[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 10.12.2006, at 11:23, Jon Harrop wrote: >> F# addresses this by adding operator overloading. However, you have >> to add more type annotations... > > That sounds interesting, but I'd have to see this in practice to form > an opinion. As long as F# is a Windows-only language, I am not > interested in it anyway.
F# runs under Linux with Mono. >> OCaml already supports 9 architectures and optimised to AMD64 >> earlier than gcc. How many do you want? > > It's not a matter of number, it's a matter of availability when new > processors appear on the market. How much time passes on average > between the availability of a new processor type and the availability > of a native code compiler for OCaml? OCaml had AMD64 support before many other language. It had a better optimiser before gcc... -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/index.html?usenet -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
