templating library to join
> all the pieces into the final h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/index.html
>
> Careful there with the sweeping generalizations and quick judgments
> about languages :)
I just read "PHP as a language is rather dry and business-like",
and fell off my chair.
--
http://mail.p
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Boddie wrote:
>> it is a kind of nooby question. Is there a way to transfer a CGI python
>> script to mod_python without rewriting the code?
>
> Had you used WebStack [1] to begin with, this migration would involve
> changing a few lines of glue code.
Or Jonpy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Warren wrote:
> I would expect this to work,
>
> rawstring=r'some things\new things\some other things\'
>
> But it fails as the last backslash escapes the single quote.
String constants in Python are weird - raw strings doubly so.
In a raw string, backslas
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Duncan Booth wrote:
>> I presume there was originally some reason for this bizarre behaviour
>> - it'd be interesting to know what it is/was, if anyone knows?
>>
> See the FAQ for the explanation:
>
> http://www.python.org/doc/faq/general/#why-can-t-raw-strings-r-s
>
> but I'm not able to find the name of the function ??? in the python
> documentation, any help?
> Thanks
Ummm, that's a list not a tuple: I'll assume you meant sequence.
This will generate a list of indexes which match the criteria:
>>> a = [ 1, 2, 3, 2, 5, 7]
>>> [elno for elno,el in enumerate(a) if el == 2]
[1, 3]
hth
Jon.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ng Kevin Bacon and dependency tracking etc... so
a good old Google might do you some good -- ie, it's not completely
related, but it might give you a few extra things to search on...
All the best with the search.
Jon.
PS. If you do find a library, can you let me know? I'd be intereste
2 in
let c4 = 0.51763809020504137 in
let c5 = 1.9318516525781364 in
let n = Array.length x in
let odd i = x.(2*i) and even i = x.(2*i + 1) in
let d1 i = odd i -. c1 *. even i in
let f = function -1 -> n/2 - 1 | i -> i in
let s1 i = even i +. c2 *. d1 i +. c3 *. d1 (f(i-1)) in
l
n't easily make. (It'd require are really smart JIT compiler
> or some concessions in dynamicity.)
Writing a JIT to compile this kind of stuff is easy. My point is that this
is fundamentally bad code, so why bother trying to write a Python JIT? Why
not just write in a better language for
ttp://showmedo.com/videos/series?name=pythonThompsonVPythonSeries
I just found some more interesting stuff here:
http://www.phy.syr.edu/~salgado/software/vpython/
This is really great work but I can't help but wonder why the authors chose
to use Python when other languages seem better suited. I'd like to work on
raising people's awareness of these alternatives, and probably create some
useful tools in the process. So I'm keen to learn what Python programmers
would want/expect from F# and OCaml.
What would it take to make you convert?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ome useful tools in the process. So I'm keen to learn what Python
>> programmers would want/expect from F# and OCaml.
>>
>> What would it take to make you convert?
>
> Them not being functional would be a good start
They don't impose functional programming on you.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t the Zen of
> Python, a set of principles by which the language is designed. One of
> them is "Practicality beats purity." And let's face it, functional
> languages are (or seem to be) all about purity. Notice that there's no
> Zen that says "Fast i
es are now iterating over the arrays many times
instead of once and the whole program is slower than a simple loop written
in C.
Indeed, this algorithm could be written concisely using pattern matching
over linked lists. I wonder if that would be as fast as using BLAS from
Python.
--
Dr Jon D Harro
d t a = match t, a with
| [x0; x1; x2; x3], x4::x5::x6::_ ->
h x0 x1 x2 x3::h x2 x3 x4 x5::s, g x1 x2 x3 x4::g x3 x4 x5 x6::d
| x0::x1::(x2::x3::x4::_ as t), a ->
d4_even (h x0 x1 x2 x3 :: s) (g x1 x2 x3 x4 :: d) t a
let rec d4 = function
| [_; _; _; _] as a -> [a, []]
|
Filip Wasilewski wrote:
> Besides of that this code is irrelevant to the original one and your
> further conclusions may not be perfectly correct. Please learn first
> about the topic of your benchmark and different variants of wavelet
> transform, namely difference between lifting scheme and dwt,
y, max. And they would work the right way first time.
> No, I haven't actually done it myself. But I'm sure I could do it, easy."
True.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/inde
moization whereas c.l.p has
a thread about wrestling oiled pigs.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10.12.2006, at 11:23, Jon Harrop wrote:
>> F# addresses this by adding operator overloading. However, you have
>> to add more type annotations...
>
> That sounds interesting, but I'd have to see this in practice to form
> an opinion. As
Carl Banks wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>> What about translating the current Python interpreter into a language
>> with a GC, like MLton-compiled SML? That would probably make it much
>> faster, more reliable and easier to develop.
>
> I doubt it would work too
NET vs OCaml or
MLton).
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
/www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/visualisation
More recently, I've been writing F# examples:
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/dotnet/fsharp
You can probably translate the F# demos into a Lisp for .NET without too
much difficulty.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultanc
and related syntax (e.g. pattern matching, comprehensions). I
think this is an important point often missed by Lispers.
> lazyness has a nontrivial cost, however, both runtime and cognitive.
The main problem with lazy evaluation is unpredictable memory use.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog C
body decades of
programming language research.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
o learn what's new.
For example, we're going multicore whether you like it or not, so concurrent
GCs will become much more important over the next few years. F# adds that
to OCaml. That's new and its better.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s inherently slower. I
haven't benchmarked this in detail but F# seems to be 2-4x slower than
OCaml here.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
7; p e1 e2 =
doodleShooble();
force (if p then e1 else e2)
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
g, f_Args(x), g_Args(x))
>
> if you adopt cond. But of course it is getting ugly.
> So a macro can free you from this extra code.
Yes, that's just lazy evaluation. Again, you don't need macros.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
htt
unting the brain units which I regard as an important factor
> they are both equal.
Python is clearly more succinct in this case. I also think it is worth
counting chars or LOC as well as tokens. Lisp has unnecessarily long
built-in tokens...
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective
ode is 30x slower than native code on this benchmark.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Filip Wasilewski wrote:
> Jon, both Python and Matlab implementations discussed here use the
> lifting scheme, while yours is a classic convolution based approach.
I've done both in OCaml. The results are basically the same.
> These are two *different* algorithms for computing wave
quite a good PPC backend for the Mac already so you might
be able to persuade a student to do the conversion as a project.
If Mono runs on that platform then you might also consider F#...
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
> So you don't count line endings when counting bytes. ;-)
You'd probably replace "\n" -> " " so it wouldn't affect the byte count.
Anyway, I think I was using non-whitespace bytes, so neither "\n" nor
oint intensive code is as fast as OCaml and MLton.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Filip Wasilewski wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>> Filip Wasilewski wrote:
>> > Jon, both Python and Matlab implementations discussed here use the
>> > lifting scheme, while yours is a classic convolution based approach.
>>
>> I've done both in OCaml. The r
Filip Wasilewski wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>> Yes. The time taken is dominated by memory accesses. The amount of
>> arithmetic is almost irrelevant.
>
> I can say from my experience, that this depends much on the input size
> and the CPU cache size. For arrays of about n^
sturlamolden wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>> Yes. The time taken is dominated by memory accesses. The amount of
>> arithmetic is almost irrelevant.
>
> That is extremely interesting. It would explain why I see almost the
> same performance in NumPy and Fortran 95 on this kin
t; a particular paradigm, however powerful, is what makes any such
> language strictly less expressive than one with syntactic abstraction
> over a uniform syntax.
Can you give an example of a Lisp macro that does something useful that you
can't do in these other languages?
Raffael Cavallaro wrote:
> On 2006-12-16 13:58:37 -0500, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Why do you think that uniform syntax is necessary to provide new
>> paradigms when it is equivalent to infix syntax?
>
> Because it doesn't require one to write a parse
Raffael Cavallaro wrote:
> On 2006-12-17 07:54:28 -0500, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> What if eager impurity isn't the "very nature" of the problem but,
>> rather, is the very nature of Tilton's chosen solution?
>
> That's the who
haskell and ocaml when you
> already have lisp.
On the contrary, Lisp predates the features and, since their inception, most
Lisp programmers have moved on to newer languages.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml
ed, without causing a leak, so these
> programs are no longer buggy. The pool of non-buggy programs has
> increased without anything being rejected.
You have rejected all programs that rely upon a resource being disposed
before a certain point.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consul
s depending on what you really want to achieve. For instance, what
happens with: a comma appearing before any text, consecutive commas (ie
,,,), or commas within quotes?
hth
Jon.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
(OCaml, SML
and F#) are typically much faster than those that do (Lisp, Scheme, Dylan).
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
interactive mode that allows you to visualise 2D and 3D graphics in
real time with simplicity rivalling Mathematica but the sophistication and
performance of DirectX, whilst also having the power of the F# programming
language and .NET to analyse your data.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consu
everal fold whilst also having it run a few orders of
magnitude faster and having it statically checked, so it will be more
reliable.
You might want to look at any language with pattern matching: OCaml, SML,
Haskell, F#, Mathematica etc. If you're running Windows then F# is a .NET
language...
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jon Harrop:
>> OCaml's pattern matcher is very sophisticated and very fast. You'll
>> probably shrink your code by several fold whilst also having it run a few
>> orders of magnitude faster and having it statically checked, so it will
>
hing isn't a language.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jon Harrop:
>> I think most people could pick up the core ideas in a day and start
>> writing working programs.
>
> Probably I am not that intelligent, I probably need some months :-) But
> that language has many good sides, and one day I'll
27;
of the input data: given this, it's impossible to reproduce the
original input.
Is this what you're looking for?
>>> import urllib
>>> urllib.quote('[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
'some.persons%40somedomain.com'
hth
Jon.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ed to make certain
things easier and dynamic(just as generating tables and forms and all that).
Thanks for any help,
Jon
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2007-06-27, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the any way to get an efficient 16bit hash in python?
int(md5.new(s).hexdigest()[:4], 16) ?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2007-07-12 04:42:25 -0500, kublai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> For a project, I need to develop a corpus of online news stories. I'm
> looking for an application that, given the url of a web page, "copies"
> the rendered text of the web page (not the source HTNL text), opens a
> text editor (Not
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Now I want something that's going to give me a string whose value is the
> set of all of the first letters of months. Order is not important.
"".join(set(m[0] for m in calendar.month_abbr[1:]))
> And for extra credit, I need the string whose
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.911blogger.com/node/8053
>
> Senator John Kerry was questioned concerning 9/11 during an appearance
> at Book People in Austin, Texas. Members of Austin 9/11 Truth Now
> asked Kerry about the officially unexplained collapse
# List of formatting to apply to each column (change this to suit)
format = ['%03d', '%10s', '%10s']
data = [1, 10, 100]
print [fmt % d for fmt,d in zip(format,data)]
Results in: ['001', '10', ' 100']
Then write that using the CSV module.
hth
Jon.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ing polymorphic variants. However, this is not generally a good idea
because they are slower and harbor some of the disadvantages of dynamic
typing.
It is worth noting that eager, statically-typed languages like OCaml and F#
are many times faster than the other languages at this task. This is
preci
I don't really see the use for being able to do that. Have you tried
doing it with the 'app' mode?, But I am guessing that it is just an
advanced mode spawned from 'w'. So, no, I don't think you can do this.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2007-05-11, HMS Surprise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If file writing has no return value (http://docs.python.org/lib/bltin-
> file-objects.html), how do you know if the write was successful?
Because no exception was thrown?
Although bear in mind that some errors might not become apparent unti
Anybody tried it?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The F#.NET Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?usenet
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s an interface or a server thing. Any ideas
are most welcome.
Cheers,
Jon.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
, Java or any functional language (except OCaml and F#
and excluding WPF and Silverlight)?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The F#.NET Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?u7
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kev,
Geopy is pretty cool:
http://exogen.case.edu/projects/geopy/
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Bell, Kevin wrote:
> I see that the weapon of choice for google maps is javascript... Is
> there anything for python?
>
>
>
> Kev
>
>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm trying to set sys.ps1 and sys.ps2 with some formatting (linux) using:
python -i -c 'import sys;
sys.ps1="\033[1m\033[32mspy>\033[0m";sys.ps2="\033[1m\033[32m .\033[0m"'
I get the colored prompt(s) as you might expect, but I'm getting some strange
behavior with wrapping. Once the interact
501 - 600 of 1223 matches
Mail list logo
