On 2010-06-25 19:49 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message<slrni297ec.1m5.grahn+n...@frailea.sa.invalid>, Jorgen Grahn
wrote:

I thought it was well-known that the solution is *not* to try to
sanitize the input -- it's to switch to an interface which doesn't
involve generating an intermediate executable.  In the Python example,
that would be something like os.popen2(['zcat', '-f', '--', untrusted]).

That’s what I mean. Why do people consider input sanitization so hard?

It's not hard per se; it's just repetitive, prone to the occasional mistake, and, frankly, really boring. When faced with things like that, we do what we do everywhere else in programming: wrap up the repetitive bits into a simpler library API and use that everywhere. Wrapping up the escaping code into SQLString is a step in that direction. However, the standard SQL parameterization in most of the DB protocols or SQLAlchemy's query construction removes even more repetition and unnecessary typing. There's just no point in not using it.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
 that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
 an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to