Hi Puppeteers,
I spent some time tonight making a first pass at what I hope will
eventually be a good replacement for the current "Puppet Best
Practices" page on the wiki. I know this needs *tons of work, but I
hit a good pausing point and decided it was time to ask for feedback
and contributions
Paul Lathrop wrote:
> Hi Puppeteers,
>
> I spent some time tonight making a first pass at what I hope will
> eventually be a good replacement for the current "Puppet Best
> Practices" page on the wiki. I know this needs *tons of work, but I
> hit a good pausing point and decided it was time to as
Hi,
i would like to use the user provider on freebsd to manage passwords.
This isn't implemented at the moment as Luke said in Message-Id:
<5fe94839-099e-43a6-a2a6-411224d9b...@madstop.com>.
If you run pw with -h $fd or -H $fd you can provide a password via the
file descriptor with nunber $fd (a
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 22:21 +0200, Peter Meier wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I've created two Nginx patches (see at the end of this message) to allow
> > a simpler Nginx configuration for your Mongrel puppetmasters.
> >
> > The two main issues with Nginx in front of puppet were:
> > * no CRL s
Paul Lathrop writes:
> Hi Puppeteers,
>
> I spent some time tonight making a first pass at what I hope will
> eventually be a good replacement for the current "Puppet Best
> Practices" page on the wiki.
Thanks!
> Please take a look and flame away. I need feedback, both positive and
> negative,
Hi Paul,
Some comments about the doc.
"Use double-quotes around node names" I would say using single quotes
is better since the Puppet language does not try to parse it for
variables. I have not done any tests in Puppet of single over double
quotes but have seen other interpreted languag
Hi
> "Use double-quotes around node names" I would say using single quotes
> is better since the Puppet language does not try to parse it for
> variables. I have not done any tests in Puppet of single over double
> quotes but have seen other interpreted languages recommend single
> quote first
>
> good idea! Currently I have all site specific stuff in one big module,
> but like that I might be able to organize it again in modules per each
> site specific module adaptions. Question: Is autoloading looking in
> both module directories? so if it's not found in the module in one
> module di
Mark Plaksin wrote:
> I'm sure you know this but when you talk about version control be
> sure to mention a syntax-checking pre-commit hook. That has saved
> us countless hours. This page has hooks for SVN and Git:
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetVersionControl
Indeed, this hel
Hi
>> good idea! Currently I have all site specific stuff in one big module,
>> but like that I might be able to organize it again in modules per each
>> site specific module adaptions. Question: Is autoloading looking in
>> both module directories? so if it's not found in the module in one
>> mo
Todd Zullinger writes:
> One potential fix for that is to check for deletions, like so:
Thanks for doing work for us :) We noticed the need for this but
haven't had a chance to fix it. Your change works great. I updated the
Wiki.
> One other potential problem is if puppet is used to manage
Hello All,
I recently found an excellent feature that I never knew about. I
never knew that you could source an array of files and then have
puppet figure out which one to use (like a case statement, within the
source directive.
An example of this would be:
file { "/etc/sysctl.conf":
source =
Hi,
On 23.07.2009, at 19:58, TomTom wrote:
Is it possible to do the same thing with templates?
An example of what I want to do is:
file { "/etc/sysctl.conf":
content => [
template("sysctl.conf.$hostname.erb"),
template("sysctl.conf.$tuningpolicy.erb"),
template("sysctl.conf.erb"),
]
}
hmmm, right after sending the provious mail, I realised something:
On 23.07.2009, at 21:27, Udo Waechter wrote:
Hi,
On 23.07.2009, at 19:58, TomTom wrote:
Is it possible to do the same thing with templates?
An example of what I want to do is:
file { "/etc/sysctl.conf":
content => [
templat
On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:58 PM, TomTom wrote:
> Is it possible to do the same thing with templates?
> An example of what I want to do is:
>
> file { "/etc/sysctl.conf":
> content => [
> template("sysctl.conf.$hostname.erb"),
> template("sysctl.conf.$tuningpolicy.erb"),
> template("sysctl.conf
How can I have a module/class that is dependent on another class?
Say, /etc/puppet/modules:
module1
module2
in module2/manifests/init.pp
class module2 {
file { # blah blah blah
require => Class["module1"],
}
package { }
}
Usually this gives me an error (can't remember what; I'm writ
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> It's not daemonizing there, it's exiting -- if you use --onetime, it
> exits after the run.
>
It really does daemonize there,
# ps axuww | grep puppet
root 2476 0.0 0.2 4036 644 pts/1S+ 17:41 0:00 grep puppet
# /usr/sbin/p
Just for input, I haven't been seeing this behavior with 0.24.8 (or
any previous release) on Fedora.
Trevor
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 17:43, Derek Yarnell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>
>> It's not daemonizing there, it's exiting -- if you use --onetime, it
>> exi
Try using: ingroups => ['wheel', 'devel']
On Jul 23, 2009, at 13:18, Bryan Ross wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've read puppet isn't great at handling lots of users, but I've got a
> small user base and all my servers are geographically distributed and
> hidden behind various firewalls/vpns, making them
Scott Smith wrote:
> Am fairly certain --test implies --dry-run and won't actually enact
> any changes.
Sorry, but --test certainly does apply changes. We use it a lot!
cYa,
Avi
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>
> Am fairly certain --test implies --dry-run and won't actually enact
> any changes.
Nope.
--test is basically shorthand for:
--verbose
--ignorecache
--no-usecacheonfailure
--no-splay
--show_diff
--no-daemonize
IIRC.
>
> You have other
Avi Miller wrote:
> Scott Smith wrote:
>> Am fairly certain --test implies --dry-run and won't actually enact
>> any changes.
>
> Sorry, but --test certainly does apply changes. We use it a lot!
>
D'oh, I misread. That's what I get for reading E-mail on my iphone
while riding the bus :(
-sco
Am fairly certain --test implies --dry-run and won't actually enact
any changes.
You have other issues w/your config, though.
-scott
On Jul 23, 2009, at 9:50, awreneau wrote:
>
> Found a recipe that indicates the following will uninstall (equiv of
> apt-get remove vlc) the vlc package.
>
Hi,
I've read puppet isn't great at handling lots of users, but I've got a
small user base and all my servers are geographically distributed and
hidden behind various firewalls/vpns, making them unsuitable for
centralised authentication that requires a constant connection (eg.
LDAP).
We've previ
Ok, this would seem to be a problem on RHEL4 w/ the built in ruby as my
RHEL5 w/ the built in ruby works as I would expect running the same command.
RHEL4 ships with,
# ruby --version
ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-25) [i386-linux-gnu]
What are other people doing on RHEL4 are you using the built in ruby or
Found a recipe that indicates the following will uninstall (equiv of
apt-get remove vlc) the vlc package.
# /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/packages.pp
class packages {
$packages = ["vlc"]
package{ $packages:
ensure => absent
}
}
When I run sudo puppetd --test I see the follo
So, I have a directory of symlinks that I'm managing and Tidy doesn't
seem to be doing much for me in there.
Does Tidy ignore symlinks for some reason?
If not, does anyone have the correct syntax?
Thanks,
Trevor
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
Hi All,
I've recently upgraded all of my mongrels to passenger on all of my
puppetmasters, and I'm seeing some performance degradations, hopefully
someone can provide some feedback..
i see an increase in cpu and load indicators, and i've calculated that the
actual puppet compile time has increase
Hi all,
I have an NFS server on our network sharing out package files for
Puppet to install to all and sundry. The clients access said NFS
server via an automounter configuration (I don't want the packages
share mounted all the time, only when installing packages) As a
result, installation of pac
Ohad,
Was discussed a little last month (linky:
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/445bf03568856a0a/36004ff8c56271c3
)
I think the general theme there was that it wasn't as fast as well...
Someone submitted a patch to 0.25 to change the apache2 config example
(linky
Thanks Greg,
I saw Larrys patch, and its inline with my changes :(
Ohad
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Greg wrote:
>
> Ohad,
>
> Was discussed a little last month (linky:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/445bf03568856a0a/36004ff8c56271c3
> )
>
> I thi
Simple answer - no. Dependencies can only be between objects in
0.24.x...
I believe (but haven't seen for myself yet) that there are changes to
this coming as its a frequently requested feature...
I used to think it was a good idea, then I sat and thought about it
for a while and now I don't act
Trevor,
Not sure - the docs don't seem to reference symlinks in terms of
tidy...
Just something to try - does setting rmdirs => true make any
difference?
Greg
On Jul 24, 11:19 am, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> So, I have a directory of symlinks that I'm managing and Tidy doesn't
> seem to be doing
In case it saves you any time...
the file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ needs to end in .list or it will
be ignored.
-Signed, someone who learned the hard way.
On Jul 14, 9:40 am, Fernando Padilla wrote:
> I keep googling, but I can't seem to find the answer.
>
> What's the best way to add a apt-
34 matches
Mail list logo
