Antoine Pitrou writes on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:25:43 +
(UTC):
> Le Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:39:14 -0700, John Nagle a écrit :
> >
> > Note that multithreaded compute-bound Python programs really suck
> > on multiprocessors. Adding a second CPU makes the program go slower,
> > due to a lame mec
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Aahz wrote:
> In article <
> 1a4707f5-85be-4f5f-ac3e-cf8f5bd21...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> inaf wrote:
> >
> >I have been following this group for quite some time and I figured
> >(after searching enough on google --and on this group-- and not finding
>
In article <1a4707f5-85be-4f5f-ac3e-cf8f5bd21...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
inaf wrote:
>
>I have been following this group for quite some time and I figured
>(after searching enough on google --and on this group-- and not finding
>anything useful) I could pose this question here. Can anyone
Le Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:39:14 -0700, John Nagle a écrit :
>
> Note that multithreaded compute-bound Python programs really suck
> on multiprocessors. Adding a second CPU makes the program go slower,
> due to a lame mechanism for resolving conflicts over the global
> interpreter lock.
I'm not
inaf wrote:
I have been following this group for quite some time and I figured
(after searching enough on google --and on this group-- and not
finding anything useful) I could pose this question here. Can anyone
shed some light on python's performance on Solaris?
Note that multithreaded com
On Oct 14, 7:15 am, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> > Good point. I failed to compare the CPU power on these machines.. 32
> > bit linux box I have is 2666 Mhz vs the Solaris zone is 1415 Mhz.. I
> > guess that explains :) Thank you for the tip..
>
> You have to compare no
I use python in almost the same environment. I use it on Joyent and on the
Rackspace cloud. Joyent is faster for a few reasons (cpu bursting and faster
disks) but these aren't real benchmarks until they are on the same machines.
James
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jorgen Grahn
> wrote:
> On
On Wed, 2009-10-14, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> inaf gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Good point. I failed to compare the CPU power on these machines.. 32
>> bit linux box I have is 2666 Mhz vs the Solaris zone is 1415 Mhz.. I
>> guess that explains :) Thank you for the tip..
>
> You have to compare not only
inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
> Good point. I failed to compare the CPU power on these machines.. 32
> bit linux box I have is 2666 Mhz vs the Solaris zone is 1415 Mhz.. I
> guess that explains :) Thank you for the tip..
You have to compare not only CPU frequencies but the CPU models.
Recently Sun h
On Oct 11, 6:59 am, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> > My code seem to
> > return lookups from a in memory data structure I build combining bunch
> > of dictionaries and lists 6-8 times faster on a 32 bit Linux box than
> > on a Solaris zone.
>
> Well, if your workload is C
inaf gmail.com> writes:
>
> My code seem to
> return lookups from a in memory data structure I build combining bunch
> of dictionaries and lists 6-8 times faster on a 32 bit Linux box than
> on a Solaris zone.
Well, if your workload is CPU-bound, the issue here is not really Solaris vs.
Linux bu
11 matches
Mail list logo
