I am happy to announce the 0.9 release of Pymazon.
http://code.google.com/p/pymazon/
Pymazon is a Python implemented downloader for the Amazon MP3 store.
This release is a near-full rewrite which brings a brand new GUI design and
a host of new features:
Notably:
- Pymazon now supports MP3 downl
On Jun 26, 5:36 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Rick, I am one of the all-too-few people who review tracker issues and
> occasionally close them. I do not 'hate' you and have never
> 'brow-beaten' you.
Yes and i never said you did, i am sorry if you felt my words were
directed towards you, please belie
Roman Polansky RAPED Semantha Geimer Orally, Analy and Vaginally -
TRAUMA for victim is so much that she wants it to be out of sight from
her
Full Court Declaration of ROMAN POLANSKY
http://www.netlexfrance.net/29/09/2009/roman-polanski-a-respected-fugitive-case-n%C2%B0-a-334139/
http://www.thes
Everyone,
I'm pleased to annouce the release both a production and
experimental release of GMPY. GMPY is a wrapper for the
MPIR or GMP multiple-precision arithmetic library. GMPY
is available for download from:
http://code.google.com/p/gmpy/
Production release
--
GMPY 1.12 is th
How Non-Torah Zionist Rabbi Sholom Rubashkin, a former vice president
of Agriprocessors Inc became so rich and EARNED 27 years in JAIL ?
Most Jew Lawyers are LIARS !!!
Former slaughterhouse exec gets 27 years for fraud
By MICHAEL J. CRUMB (AP) – 4 days ago
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa — A former Iowa koshe
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:32:23 -0700 (PDT), small Pox
wrote:
>By
You're an idiot. Take your SPAM elsewhere.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dutch may use 'decoy Jews' to fight racism
By TOBY STERLING (AP) – 1 day ago
AMSTERDAM — A hidden-camera video showing Jews being harassed on the
street in a Moroccan neighborhood of Amsterdam has led Dutch
authorities to consider combating hate crimes with "decoy Jews" —
undercover police officer
In message , Ian Kelly
wrote:
> I use cron.
>
> Con: Most cron implementations have a maximum frequency of once per
> minute.
Another con is: what happens if a run takes longer than the invocation
frequency?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In message , Roy Smith wrote:
> I recently fixed a bug in some production code. The programmer was
> careful to use snprintf() to avoid buffer overflows. The only problem
> is, he wrote something along the lines of:
>
> snprintf(buf, strlen(foo), foo);
A long while ago I came up with this macr
In message , Nobody wrote:
> Ask anyone with a surname like O'Neil, O'Connor, O'Leary, etc; they've
> probably broken a lot of web apps *without even trying*.
Last I checked, I couldn’t post comments on freedom-to-tinker.com.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 25, 8:24 pm, WANG Cong wrote:
> Understand, but please consider my proposal again, if we switched to:
>
> setattr(foo, 'new_attr', "blah")
>
> by default, isn't Python still dynamic as it is? (Please teach me if I
> am wrong here.)
>
> This why I said the questionable thing is not so much r
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
>
>> I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for
>> all to see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away.
>> I'm assuming this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for
> all to see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away.
> I'm assuming this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I
> expect an apology. Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an
On Jun 26, 8:28 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
wrote:
> USA will be DESTROYED the same way GERMANY was DESTROYED - What The
> Zionist Jews Did To Germany
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw2FhXZ9tiw
How the Jews did 9 11
4000 Jews KNEW in ADVANCE of 911, They control Money, NWO
http://www.you
USA will be DESTROYED the same way GERMANY was DESTROYED - What The
Zionist Jews Did To Germany
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw2FhXZ9tiw
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 06/26/2010 09:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message, Tim Chase
wrote:
On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this w
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <> wrote:
> In message , Tim Chase
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> ...
>
> I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
> see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers
In article ,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>In message , Tim Chase
>wrote:
>>
>> On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> ...
>
>I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
>see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
>thi
In article ,
Terry Reedy wrote:
>On 6/26/2010 2:55 PM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>>
>> Some basic text string functions seem to be working on byte
>> string functions as well, but sometimes they don't, and there's
>> no rhyme in why it does or doesn't.
>>
>> >>> 'abcd'[0] == 'abcd'[:1]
>> T
On Jun 24, 2:17 am, "Christian Stapfer" wrote:
> "David Kastrup" schrieb im
> Newsbeitragnews:87eifw50cd@lola.goethe.zz...
>
>
>
> > small Pox writes:
>
> >> Leslie Lamport is a Jew - His book is NOTORIOUSLY
> >> uninsightful&obfuscatory (nothing on the design of LaTeX and macros,
> >> no i
In message , Nobody wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:40:41 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
I construct ad-hoc queries all the time. It really isn’t that hard to
do safely.
>>>
>>> Wrong.
>>>
>>> Even if you get the quoting absolutely correct (which is a very big
>>> "if"), you have
In message <2010062522560231540-angrybald...@gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> It's not hard. It's just begging for a visit from the fuckup fairy.
That’s the same fallacious argument I pointed out earlier.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In message , Ian Kelly
wrote:
> Your example from the first post of the thread rewritten using sqlalchemy:
>
> conn.execute(
> items.update()
> .where(items.c.inventory_nr == modify_id)
> .values(
> dict(
> (field[0], Params.getvalue("%s[%s]"
In message , Tim Chase
wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I ex
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:06:12 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:02:32 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
[...]
> To all the Python 3.x haters
Hmmm, I just realised that it might seem that this was aimed at Paul
directly. I'm sorry, I wasn't intending to imply that he's a Python 3
hate
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:35:25 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> CPython is a fairly plodding implementation. But that's due to the
>> conservativeness of CPython: Unladen Swallow is faster, and PyPI is
>> faster still, and the PyPI people ex
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:08:48 +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
>> I think that's not true. If enough people want to support Python 2 it
>> might be possible to advance Python 2.
>
> That won't be sufficient: enough people wanting support won't have any
> effect. People also need to want it enough to
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 00:59:35 +0200, Laurent Verweijen wrote:
> Something I really dislike, is that the "__cmp__"-method is gone. I
> really hate to write 6 different functions, whereas I'm used to writing
> a oneliners which covers each of the 6 cases. I haven't switched to
> pyton 3 yet, but when
On 6/26/10 6:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:38:30 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote:
All in all, the new syntax requires 4 keystrokes, none of which are home
keys; compared with old syntax which requires 1 keystroke in thumb's
home position.
Producing print function takes a little bit
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:33:02 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> * str is now unicode => unicode is no longer a pain in the a
True. Now byte strings are a pain in the arse.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> CPython is a fairly plodding implementation. But that's due to the
> conservativeness of CPython: Unladen Swallow is faster, and PyPI is
> faster still, and the PyPI people expect to eventually be competitive
> with C for speed.
PyPy (htt
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:41:30 -0500, John Bokma wrote:
>> Done means finished: complete, not going to be advanced any further.
>
> I think that's not true. If enough people want to support Python 2 it
> might be possible to advance Python 2.
I can't see that happening. In my experience those who
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:38:30 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote:
> On 06/27/10 02:33, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>>> >
>>> > And here's the disadvantages:
>>> >
>>> > -The Python 3 syntax actually requires more keystrokes.
>> Typically ONE extra character: the closing bracket. The opening bracket
>> can replace t
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:10:39 -0700, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> This characterization of adding attributes to an object as something
> "else", some special kind of activity called "metaprogramming" I think I
> reject outright, whereas I believe -- though I do not claim to speak for
> him/her -- the OP
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:02:32 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Terry Reedy writes:
>> Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a bit
>> of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest source
>> of typos. But a decent system that puts me at the site of syntax err
Terry Reedy writes:
> To make your life easier, and even save keystrokes:..
def tp(*args): print(args) # tuple print
Too much to remember, makes my life harder. If I were that organized,
I'd figure out how to use the logging module. ;)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On 6/26/2010 8:02 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a
bit of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest
source of typos. But a decent system that puts me at the site of
syntax errors alleviates this. Lo
Terry Reedy writes:
> Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a
> bit of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest
> source of typos. But a decent system that puts me at the site of
> syntax errors alleviates this. Logic bugs are a much bigger problem.
On 6/26/2010 11:59 AM, Stefan Reich wrote:
I don't like Python 3.
I love it.
My complaint is about changing the syntax of "print".
Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a bit
of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest source
of typos. But
I released Oktest 0.4.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Oktest/
http://packages.python.org/Oktest/
Overview
Oktest is a new-style testing library for Python.
::
from oktest import ok
ok (x) > 0 # same as assert_(x > 0)
ok (s) == 'foo'# same as asser
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Kermit Rose wrote:
> On 6/26/2010 5:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> I do not provide Python support in private email. Please try the
>> python-list:
>>
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>
>> or its USENET gateway:
>>
>> news:comp.lang.pyth
On 6/26/2010 2:55 PM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
PSF is funding work on the email module. Problems with cgi and other
internet interfacing modules are the main topic of discussion on py-dev
this week.
Some basic text string functions seem to be working on byte
string functions as well, but sometim
Terry,
Thank you for trying Benchmarker.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 6/26/2010 1:09 PM, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
>>
>> I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
>>
>> Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
>>
>>
>> Example
>
Since I was relatively new to python when python 3 was released (I'm
using it since python 2.5) I don't really care about the print
statement. Making print a function makes print less an exception since
all other functions need brackets.
I also like most of the other changes in python 3 like float
On 6/25/2010 4:56 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:26 PM, rantingrick
If *I* open an issue it will be ignored or quickly dismissed because
the people in charge of the Python community hate me.
Nonsense.
Though an inflammatory, hyperbole-filled rant made up of nothi
On 6/26/2010 1:09 PM, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
Example
===
ex.py::
def fib(n):
return n<= 2 and 1 or fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
from benchmarker import Be
Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 6/26/10 9:01 AM, Alexander Kapps wrote:
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand why
some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, those typos that seem to
catch newcommers won't happen anymore. Wh
On 6/26/2010 5:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
I do not provide Python support in private email. Please try the python-list:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
or its USENET gateway:
news:comp.lang.python
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 16:23, Kermit Rose wrote:
Hello Robert.
I h
On 27 June 2010 05:36, Brian J Mingus wrote:
> This comment and many others in this thread fail to address the substance
> of the OP's point. Languages such as Python and Perl have adopted the
> strange practice of making new versions of the language backwards
> incompatible. Many other languages
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 26.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Stefan Reich:
> > The main problem is that Python 3 is incompatible with almost all
> > scripts written for Python 2 (if they use print). And it gets worse:
> > Python 3 scripts are incompatible with Python 2
On 6/26/10 3:56 AM, John Pinner wrote:
On Jun 25, 11:14 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Terry made the
very reasonable observation that you would serve the community, and thank
us, by posting a bug report to pylint, rather than just ignoring it, and
you respond with a totally bogus accusation of "ru
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Lie Ryan wrote:
> What really matters is not the number of extra characters, but the
> number of keystrokes. On a typical keyboard, producing a '(' requires 2
> keystrokes (Shift + 9) and another 2 keystrokes for ')' (Shift + 0).
> Also, spacebar is a key in the h
Stephen Hansen schreef op de 26e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
> On 6/26/10 11:55 AM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>
> > I have been using Python 3 for quite some time now, and this
> [snip]
>
> I'm not advocating using Python 3 or that it doesn't have plenty of work to do
> still. I don't us
http://www.ae911truth.org/newsletter/2010/06/index.php#cdi
Explosive Evidence at WTC Cited by Former CDI Employee
News - News Releases By AE911Truth
Written by Darcy Wearing and Richard Gage, AIA
Thursday, 24 June 2010 18:55
Having had the privilege of speaking with Tom Sullivan, an actual
explos
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> Stephen Hansen schreef op de 26e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
>> There were various serious problems with Python 2 which could not be fixed in
>> a backwards compatible way; we've been living with them for years and years
>> now,
>> No, "I'm" not trying to kill Python 2 at all. My current estimation is
>> that I'll be using it for at least the next three years -- library
>> conversion momentum is there, but its happening faster in the pure
>> Python libraries then a few critical C extensions I rely upon.
>
> Based on my ex
On 6/26/10 11:55 AM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
I have been using Python 3 for quite some time now, and this
[snip]
I'm not advocating using Python 3 or that it doesn't have plenty of work
to do still. I don't use it yet, so can't really comment on any of your
issues except to ask: Have you opened
Stephen Hansen schreef op de 26e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
> There were various serious problems with Python 2 which could not be fixed in
> a backwards compatible way; we've been living with them for years and years
> now, and it was decided that a single break to go back and corre
On 6/26/10 11:41 AM, John Bokma wrote:
Stephen Hansen writes:
No, "I'm" not trying to kill Python 2 at all. My current estimation is
that I'll be using it for at least the next three years -- library
conversion momentum is there, but its happening faster in the pure
Python libraries then a few
Stephen Hansen writes:
> No, "I'm" not trying to kill Python 2 at all. My current estimation is
> that I'll be using it for at least the next three years -- library
> conversion momentum is there, but its happening faster in the pure
> Python libraries then a few critical C extensions I rely upon
On 6/26/10 10:59 AM, Stefan Reich wrote:
There's no "as long as" -- its done. Python 2 is over with 2.7.
Well, then it is NOT done yet. And of course there is an "as long as".
Yes, it is. 2.7 is in its release candidate phase right now. That means
there are no more features, new development o
On 6/26/10 11:11 AM, John Bokma wrote:
Stephen Hansen writes:
Please ignore, sorry about wasted post. Having a posting issue, need
to test.
If you mean with post Usenet, there are several groups dedicated to
testing...
I know. I don't access this forum via usenet, but via python-list.
--
Stephen Hansen writes:
> Please ignore, sorry about wasted post. Having a posting issue, need
> to test.
If you mean with post Usenet, there are several groups dedicated to
testing...
--
John Bokma j3b
Hacking & Hiking in Mexico -
Stephen.
Stephen Hansen schrieb:
If your biggest complaint is the print statement/function -- man,
you're looking small, and are in for a world of hurt when you get to
the bytes/[string|unicode] split hits.
No, I'm not "looking small". I'm thinking big. I sometimes use seemingly
small examples
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:59:41 -0430, Victor Subervi
> declaimed the following in
> gmane.comp.python.general:
>
>I could have sworn the concept had been brought up some 8 months
> ago... Probably couched in relational database ter
On 06/27/10 02:33, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>> >
>> > And here's the disadvantages:
>> >
>> > -The Python 3 syntax actually requires more keystrokes.
> Typically ONE extra character: the closing bracket. The opening bracket
> can replace the whitespace previously required.
What really matters is no
On 6/26/10 9:01 AM, Alexander Kapps wrote:
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand why
some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, those typos that seem to
catch newcommers won't happen anymore. What I mean is this:
I
I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
Example
===
ex.py::
def fib(n):
return n <= 2 and 1 or fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
from benchmarker import Benchmarker
bm = Benchmarker(30) # or Benchm
Bruno Desthuilliers websiteburo.invalid> writes:
>
> Victoria Hernandez a écrit :
> > The new mision I herits the buggered code (i do not the bugger). How
> > do debugger him? Tahnk you very much. Vikhy :)
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/pdb.html#module-pdb
> http://docs.python.org/library/u
Please ignore, sorry about wasted post. Having a posting issue, need to
test.
La de la la. Nothing to see here, move along.
--
... Stephen Hansen
... Also: Ixokai
... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io
... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
Python 3 is, by design, not 100% backwards compatible with Python 2.
Not that I'm completely happy with everything in Python 3 but, in it's
defense, discussion of Python 3 has been ongoing for years, almost as
long as the existence of Python 2. So the discussion of what went into
Python 3 is so o
thanks for the info, christian!
Quoting Christian Heimes :
Am 26.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Stefan Reich:
The main problem is that Python 3 is incompatible with almost all
scripts written for Python 2 (if they use print). And it gets worse:
Python 3 scripts are incompatible with Python 2! (If they
On 06/26/2010 05:59 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> Let me preface this by saying that I am a fan of Python. I use it
> regularly and I like it a lot.
>
> That is, I am using and liking Python 2.6.
>
> I don't like Python 3.
>
> I won't comment on the advanced stuff that is changed in P
Ixokai wrote:
In what possible way is:
setattr(foo, 'new_attr', 'blah')
getattr(foo, 'new_attr')
delattr(foo, 'new_attr')
Better then:
foo.new_attr = 'blah'
foo.new_attr
del foo.new_attr
I don't understand what your argument is or problem is with the regular
syntax,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stefan Reich <
wertiges.prod...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> My complaint is about changing the syntax of "print".
>
Okay.
To reiterate, I am strongly in disfavor of Python 3 and will stick to Python
> 2, for as least as long as Python 3 breaks my scripts.
>
This wi
On 06/25/2010 04:15 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> Idle is dead -- long live idlefork!
>
> http://osdir.com/ml/python.idle/2002-09/msg00105.html
Actually idlefork is dead. It was merged back into Idle sometime around
Python 2.3. At least that's what its homepage claims.
--
http://mail.python.o
Am 26.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Stefan Reich:
> The main problem is that Python 3 is incompatible with almost all
> scripts written for Python 2 (if they use print). And it gets worse:
> Python 3 scripts are incompatible with Python 2! (If they use print
> variants, like writing to a file.)
Seems
Hi there.
Let me preface this by saying that I am a fan of Python. I use it
regularly and I like it a lot.
That is, I am using and liking Python 2.6.
I don't like Python 3.
I won't comment on the advanced stuff that is changed in Python 3, as I
haven't look into that.
My complaint is abou
thanks,firend. I have a try with SyncManager, Is there any problem in my
code?
from multiprocessing.managers import SyncManager,BaseProxy
import multiprocessing
import Queue
class ResourceController(object):
def __init__(self):
self.text = 'Hello world!'
self.queue
Hello Xah,
With your background and the time you spend with emacs/computers, I
cannot explain to myself how you can read the news via a web interface
like google news (google groups was a little better years ago, but now
it is complete rubish). There are so many dedicated readers:
emacs-gnus, tin
Oh wow. You went beyond :-)
Let me rewrite the example. I only want to calculate the wait time
which is basically the depart time minus the arrival time for multiple
days.
This is all on 1 station.
June 26, 2010:
Trian A, Arrived at 6:00AM, Depart at 9:00AM
Trian B, Arrived at 2:00AM, Depart at
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:04:38 +0100
Nobody wrote:
> Ask anyone with a surname like O'Neil, O'Connor, O'Leary, etc; they've
> probably broken a lot of web apps *without even trying*.
At least it isn't a problem with the first name field. Oh, wait...
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is t
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:10:06 +0200
Thomas Jollans wrote:
> Also, please refrain from top posting.
If you are going to berate people for bad netiquette you should learn
it too. Please trim your included text. You included the entire rest
of the OP's message including his signature after your res
On 06/26/2010 05:39 AM, WANG Cong wrote:
> On 06/26/10 00:11, Neil Hodgson wrote:
>
>> WANG Cong:
>>
>>> 4) Also, this will _somewhat_ violate the OOP princples, in OOP,
>>> this is and should be implemented by inherence.
>>
>>Most object oriented programming languages starting with Smalltalk
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:02:55 +0200
Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 10:41 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> None is None is None
> > True
> (None is None) is None
> > False
> None is (None is None)
> > False
>
> Chained comparisons - one of those language features that some of the
> t
In article <2010062522560231540-angrybald...@gmailcom>,
Owen Jacobson wrote:
> It's not hard. It's just begging for a visit from the fuckup fairy.
QOTD?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nobody wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
>
>> I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
>> faster than C,
>
> Faster than *what* C, though?
Well, than the C it was replacing, which is admittedly not much
of
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
> I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
> faster than C,
Faster than *what* C, though?
With Haskell, there's seldom a significant performance hit for using
-fvia-C, so you would probably have been able to get
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:44:36 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Please don't top post!
>
> On 25/06/2010 15:20, Shashwat Anand wrote:
>> why do you need that ?
>> which platform are you onto ?
Prime example of an idiot.
His first line is 'Please don't top post' and what does he do
'top posts'
> p.s.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:43:51 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
> To bring this back to something remotely Python related, the point of
> all this is that security is hard.
Oh, this isn't solely a security issue.
Ask anyone with a surname like O'Neil, O'Connor, O'Leary, etc; they've
probably broken a lot
If any of you are surprised at my harshness at this YANQUI bustard,
take from me 100% that this is a SPOOOK. I have caught a real one with
a bait.
On Jun 25, 10:30 pm, "n...@bid.nes" wrote:
> On Jun 25, 8:42 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
>
> wrote:
> > YANQUI courts were ALWAYS K A N G A R O
On Jun 25, 11:14 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:31:17 -0500, GrayShark wrote:
> > Why the rudness Terry Jan Reedy? Get up on the wrong side of the bed? Or
> > worse luck, no one on the other side to create a wrong side?
>
> I see only one person being rude here, and that's you
On Jun 25, 10:30 pm, "n...@bid.nes" wrote:
> On Jun 25, 8:42 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
>
> wrote:
> > YANQUI courts were ALWAYS K A N G A R O O Courts - thats how
> > they carried out GENOCIDE of NATIVES !!!
>
> You're stupid as well as biased.
>
[ TERRIBLY HURTING YANQUI SPOK F
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:40:41 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> I construct ad-hoc queries all the time. It really isn’t that hard to
>>> do safely.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>> Even if you get the quoting absolutely correct (which is a very big "if"),
>> you have to remember to perform it every time,
On 06/26/2010 10:17 AM, anu python wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for your reply to Shashwat Anand & thomas.sub( Help on finding
> word is valid as per English Dictionary through python )
>
> Let me try.
Please don't top post (it makes it difficult to understand what you're
replying to, and is thus con
WANG Cong:
> From what you are saying, Smalltalk picks a way similar to setattr() in
> Python?
addInstVarName is a method on ClassDescription objects.
> Because you mentioned 'addInstVarName' which seems to be a
> method or a builtin function. If so, that is my point, as I mentioned
> earlier
On 06/26/2010 01:35 AM, Tom Pacheco wrote:
> from .. import module
> or
> from ..module import foo
>
> this is intended for use within packages.
And it only works within nested packages.
Also, please refrain from top posting.
>
> see
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/
>
> also search
On 06/25/2010 10:41 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> Surprising for a moment, if you don't
> immediatelyrecognize it as a chained comparison.
> (Just sharing.)
> Alan Isaac
>
None is None is None
> True
(None is None) is None
> False
None is (None is None)
> False
>
Chained comparisons -
Thanks for your reply to Shashwat Anand & thomas.sub( Help on finding word
is valid as per English Dictionary through python )
Let me try.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:57 PM, wrote:
> Send Python-list mailing list submissions to
>python-list@python.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe v
On 2010-06-25 19:49 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message, Jorgen Grahn
wrote:
I thought it was well-known that the solution is *not* to try to
sanitize the input -- it's to switch to an interface which doesn't
involve generating an intermediate executable. In the Python example,
that would
100 matches
Mail list logo
