On Jun 25, 8:24 pm, WANG Cong <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Understand, but please consider my proposal again, if we switched to: > > setattr(foo, 'new_attr', "blah") > > by default, isn't Python still dynamic as it is? (Please teach me if I > am wrong here.) > > This why I said the questionable thing is not so much related with dynamic > programming or not.
Because it makes dynamicism harder to do. Like I said, Python's goal isn't simply to make dynamicism possible, it's to make it easy. "foo.new_attr = 'blah'" is easier than using setattr. Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
