Re: Message Box

2015-12-28 Thread Terry Reedy
On 12/28/2015 4:43 PM, Malik Brahimi wrote: I have an event driven script What does that mean, more specifically? that prompts users as the events are triggered with a message box. Is there anyway with any GUI toolkit to create these dialogs simultaneously in the event that they coincide?

Re: Message-IDs on Usenet gateway

2015-12-06 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Sun, 06 Dec 2015 15:51:54 -0500, Random832 writes: >Something weird is going on. On google groups, this message has >a different Message-ID: > I think it is this problem. Start here. https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2015-November/025225.html Laura -- https://

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2015-06-01 Thread TheDoctor
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 12:39:37 AM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:35:58 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > Long story short: the lambda > > calculus folks have to split from the Turing machine folks. > > These models of computation should not use the same language. The

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-15 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > You're very right. But that is what has made it sort of a test-bed > for internet collaboration. The project I'm working on is aimed to > solve that problem and take the Wiki philosophy to its next or even > ultimate level. By adding a "n

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-14 Thread Fábio Santos
Impressive, I'd say. On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Sounds a lot like reddit threads. > > It's similar, but it goes a lot further. Where every other site > without centralized editors, the thread mess on a simple flat page > doesn't scale after about a 100 interactions.

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-14 Thread Mark Janssen
> Sounds a lot like reddit threads. It's similar, but it goes a lot further. Where every other site without centralized editors, the thread mess on a simple flat page doesn't scale after about a 100 interactions. To sort out the mess, it takes another dimension. The project I'm working on uses

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-13 Thread Fábio Santos
Sounds a lot like reddit threads. On 13 May 2013 08:17, "Mark Janssen" wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ned Batchelder > wrote: > > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being > > unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding > who

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-13 Thread Fábio Santos
On 12 May 2013 18:23, "Ned Batchelder" wrote: > > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding who is saying what, or in response to whom. > > --Ned. There's not so much noise there, but indeed the

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-13 Thread Mark Janssen
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote: > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being > unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding who > is saying what, or in response to whom. You're very right. But that is what has made i

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-12 Thread Terry Jan Reedy
On 5/12/2013 1:18 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote: On 5/8/2013 10:39 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...] For anyone who want to be involved. See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool that every programmer should know and use -- and these pages: ComputerScienceVersionTwo

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-12 Thread Ned Batchelder
On 5/8/2013 10:39 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...] For anyone who want to be involved. See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool that every programmer should know and use -- and these pages: ComputerScienceVersionTwo and ObjectOrientedRefactored. I've never un

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber >> wrote: > > >>>The coordinates of each particle storing the information in that >>> teaspoon of matter. >> >> >> Which is probably more data than any o

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >>> >>> I also believe in a path of endless >>> exponential growth. Challenge: Create more information than can be >>> stored in one teaspoon of matter. Go ahead. Try! > > > If that's your argument, then you don't re

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Gregory Ewing
Chris Angelico wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: The coordinates of each particle storing the information in that teaspoon of matter. Which is probably more data than any of us will keyboard in a lifetime. Hence my point. My 1TB hard disk *already* co

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Gregory Ewing
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: I also believe in a path of endless exponential growth. Challenge: Create more information than can be stored in one teaspoon of matter. Go ahead. Try! If that's your argument, then you don't really believe in *endless* exponential growth. You only believe in "exponenti

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:33:52 +1000, Chris Angelico > declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: > >> >> I don't answer to them. I also believe in a path of endless >> exponential growth. Challenge: Create more information than

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread alex23
On 10 May, 13:07, Chris Angelico wrote: > Now, whether or not it's worth _debating_ the expressiveness of a > language... well, that's another point entirely. But for your major > project, I think you'll do better working in Python than in machine > code. I wasn't disagreeing with the concept of

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > All this irrelevant nonsense > about Turing machines and lambda calculus that you've injected into > the conversation though just reminds me of the "Einstein was wrong" > cranks. http://xkcd.com/1206/ ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Mark Janssen
> ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...] For anyone who want to be involved. See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool that every programmer should know and use -- and these pages: ComputerScienceVersionTwo and ObjectOrientedRefactored. Cheers! -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington -- http://mail.pyt

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 9 May 2013 11:33:45 -0600 Ian Kelly wrote: > about Turing machines and lambda calculus that you've injected into > the conversation though just reminds me of the "Einstein was wrong" > cranks. But Einstein *was* wrong. http://www.xkcd.com/1206/ -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-10 Thread Roy Smith
On May 10, 2013, at 7:49 AM, William Ray Wing wrote: > On May 10, 2013, at 12:55 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > >> In article , >> Chris Angelico wrote: >> >>> The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a >>> 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). >> >> Heh. T

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-10 Thread William Ray Wing
On May 10, 2013, at 12:55 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a >> 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). > > Heh. The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 2.4 MB in 6U of rack

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-10 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a >> 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). > > Heh. The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 2.4 MB in 6U of rack

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Roy Smith
In article , Chris Angelico wrote: > The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a > 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). Heh. The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 2.4 MB in 6U of rack space (plus 4 Unibus cards worth of controller). That's no

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, alex23 wrote: >> On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: >>> You see Ian, while you and the other millions of coding practitioners >>> have (mal)adapted to a suboptimal coding environment where "hey >>> there's

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Janssen
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, alex23 wrote: > On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: >> You see Ian, while you and the other millions of coding practitioners >> have (mal)adapted to a suboptimal coding environment where "hey >> there's a language for everyone" and terms are thrown around, >> mi

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:58 AM, alex23 wrote: > On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Languages can reach for an optimal design (within a >> constant margin of leeway). Language "expressivity" can be measured. > > I'm sure that's great. I, however, have a major project going live in > a few

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread alex23
On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: > You see Ian, while you and the other millions of coding practitioners > have (mal)adapted to a suboptimal coding environment where "hey > there's a language for everyone"  and terms are thrown around, > misused, this is not how it needs or should be. Please

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread alex23
On 10 May, 03:33, Ian Kelly wrote: > You've been posting on this > topic for going on two months now, and I still have no idea of what > the point of it all is. As Charlie Brooker put it: "almost every monologue consists of nothing but the words PLEASE AUTHENTICATE MY EXISTENCE, repeated over and

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Mark Janssen > wrote: >> the community stays fractured. > > The open source community seems pretty healthy to me. What is the > basis of your claim that it is "fractured"? The carpentry community is fractured.

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mark Janssen >> wrote: >>> Okay, to anyone who might be listening, I found the core of the problem. >> >> What "problem" are you referring to? You've been

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Janssen
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mark Janssen > wrote: >> Okay, to anyone who might be listening, I found the core of the problem. > > What "problem" are you referring to? You've been posting on this > topic for going on two months now, and I s

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Janssen
>> These models of computation should not use the same language. Their >> computation models are too radically different. > > Their computation models are exactly equivalent. No they are not. While one can find levels of indirection to translate between one and the other, that doesn't mean they

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Okay, to anyone who might be listening, I found the core of the problem. What "problem" are you referring to? You've been posting on this topic for going on two months now, and I still have no idea of what the point of it all is. I recall so

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:35:58 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote: > Long story short: the lambda > calculus folks have to split from the Turing machine folks. > These models of computation should not use the same language. Their > computation models are too radically different. Their computation models

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread Mark Janssen
> "Lisp will remain the pinnacle of lambda calculus" ??? : Surreal > feeling of falling into a 25-year time-warp > > Read this http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/wadler87.pdf > > Just for historical context: > When this was written in the 80s: > - The FP languages of the time -- KRC

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread rusi
On May 9, 7:35 am, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Mark Janssen > > wrote: > >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes > >> an > >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in > >> Python now, or is even remote

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread Mark Janssen
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in >> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the >> future. >

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-13 Thread Michael Torrie
On 04/13/2013 12:28 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in >> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the >> future. > > Wow, you

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in >> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the >> future. > >

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Janssen
> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an > object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in > Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the > future. Wow, you guys are a bunch of ninnies. I'm going to find som

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Ned Batchelder
On 4/11/2013 9:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not been communicated or perceived adequately. Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it propo

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 12/04/2013 02:57, Mark Janssen wrote: [dross snipped] A summary here http://pinterest.com/pin/464293042804330899/ -- If you're using GoogleCrap™ please read this http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython. Mark Lawrence -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Further, I will admit that I am not deeply > experienced in application or Internet programming Would you listen to someone who is, by his own admission, not experienced as a surgeon, and tries to tell you that your liver and heart would be

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-11 Thread alex23
On Apr 12, 11:57 am, Mark Janssen wrote: > hijacked by naysayers Says the man who wrote: - "I blame the feminists for being too loyal to atheism and G-d for being too loyal to the Jews. Torture happened." - "The world is insane because people loved snakes more than G-d, and believed in homose

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-11 Thread Ethan Furman
On 04/11/2013 06:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: [blah blah not python blah blah] Mark, this list if for Python, about Python, helping with Python. If you want to discuss whatever this idea is, you should do it somewhere else, as it is *not* Python. -- ~Ethan~ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/list

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Janssen
Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not been communicated or perceived adequately. As a personal request from the BDFL, which I begrudge him for, I've removed the thread from python-ideas. If you w

Re: Message passing syntax for objects

2013-03-20 Thread alex23
On Mar 20, 2:24 pm, Mark Janssen wrote: > Yes, that's the point I'm making, and it's significant because other > programmers can't see other's mental models. How does having API-less magic objects make this any better? I pass a string message to your RSS object: does it create XML from it? does i

Re: Message passing syntax for objects

2013-03-18 Thread Tim Harig
On 2013-03-18, Mark Janssen wrote: > Alan Kay's idea of message-passing in Smalltalk are interesting, and > like the questioner says, never took off. My answer was that Alan > Kay's abstraction of "Everything is an object" fails because you can't > have message-passing, an I/O task, working in th

Re: Message passing syntax for objects

2013-03-17 Thread Mark Janssen
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Continuing on this thread, there would be a new bunch of behaviors to > be defined. Since "everything is an object", there can now be a > standard way to define the *next* common abstraction of "every object > interacts with other objects".

Re: Message passing syntax for objects

2013-03-17 Thread Mark Janssen
Continuing on this thread, there would be a new bunch of behaviors to be defined. Since "everything is an object", there can now be a standard way to define the *next* common abstraction of "every object interacts with other objects". And going with my suggestion of defining >> and << operators,

Re: Message passing between python objects

2012-03-19 Thread Peter Otten
J. Mwebaze wrote: > I am trying to learn about the interaction between python objects. One > thing i have often read is that objects interact by sending messages to > other objects to invoke corresponding methods. I am specifically > interested in tracing these messages and also probably log the m

Re: message box in Tkinter

2010-08-17 Thread Eric Brunel
In article <61cbd1cb-bd6d-49aa-818f-d28c46098...@x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, Jah_Alarm wrote: > I need to display a message box at the click of a button. I od the > following: > > from Tkinter import * > > def msg1(): > messagebox.showinfo(message='Have a good day') > > > Button(main

Re: message box in Tkinter

2010-08-17 Thread Matt Saxton
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Jah_Alarm wrote: > > When I try importing messagebox from Tkinter i get an error message > that this module doesn't exist. > I believe what you want is Tkinter.Message -- Matt Saxton -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Message box always appears on 2nd monitor

2009-09-14 Thread ed
Sean DiZazzo wrote: On Sep 11, 8:27 am, ed wrote: No matter what I do, the MessageBox always appears on the 2nd monitor. I've forced all the other widgets to monitor 1. I thought that creating a class and forcing the position would help, but it hasn't. I'm using Ubuntu Jaunty, python 2.6. Any

Re: Message box always appears on 2nd monitor

2009-09-11 Thread Sean DiZazzo
On Sep 11, 8:27 am, ed wrote: > No matter what I do, the MessageBox always appears on the 2nd monitor. > I've forced all the other widgets to monitor 1. > I thought that creating a class and forcing the position would help, but > it hasn't. > > I'm using Ubuntu Jaunty, python 2.6. > > Any ideas wh

Style of "raise" (was Re: message of Exception)

2009-01-20 Thread Aahz
In article , Terry Reedy wrote: >Steven Woody wrote: >> >> And, I expect that when I raise a MyError as >> raise MyError, "my message" > >In 2.x you may and in 3.0 you must write that as >raise MyError("my message") >Best to start looking forward ;-). Funny, when I suggested to MvL that he

Re: message of Exception

2009-01-06 Thread Steven Woody
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > Steven Woody wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am trying define an Exception as below: >> >> class MyError(Exception): >>def __init__(self, message): >>self.message = message >> >> And, I expect that when I raise a MyError as >>raise MyE

Re: message of Exception

2009-01-06 Thread Terry Reedy
Steven Woody wrote: Hi, I am trying define an Exception as below: class MyError(Exception): def __init__(self, message): self.message = message And, I expect that when I raise a MyError as raise MyError, "my message" In 2.x you may and in 3.0 you must write that as raise MyEr

Re: message of Exception

2009-01-06 Thread Steven Woody
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Chris Rebert wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Steven Woody wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying define an Exception as below: >> >> class MyError(Exception): >>def __init__(self, message): >>self.message = message >> >> And, I expect that when I rai

Re: message of Exception

2009-01-06 Thread Chris Rebert
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Steven Woody wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying define an Exception as below: > > class MyError(Exception): >def __init__(self, message): >self.message = message > > And, I expect that when I raise a MyError as >raise MyError, "my message" > the python sho

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-25 Thread Daniel Fetchinson
> >> And as such, I find it hard to believe you could lose your job > >> over it. > > > > Me too. That is, until I tried to Google Belcan and Blubaugh > > together. May I suggest a new thread to clear that ugly > > results? :D > > I know it's not nice to laugh at things like that, but I can't > hel

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-25 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2008-04-25, ajaksu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And as such, I find it hard to believe you could lose your job >> over it. > > Me too. That is, until I tried to Google Belcan and Blubaugh > together. May I suggest a new thread to clear that ugly > results? :D I know it's not nice to laugh at

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-25 Thread Neil Hodgson
ajaksu: Me too. That is, until I tried to Google Belcan and Blubaugh together. Or google for "Blubaugh, David" or similar. Repeating a message you object to actually increases its visibility and includes you in its footprint. Neil -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-25 Thread Dan Upton
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:00 PM, ajaksu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 23, 1:27 pm, "Dan Upton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: > > > > > > Is there a way to block thes

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-25 Thread ajaksu
On Apr 23, 1:27 pm, "Dan Upton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: > > > > Is there a way to block these messages.   I do not want to be caught > > > with filth such as this material.  I could

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-25 Thread Nick Stinemates
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 06:50:44PM +0200, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: >> Dear Sir, >> Belcan has an absolute zero-tolerance policy toward material such as the >> material described. > > That pairs up nicely with them having zero knowledge about the internet. > ZING! --

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-24 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: Dear Sir, Belcan has an absolute zero-tolerance policy toward material such as the material described. That pairs up nicely with them having zero knowledge about the internet. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-24 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:28:29 -0400 "Blubaugh, David A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Belcan has an absolute zero-tolerance policy toward material such as the > material described. Hard to imagine that they would hold you responsible for something sent to you without your permission. On the oth

RE: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-24 Thread Blubaugh, David A.
: Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: > > > Is there a way to block these messages. I do not want to be caught > > with filth such as this material. I could lose my job w

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-23 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2008-04-22, Blubaugh, David A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to block these messages. I do not want to be caught > with filth such as this material. I could lose my job with Belcan with > evil messages such as these messages. No, not really. That's one reason I never use my w

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-23 Thread Dan Upton
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: > > > Is there a way to block these messages. I do not want to be caught > > with filth such as this material. I could lose my job with Belcan with > > evil messages such as these messages

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-23 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:31:23 -0400 Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Blubaugh, David A. wrote: > > Is there a way to block these messages. I do not want to be caught > > with filth such as this material. I could lose my job with Belcan with > > evil messages such as these messages. >

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-23 Thread Steve Holden
Blubaugh, David A. wrote: Is there a way to block these messages. I do not want to be caught with filth such as this material. I could lose my job with Belcan with evil messages such as these messages. David Blubaugh In future please ensure you do not quote the offending URLs when send

Re: MESSAGE RESPONSE

2008-04-23 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Blubaugh, David A. schrieb: Is there a way to block these messages. I do not want to be caught with filth such as this material. I could lose my job with Belcan with evil messages such as these messages. If I (or *anybody*) knew how to block these messages, he or she would sell the resu

Re: message entry box at center

2008-02-28 Thread Peter Otten
asit wrote: > On Feb 28, 7:53 pm, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> asit wrote: >> > i want to show the entry button at the center of the window. How is it >> > possible ?? >> > from Tkinter import * >> >> > def callback(): >> > print e.get() >> >> > master=Tk() >> > e=Entry(master) >> >>

Re: message entry box at center

2008-02-28 Thread asit
On Feb 28, 7:53 pm, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > asit wrote: > > i want to show the entry button at the center of the window. How is it > > possible ?? > > from Tkinter import * > > > def callback(): > > print e.get() > > > master=Tk() > > e=Entry(master) > > e.pack(expand=True) > > > e

Re: message entry box at center

2008-02-28 Thread Peter Otten
asit wrote: > i want to show the entry button at the center of the window. How is it > possible ?? > from Tkinter import * > > > def callback(): > print e.get() > > > master=Tk() > e=Entry(master) e.pack(expand=True) > e.focus_set() > > > b=Button(master,text="get",width=10,command=callba

Re: message processing/threads

2007-02-26 Thread joncfoo
Thank you all for your input. I now have some new ways that I need to look into and see what fits best. Thanks once again, Jonathan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: message processing/threads

2007-02-17 Thread Irmen de Jong
Jonathan Curran wrote: > I need a program running in the background to process messages (FIFO order) > which I would send using soap/xmlrpc/pyro (haven't decided yet). According to > my thinking I would need to make this a threaded application. One thread to > process the messages and the other

Re: message processing/threads

2007-02-17 Thread fumanchu
On Feb 11, 9:30 pm, Jonathan Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need a program running in the background to process > messages (FIFO order) which I would send using > soap/xmlrpc/pyro (haven't decided yet). According to > my thinking I would need to make this a threaded > application. One thread

Re: message processing/threads

2007-02-17 Thread Aahz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathan Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I need a program running in the background to process messages (FIFO order) >which I would send using soap/xmlrpc/pyro (haven't decided yet). According to >my thinking I would need to make this a threaded application.

Re: message handling in Python / wxPython

2007-01-30 Thread Chris Mellon
On 1/30/07, murali iyengar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > i have basic knowledge of python and wxPython... now i need to know about > message handling in python/wxPython? > > could anybody pls help me by giving some info on how to handle (in Python), > 'the user defined messages' posted from VC

Re: message box halts prgram flow

2006-03-19 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > HI > > I am creating a tkinter app. > > example > > tkMessageBox.showinfo("Window Text", "A short message") > print "blah" > > The execution of the application halts when the message box is > displayed until the user clicks OK, then "blah is printed. Yeps, this is

Re: message

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Holden
Nina Almaguer wrote: > Hi, > We are a web integration firm in Reston, VA and would like to post the > following developer position (I have already joined the group). > > > > When you begin your career at Siteworx, you’ll be part of a rapidly > growing software and services company. In fact,

Re: Message about not deleted folders using Inno Setup

2005-10-30 Thread Peter Hansen
Martin wrote: >I would like to place a message in an uninstaller window which will > inform the user that some folders haven't been deleted. Is that possible > using > Inno Setup? Probably, but this newsgroup is for discussion of Python. Unless you have some kind of Python angle to your que