https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #63 from Charlie Li ---
After the above two commits, this can land.
(In reply to Charlie Li from comment #60)
Even extracting those two commits was a lot of effort, as my local overlay is
often times multiple steps ahead of wha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Charlie Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|270358 |
See Also|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #62 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8b5ae17d2f43388fade30e266615a9e34bf06abd
commit 8b5ae17d2f43388fade30e266615a9e34bf06abd
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #61 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=de7c5ca4a2d40df82a8ca46b37c8b859a412b89c
commit de7c5ca4a2d40df82a8ca46b37c8b859a412b89c
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #59 from p5b2ea8...@t-online.de ---
Please increase Importance:--- Affects Only Me ---> Affects some people
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #60 from Charlie Li ---
(In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #58)
>From a technical standpoint, it may be possible to add a new CPython version to
the tree without adjusting python.mk. From a political standpoint, it is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People
--
You are rece
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #58 from Baptiste Daroussin ---
vishwin: is adding this version to the tree, with no possibility to enable it
via as default python in collision with the part you are working on ? if no
then we should proceed with the addition o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #57 from p5b2ea8...@t-online.de ---
I used the the latest attachement to create the badly needed lang/python312
myself and run python3.12 -m ensurepip
So thanks for providing the attachement! This saved me and using FreeBSD at
w
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #56 from p5b2ea8...@t-online.de ---
Please provide the Python3.12 port as is now.
It is desperately needed for development!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Kamil Choudhury changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamil.choudhury@anserinae.n
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Bug 271673 depends on bug 268283, which changed state.
Bug 268283 Summary: databases/py-sqlite3: switch away from distutils
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268283
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Bug 271673 depends on bug 270510, which changed state.
Bug 270510 Summary: python.mk: remove setuptools from RUN_DEPENDS
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270510
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
j.david.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.david.li...@gmail.com
-
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #52 from Charlie Li ---
(In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #51)
Not an imperfection, but a required component to address questions as to why
the change happened/is needed.
The exp-run on the other component is prevented
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #50 from Charlie Li ---
(In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #48)
You alone don't get to decide that, especially when it's not obvious to me that
you have put *any* work into this or the supporting cast. Not everything is
v
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #46 from Matthias Andree ---
we're not switching anything yet, but as proposed, only adding now, and
switching only after 2025Q2 branch - and what do we do will fallout when the
respective maintainers are asleep at the helm?
T
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #53 from Matthias Andree ---
You're free to set the ball rolling instead of replying what doesn't work.
Instead, show what does work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #51 from Matthias Andree ---
(In reply to Charlie Li from comment #50)
That's what I am saying. Disruptions by vishwin@ because there's an
imperfection such as a missing documentation commit. That doesn't prevent an
exp-run, s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #49 from Antoine Brodin ---
(In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #46)
>From my experience, poudriere bulk -a does not even start the 1st time you do a
python new version exp-run
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #48 from Matthias Andree ---
(In reply to Charlie Li from comment #47)
Charlie, you've used up your "stop the world now" tokens for the next three
years already. Either you get things moving or you shut up. I will have no
more
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #47 from Charlie Li ---
(In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #44)
No course of action is perfect, this is a matter of keeping things orderly.
Adding the other ports isn't orderly at this time, it only incites more mess
and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #45 from Antoine Brodin ---
(In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #44)
You can't switch just like that, it has to pass an exp-run
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Matthias Andree changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mand...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #43 from Konstantin Belousov ---
I do not follow your logic. So somebody have to install the python port with
explicitly disabled use for default version, then somebody has to post a patch
to enable its use for flavor, then som
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #42 from Charlie Li ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #40)
Ironically this proves my point/argument of not making available newer Python
distributions yet. From a maintainer-support angle, keeping the complaining
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Konstantin Belousov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #39 from Charlie Li ---
(In reply to Mohamed Akram from comment #37)
This isn't about you, but rather for the ports tree and those who interact with
it. Having a Python interpreter/distribution in the tree without its supporting
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #38 from Kurt Jaeger ---
(In reply to Mohamed Akram from comment #37)
Thanks for describing this approach. So what is the counter-argument to this ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #37 from Mohamed Akram ---
(In reply to Charlie Li from comment #15)
I don't need the Python package ports, I just need a working Python so I can
use `python3.13 -m venv` to create a virtual environment and install the
dependen
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #36 from d...@sunsaturn.com ---
For anyone doesn't want to wait 2-3 more years for recent python version, you
can download tar ball off python site, and do the usual ./configure ; make ;
make install.
No issues running python 3.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Chad Jacob Milios changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mil...@ccsys.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
--- Comment #34 from Saro ---
(In reply to Wen Heping from comment #33)
I believe the pkg-plist needs to be updated as it is referencing the wrong pip
version upon packaging:
===> Building packages for python312-3.12.8
===> Building py
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271673
Wen Heping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|lang/python312: New port, |lang/python312: New port,
35 matches
Mail list logo
