[Python-buildbots] Re: Paused workers

uildbot worker. > > "AMD64 Windows10 3.x" and "AMD64 Windows10 Pro 3.x" built Python > successfully 5 hours ago. > > Does someone know if any other worker is paused? > > Victor > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:03 PM David Bolen wrote: > > > &

[Python-buildbots] Paused workers

There seem to be a handful of workers who have been in a "paused" state for the past 24 hours or so, including my Win10 worker. Does anyone know what might be the cause? I experimented with trying to resume mine, but don't have the necessary admin rights. The worker appeared to be working normal

[Python-buildbots] Re: buildmaster worker naming

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jeremy Kloth wrote: > While I appreciate the information, I believe that the names being > referred to here are the worker IDs. I'm wondering about the worker > *display* names, those that are shown in the various status views. In > the buildmaster config, this

[Python-buildbots] Re: buildmaster worker naming

With respect to the current Win10 worker, the older system status looks like my fault - it appears stuck waiting for a manual reboot for prior updates (I guess at some point it stopped doing it automatically), so I'll get that caught up. Personally, I'd prefer not to encode additional release deta

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbots and 2.7

In my experience no, workers don't remove build trees automatically, it's something you have to do manually. You do get a warning at startup about those that are no longer needed though. -- David On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:24 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > One of my Z systems recently ran out of di

[Python-buildbots] Re: Two failing buildbots in cpython master

This began in response to a change committed for bpo-39401 . It appears the the intent is to remove the Windows 7 builders completely from master and subsequent branches as Python 3.9+ no longer needs to support Windows 7 given its release will be after the Wind

Re: [Python-buildbots] Current build stuck for four days(!)

If you're signed in with your github.com account, then on the buildbot web interface you should be able to stop the build as builder owner (if your github.com account matches the worker information and is in the python group - or something like that). Although I suppose in this case it may depend

[Python-buildbots] Windows 8.1 worker (bolen-worker8) retirement

My Windows 8.1 worker got hit on Wednesday by some "encrypt the world" ransomware. I'm not quite sure the path by which it reached the Azure VM, but regardless, it's toast. I don't think I see enough value in re-installation, given the existence of the Windows 10 worker, plus I can probably bump

Re: [Python-buildbots] [Python-Buildbots] - some/many bots stuck acquiring locks

If you look back on the worker there's probably some other build on the same worker still technically running that's blocking the rest. It might be old enough to not show on the main summary page, and you won't see if it just looking at a single builder history, so look at the worker in general.

Re: [Python-buildbots] bolen-ubuntu worker updated to 18.04

Thanks - I hadn't even thought about the prefix. I had an experimental Xvfb setup when first configuring the buildbot, but something still broke during the tests. Unfortunately at this point I can't remember quite what it was and/or if it was platform/dist specific. But yes, time permitting I'd l

[Python-buildbots] bolen-ubuntu worker updated to 18.04

While on my near term to-do list, Ned's note helped give me a bit of a nudge, so... The bolen-ubuntu worker has been updated to Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. This restores the SSL test coverage, plus includes the libraries to pick up the previously skipped uuid and ctypes modules. At this point, of the poss

Re: [Python-buildbots] Internal buildbot error?

hu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:26 PM, David Bolen wrote: > It does seem like it might be a race condition of some sort - or at least > an unhandled case - in Twisted's process handling. > > It's in the writer path, so I wonder if the umask operation completes > quickly enough, p

Re: [Python-buildbots] Internal buildbot error?

It does seem like it might be a race condition of some sort - or at least an unhandled case - in Twisted's process handling. It's in the writer path, so I wonder if the umask operation completes quickly enough, perhaps the output handle is in fact invalid by the time the buildbot parent gets to th

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

in 2009 :-) -- David On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Did you try leaving things on Python 2.6, but upgrading the worker to > buidlbot-worker 0.9.12 ? > buildbot-worker is still tested on Python 2.6. > > -- > Craig > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

o to 3.x). I'm not sure if that might be the same issue with kloth-win64. -- David On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David Bolen wrote: > >> >> Oh, and I can offer any of my Windows workers for interoperability

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Based on my experiments, I think it is safe to perform the migration as > follows: > > 1. Update the buildbot master to buildbot 9 + Python 3. Leave the > buildbot workers/slaves alone. They should be > able to successfully connec

Re: [Python-buildbots] Buildbot: buildslave angelico-debian-amd64 was lost

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > I didn't see anything fall over on my end. Was this disconnect related > to the hg->git changeover, and if not, is there something I should > check? Probably not, or at least I haven't seen any disconnects across any of my buildbots. The s

Re: [Python-buildbots] Git installation and roll call

Git has been installed on all of my buildslaves. And I don't believe any lost messages in the past for me. -- David On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > Hi all, > > It has come to my attention that one of our members has been trying to > send mail to the list and it has been

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 2.7 Builders

BTW, just to follow up on my last message: > But for third party independent builds, it appears like the 2.7.12 > documentation (https://docs.python.org/2/using/windows.html) still > lists PCBuild and 2008. I should have checked first, but the readme.txt in the PCBuild directory seems to cover th

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 2.7 Builders

Zachary, > I'd like to just add a builder to your XP bot that builds in PC/VS9.0 > in addition to the regular builder in PCbuild. That will allow us to > keep track of whether a change breaks one build or both. Once I have > a VS9-only builder set up, if you want to remove VS2010 from any of > y

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 2.7 Builders

Interesting - I probably would have assumed removing 2010 was safe for 2.7 as well. However, all of my 2.7 builders (XP/7/8/10) currently have both 2008 and 2010 so any dependency on 2010 would go unnoticed. Assuming the 2010 dependency is unintentional, or we specifically want to test without it

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

Zachary Ware writes: > I'm not sure about bolen-ubuntu, but I figured its issues are most > likely slave- (or slave-environment-) related due to the fact that all > branches are failing and the other Ubuntu bots are fine. I did notice > that bolen-ubuntu seems to have a pretty old OpenSSL (1.0.1

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

Just an FYI related to these: > "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are > platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be > marked unstable): > bolen-ubuntu > bolen-windows > bolen-windows8 > bolen-windows10 I've watched them consistently failing for a