On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:03:16 PM UTC+1, Kiuhnm wrote: > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:19:11 PM UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > > Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at > > > least) will use it, which will make it a lot more useful than it > > > currently is. > > > > I doubt it. Python should decide if it wants to stay Python or become > > another Java. I don't really believe in this "be everything for > > everybody" thing. You'll only become nothing for anybody. > > > > > > Marko > > 1) Java is not optionally typed. > 2) Having optional types is not "being everything for everybody", it's just > being smart.
...where "smart" is referred to IDEs, etc... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
