> The version of CFEngine he is running is 3.0.1b3
> (released ??? Jan or Feb '09, sometime, maybe?)
>
> The version of Puppet he is running is 0.24.7
> (released 16-Dec-2008)
>
> So, even though this article was just released, I think it was
> written a year
> ago. The author said these were th
On 24/02/10 17:31, Eric Gerlach wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
>> wrote:
>>> I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
>>> article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and C
Eric Gerlach wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
wrote:
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
> wrote:
> > I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
> > article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
> > abbreviate massively: Puppe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/10 8:23 PM, Andrew Heagle wrote:
> The version of CFEngine he is running is 3.0.1b3
> (released ??? Jan or Feb '09, sometime, maybe?)
>
> The version of Puppet he is running is 0.24.7
> (released 16-Dec-2008)
It's also important to note the
On Monday 22 February 2010 16:17:52 Toby Riddell wrote:
> I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
> article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
> abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
> both verifying and fixing configu
Hello
When testing puppet scalability, we noticed that one bottleneck is CPU usage on
puppetmaster node.
To scale up the number of concurrent puppet clients running in the same time, we tweaked our puppet configuration in
order to reduce puppetmaster work, mainly reducing its CPU work, and so s
On 22 February 2010 16:37, James Cammarata wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
> wrote:
>> I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
>> article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
>> abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much mo
>
> I'm not really surprised by this, puppet is written in Ruby (an interpreted
> language) vs CFengine which is written in C. I've used both, and I'd
> gladly trade a little CPU performance for the stability gains offered by
> puppet. CFengine is notoriously buggy in implementation, something I
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell
wrote:
> I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
> article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
> abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
> both verifying and fixing confi
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
both verifying and fixing configuration.
I'm in the early days of implementing Puppet and this h
11 matches
Mail list logo
