of one hardcoded
> class per user.
>
> Thanks a lot for the tip!
>
> Cheers,
> Marcello
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: puppet-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:puppet-
> > us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of dan trainor
> > Sent: donderdag 25
Sent: vrijdag 26 februari 2010 11:32
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Alan Barrett
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] ssh::auth server dependency on ~/.ssh and a
> scoping question
>
> On Friday 26 Feb 2010 09:37:28 Alan Barrett wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Marcello
On Friday 26 Feb 2010 09:37:28 Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Marcello de Sousa wrote:
> > "IF homedir exists => deploy .ssh/authorized_keys , else do nothing"
>
> If you don't mind errors when you attempt to apply the manifest and the
> homedir does not exist, then you could make the
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Marcello de Sousa wrote:
> "IF homedir exists => deploy .ssh/authorized_keys , else do nothing"
If you don't mind errors when you attempt to apply the manifest and the
homedir does not exist, then you could make the authorized_keys file
depend on something that fails if the ho
r.
Thanks a lot for the tip!
Cheers,
Marcello
> -Original Message-
> From: puppet-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:puppet-
> us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of dan trainor
> Sent: donderdag 25 februari 2010 23:16
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Puppe
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Patrick wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Marcello de Sousa wrote:
>
> > Patrick,
> >
> > If you do that you would put all the public keys together, wouldn't you ?
> > That means users would be able to login as any other user. That is of
> course
> > not w
On Feb 25, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Marcello de Sousa wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> If you do that you would put all the public keys together, wouldn't you ?
> That means users would be able to login as any other user. That is of course
> not what you want.
>
> We need to deploy a single specific public key
rom: puppet-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:puppet-
> us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Patrick
> Sent: donderdag 25 februari 2010 19:47
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] ssh::auth server dependency on ~/.ssh and a
> scoping question
>
> What
What about deploying the keys to /etc/skel? Would that be enough for what you
want?
On Feb 25, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Marcello de Sousa wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>>> "IF homedir exists => deploy .ssh/authorized_keys , else do nothing"
>>> As far as I know this is not possible with puppet.
>>
>> Marce
Hi Andrew,
> > "IF homedir exists => deploy .ssh/authorized_keys , else do nothing"
> > As far as I know this is not possible with puppet.
>
> Marcello, I want to understand your use case. AD and LDAP seem to be
> fairly common in Puppet installations, and I'd like for ssh::auth to
> work well w
On Thursday 25 Feb 2010 15:39:09 Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > I also manage users using AD (and likewise-open deployed with puppet),
> > and I've had a similar issue.
> > I couldn't find an elegant way to deploy ssh public keys "only if" the
> > home dir exists.
> >
> > I do NOT want the user homedir
> I also manage users using AD (and likewise-open deployed with puppet), and
> I've had a similar issue.
> I couldn't find an elegant way to deploy ssh public keys "only if" the home
> dir exists.
>
> I do NOT want the user homedir to be created by puppet! (It must be created
> by likewise-open i
: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Andrew Schulman
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] ssh::auth server dependency on ~/.ssh and a
> scoping question
>
> On Wednesday 24 Feb 2010 18:12:18 Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > Just noticed that ssh:
On Wednesday 24 Feb 2010 18:12:18 Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Just noticed that ssh::auth::server doesn't require the resource for
> > ~/.ssh directory. Considering the documentation says it does (in
> > Examples -> 1. With account management at the bottom mentions that
> > 'requ
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Just noticed that ssh::auth::server doesn't require the resource for ~/.ssh
> directory. Considering the documentation says it does (in Examples -> 1.
> With
> account management at the bottom mentions that 'require => [User[$title],
> File["$home/.ssh"]]' is implicitly inclu
Hi Andrew,
Just noticed that ssh::auth::server doesn't require the resource for ~/.ssh
directory. Considering the documentation says it does (in Examples -> 1. With
account management at the bottom mentions that 'require => [User[$title],
File["$home/.ssh"]]' is implicitly included in both cli
16 matches
Mail list logo
