Re: What does %%(%s)s mean/expand to in Python? What does rowshtml += (rowhtml % ((fieldname, ) * 3)) expand to? Kindly explain.

2014-10-29 Thread Peter Otten
satishmlm...@gmail.com wrote: > What does %%(%s)s mean in Python? According to https://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting in an expression like "%%(%s)s" % ("foo",) '%%' expands to '%' and '%s' expands to 'foo' so the whole thing gives >>> "%%(%s)s" % ("foo",) '%(f

Re: What does %%(%s)s mean/expand to in Python? What does rowshtml += (rowhtml % ((fieldname, ) * 3)) expand to? Kindly explain.

2014-10-29 Thread Christian Gollwitzer
Am 29.10.14 07:15, schrieb satishmlm...@gmail.com: What does %%(%s)s mean in Python? Instead of posting all those questions here, you can simply try it in an interactive python interpreter: Apfelkiste:VecTcl chris$ python Python 2.7.2 (default, Oct 11 2012, 20:14:37) [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Ap

Re: % symbol in python

2014-10-29 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 29/10/2014 05:48, satishmlm...@gmail.com wrote: kindly let me know what does %%(%s)% mean What did you not understand from the link I posted ten hours ago? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence -- https://m

Meaning of * in the function arguments list

2014-10-29 Thread ast
Hi Consider the following to_bytes method from integer class: int.to_bytes(length, byteorder, *, signed=False) What doest the '*' in the arguments list means ? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Meaning of * in the function arguments list

2014-10-29 Thread Peter Otten
ast wrote: > Consider the following to_bytes method from integer class: > > int.to_bytes(length, byteorder, *, signed=False) > > What doest the '*' in the arguments list means ? A bare * indicates that the arguments that follow it are keyword-only: >>> def f(a, b=2, *, c=3): ... print("a =

Re: memory, PE files, etc...

2014-10-29 Thread Tim Golden
On 29/10/2014 02:18, Denis McMahon wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:16:43 -0700, kiuhnm03 wrote: > >> I'd like to write one or more scripts that analyze processes in memory >> on Windows 7. I used to do these things in C++ by using native Win32 API >> calls. >> How should I proceed in python? Any p

Re: Meaning of * in the function arguments list

2014-10-29 Thread ast
"Peter Otten" <__pete...@web.de> a écrit dans le message de news:mailman.15291.1414574006.18130.python-l...@python.org... A bare * indicates that the arguments that follow it are keyword-only: ok, thx -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Anton
Let's say I have an incoming list of values *l*. Every element of *l* can be one of the following options: 1) an integer value 2) a string in form of '', e.g. '7' 3) a string with a json serialization of an integer value, e.g. '"7"' 4) something else that should be ignored I need to transform th

Re: %%(%s)s mean in python

2014-10-29 Thread Ned Batchelder
On 10/29/14 2:02 AM, satishmlm...@gmail.com wrote: def fetchRecord(db, form): try: ... 34 lines deleted ... db.close() print(replyhtml % htmlize(fields)) Why did you paste all this code, it doesn't have the thing you are asking about. What does %%(%s)s mean in Python? It depends e

Re: Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Martin Kemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/2014 10:45, Anton wrote: > Let's say I have an incoming list of values *l*. Every element of > *l* can be one of the following options: 1) an integer value 2) a > string in form of '', e.g. '7' 3) a string with a json > serialization of an int

Re: Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Rafael Romero Carmona
Hi, first in Python 2.7.6 and Python 3.4.0 list haven't got any add function but they have append. I think you could do better with something like == import json l = [1, -1, 0, '1', '-1', '0', json.dumps(-1), json.dumps(1), json.dumps(0), 'x', 'sqjklsqjk__', (1, 2)] values = [] for c in

Re: Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Rafael Romero Carmona
2014-10-29 12:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kemp : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 29/10/2014 10:45, Anton wrote: >> Let's say I have an incoming list of values *l*. Every element of >> *l* can be one of the following options: 1) an integer value 2) a >> string in form of '', e.g. '7

problem with pefile

2014-10-29 Thread gandalf23
Where is DIRECTORY_ENTRY_LOAD_CONFIG? In the changelog (https://code.google.com/p/pefile/) one can read: "Version: 1.2.10-60 Besides some small bugfixes in this release I've added functionality to parse the LOAD_CONFIG data directory. Now one can access this structure's fields like, for ins

Re: Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Martin Kemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/2014 12:01, Rafael Romero Carmona wrote: > 2014-10-29 12:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kemp : On > 29/10/2014 10:45, Anton wrote: Let's say I have an incoming list of values *l*. Every element of *l* can be one of the following options: 1) an

Re: problem with pefile

2014-10-29 Thread Tim Golden
On 29/10/2014 13:15, gandal...@mail.com wrote: > Where is DIRECTORY_ENTRY_LOAD_CONFIG? In the changelog > (https://code.google.com/p/pefile/) one can read: > > "Version: 1.2.10-60 > > Besides some small bugfixes in this release I've added functionality > to parse the LOAD_CONFIG data directory. N

Re: Build Question: How to Add -Wl, --option Before Objects In Setup.py?

2014-10-29 Thread Cyd Haselton
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > In article > , > Cyd Haselton wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Ned Deily wrote: >> > In article >> > , >> > Cyd Haselton wrote: >> > [...] >> >> I'm building python on an Android device in the KBOX >> >> environment...which simul

Re: hotel management system

2014-10-29 Thread Florian Schweikert
On 28/10/14 07:42, ngangsia akumbo wrote: > Please can someone look at my code and may be advice and may be help me with > some correction. I have been learning python for some time now. This is my > first project i wish to write. A hotel management system. > > > http://pastebin.com/LMHmuTiC B

Emulating py2exe for python version 3 and above

2014-10-29 Thread Ian Dickinson
Can i emulate py2exe for python version 3 and above i also use pygame any suggestions for a basic staring script would be greatly appreciated Thanks Ian -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: %%(%s)s mean in python

2014-10-29 Thread Thomas Rachel
Am 29.10.2014 07:02 schrieb satishmlm...@gmail.com: What does %%(%s)s mean in Python? Weird question, as this has nothing to do with the code you just posted. In general, what comes up to my mind, is that it is a format string to build another format string. Example: metafmt = '%%(%s)s' f

Send UDP packet to link-local IPv6 address?

2014-10-29 Thread Grant Edwards
How do you send a UDP frame to an IPv6 link-local address? Initially, I'm most concerned with Linux. I'm using CPython 2.7.7, but so far all behavior seems to be identical under 3.3.5, and I need to keep my code compatible with both 2.7 and 3.3/3.4. I'm particularly interested in sending to the

Re: problem with pefile

2014-10-29 Thread gandalf23
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 2:39:30 PM UTC+1, Tim Golden wrote: > On 29/10/2014 13:15, gandalf23 wrote: > > Where is DIRECTORY_ENTRY_LOAD_CONFIG? In the changelog > > (https://code.google.com/p/pefile/) one can read: > > > > "Version: 1.2.10-60 > > > > Besides some small bugfixes in this relea

Re: problem with pefile

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
Little test...sorry. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: problem with pefile

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:34:42 PM UTC+1, Kiuhnm wrote: > OT: how can I hide my email in these posts? > Every time I try to send a post, google warns me that my email is visible and > so I edit it out. Problem solved :) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
I must say that the lack of static types in Python is a pain in the neck especially when I'm exploring new libraries. Recently, I learned a new language called Dart which have optional typing and I had a lot of fun with it. Basically, you use type annotations as documentation and to give useful

Re: Send UDP packet to link-local IPv6 address?

2014-10-29 Thread Alain Ketterlin
Grant Edwards writes: [...] > With link-local addresses you also need to specify which interface to > use. The normal way of doing this on Linux with command-line utilities > is append % to the address/hostname (e.g. ping6 ff02::1%net1). > > That doesn't work: > > s.sendto(data, ("ff02::1%net1",p

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Peter Otten
Kiuhnm wrote: > I must say that the lack of static types in Python is a pain in the neck > especially when I'm exploring new libraries. Recently, I learned a new > language called Dart which have optional typing and I had a lot of fun > with it. Basically, you use type annotations as documentation

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:57:13 PM UTC+1, Peter Otten wrote: > Kiuhnm wrote: > > > I must say that the lack of static types in Python is a pain in the neck > > especially when I'm exploring new libraries. Recently, I learned a new > > language called Dart which have optional typing and I ha

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Kiuhnm wrote: >> Personally I am skeptical, but there is an effort underway: >> >> http://www.mypy-lang.org/ >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-August/028742.html >> >> Nothing that your search engine of choice could not have found you... > > In

Re: Send UDP packet to link-local IPv6 address?

2014-10-29 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2014-10-29, Alain Ketterlin wrote: > Grant Edwards writes: > > [...] >> With link-local addresses you also need to specify which interface to >> use. The normal way of doing this on Linux with command-line utilities >> is append % to the address/hostname (e.g. ping6 ff02::1%net1). >> >> That d

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Ethan Furman
On 10/29/2014 10:18 AM, Kiuhnm wrote: On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:57:13 PM UTC+1, Peter Otten wrote: Kiuhnm wrote: I must say that the lack of static types in Python is a pain in the neck especially when I'm exploring new libraries. Recently, I learned a new language called Dart which hav

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > Even if it becomes official, which seems likely, it will still be optional > -- hence, only useful if folks actually use it. ;) Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at least) will use it, which will make it a l

Re: Anyone know the solution

2014-10-29 Thread Denis McMahon
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:10:04 -0700, emmanueloje wrote: > Write a program ... Hey dudester I coded a solution for you, you can get it here: http://www.sined.co.uk/tmp/names.py.txt Make sure you leave all the comments in so your instructor realises how much effort you went in to in researching

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Marko Rauhamaa
Chris Angelico : > Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at > least) will use it, which will make it a lot more useful than it > currently is. I doubt it. Python should decide if it wants to stay Python or become another Java. I don't really believe in this "be every

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Chris Angelico : > >> Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at >> least) will use it, which will make it a lot more useful than it >> currently is. > > I doubt it. Python should decide if it wants to stay Python

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Nick Cash
> Am I the only one who'd like to see optional types introduced in Python? Nope! Some dude named "Guido" would like to see them as well: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-August/028742.html -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:19:11 PM UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Chris Angelico : > > > Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at > > least) will use it, which will make it a lot more useful than it > > currently is. > > I doubt it. Python should decide if it

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Marko Rauhamaa
Kiuhnm : > 2) Having optional types is not "being everything for everybody", it's > just being smart. We'll see, we'll see... Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Anton
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:43:33 AM UTC-7, Rafael Romero Carmona wrote: > Hi, first in Python 2.7.6 and Python 3.4.0 list haven't got any add > function but they have append. You are right, in my original code I use set instead of array, so it should be either values = set() or values.append

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:03:16 PM UTC+1, Kiuhnm wrote: > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:19:11 PM UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > > Chris Angelico : > > > > > Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at > > > least) will use it, which will make it a lot more usef

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 29/10/2014 19:03, Kiuhnm wrote: On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:19:11 PM UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: Chris Angelico : Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at least) will use it, which will make it a lot more useful than it currently is. I doubt it. Python

Re: Python Style Question

2014-10-29 Thread Anton
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:59:25 AM UTC-7, Rafael Romero Carmona wrote: > 2014-10-29 12:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kemp : > Actually it doesn't work because there is no add function and it > doesn't catch the TypeError function to ignore other exceptions than > ValueError. Doesn't it? I tested in Py

Re: (-1)**1000

2014-10-29 Thread Stefan Behnel
Ned Batchelder schrieb am 26.10.2014 um 21:45: > On 10/26/14 4:07 PM, Tony the Tiger wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:27:34 +0200, ast wrote: >> >>> If i am writing (-1)**1000 on a python program, will the interpreter do >>> (-1)*(-1)*...*(-1) or something clever ? >> >> Even vs. odd. It ought to k

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Marko Rauhamaa
Mark Lawrence : > Regarding 2) Python has somehow managed without optional types for > over 20 years so it's my belief that they're not the panacea that so > many people think they are. Sure if they get implemented and if they > improve Python then I'm all for them, but I'm not holding my breath.

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:45:08 PM UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Mark Lawrence : > > > Regarding 2) Python has somehow managed without optional types for > > over 20 years so it's my belief that they're not the panacea that so > > many people think they are. Sure if they get implemented an

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Kiuhnm
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:23:30 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 29/10/2014 19:03, Kiuhnm wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:19:11 PM UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > >> Chris Angelico : > >> > >>> Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at > >>> least)

Re: Python 3.4.2 + PyQt4 + PyCharm 3.4.1

2014-10-29 Thread Juan Christian
It only occurs whule using PyCharm I tried it via pure terminal and everything works... =/ On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Juan Christian wrote: > Python 3.4.2 Windows x64 > PyQt4 4.11.2 Py3.4 Qt4.8.6 (x64) > PyCharm 3.4.1 Pro Edition > > > So, PyCharm works 100% with everything here but PyQt.

Re: Anyone know the solution

2014-10-29 Thread Anton
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:13:14 PM UTC-7, Gregory Ewing wrote: > No, that's not the correct answer. Being NP-complete doesn't > mean something is impossible, or even hard to do. All it > means is that nobody knows of a cleverer solution than > just trying all possibilities. That's only a diff

Re: What for -- for? (was A bug?)

2014-10-29 Thread Terry Reedy
On 10/29/2014 1:42 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: to avoid inconvenient line-wrapping (that I can avoid just by sticking to 80 column lines in the first place:). Try perhaps 65 for email. def get_abc_map(cls): return {n: issubclass(cls, getattr(abc, n)) for n in dir(abc) if n[0].isupp

Re: Meaning of * in the function arguments list

2014-10-29 Thread Terry Reedy
On 10/29/2014 4:56 AM, ast wrote: Consider the following to_bytes method from integer class: int.to_bytes(length, byteorder, *, signed=False) What doest the '*' in the arguments list means ? If you go to the online doc index page for Symbols, https://docs.python.org/3/genindex-Symbols.html the

Re: optional types

2014-10-29 Thread Terry Reedy
On 10/29/2014 4:40 PM, Kiuhnm wrote: The only thing I know is that I programmed in ASM and C++ for many years and I liked it. Then I moved to C#, Haskell, Scala, and many other languages. Then I learned Python and I liked it. Then I tried Dart (with optional static typing) and liked it very much