On Friday, December 20, 2013 9:30:22 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 20/12/2013 15:34, rusi wrote:
> > On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:46:31 PM UTC+5:30, dec...@msn.com wrote:
> >> y = raw_input('Enter a number:')
> >> print type y
> >> y = float
On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:46:31 PM UTC+5:30, dec...@msn.com wrote:
> y = raw_input('Enter a number:')
> print type y
> y = float(raw_input('Enter a number:'))
> print type y
> I'm assuming that y is an object. I'm also assuming that the second and the
> first y are different objects because
On Friday, December 20, 2013 11:18:53 AM UTC+5:30, chao dong wrote:
> HI, everybody. When I try to use numpy to deal with my dataset in the style
> of csv, I face a little problem.
> In my dataset of the csv file, some columns are string that can not
> convert to float easily. Some of them c
> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 9:46:26 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> > rusi wrote:
> > > Soon the foo has to split into foo1.c and foo2.c. And suddenly you need
> > > to
> > > understand:
> > > 1. Separate compilation
> > > 2. Make (
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:20:54 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/12/2013 04:29, rusi wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 19, 2013 6:19:04 AM UTC+5:30, Rhodri James wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:51:44 -, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> >>> The only issu
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 9:46:26 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> rusi wrote:
> > Soon the foo has to split into foo1.c and foo2.c. And suddenly you need to
> > understand:
> > 1. Separate compilation
> > 2. Make (which is separate from 'separate compi
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 6:19:04 AM UTC+5:30, Rhodri James wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:51:44 -, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> > The only issue for me was to figure out how to do in C what I already
> > knew in Pascal. And I had to waste a *lot* more time and mental effort
> > to mess with
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 7:10:53 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > I've always felt that there are features in C that don't make a lot of
> > sense until you've actually implemented a compiler -- at which point
> > it becomes a lot more obvious why some thing are done
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:53:54 PM UTC+5:30, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 12:18 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 22:49:43 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 01:33 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >>> On 12/17/2013 04:32 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Yo
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:42:07 PM UTC+5:30, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 17 December 2013 00:39, rusi wrote:
> > I had a paper some years ago on why C is a horrible language *to teach with*
> > http://www.the-magus.in/Publications/chor.pdf
> Thanks for this Rusi, I j
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:52:11 AM UTC+5:30, smileso...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a newbie in python. I am looking for a existing module which I can
> import in my program to log the objects to a file?
> I know there is a module Data::Dumper in perl which dumps the objects to
> fil
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:10:20 AM UTC+5:30, Frank Cui wrote:
> Hi Pythoners,
> I'm looking for a tool or framework in which I can do a slight modification to
> achieve the following task:
> "Asynchronously reset a large number of cisco routers back to their original
> configurations and pu
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 8:21:39 PM UTC+5:30, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-12-17, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > I would really like to see good quality statistics about bugs
> > per program written in different languages. I expect that, for
> > all we like to make fun of COBOL, it probably has f
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:35:31 PM UTC+5:30, Mark wrote:
> I am sorry, using google groups i cant tell what you see...
> Anyways, I guess i will just make lots of lines instead of long sentences?
> How about this, the first person that can get this to work for me...
> I will paypal them 20 d
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:51:07 PM UTC+5:30, larry@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > I was in charge of the team at work that had to make all code Y2K compliant.
> > I discovered the one bug that to my knowledge slipped through the net. Four
>
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 6:14:59 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, rusi wrote:
> > I had a paper some years ago on why C is a horrible language *to teach with*
> > http://www.the-magus.in/Publications/chor.pdf
> > I believe people
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:55:57 AM UTC+5:30, Mark wrote:
> I am sorry if the way I posted messages was incorrect. Like I said, I am new
> to google groups and python quite a bit but i am trying to do things
> correctly by you guys. The errors that I am getting were not necessarily
> postin
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:00:14 AM UTC+5:30, Djoser wrote:
> Basically I have a .dat file, so I get some numbers and make a different
> conversion.
>
> I'll try this struct script. I'm not used to it, but it seems to do what I
> want.
Construct is a very powerful utility for binary parsin
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:58:12 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 12/16/13 3:32 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> >>> And ever after that experience, I avoided all languages that were
> >>> even remotely similar to C, such as C++, Java, C#, Javascript, PHP
> >>> etc.
> >> I think that's disa
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:11:15 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> >>Well "performant" is performant enough for the purposes of communicating
> >>on the python list I think :D
> > Most probably could figure it out as being stylistically similar to
> >conformant =>
On Monday, December 16, 2013 9:27:11 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:30 PM, liuerfire Wang wrote:
> > TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
> > In [5]: a
> > Out[5]: ([1, 1], [])
> > no problem, there is an exception. But a is still changed.
> >
On Monday, December 16, 2013 8:10:57 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> rusi wrote:
> > On Monday, December 16, 2013 7:29:31 AM UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> > > > # Need to compare values of counter and reject in function/routine in
> > > > value in counter2 is hi
On Monday, December 16, 2013 7:29:31 AM UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> > # Need to compare values of counter and reject in function/routine in value
> > in counter2 is higher then value in counter1 for a current key
> [(k,Counter2[k]) for k in Counter2 - Counter1]
Why not just?
Counter2 - Count
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:41:09 AM UTC+5:30, David Hutto wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I didn't mean reinventing the wheel is a bad
> thing, just that once you get the hang of things, you need to
> display some creativity in your work to set yourself apart from the
> rest.
> Nowadays, ever
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:30:12 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm sorry, I was under the impression that Mark had done most of the
> work. I hadn't realised that others had contributed most of the practical
> advice.
To be fair, I added the stuff to the wiki on Mark's prompting.
Ea
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:21:08 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Apart from annoying the bystanders, your repeated angry and abusive
> screeds aimed at JMF in particular but others as well over minor
> formatting issues is more disruptive than the issues you are complaining
> about. I
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:41:09 AM UTC+5:30, David Hutto wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I didn't mean reinventing the wheel is a bad thing, just
> that once you get the hang of things, you need to display some creativity in
> your work to set yourself apart from the rest.
> Nowadays, everyo
On Friday, December 13, 2013 11:58:51 AM UTC+5:30, Robert Voigtländer wrote:
> >I've heard the term used often. It means something like, "performs
> >well" or "runs fast". It may or may not be an English word, but that
> >doesn't stop people from using it :-)
> > If "google" can be used to me
On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:50:03 PM UTC+5:30, Jean Dubois wrote:
> to make the script check itself whether pyhon2 or python3 should be used?
As far as I know both (2 and 3) worked
Do you have some reason to suspect one works and other not?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:50:03 PM UTC+5:30, Jean Dubois wrote:
> Op vrijdag 13 december 2013 09:35:18 UTC+1 schreef Mark Lawrence:
> > Would you please read and action this
> > https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython to prevent us seeing the
> > double line spacing that accompanied
On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:13:11 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > You'll have to wait until the cows come home on two counts. One, he's never
> > yet provided any evidence to support any statement that he's ever made here.
> > Sec
On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:45:22 AM UTC+5:30, jennifer stone wrote:
> greetings
> I am a novice who is really interested in contributing to Python
> projects. How and where do I begin?
Good to see new names!
How much python do you know/studied/coded?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/list
On Friday, December 13, 2013 8:31:37 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I don't know of any reasonable way to tell at runtime which of the two
> algorithms I ought to take. Hard-coding an arbitrary value
> ("if len(table) > 500") is not the worst idea I've ever had, but I'm
> hoping for
On Friday, December 13, 2013 9:59:25 AM UTC+5:30, Unix SA wrote:
> s=open('/tmp/file2')
>s.write(line)
Among other things you are missing a write mode
(2nd optional argument to open)
http://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/inputoutput.html#reading-and-writing-files
--
https://mail.python.org/
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 7:30:38 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > When did this forum become so intolerant of even the tiniest, most minor
> > breaches of old-school tech etiquette? Have we really got nothing better
> > to do than to go on the war path
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 7:12:32 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> rusi wrote:
> > Kernighan and Ritchie set an important "first" in our field by making
> > "Hello World" their first program.
> Yup.
> > People tend to under-estimate the importa
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 6:42:42 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
> Dan Stromberg writes:
> > I found a "remove formatting" button in gmail's composer, and used it
> > on this message. Does this message look like plain text?
> Still sent with an HTML part, so some other change must be needed
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 9:31:42 PM UTC+5:30, bob gailer wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 3:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > When you tell a story, it's important to engage the reader from the
> > start...explain "This is how to print Hello World to the
> > console" and worry about what exactly the co
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 8:54:30 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:44 AM, rusi wrote:
> > It is this need to balance that makes functional programming attractive:
> > - implemented like any other programming language
> > - but also ma
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 8:16:12 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> rusi wrote:
> > The classic data structure for this is the trie:
> > General idea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie
> > In python:
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11015320/how-to-create-a
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 5:16:50 PM UTC+5:30, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> The Electrical Engineering students will subsequently do low-level
> programming with registers etc. but at the earliest stage we just want
> them to think about how algorithms and programs work before going into
> all the
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 7:47:34 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> JL wrote:
> > Python scripts can run without a main(). What is the advantage to using a
> > main()? Is it necessary to use a main() when the script uses command line
> > arguments? (See script below)
> > #!/usr/bin/python
Reordering to un-top-post.
> On 11.12.2013 06:47, Dave Angel wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:02:20 +0200, Tamer Higazi wrote:
> >> Is there a way to get dict by search terms without iterating the
> > entire
> >> dictionary ?!
> >> I want to grab the dict's key and values started with 'Ar'...
>
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:52:47 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 15:48, rurpy wrote:
> > On 12/10/2013 06:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:35 AM, harish.barvekar wrote:
> >> Also: You appear to be using Google Groups, which is the Mos Eisley of
>
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:12:53 PM UTC+5:30, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 9 December 2013 19:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 12/9/2013 7:23 AM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I work in a University Engineering faculty teaching, among other
> >> things, programming. In our last meeting a
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 3:07:36 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 05:16, rusi wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:40:27 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> By the way, I'm curious. Why are discussions about object oriented coding
>
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:40:27 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> By the way, I'm curious. Why are discussions about object oriented coding
> off-topic to Python? This is not a rhetorical question.
Well OOP on the python list is certainly on topic.
Interminable discussions about why r
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 8:49:46 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 05:59:29 -0500, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> [...]
> > And the cycle continues:
> [...]
> > Maybe we could just not?
Thanks Ned for your attempts at bringing some order and sense in these parts
of the univ
On Monday, December 9, 2013 5:53:41 PM UTC+5:30, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> 5) Learning to program "should be painful" and we should expect the
> students to complain about it (someone actually said that!) but the
> pain makes them better programmers in the end.
Yeah this will get some people's back
On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:55:19 PM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
> On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:14:08 PM UTC+5:30, Travis Griggs wrote:
> > As long as we’re in full scale rant drift, I’d like to remind others
> > of the time honored tradition of changing the post subject, when,
On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:14:08 PM UTC+5:30, Travis Griggs wrote:
> As long as we’re in full scale rant drift, I’d like to remind others
> of the time honored tradition of changing the post subject, when,
> er, uh, the subject changes. Because this obviously is not
> "programming help" anymore.
g strewn about
"FP is a good idea"
http://blog.languager.org/2011/02/cs-education-is-fat-and-weak-1.html
and following 2 posts
--
रुसि मोदि
["Rusi Mody" in devanagari so that GG will not use an obsolete charset]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, December 9, 2013 10:56:28 AM UTC+5:30, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 12/08/2013 09:46 PM, rusi wrote:
> > On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:46:30 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:58:09 -0800, rusi wrote:
> >[...]
> >> Does
On Monday, December 9, 2013 10:37:38 AM UTC+5:30, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 12/08/2013 05:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > On 09/12/2013 00:08, wrote:
> >> On 12/08/2013 12:17 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:06 AM, rafaell wrote:
> >[...]
> > To the OP, please ignore the
Thanks for the info.
On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:46:30 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:58:09 -0800, rusi wrote:
> > PS Can some kind soul inform me whether I could convince GG to unicode
> > my post?
> Does GG not give you some way of ins
On Monday, December 9, 2013 1:41:41 AM UTC+5:30, giacomo boffi wrote:
> the wrong one... i.e, the one JUST BEFORE your change of
> subject --- if i look at the "ellipsis" post, i see the same encoding
> that you have mentioned
> sorry for the confusion
And thank you for pointing the way to the c
On Monday, December 9, 2013 8:11:47 AM UTC+5:30, zipher wrote:
> >> What methods, if any does it provide? Are they all abstract? etc???
> > Pretty much nothing useful :-)
> > py> dir(object)
> > [...]
> So (prodding the student), Why does everything inherit from Object if
> it provides no functio
On Sunday, December 8, 2013 10:52:34 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:05:34 +0100, giacomo boffi wrote:
> > Steven D'Aprano writes:
> >> Ironically, your post was not Unicode. [...] Your post was sent using
> >> a legacy encoding, Windows-1252, also known as CP-1252
>
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 9:35:34 PM UTC+5:30, giacomo boffi wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
> > Ironically, your post was not Unicode. [...] Your post was sent
> > using a legacy encoding, Windows-1252, also known as CP-1252
> i access rusi's post using a NNTP server,
> and in his post i
On Sunday, December 8, 2013 8:09:39 PM UTC+5:30, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> rusi writes:
> > On Sunday, December 8, 2013 4:05:54 PM UTC+5:30, Kalinni Gorzkis wrote:
> > > By which languages(s) Python was inspired to support evaluating
> > > expressions and executi
On Sunday, December 8, 2013 7:36:04 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 12:41, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> > First of all. Id like to say I have no idea how these mailing lists
> > work, so I dont know if this'll come through right, but we'll see I
> > guess :-) I'm coming from the Google Group
On Sunday, December 8, 2013 4:05:54 PM UTC+5:30, Kalinni Gorzkis wrote:
> By which languages(s) Python was inspired to support evaluating expressions
> and executing statements in a separate “namespace” object?
> This syntax:
> eval(expression,globals) or exec(code,globals)
> What is the origin o
On Sunday, December 8, 2013 6:28:24 AM UTC+5:30, Mahan Marwat wrote:
> Why this is not working.
> >>> 'Hello, World'.replace('\\', '\\')
> To me, Python will interpret '' to '\\'. And the replace method
> will replace '\\' with '\'. So, the result will be 'Hello,
> \World'. But it's give
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 10:26:04 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 08:27 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> > Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> The ternary if is slightly unusual and unfamiliar
> > It's only unusual an unfamiliar if you're not used to using it :-)
> > Coming from a C/C++ b
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 3:46:02 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rusi:
> "unicode as a medium is universal in the same way that
> ASCII used to be"
> Probably, you do not realize deeply how this sentence
> is correct. Unicode and ascii are constructed in t
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 7:54:50 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 12/6/13 8:03 AM, rusi wrote:
> > Leaving aside whose fault this is (very likely buggy google groups),
> > this mojibaking cannot happen if the assumption "All text is ASCII"
> > were t
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 8:11:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
> > That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
> > mailing list config. No??
> If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
> I'd first
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 12:30:18 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> > Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> > illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
> > "unicode as a
On Friday, December 6, 2013 10:11:04 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 15:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:52:48 -0800, iMath wrote:
> >> yes ,I am a native Chinese speaker.I always post question by Google
> >> Group not through email ,is there something wrong with it ?
On Friday, December 6, 2013 9:55:54 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 16:19, rusi wrote:
> > So someone please update that page!
> This is a community so why don't you?
Ok done (at least a first draft)
I was under the impression that anyone could n
Roy's yesterday's post in "Packaging a proprietary python library"
says:
> I, and Rusi, know enough, and take the effort, to overcome its
> shortcomings doesn't change that.
But in fact his post takes care of 1 not 2.
In all fairness I did not know that 2 is a problem u
On Friday, December 6, 2013 8:42:02 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> The English I used was archaic, please ignore it :)
"Archaic" is almost archaic
"Old" is ever-young
:D
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
not
> through email ,is there something wrong with it ?
Yes but its easily correctable
I recently answered this question to another poster here
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.lang.python/rusi$20google$20groups|sort:date/comp.lang.python/C51hEvi-KbY/KSeaMFoHtcIJ
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, December 6, 2013 7:18:19 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:32 AM, rusi wrote:
> > I guess we are using 'structured' in different ways. All I am saying
> > is that mediawiki which seems to present as html, actually stores its
&g
On Friday, December 6, 2013 6:49:04 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:03 AM, rusi wrote:
> > SQL databases (assuming thats the mediawiki backend) is another -- ok for
> > data-structuring bad for presentation.
> No, SQL databases don't store str
On Friday, December 6, 2013 1:06:30 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Rusi wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 5, 2013 6:28:54 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> > > The real problem with web forums is they conflate transport and
> > > presentation into a single opaqu
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 4:17:11 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 03Dec2013 17:39, rusi wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:10:05 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > > My first act on joining any mailing list is to download the entire
> > > archi
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 6:28:54 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> > Yes, I'm
> > aware of web forums: I've used hundreds of them. They suck. They ALL
> > suck, they just all suck differently. I could spend the next several
> > thousand lines explaining why, but inste
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:44:50 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Herrmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am developing a proprietary Python library. The library is currently
> Windows-only, and I want to also make it available for other platforms (Linux
> & Mac). I'm writing because I wanted to ask for yo
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 8:13:49 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:09 AM, rusi wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
> >> > Its a more fundamental problem tha
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:02:18 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 04-12-13 13:01, rusi schreef:
> > On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:59:06 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> >> Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
> >>> I used the spaces case to indicate th
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:59:06 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
> > I used the spaces case to indicate the limit of chaos.
> > Other characters (that
> > already have uses) are just as problematic.
>
> I don't agree with
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 4:03:14 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:09 PM, rusi wrote:
> > OP wants attribute identifiers like
> > outer_fieldset-inner_fieldset-third_field.
> > Say I have a python expression:
> > obj.outer_fieldset
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
> > Its a more fundamental problem than that:
> > It emerges from the OP's second post) that he wants '-' in the attributes.
> > Is that all?
> &
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:15:05 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> >
> >Attribute access syntax being very concise is very often preferred
> >to dict's interface.
>
> It is not "very concise". It is slightly more concise.
>
> x = obj.value1
> x = dct['val
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:10:05 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
> > > [NNTP] clients provide full-fledged editors
> >and conversely full-fledged editors provide
> >NNTP clients
> GNU Emacs is a LISP operating system disguised as a word processor.
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:18:43 PM UTC+5:30, geez...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am trying to solve this problem:
>
> http://codeforces.com/problemset/problem/71/A
>
> The input and output is as wanted, but my answer keep rejected, here is my
> source code http://txt.do/1smv
>
> Please, I need help.
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 5:48:59 PM UTC+5:30, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop.
> I feel my solution below is much too complicated.
> How to do it more elegantly?
> I know I could use a while loop but I don't like it.
How about
def in
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 8:39:02 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 06:43 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> > And this is surprising, why?
>
> Well back when Google was a young hip company they billed themselves as
> a bunch of nerds making stuff for nerds. But yes we should have seen
> t
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:13:03 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Michael Torrie wrote:
> > I wish Google hadn't bought a lot of things. Seems like they bye up a
> > lot of cool, nerd-centric apps and companies and then turned them into
> > apps that do less and do it poorly, but in a slick w
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 6:45:42 AM UTC+5:30, iMath wrote:
> so is there any way to create a temporary file by Python here ?
http://docs.python.org/2/library/tempfile.html
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, December 2, 2013 7:34:33 PM UTC+5:30, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-12-02, Roy Smith wrote:
> >> The current situation does force a lot of technology-focused
> >> people, progammers in particular, into a low opinion of Google.
> >> The crappy usenet portal is poor marketing.
> >
> > If
On Monday, December 2, 2013 5:11:15 AM UTC+5:30, jade wrote:
> > To: pytho...@python.org
> > From: wlf...@ix.netcom.com
> > Subject: Re: Checking Common File Types
> > Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 18:23:22 -0500
> >
> > On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 18:27:16 +, jade declaimed the
> > following:
> >
> > >Hello
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 8:52:03 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, rusi wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 1, 2013 5:34:11 AM UTC+5:30, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> >> Thanks for the help!
> >>
> >> Ok, I'll look into the mailing
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 5:34:11 AM UTC+5:30, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Ok, I'll look into the mailing list.
[Assuming you are using GG with firefox on linux]
All you need to do is
1. Install 'Its all text' FF addon
2. Point the 'editor' of 'Its all text' to the below python
On Friday, November 29, 2013 12:07:29 AM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:59:13 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > On 11/28/2013 10:23 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > > Funny, I thought the sentiment of many here was, "let's just keep this
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:59:13 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/28/2013 10:23 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > Funny, I thought the sentiment of many here was, "let's just keep this
> > as a newsgroup, why do we need the mailing list also?" but I'll admit to
> > being confused abo
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:41:30 PM UTC+5:30, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I'm new to how Google Groups works. I wonder why it lays it out
> like that. Can it not just show quotes like the way that PHPbb does?
>
> I never thought of reading the source code, thanks! :-)
>
> Oh, and the last
Here's a 1-click pure python solution.
As I said I dont know how to manage errors!
1. Put it in a file say cleangg.py and make it executable
2. Install it as the 'editor' for the "Its all text" firefox addon
3. Click the edit and you should get a cleaned out post
--
#
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:20:39 PM UTC+5:30, Alister wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:08:17 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, rusi wrote:
> >> Its really quite unclear to me why GG is a problem if all the problems
> >> of GG are ob
1 - 100 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
