You might use a separate prime generator to produce prime factors. The
factorize algorithm becomes quite simple and configurable by prime
generators. For demonstration purposes I use the eratosthenes sieve.
def eratosthenes():
memo = {}
q = 2
while True:
p = memo.pop(q, None)
This inquiry may either turn out to be about the suitability of the
SHA-1 (160 bit digest) for file identification, the sha function in
Python ... or about some error in my script. Any insight appreciated
in advance.
I am trying to reduce duplicate files in storage at home - I have a
large numbe
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
> Xiaolei enlightened us with:
> > from pylab import *
>
> You'd better not do that. Just use "import pylab".
>
> > If I remove the first line, I correctly get:
> >
> > [1, 2, 3, 3]
> >
> > set([1, 2, 3])
>
> Pylab shadows the built-in set name, which is one of the reasons you
EP wrote:
> This inquiry may either turn out to be about the suitability of the
> SHA-1 (160 bit digest) for file identification, the sha function in
> Python ... or about some error in my script.
>
> This is on Windows XP.
>
> def hashit(pth):
> fs=open(pth,'r').read()
> sh=sha.new(fs).hex
Marshall wrote:
> Joe Marshall wrote:
>
>>They *do* have a related meaning. Consider this code fragment:
>>(car "a string")
>>[...]
>>Both `static typing' and `dynamic typing' (in the colloquial sense) are
>>strategies to detect this sort of error.
>
>
> The thing is though, that putting it tha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>
|> You might use a separate prime generator to produce prime factors. The
|> factorize algorithm becomes quite simple and configurable by prime
|> generators. For demonstration purposes I use the eratosthenes sieve.
Th
David Hopwood wrote:
> Pascal Costanza wrote:
>> Rob Thorpe wrote:
>>> Pascal Costanza wrote:
Matthias Blume wrote:
> Pascal Costanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> (slot-value p 'address) is an attempt to access the field 'address in
>> the object p. In many languages, the n
Hi,
just a thought: if you *always* work with "floats" with two decimals,
you are in fact working with integers, but you represent them as a
floats - confusing for the internal representation.
So why not work with int(float * 100) instead? This way you only have
to take care of roundoffs etc when
oops, should be something like this:
"int / int" = "int / int, int % int"
/per9000
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi.
I use wxPy version 2.4.2 for Python 2.3.
Now I wanted to use the wxStyledTextCtrl for viewing (editing) of sql
code.
I have the following:
self.__m_styled_text_ctrl = wxPython.stc.wxStyledTextCtrl(
self, wx.NewId(),
style=wxPython.wx.wxNO_FULL_REPAINT_ON_RESIZE
alf wrote:
> I did not think about any particular problem, just thought it would be
> cool to abstract out the base class. In fact you can do that in C++ (to
> some extend) using templates and parameterizing the base class.
Python is ways cooler than C++. This is a sensible use case where you
may
I need to execute LVM operations from within python ... are there any
packages containing direct bindings available or is forking a shell the
only solution? Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
cheers.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi there,
I would like to search for a substring in a string and get the index of
all occurances.
mystring = 'John has a really nice powerbook.'
substr = ' ' # space
I would like to get this list:
[4, 8, 10, 17, 22]
How can I do that without using "for i in mystring" which might be
expens
[EP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> This inquiry may either turn out to be about the suitability of the
> SHA-1 (160 bit digest) for file identification, the sha function in
> Python ... or about some error in my script
It's your script. Always open binary files in binary mode. It's a
disaster on Windows
> just a thought: if you *always* work with "floats" with two decimals,
> you are in fact working with integers, but you represent them as a
> floats - confusing for the internal representation.
>
> So why not work with int(float * 100) instead? This way you only have
> to take care of roundoffs e
mystring = 'John has a really nice powerbook.'
substr = ' ' # space
pos = 0
indices = []
while True:
i = mystring.find(substr,pos)
if i==-1:
break
indices.append(i)
pos = i+1
print indices
> [4, 8, 10, 17, 22]
Pierre
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
> I have the following:
> self.__m_styled_text_ctrl = wxPython.stc.wxStyledTextCtrl(
> self, wx.NewId(),
> style=wxPython.wx.wxNO_FULL_REPAINT_ON_RESIZE)
> self.__m_styled_text_ctrl.SetLexer(wxPython.stc.wxSTC_LEX_SQL)
> self.__m_styled_text_ctrl.SetP
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"per9000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>
|> just a thought: if you *always* work with "floats" with two decimals,
|> you are in fact working with integers, but you represent them as a
|> floats - confusing for the internal representation.
No, you aren't - you are
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
You know what are dicts, right ? That is, containers with
keyword-access to values ? Then you probably have dicts
with a known, defined structure, and functions working on
it. What classes (and hence 00) gives you is a way to
associate these functions wi
"Don Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I find it easy to use sizers in
> wxGlade.
Just gave is a spin yesterday: How does on fix the size of layout; I
can only manage to get sizers to distribute space evently amongst the
fields, which is *not* what I want.
-
"Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Rossberg wrote:
>
> > No, variables are insignificant in this context. You can consider a
> > language without variables at all (such languages exist, and they can
> > even be Turing-complete) and still have evaluation, values, and a
> > non-trivi
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> I have a function
>
> def f(the_arg):
> ...
>
> and I want to state that the_arg must be only of a certain type
> (actually a list). Is there a way to do that?
I wrote a cool function decorator just for that purpose. It's posted on
the Python Decorator Library at:
http://w
Ghido wrote:
> Hi all, i'm writing a software with python and wxpython for manage the
> quality/environmental/security system for the my factory. I want to
> separate the gui structure from the events and database operations for
> obtain a very modular software, for this reason i start to use
> sql
David Hopwood wrote:
>
> Oh, but it *does* make sense to talk about dynamic tagging in a statically
> typed language.
It even makes perfect sense to talk about dynamic typing in a statically
typed language - but keeping the terminology straight, this rather
refers to something like described in
Matthias Blume wrote:
> "Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think we're discussing this at cross-purposes. In a language like C
> > or another statically typed language there is no information passed
> > with values indicating their type.
>
> You seem to be confusing "does not have a
Python 2.4.1 (#1, May 16 2005, 15:19:29)
[GCC 4.0.0 20050512 (Red Hat 4.0.0-5)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from sys import stdout
>>> help (stdout.closed)
If I do this, it gives me help on the bool object. Also:
>>> stdout.closed.__doc__
Rob Thorpe wrote:
>
> I think this should make it clear. If I have a "xyz" in lisp I know it
> is a string.
> If I have "xyz" in an untyped language like assembler it may be
> anything, two pointers in binary, an integer, a bitfield. There is no
> data at compile time or runtime to tell what it
I want to wrap a whole script in try ... except. What is the best way of
doing this?
Consider the following: -
try:
import
def notifyme(traceback):
code to tell me there is a problem
except Exception, traceback:
notifyme(traceback)
Would this code not work because i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pekka Karjalainen wrote:
from sys import stdout
help (stdout.closed)
>
> If I do this, it gives me help on the bool object.
stdout.closed is a bool. What were you expecting it to show you?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Pekka Karjalainen wrote:
from sys import stdout
help (stdout.closed)
>
> If I do this, it gives me help on the bool object.
that's probably because "sys.stdout.closed" *is* a bool object:
>>> sys.stdout.closed
False
>>> type(sys.stdout.closed)
there's no way the reflection system can
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hari Sekhon wrote:
> I want to wrap a whole script in try ... except. What is the best way of
> doing this?
You could do this maybe:
import sys
def excepthook(exc_type, exc_value, tb):
import modules_needed_to_notify_exception
...
sys.excepthook =
Hari Sekhon wrote:
> I want to wrap a whole script in try ... except. What is the best way of
> doing this?
>
> Consider the following: -
>
> try:
>import
>
>
>
>def notifyme(traceback):
> code to tell me there is a problem
>
> except Exception, traceback:
>notifyme(trac
I take it that it's not worth listening to that tutorial and just using good old "import from", which I suspect is better anyway since it imports less..."uneducated premature optimisation" - I take it this is insulting a that programmer's progexuality...!
"import from" it is then unless anybody has
Nico Grubert wrote:
> I would like to search for a substring in a string and get the index of
> all occurances.
>
> mystring = 'John has a really nice powerbook.'
> substr = ' ' # space
>
> I would like to get this list:
> [4, 8, 10, 17, 22]
the find and index methods take an optional start ar
If you were going to do this you may as well just do something likeif sys.platform='win32': os.system('net send ')elif sys.platform[:5]='linux' os.system('smblcient -M etc...')
This would be more portable and simpler than the alternatives I've seen. It would be better if there was just a cro
Hi.
Thanks it works now .. i must reset the default styles with
StyleClearAll and then set the styles apropriate again.
Is there a way that the keyword list isn't case sensitive, as sql
isn't.
reg,
Pierre
jean-michel bain-cornu wrote:
> > I have the following:
> > self.__m_styled_text_c
On 20/05/06, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roger Miller a écrit :> The basic problem is that the zipfile interface only reads and writes> whole files, so it may perform poorly or fail on huge files. At one> time I implemented a patch to allow reading files in chunks. However I
>
I have a C++ app which fires up a Python script using C API calls.
That script operates the app via Automation calls, like this:
from win32com.client import *
from mywrapper import *
myapp = Application()
myapp.Visible = True
mydoc = myapp.Documents.Open(...)
My problem is to make sure the insta
Andreas Rossberg schrieb:
> Rob Thorpe wrote:
>> Hmm. You're right, ML is no-where in my definition since it has no
>> variables.
>
> Um, it has. Mind you, it has no /mutable/ variables, but that was not
> even what I was talking about.
Indeed. A (possibly nonexhaustive) list of program entitie
Matthias Blume schrieb:
> Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Matthias Blume schrieb:
>>> Perhaps better: A language is statically typed if its definition
>>> includes (or ever better: is based on) a static type system, i.e., a
>>> static semantics with typing judgments derivable by
Nick Maclaren wrote:
> |> just a thought: if you *always* work with "floats" with two decimals,
> |> you are in fact working with integers, but you represent them as a
> |> floats - confusing for the internal representation.
>
> No, you aren't - you are working with fixed-point
Nick, your answer h
Pascal Costanza schrieb:
> (It's really important to understand that the idea is to use this for
> deployed programs - albeit hopefully in a more structured fashion - and
> not only for debugging. The example I have given is an extreme one that
> you would probably not use as such in a "real-wor
Jon Ribbens wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hari Sekhon wrote:
I want to wrap a whole script in try ... except. What is the best way of
doing this?
You could do this maybe:
import sys
def excepthook(exc_type, exc_value, tb):
import modules_needed_to_not
Anton van Straaten wrote:
> But a program as seen by the programmer has types: the programmer
> performs (static) type inference when reasoning about the program, and
> debugs those inferences when debugging the program, finally ending up
> with a program which has a perfectly good type scheme. I
Darren New wrote:
[me:]
> > Personally, I would be quite happy to go there -- I dislike the idea
> > that a value has a specific inherent type.
>
> Interestingly, Ada defines a type as a collection of values. It works
> quite well, when one consistantly applies the definition.
I have never been v
David Hopwood wrote:
> When people talk
> about "types" being associated with values in a "latently typed" or
> "dynamically typed" language, they really mean *tag*, not type.
I don't think that's true. Maybe /some/ people do confuse the two, but I am
certainly a counter-example ;-)
The tag (if
Chris Smith wrote:
> > It would be interesting to see what a language designed specifically to
> > support user-defined, pluggable, and perhaps composable, type systems
> > would look like. [...]
>
> You mean in terms of a practical programming language? If not, then
> lambda calculus is used in
[Kay Schluehr]
> You might use a separate prime generator to produce prime factors. The
> factorize algorithm becomes quite simple and configurable by prime
> generators.
Alas, yours was _so_ simple that it always takes time proportional to
the largest prime factor of n (which may be n) instead of
Jon Ribbens wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hari Sekhon wrote:
I want to wrap a whole script in try ... except. What is the best way of
doing this?
You could do this maybe:
import sys
def excepthook(exc_type, exc_value, tb):
import modules_needed_to_not
Another variant, I feel this one more natural as it doesn't contain a
C-looking infinite loop (also I made it a generator but this is not the
topic).
In [160]: def indices(s, subs) :
.: last = 0
.: for ind, part in in enumerate(s.split(subs)[:-1]) :
.: yield
On 2006-06-21, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have you tried things like
[...]
I have now. I'm not sure what the results are supposed to tell me, but I
am not going to press the issue.
Suppose I had no idea what sys.stdout.closed was and wanted to find out.
Where would I look it up?
Pekka Karjalainen wrote:
> Suppose I had no idea what sys.stdout.closed was and wanted to find out.
> Where would I look it up?
>>> help(sys.stdout)
...
| closed =
| True if the file is closed
...
in case anyone feels like hacking, support for something like
>>> help(sys.stdout, "close
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pekka Karjalainen wrote:
> Suppose I had no idea what sys.stdout.closed was and wanted to find out.
> Where would I look it up?
`sys.stdout` is a file (like) object:
http://docs.python.org/lib/bltin-file-objects.html
Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
--
http://mai
I've been testing my recursive function against your iterative
function, and yours is generally a quite steady 50% faster on
factorizing 2**n +/- 1 for 0 < n < 60. I think that, for a challenge,
I'll try to make a recursive function that matche or beats the
iterative function -- it's worth the exp
Maric Michaud wrote:
> Another variant, I feel this one more natural as it doesn't contain a
> C-looking infinite loop
doing things in a convoluted way because you think that non-infinite while-
loops are not natural? you can get help for that, you know ;-)
> Actually it's even more efficient t
> So, will y'all just switch from using "dynamically typed" to "latently
> typed", and stop talking about any real programs in real programming
> languages as being "untyped" or "type-free", unless you really are
> talking about situations in which human reasoning doesn't come into
> play? I think
Maric Michaud wrote:
> Actually it's even more efficient than Lundh's
effbot's solution finds overlapping occurrences, whereas your solution
finds non-overlapping occurrences. So efficiency comparisons are not valid.
e.g:
indices( 'a', 'aa' )
your solution gives: 0,2
effbots's solution: 0,1
Hello all,
I am using urllib2 as a part of a web testing tool. One of the things I
am testing is the effect of two different people perforing the same
actions on the website - do they interfer with each other or not.
So to emulate this, I essentially have the following function:
def get_opener()
> I would like to search for a substring in a string and get the index of
> all occurances.
>
> mystring = 'John has a really nice powerbook.'
> substr = ' ' # space
>
> I would like to get this list:
>[4, 8, 10, 17, 22]
>
> How can I do that without using "for i in mystring" which might b
Unfortunately (i guess), I am not doing any XML. However, I am taking
the previous suggestion of putting print lines in every other line of
my code and then seeing where it crashes. Hopefully, that will solve
the problem.
thanks for the suggestions everybody
-- Kiran
Frank Millman wrote:
> Kira
Hari Sekhon wrote:
Jon Ribbens wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hari Sekhon wrote:
I want to wrap a whole script in try ... except. What is the best way of
doing this?
You could do this maybe:
import sys
def excepthook(exc_type, exc_value, tb
i truly didn't understand this error :Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Programmation\FrancePaquet\FrancePaquet.py", line 77, in ? cabtri = "zz" + chiffrescabtri + clefcTypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, int found
>>> if someone could help me i will be glad, this p
Chris Uppal wrote:
>
> I have never been very happy with relating type to sets of values (objects,
> whatever).
Indeed, this view is much too narrow. In particular, it cannot explain
abstract types, which is *the* central aspect of decent type systems.
There were papers observing this as early
Maric Michaud:
> I'd love str implement a xsplit(sub, start, end) method, so I could have
> wrote : enumerate(s.xsplit(subs, 0, -1)).
Some of such str.x-methods (or str.i-methods, etc) can be useful
(especially for Py3.0), but keeping APIs simple and compact is very
important, otherwise when you p
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Pascal Costanza schrieb:
>> (It's really important to understand that the idea is to use this for
>> deployed programs - albeit hopefully in a more structured fashion -
>> and not only for debugging. The example I have given is an extreme one
>> that you would probably
Le Mercredi 21 Juin 2006 14:01, Fredrik Lundh a écrit :
> > Another variant, I feel this one more natural as it doesn't contain a
> > C-looking infinite loop
>
> doing things in a convoluted way because you think that non-infinite while-
> loops are not natural? you can get help for that, you know
-This message contained a computer virus which has been detected and deleted by
the BT Business Email Virus Filter to avoid infecting your computer.
-
-You may wish to contact the sender of this email requesting they remove any
virus infection from their PC before re-sending the email and attachm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dialog binary is 110 KB. Won't it fit ?
missing library. I have ncurses and newt and dialog seems to require
something called ncursesw. I've been trying to find the Python newt
module as well and that seems to be as invisible as the creature it's
named after.
--
Hi,
I'm not really sure about the right terminology, but here is my question, boiled
down to this code:
class widget (object):
"""This is a widget."""
def __init__(self):
self._x = None
def fget(self):
return self._x
def fset(self, value):
self._x = value
Miki wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
>> Is there anything like an all Python dialog equivalent floating around?
> http://www.pythonware.com/library/tkinter/introduction/
I'm sorry. I should have been more explicit. I need a textbased
interface such as the ones you would get with curses and dialogue.
-
"bussiere maillist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --=_Part_118629_1441854.1150895040355
> i truly didn't understand this error :
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "D:\Programmation\FrancePaquet\FrancePaquet.py", line 77,
> in ?
> cabtri = "zz" + chiffrescabtri + clefc
> TypeE
I have a question on getpass. Since I am a newbie you might find it a
little dumb.
By using the getpass, are u trying to retrieve the username and
password of remote mahcine or local ?
Avell Diroll wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > When you connect (via ssh or telnet) to a remote machine, y
K.S.Sreeram wrote:
> effbot's solution finds overlapping occurrences, whereas your solution
> finds non-overlapping occurrences. So efficiency comparisons are not valid.
oops. my bad. here's a fixed version:
result = []; pos = 0
try:
while 1:
pos = mystring.index(su
Le Mercredi 21 Juin 2006 06:50, David Huard a écrit :
> class widget (object):
> """This is a widget."""
> def __init__(self):
> self._x = None
> def fget(self):
> return self._x
> def fset(self, value):
> self._x = value
> print self._x, 'Ok'
>
"Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Blume wrote:
>> "Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I think we're discussing this at cross-purposes. In a language like C
>> > or another statically typed language there is no information passed
>> > with values indicating their typ
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So basically, instead of typing in on the command line argument I want
>> to have it in a python program and let it do the action.
>
> Try exec() and execfile() from the standard library (IIRC)
Ths os.spawn...() functions are likely to b
"bussiere maillist" wrote:
>i truly didn't understand this error :
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "D:\Programmation\FrancePaquet\FrancePaquet.py", line 77, in ?
>cabtri = "zz" + chiffrescabtri + clefc
> TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, int found
hint:
Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Blume schrieb:
>> Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Matthias Blume schrieb:
Perhaps better: A language is statically typed if its definition
includes (or ever better: is based on) a static type system, i.e., a
>
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:39:02 +0200, Maric Michaud wrote:
> This is w.__class__.x.__doc__.
Thanks,
So in order to implement what I want, I should rather consider an
ipython hack to print w.__class__.x.__doc__ when it exists, instead of
w.x.__doc_ ? Does this makes sense or it will ruin the stand
On 2006-06-21, Eric S. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> dialog binary is 110 KB. Won't it fit ?
>
> missing library. I have ncurses and newt and dialog seems to require
> something called ncursesw. I've been trying to find the Python newt
> module as well and
> > > Place all the code in a function. Even without psyco you might get
> > > somewhat better performances then. And I doubt psyco can optimise code
> > > that isn't in a function anyway.
Another thing I wasn't considering is that the first call with psyco
enabled might be slower. The 2nd time th
Hi Avell,
I want to communicate using subprocess module but my task is a little
different. May be you can guide me.
I have a linux box, from where I remotely execute all the commands. The
remote machine is windows machine. I installed an OpenSSH server for
windows to send the shutdown command. I
Chris Uppal schrieb:
> Chris Smith wrote:
>> I think Marshall got this one right. The two are accomplishing
>> different things. In one case (the dynamic case) I am safeguarding
>> against negative consequences of the program behaving in certain non-
>> sensical ways. In the other (the static ca
Matthias Blume schrieb:
> Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Matthias Blume schrieb:
>>> Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Matthias Blume schrieb:
> Perhaps better: A language is statically typed if its definition
> includes (or ever better: is based on
Matthias Blume wrote:
> "Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Matthias Blume wrote:
> >> "Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > I think we're discussing this at cross-purposes. In a language like C
> >> > or another statically typed language there is no information passed
> >>
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> You mean like 'converting' javascript to python or python to ruby (or
> converting any home-grown DSL to Python, etc) ?
Yes, but also what some other posters mentioned, making Pythons internal
parsing tree available to other programs (and to Python itself) by using
Pascal Costanza schrieb:
> Static type systems potentially change the semantics of a
> language in ways that cannot be captured by dynamically typed languages
> anymore, and vice versa.
Very true.
I also suspect that's also why adding type inference to a
dynamically-typed language doesn't give
I just started to write a small project in Python. I was wondering if
there can be something like remote boot manager.
I have to remotely start a computer. It has dual boot (WinXP and
Linux).
My remote computer is Linux which will send command to remotely boot
the other computer.
Can we write pyt
Istvan Albert wrote:
> But these new icons are too large, too blocky and too pastel.
Hooray! Glad to see *someone* doesn't like 'em, I'll expect a few more
when b1 hits. :-)
Although I can't really see 'large', 'blocky' or 'pastel'... they're
the same size and shape as other Windows document ico
Hi all,
Is there a simple python function to return the list index of the
minimum entry in a list of lists?
ie, for [[3,3,3,3], [3,3,3,1], [3,3,3,3]] to return 2,4.
Or, same question but just for a list of numbers, not a list of lists.
Thanks,
Josh
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
"David Huard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:39:02 +0200, Maric Michaud wrote:
>
> > This is w.__class__.x.__doc__.
>
> Thanks,
>
> So in order to implement what I want, I should rather consider an
> ipython hack to print w.__class__.x.__doc__ w
Tim Chase wrote:
> >>> indicies = [i for i in xrange(len(mystring)) if
> mystring.startswith(substr, i)]
> >>> indicies
> [4, 8, 10, 17, 22]
>
> is my preferred way of doing this.
it's things like this that makes me wonder why I spent a week speeding
up the string implementation for Python 2
Chris Smith wrote:
>
> When I used the word "type" above, I was adopting the
> working definition of a type from the dynamic sense. That is, I'm
> considering whether statically typed languages may be considered to also
> have dynamic types, and it's pretty clear to me that they do.
I suppose th
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> Hmm... I think this distinction doesn't cover all cases.
>
> Assume a language that
> a) defines that a program is "type-correct" iff HM inference establishes
> that there are no type errors
> b) compiles a type-incorrect program anyway, with an establishes
> rigorous s
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> I'm creating a dialogue style interface for an application on a
> dedicated system. All I have is basic Python 2.3. Is there anything
> like an all Python dialog equivalent floating around? I'm currently
> hacking away in curses but it's taking me a long way down w
"Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> > No it doesn't. Casting reinterprets a value of one type as a value of
>> >> > another type.
>> >> > There is a difference. If I cast an unsigned integer 20 to a
>> >> > signed integer in C on the machine I'm using then the result I will get
Rob Thorpe wrote:
> Matthias Blume wrote:
>>"Rob Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>I think we're discussing this at cross-purposes. In a language like C
>>>or another statically typed language there is no information passed
>>>with values indicating their type.
>>
>>You seem to be confusin
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> On a semantic level, the tag is always there - it's the type (and
> definitely part of an axiomatic definition of the language).
> Tag elimination is "just" an optimization.
I see what you're saying, but the distinction is a bit fine for me.
If the language has no poss
David Hopwood wrote:
>
> Oh, but it *does* make sense to talk about dynamic tagging in a statically
> typed language.
>
> That's part of what makes the term "dynamically typed" harmful: it implies
> a dichotomy between "dynamically typed" and "statically typed" languages,
> when in fact dynamic tag
Le Mercredi 21 Juin 2006 15:58, David Huard a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:39:02 +0200, Maric Michaud wrote:
> > This is w.__class__.x.__doc__.
>
> Thanks,
>
> So in order to implement what I want, I should rather consider an
> ipython hack to print w.__class__.x.__doc__ when it exists, instead
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
