On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 10:25, Wolfgang Rapp wrote:
> While in RH7.X and 2.4.18.x RH kernels the linux ABI is includes the
> 2.4.20 kernels miss this patch.
> Is it intended to add this again?
No it's gone permanent. It's not really maintained upstream and gave far
more problems than that there ar
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in putting together a spec file for building
> a 2.5 series kernel, with some additional options that I am interested
> in, such as SCTP.
>
> Does anyone have a spec file that I can start from
it's outdated but see
htt
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 22:10, Jedidiah Thomet wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to compile the drivers for an Orinoco wireless card. I can
> build the drivers without a problem and I get no compile or build
> errors. But, when I plug the card in, I get these messages in the
> messages log:
>
>
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 17:02, M. Yu wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am planning on moving a program, currently running on SCO Xenix System V
> version 2.3.4, over to Linux using iBCS2. Browsing the web informed me that
> it has been replaced by Linux-ABI and that ABI should be patched against a
> vanil
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 00:52, Leonard Miller wrote:
> Should be in /root/install.log
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/23/03 18:35 PM >>>
> When RH8 is first installed, where is the .config file that was used
> for the install. Maybe I am missing something, but I know there are
> configs in the /usr/
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:48, Tomas Larsson wrote:
> Is there anyway I can limit the bandwidth used by Apache
>
> With best regards
see the bandwidth shaping doc's on
http://lartc.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 16:29, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I can build the module and load it into a running system w/out
> trouble. It's the boot kernel that is giving me trouble, and I'm thinking
> that it's because the -i386-BOOT config that came w/ the kernel differs from
> the actual kernel use
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 17:15, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2003 08:03, Arjan van de Ven uttered:
> > that is not correct.
>
> Ok, so if thats not correct, could you help me in any way as to figure out why
> the method I use works for an installed kernel, but n
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 04:45, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no
> > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding
> > something no one else is
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 12:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
>
>I need to compile the application in 8.x and want to run the binary
> In 7.x?
not really. We only try to preserve the other way around, compatibility
wise.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
>
>Could anybody throw a pointer which has a table/matrix
> about the different "gcc + glibc vs kernel" version compatible?
the kernel has nothing to do with this actually.
The kernel has a stable userspace interface in a backward
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 07:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
>
>I have a C++ application. I want to run it
> In AS2.1/7.x/8.x/9.x without recompiling.
>
> Is there a way?
>
> As of my knowledge If you compile it in 8.x/9.x
> It will not run in AS2.1/7.x. If you compile it in AS2.1/RH7.3,
>
> Could someone please provide, or give a documentation pointer for,
> what (if anything) special needs to be done to give a RH 8.0 user
> process the largest possible virtual memory space? I seem to recall
> that limit being 3Gig.
the current limit is indeed 3G. With some tricks you can enhance
>
> It used to be claimed that since the name resolution was done with a recursive
> algorithm, there was concern about using more kernel stack space. But
> I believe the recursive algorithm has been removed. Just the prohibition
> for a nesting level greater than 5 remains.
this is not corre
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 03:00, codefit wrote:
> I'm curious about this end of life situation for Red Hat 8 and no more
> errata reports. Does this mean that I have to upgrade to RH 9 or above in
> order to continue to receive errata ?
yes
> I signed up for a one year agreement with Red Hat Netw
few releases already)
Anyway for the erratum I turned on the i386 build again since there's no
space issue there
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
at improves performance is i686 but that
would rule out K6 and Via C3 cpu's
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 16:40, Petr Soucek wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2002, at 15:56, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > i586 rpms make all machines except the original Pentium I and Pentium
> > MMX slower. The first step that improves performance is i686 but that
> > would rule
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 21:51, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:59:11PM +0200, Bernd Kunze wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 20:09, Roger wrote:
>
> > > Around Sun,Oct 20 2002, at 02:50, Bernd Kunze, wrote:
> > > > Well, I did the reinstall from scratch, maestro3 works great
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 07:21, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 23:00, David Sudjiman wrote:
> > where can I found kernel-header.rpm in rh80 cd?
>
> Renamed to glibc-kernheaders, and really has very little to do with the
> running kernel. It's the kernel headers in use when glibc was com
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 22:30, Jeremy Hein wrote:
> Does anyone have step by step instructions to recompile a kernel or can
> possibly help me? And please don't point me to the kernel howto since
step 1: make mrproper
step 2: make xconfig
or make menuconfig
or make config
the co
mething like this.
could you try the kernel at
http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/testkernels/
and see if that fixes it?
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 12:02, Scott Taylor wrote:
> I tried to upgrade from 7.3 to 8 but met with absolute disaster, when the install
>program forced me to choose a location for a larger swap partition between /dev/hda2
>(boot partition where GRUB was) and /dev/hda3 (where my root file system was)
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 01:15, whitehat wrote:
> Apparently the spinlock.h header file included with
> gblic-kernheaders-2.4.7.20 for RH8.0 differs
> with the spinlock.h in kernel-sources-2.4.18-17.8.0 and this is the,
> excuse the pun, source of the problem.
it can't. spinlock.h contains kernel-on
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 20:59, John Kodis wrote:
> I've just loaded Red Hat Linux 8.0 on a computer with a new Asus
> P4S533-E motherboard, and am unable to get the on-board NIC working.
> I've left all the critical BIOS settings at their defaults, with "Plug
> & Play OS" set to "No", as setting it t
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 05:21, "Ricardo Jofré S." wrote:
> Thank's but the problem is not resolve .
>
> Note :
>
> rpm -ivh kernel-source-2.4.18-14.i386.rpm
> warning : kernel-source-2.4.18-14.i386.rpm : V3 DSA signature : NOKEY ,
> key ID db42a60e
>
> File "stdarg.h" not exist in /usr/src/linux-
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 20:18, "Ricardo Jofré S." wrote:
> Thank's but the problem apparentment is file "stdarg.h" not found or not
> exist .
it is not found because the gcc output the kernel makefile uses to find
it is translated unless you set LANG=C and hence the kernel makefile
gets confused wh
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 16:52, John Kodis wrote:
> I'll be setting up a machine with a multi-terabyte RAID array shortly,
> and had a couple of questions.
>
> - Does the kernel supplied with RHL 8.0 support devices of this size
> as a single file system? What about RHL 7.3?
>
> - Is there some k
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:49, JUSTIN GERRY wrote:
> I've been using SCSI RAID arrays for almost three years now, different
> controllers, different RAID setups and I've never run across such a
> poorly supported/designed product.
You are comparing hardware raid with software raid here. Promise "r
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:30, Kelly FitzGerald wrote:
> Hello All,
> I just got the fancy pants version of Redhat 8.0. It appears to go
> into a never ending plummeting halt when it comes time to install the
> Adaptec aic7xxx driver. What can I do? I'm using a SS50 Space Walker
> Shuttle
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 22:25, Kelly FitzGerald wrote:
> Arjan,
> Thank you so much for your information. Do you by chance know of any
> of the hacks or workarounds that can help my sytem?
for some systems (Asus ones mostly) it seems to help to change the "MPS"
setting in the bios. For others
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 22:43, Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 15:33, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > for some systems (Asus ones mostly) it seems to help to change the "MPS"
> > setting in the bios. For others it helps if you boot with
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 18:04, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Raises the question whether ext3 undeletion works for you actually?
it won't the problem is that the guarantees ext3 has to provide for
integrity lead to nothing of the file being left when the delete command
returns.
--
Psyche-li
re are too
many bioses where it doesn't work for us to turn it on by default.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 23:26, Eric Wood wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Neil Loffhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > With Linux I was getting
> > the impression, but this may be wrong, that if a Server is running fine,
> > then there is not so much point in upgrading from one version to
>
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 14:03, Cedric Chausson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I get a weird message about one of my hard disks during boot : It says
> this :
>
> Dec 15 13:55:17 kernel: hdd: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> SeekComplete Error }
> Dec 15 13:55:17 kernel: hdd: dma_intr: error=0x84 { D
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 00:32, Tom Ball wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:05, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:12:26AM -0800, Tom Ball wrote:
> > > title Red Hat Linux (2.4.18-18.8.0) - Home
> > > root (hd0,5)
> > > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-18.8.0 ro root=LABEL=/ rootfla
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 23:02, David Durst wrote:
> Anyone know where I would submit PCMCIA config changes to?
> That is mod the config so it supports some new cards.
please file a bugzilla bug against either the kernel-pcmcia-cs or hwdata
packages (the later is prefered).
signature.asc
Descripti
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 17:38, Zaphod wrote:
> Pardon me for an incredibly stupid question, but where is the rawhide
> kernel? Is it a "kernel-source" RPM somewhere? I can't find it
> anywhere on Red Hat's ftp sites or mirrors. Specifically I want to play
> with the latest XFree86 stuff (Mike Harr
h the latest XFree86 stuff (Mike Harris are you out there?), which
> requires the latest kernel from Rawhide.
ok I've put it up at
http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/testkernels/
for now.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 19:11, Samuel Flory wrote:
>
> >
> On the x86 arch you can't have a swap device more than 2G.
excuse me ? 8Gb works just fine ;)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 02:29, David Durst wrote:
> Just as a crazy question why has RH not added install support for
> the differnt Journalling file systems??
people would actually use it, and expect the same level of support we
can give for ext3/ext2.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 22:52, HakanTerzioglu wrote:
> As a conclusion;
> If you already have partition(s) which are JFS and/or Reiserfs from a
> previous operating system, such as Mandrake, SuSE and vice versa (these
> distros do support installion of reiserfs and jfs filesystems)
> Then RedHat's in
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 13:40, Justin Clacherty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone help with creating a driver disk for use at installation
> time with "linux dd"?
see the "device driver kit" at http://people.redhat.com/dledford
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 06:52, Charles A. Crayne wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:02:29 -0500
> "Peter Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> :I'm never going to get used to the oxymoron IDE RAID :)
>
> If you think that "IDE RAID" is an oxymoron, what terms
> of abuse do you reserve for "SOFTWARE
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:18, Nadim Bitar wrote:
> My log has this message:
> "Uhhuh, MMI received, Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
> ..
> You probably have a hardware problem with your chips."
>
> How do I diagnose this?
> Do i need new RAM?
depends a bit. Some dell machine create NMI'
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 18:16, Nadim Bitar wrote:
> >for testing memory memtest86 is a very useful program; that would be a
> >very good start
>
> I ran memtest86 and no errors where detected, what should i test next?
> this server was supposed to go live tomorrow.
> thanks.
If it's a Dell call Del
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 17:16, Lucas Albers wrote:
> How do you optimize it for a particular platform?
> Lets say I want to recompile my kernel from a src rpm, using the gcc 3.2
> compiler.
> How do I tell gcc 3.2 to optimize for my p4 or athlon or whatever system?
for the kernel it's easy to do it
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 21:38, M A Young wrote:
> Actually, 8.1.7 isn't certified on RHAS 2.1, the latest release 8.1.7 is
> certified on is 7.1.
7.1 with a 2.4.3-12 kernel even
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-j8sONcMtN1BI+8ZSWJOI"
ecksum.
Are you sure you have an 80 ribbon cable (as opposed to a 40 ribbon
one)? Is it one of those ultra-long cables?
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 16:27, Duncan Rubinger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Gericom Laptop with a DVD Drive, but RedHat only recognizes a
> CDROM. How can I create a new DVD Drive ? MAKEDEV dvd in /dev doesn't
> work ...
cdroms and dvdroms are alike enough from the os' point of view that they
are
h one
and it's also stored in /boot :)
> is the pcmcia config file ? Can anyone help me ...
None of the Red Hat Linux releases that come with a 2.4 kernel have
actually used the kernel parts pcmcia-cs. (eg just the cardmgr etc
userspace tools and the config stuff).
Greeting
actice ;(
Anyway can you please try
apm=idle-threshold=100
instead of apm=off to narrow down the breakage?
And can you send me (off list) the output of the dmidecode program (part
of the kernel-utils package) so that I can mark your machine as "can't
do APM" (or can't do APM
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 17:52, Randall J. Parr wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 03:44, Randall J. Parr wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I have installed RH8 several times now and it has always detected the
> >>NIC card (some required
55 matches
Mail list logo
