Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk>: > Regarding 2) Python has somehow managed without optional types for > over 20 years so it's my belief that they're not the panacea that so > many people think they are. Sure if they get implemented and if they > improve Python then I'm all for them, but I'm not holding my breath.
I'm afraid of stylistic chaos and optional types turning into de-facto mandatory types as modules interface each other. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
