Re: [Puppet Users] Proposal to remove redundant info in source => parameters

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Christian Kauhaus wrote: >> Am 28.09.2010 21:36, schrieb Peter Meier: >>> it wouldn't be one for me and I still stick with sg keyboards. >> >> It is two keys on most Euro

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Setup 2.6 + apache, passenger

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Gavin wrote: > On 29 September 2010 17:35, Patrick wrote: >> >> On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Gavin wrote: >> >>> On 10 September 2010 18:54, Stefan Schlesinger wrote: On Sep 10, 2010, at 15:47 , Gavin wrote: > File does not exist: /usr/share/puppet/

Re: [Puppet Users] Overwrite default settings in nodes using external nodes.

2010/9/30 Héctor Rivas Gándara : >>> We have simple inheritance in our external node classifier like this: >>> We only allow one level, and includes cannot include other includes. >>> Parameters specified in a node yaml override the same parameter in an >>> include yaml. >>> Oh, and we have a defau

Re: [Puppet Users] Proposal to remove redundant info in source => parameters

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Jeff McCune wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Nigel Kersten > wrote: >> What implications of introducing a new syntactical element are there? > > Yet another inconsistency and confusion for newbies. > > With that said, I think the

Re: [Puppet Users] Question regarding the SERVICE type

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:42 AM, D.N. van der Meijden wrote: > I'm trying to get a service running, but I keep getting the following > error message: > "err: //Node[debiannode]/zabbix/Service[zabbix_agent]/ensure: change > from stopped to running failed: Could not start Service[zabbix_agent]: > Ex

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Question regarding the SERVICE type

is not what >> > > > puppet expects, it is not a file permission problem. >> >> > > > As Nigel suggested, shut down your service then run this: >> >> > > > /etc/init.d/zabbix_agent start ; echo $? >> >> > > > And tell us wh

Re: [Puppet Users] mount type attempting remount when ensure => present

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Felix Frank wrote: > On 09/30/2010 08:57 AM, John Warburton wrote: >> Hi All >> >> I am not sure if I am doing this right, or just meeting some Solaris >> specific thing that hasn't been catered for. >> >> Solaris 10, with puppet 0.25.5, and trying to manage /tmp.

Re: [Puppet Users] mount type attempting remount when ensure => present

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Rob McBroom wrote: > On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > >>> I noticed similar behaviour in Linux, with catastrophic results. >>> Ensure => present apparently always means "in fstab, but not mounted", >>

Re: [Puppet Users] Using Puppet to Configure Other Services on the PuppetMaster Server

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Tom Duckering wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to check a few things. I have a build server which is used to > run the CI server. It also doubles up as my puppetmaster. > > Would it be possible to have a puppet client talk to a puppetmaster on the > same machine? A

Re: [Puppet Users] How do you ensure safety from errors/bugs in large deployments?

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote: > Hello all, > > This is not a puppet proper issue of course.. but I was wondering if > any of you could share some thoughts... > > When you deploy a system like Puppet at a large park of systems, you > instantly increase the efficacy of mistak

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: puppet push mode

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Patrick wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Mikel King wrote: > >> I am in a similar but different situation. I need to have puppet check >> in only upon boot up and then shutdown until next boot. Does anyone >> know a puppet way of handling this our should I res

Re: [Puppet Users] How do you ensure safety from errors/bugs in large deployments?

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Jeff McCune wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This is not a puppet proper issue of course.. but I was wondering if >> any of you could share some thoughts... >> >> When you deploy a system like Puppet at a large park

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:44:20PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: >> BUUT... maybe I am thinking about this all wrong after all. Possibly >> the better way is to give facter a custom set of facts... and then >> since facter output gets automatical

Re: [Puppet Users] Variable of define is used more than once

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Dennis Hoppe wrote: > Hello, > > i am using "puppet 0.25.4" at "debian 5.0.6" and have noticed, that the > "puppet" or "puppetmaster" process sometimes is dying. Of course i could > use the "cron" instead of the "deamon", but i have decided to write a > module for

Re: [Puppet Users] Variable of define is used more than once

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Felix Frank wrote: > On 10/13/2010 04:37 PM, Disconnect wrote: >>    - lenny (stable) (admin): >>    centralised configuration management for networks >>    0.24.5-3: all >>    - lenny-backports >>

Re: [Puppet Users] Variable of define is used more than once

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dennis Hoppe wrote: > Hello Felix, > > Am 13.10.2010 16:43, schrieb Felix Frank: >> On 10/13/2010 04:37 PM, Disconnect wrote: >>>    - lenny (stable) (admin): >>>    centralised configuration management for networks >>>    

Re: [Puppet Users] Variable of define is used more than once

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dennis Hoppe > wrote: >> Hello Felix, >> >> Am 13.10.2010 16:43, schrieb Felix Frank: >>> On 10/13/2010 04:37 PM, Disconnect wrote: >>>>    - lenny (stable) <

Re: [Puppet Users] variable modules per client

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, EAMiller wrote: > Hi all - new to puppet - and have gotten as far as configuring a > staging server with two of our web apps through puppet. > > Now we plan to have developer workstations get dev environments > through puppet. We have ~8 developers and ~5 web apps

Re: [Puppet Users] variable modules per client

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, EAMiller wrote: >> Hi all - new to puppet - and have gotten as far as configuring a >> staging server with two of our web apps through puppet. >> >> Now we plan to have dev

Re: [Puppet Users] manipulating facter variable

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Mohit Chawla wrote: > Split & Join inside an inline template should work well. Wouldn't it be a bit cleaner to use the builtin regsubst function? http://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/function.html#regsubst "Example: Get the third octet from the node’s I

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Problems with Solaris 10 & adduser

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:10 AM, nickt wrote: > No problem if I do that "by hand", as root.  Just gives me the normal > message, "64 blocks", and creates the account and directory as > indicated. Are you running puppet as root? If not, does it work as the user puppet is running as? > > On Oct 13

Re: [Puppet Users] manipulating facter variable

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Mohit Chawla wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Nigel Kersten > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Mohit Chawla >> wrote: >> > Split & Join inside an inline template should work well. >> &

Re: [Puppet Users] variable modules per client

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Felix Frank wrote: > On 10/14/2010 05:06 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, EAMiller wrote: >>> Hi all - new to puppet - and have gotten as far as configuring a >>> staging server with two of our web apps thr

Re: [Puppet Users] alternate hostnames, keys, and certs

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Don Jackson wrote: > > I'd like to extend my use of puppet to manage my desktop/notebook macs. > > As others have noted, the hostname of the mobile machines tends to change > frequently, so basing the node name (in my site.pp) and the corresponding > cert and pr

Re: [Puppet Users] alternate hostnames, keys, and certs

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Don Jackson > wrote: >> >> I'd like to extend my use of puppet to manage my desktop/notebook macs. >> >> As others have noted, the hostname of the mobile machines tends

Re: [Puppet Users] darwinports package provider under MacOS X

Don, it sounds like you may have hit: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2331 You can grab the 'macports' provider from that bug report, and use that in place of the existing 'darwinports' provider. There's probably a good argument to be made that we should have considered this a bug and "pat

Re: [Puppet Users] Applying custom patch

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:12 AM, wrote: > Hi at all, > > what do you do if you have fixed a bug or have developed a new feature for > puppet and want to use that customized puppet? > > Here's an example: We have a few HP-UX Servers and the mount provider dont > work here. I used the fix (http://p

Re: [Puppet Users] setting type defaults in some classes

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Arnau Bria wrote: >> I don't remember from where I took the idea... but seems that I chose >> wrong place :-) What do you recommend me? any doc to follow? > > Unfortunately, I don't think there is

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: best practice for removing a module & maintained resources from a system ?

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Mohit Chawla > wrote: >>> Except that some definitions may be gone. That's what worries me. Sure >>> I can read the pp files as they are today. >> >> That's probably true for any tool or method. Unless it

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetd 0.25.4 with puppetmaster 0.24.8?

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Patrick wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Ed Greenberg wrote: > > OK, so I upgraded the puppetmaster server to lucid, which got me the > puppetmaster 0.25.4. > > I am still having issues signing up a new lucid client, and I've foudn this > in the client's l

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetd 0.25.4 with puppetmaster 0.24.8?

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Patrick wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Patrick wrote: > >> >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Ed Greenberg wrote: >> >> OK, so I upgraded the p

Re: [Puppet Users] Disabling Puppet

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Douglas Garstang wrote: > Having some issues disabling puppet. I want to use scripts to update RPM's, > and obviously you need to quiesce puppet first. > It does look like you may have found a bug around disabling (be great to see a bug report once you've nailed i

Re: [Puppet Users] show dependency tree?

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Matt Wise wrote: > I'd really like to see puppet-dashboard do this dynamically show you these > graphs by pointing puppet dashboard to a local copy of your puppet > configs... Thoughts? > I'm not sure dashboard is the right place for this, but I think we all woul

Re: [Puppet Users] Accessing Facter in other languages than Ruby?

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Matt Wallace wrote: > Hi all, > > We're writing a few scripts at the moment that could really make use of > Facter, however the vast majority of them team (including my self!) are not > proficient in Ruby, however they are highly proficient in other languages > suc

Re: [Puppet Users] Accessing Facter in other languages than Ruby?

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote: > Matthew Macdonald-Wallace writes: >> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote: >> >>> Any reason you can't use facter the command line? >>> E.g. call in python commands.getstatusoutput("facter") >> >> Because it's a dirty hack? ;)

Re: [Puppet Users] Accessing Facter in other languages than Ruby?

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Daniel Pittman > wrote: > > Matthew Macdonald-Wallace writes: > >> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:44 -0700, Yushu Yao wrote: > >> > >>> Any reason you can't use fac

Re: [Puppet Users] "No source module metadata found"??

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jon Charette wrote: > Trying to debug something simple that I'm sure I'm just missing. > > I create a module, mysql. Code is at http://www.pastie.org/1218470 > > I try to apply it and I get the following error: > > err: No source module metadata provided for mysql

Re: [Puppet Users] Recursion

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Jeff McCune wrote: > To save you some hassle in the future, I recommend not defining new > fileserver mount points and instead use a module to distribute the > files. > I wanted to reiterate this. I see a lot of people creating fileserver mount points, and it rea

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Application Server Deployment

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Scott Smith wrote: > I highly suggest you refrain from using Puppet to manage service-level > applications. What has led you to this viewpoint Scott? > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:19 AM, ajax wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I wanted to know can i deploy Applic

[Puppet Users] Helping us prioritize issues.

s all too easy for us to lose track of a "+1" in an email thread or IRC. Thanks, Nigel -- Nigel Kersten Product Manager, Puppet Labs http://www.puppetlabs.com Twitter: @nigelkersten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users

Re: [Puppet Users] Helping us prioritize issues.

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote: > Nigel Kersten writes: > > > I know James has emailed about this before, but we have a lot of issue > > prioritization to sort out in the very near future, so I wanted to make > sure > > the community is aware

Re: [Puppet Users] Templates VS static files

d email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- Nigel Kersten Product Manager, Puppet Labs http://www.puppetlabs.com Twitter: @nigelkersten -- You received this message because

Re: [Puppet Users] Templates VS static files

* can be applied offline The latter will: * not be shipped as part of the catalog * fetched at catalog application time, but only if the client requires it * cannot be applied offline -- Nigel Kersten Product Manager, Puppet Labs http://www.puppetlabs.com Twitter: @nigelkersten -- You rec

[Puppet Users] Major bug scrubbing occurring soon.

the through the ticket queue, I am going to be examining the bugs with some care, but I'm going to be erring on the side of closing bugs. If one of these bugs is yours, or affects you and you wish for it to be reopened, you can do so, and we'll revisit those tickets. -- Nigel Kerste

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet hangs

gt; > > > > I'm not really familliar with debugging tools (especially not for ruby > > > applications), but I've added a few debug-statements and started a > > > loop that runs puppet to see where it hangs. So far all I know is that > > > it hangs after

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Solaris 10 Client "Default Provider for User" Woes Again

t > > > exist > > > debug: Puppet::Type::User::ProviderDirectoryservice: file /usr/bin/dscl > > > does not exist > > > > > Not at all pertinent to you, but that kind of message is what will help > > > you, I hope. > > > > > HTH, > &

Re: [Puppet Users] ANNOUNCE: Puppet 2.6.3 - Release Candidate 1 available!

/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > John Warburton > Ph: 0417 299 600 > Email: jwarbur...@gmail.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send

Re: [Puppet Users] /var/lib/puppet/clientbucket

cr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- Nigel Kersten Product Manager, Puppet Labs http://www.puppetlabs.com Twitter: @nigelkersten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &q

Re: [Puppet Users] Custom Fact Location Issues

subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > ht

Re: [Puppet Users] Uppercase Class Parameters Don't Work - Is this expected?

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Peter Meier wrote: > > Is this behaviour by design, and if so, where in the documentation > > can I discover this? It wasn't mentioned in the section on > > parameterised classes or variables. > > Some of the errors are documented here: > > > http://projects.puppe

Re: [Puppet Users] Cron on SUSE Enterprise Linux

com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nigel Kersten Product Manager, Puppet Labs http://www.puppetlabs.com Twitter

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Using puppet to update itself

; You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . >

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet REST API

Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-

[Puppet Users] RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

emplate("foo/somefile.$hostname.erb", template("foo/somefile.default.erb")], } Alternatively, do we really need to fix this? I think we do, as consistency matters a lot to me, but maybe I'm on my own here? -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.

Re: [Puppet Users] RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Patrick wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > >> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5158 >> >> --- Ticket description --- >> >> We have four main ways we can

Re: [Puppet Users] RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Patrick wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: >>> >&

Re: [Puppet Users] RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

ttp://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4920 which is very hard to do for > technical reasons.  It's mostly because the variables used in the erb file > are not sent to the file server. > Note: The template() function is executed on the server when the manifest is > compiled. > >

Re: [Puppet Users] finished, yet execution expired

g run in 93.40 seconds > debug: Using cached certificate for ca > debug: Using cached certificate for foo.bar > debug: Using cached certificate_revocation_list for ca > debug: Value of 'preferred_serialization_format' (pson) is invalid for > report, using default (b64_zlib_yaml)

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetd misbehaving on a debian based box.

r, Shark River Technical Solutions LLC > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

igureau > My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > p

Re: [Puppet Users] Help with LDAP, Users, and Puppet..

. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nig

Re: [Puppet Users] fqdn vs short name

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:34 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > > On Nov 1, 7:07 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> It would be great if someone could update the original bug with the >> position we've come to, otherwise I'll get to it in the next few days. > > Done. > > &

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Patrick wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Michael Gliwinski wrote: > >> On Tuesday 02 Nov 2010 15:06:19 Nigel Kersten wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:34 AM, jcbollinger >> wrote: >>>> On Nov 1, 7:07 pm, Nigel

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: RFC: Make file content specification methods consistent.

> I kind of disagree with splitting it off. > > Perhaps I didn't express myself well, but my main impetus was to make > the source/file/template data specifications *all* support the > find-first-existing and concatenation functionality in a sane and > consistent manner. > > I know that was your in

Re: [Puppet Users] Does puppetmaster knows its own configuration parameters?

he Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.c

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, windowsrefund wrote: > Are there any plans to retrofit this into 0.25.x? I haven't looked at the actual provider yet, but you should be able to distribute it yourself with pluginsync to 0.25.x clients once it's been sorted. We really need community testing with th

Re: [Puppet Users] Help with LDAP, Users, and Puppet..

bscribe from this group, send email to >> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > &q

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: trouble using manifests out of manifestdir

o puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs - http://www.puppetla

Re: [Puppet Users] EC2 with puppet bootstrap notes and scripts

s is half full. > To the pessimist, the glass is half empty. > To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to pu

Re: [Puppet Users] EC2 with puppet bootstrap notes and scripts

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Patrick wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Christopher McCrory > > # yes, thrice >> /usr/sbin/puppetd --no-daemonize --onetime --server >> puppetmaster.example.com >&

Re: [Puppet Users] EC2 with puppet bootstrap notes and scripts

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Patrick wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Patrick wrote: >> >> On Nov 7, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > >> >> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:52

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: agent needs to make two runs before master compiles new catalog

ew {} block, >> # therefore we need to call run *here*. >> run Puppet::Application[:master].run > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...

Re: Re: [Puppet Users] question about custom facts and environmental variables

subscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Zach >> z...@puppetlabs.com >> >> >> >

Re: Re: [Puppet Users] question about custom facts and environmental variables

et in daemon mode and the FACTER_* environment variables Edward? > > Thanks again > > Ed > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:45 PM,   >> wrote: >> > ok - that makes sense, but why does facter have a featur

Re: Re: [Puppet Users] question about custom facts and environmental variables

, and makes "real" facts based >> on the file name and contents. >> >> Then you can just drop files there and get the same result. >> >> Do you feel like updating the wiki to point out the limitations with >> puppet in daemon mode and the FACT

Re: [Puppet Users] Custom facts in current and old environments

=NUpx > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > p

Re: [Puppet Users] Custom facts in current and old environments

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hello, > > Am Mi den 10. Nov 2010 um 17:22 schrieb Nigel Kersten: >> > My problem is that I have to serve clients with different versions of >> > pup

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Query facter 'facts' from webapp

with questions over IRC. > > Paul > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> We really need community testing with this provider. There are some >> questions Rudy has in the ticket log that we need to get answered. >> >> http://projects.puppet

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Problem with modules

> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.puppetlabs.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Re: [Puppet Users] File type failing how to avoid this?

...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.puppetlabs.com -- You rece

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Emulating Debians tasksel

, > > Karsten Kruse > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+u

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: agent needs to make two runs before master compiles new catalog

seems puppetmaster as a rack application >> > > > does not look at /etc/sysconfig/puppetmaster - so I can't add options >> > > > like verbosity, etc.) >> >> > > Correct.  Files in /etc/sysconfig are red when a service starts.  When >> > using passenger

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Disabling Certificates

t; To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nigel Kerst

Re: [Puppet Users] Same Service in Different Classes

send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.puppetl

Re: [Puppet Users] Same Service in Different Classes

" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Emulating Debians tasksel

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:39 AM, tecneeq wrote: > On 13 Nov., 18:14, Nigel Kersten wrote: > >> > I guess tasksel tasks have to be installed with exec then. >> >> I was under the impression tasksel was largely being deprecated in >> favor of meta-packages. Wh

Re: [Puppet Users] Same Service in Different Classes

-- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For mo

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Controlling Package Version

Using "latest" and controlling the repositories yourself is best practice I believe. On Nov 16, 2010 2:16 PM, "jcbollinger" wrote: > > On Nov 16, 11:03 am, Andy wrote: >> Also, do you typically create your own mirrors of the repositories to >> control the repository contents? > > I don't know abo

Re: [Puppet Users] Multiple CA / Puppet master environment

t;> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: [Puppet Users] bootstrapping facts

elf? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googleg

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: bootstrapping facts

do >  setcode do >    FileTest.exist?("/etc/init.d/ublipgw.sh") >  end > end > > On Nov 17, 8:48 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:05 PM, byron appelt wrote: >> > I am using a fact inside of a template. The problem I am running into >

Re: [Puppet Users] Multiple CA / Puppet master environment

r SSL keypair between each other, > that's all. > > On Nov 17, 2010 3:53 PM, "Nigel Kersten" wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Scott Smith wrote: >>> nfs mount the puppetmaster ssl dir. seperate puppetca (set on clients) >>> play >>>

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: bootstrapping facts

't necessarily happen. It looks like you're not suffering that, so I must have pointed you in the wrong direction. When you run the client in debug/verbose mode, are you seeing the custom fact get synced down at the start of the run, and then sent up to the server? > > -Byron &

Re: [Puppet Users] Can't get plugins in modules with environments to work in 2.6

com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.puppetlabs.com -- You received this message bec

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: bootstrapping facts

s around this that need to be resolved before we can do that. > > -Byron > > On Nov 18, 1:03 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:04 AM, byron appelt >> wrote: >> > I'm sure I don't understand something here, but when I look at the &

Re: [Puppet Users] Multiple CA / Puppet master environment

tificate > for puppet.domain.com. And the CRL as well, if you use it. That directory > doesn't have to be shared via NFS. You could rsync the ssl directory between > your puppetmasters. Absolutely. I just try to avoid NFS where possible. > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Nigel Ke

Re: [Puppet Users] trying to push a whole directory...

the server version?  (Be nice if that could be made > explicit > in general.) > > My question is then, given that version on the puppetmaster, what version > *clients* will this work with?  For example, I have Ubuntu Lucid with > puppetmaster v25.4 and a Debian Lenny puppet c

[Puppet Users] Puppet Enterprise Coming Soon

speak, try reading it in Australian English. If you haven’t, just pretend it’s James Earl Jones. -- Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.puppetlabs.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >