On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 04:45, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > > > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no > > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding > > something no one else is doing, all else is out the window. Sorry, but > > the whole NPTL gains nothing...no speed...nothing.No other Linux distro > > is using it or planning on it. That in itself breaks compatibility and > > the products usefulness.
how about "it provides Posix compliant, non-broken threading" for the first time in linux history
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
