error accessing cgi-bin folder

2003-03-26 Thread Daniel Tan
tried to access my cgi-bin folder and got this error message...even my test-cgi script doesn't work access to the dir is there and rights are there too...on my 7.3, it is working fine... i have perl installnow using rh 8.0 Server error! The server encountered an internal error and was unab

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Keith Winston
Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: What Windows lacks is the ability to configure everything... this is where linux and UNIX has it all over windows, but... you have to deal with it's complexities to do it. Things average people want to do are: editing and viewing documents of various types web browsing

scp batch, what am I missing?

2003-03-26 Thread Dave
I've generated the keys, copied the .pub key to the other machine and renamed it authorized_keys in the .ssh directory of the same userid. However when attempting to either ssh, or batch scp, I am still prompted for the password. I'm using Redhat 8.0 with all current errata applied. --

Re: redhat 9?

2003-03-26 Thread Sanjeewa Wijerathne
--- Stephen Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you make of this? > > http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/ > > Is this basically rh 8.1? > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list I hope RH9 won't brake my php/snmp

one our time drift

2003-03-26 Thread Nicolas Turro
Hi, I report the same bug as in thread : Time Drift / Shift Problem - Please help by Charlie McVeigh... My computer goes 1hour ahead a few hours after i set the 'right' time. 1-My bios clock is right 2-I set the sytem clock with hwclock --hctosys 3-the clock is ok for a while, then jumps 1

page not displayed for security reason

2003-03-26 Thread steven.mugassa
Hello everybody, I've a Linux machine with RH8.0, and a windows2K machine. With Linux machine i can't open some frames in a website http://linux-igd.sourceforge.net (it gives a message that for security reasons some pages/frames can't be displayed) while in windows machine i can do that.I'm using

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Daniel T. Drea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Keith Winston wrote: > Windows, and you will lose more control of both as time goes on. You > are also supporting a group of very unethical people, at least at the > highest management levels, who are not concerned at all about y

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Keith Winston
Daniel T. Drea wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Keith Winston wrote: Windows, and you will lose more control of both as time goes on. You are also supporting a group of very unethical people, at least at the highest management levels, who are not concerne

Re: help partitioning

2003-03-26 Thread John P Verel
On 03/26/03 07:25 +0300, valeed wrote: > > I have downloaded the psyche-i386-iso images & created 3 cds reqd for > installation , As Red Hat 9.0 is due out next week for RHN subscribers and the week after that for the general public, you may want to wait for it. John -- Psyche-list mailing l

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread JD
Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this issue, but it includes all of what i essentially think on the topic. Please correct me if i am wrong on any particular technical issue. Windows and redhat might cost similar regarding the enterprise

Re: scp batch, what am I missing?

2003-03-26 Thread Ade Olonoh
You need to rename the id_dsa.pub file to authorized_keys2, not authorized_keys. If it still doesn't work, run "ssh -v " and copy the debug messages to the list. --Ade. On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 06:25, Dave wrote: > I've generated the keys, copied the .pub key to the other machine and > renamed

Re: scp batch, what am I missing?

2003-03-26 Thread Dave
> You need to rename the id_dsa.pub file to authorized_keys2, not > authorized_keys. > > If it still doesn't work, run "ssh -v " and copy the debug > messages to the list. Will give it a shot, many thanks. -- Cheers, Dave -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Lilo and mounted boot partition

2003-03-26 Thread MW Mike Weiner (5028)
Title: Lilo and mounted boot partition Dear list readers - I have a question, one which I have never really done or thought of doing before, though I am sure there is some way to do it. Where I am at is as follows, I have a server with a "cloned" disk that I have mounted temporarily so that

RedHat 9

2003-03-26 Thread David Yates
Doesa anyone know if RedHat 9 breaks all of my old Loki games, unreal tournament/2003, and quake3? -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: scp batch, what am I missing?

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Weber
One other thing. ssh will ignore the authorized_keys[2] file (even when it's named correctly) if the permissions on it are not set to 600. -Michael >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/26/03 05:25AM >>> I've generated the keys, copied the .pub key to the other machine and renamed it authorized_keys in the

Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Vanecek
On 25 Mar 2003 16:05:09 -0900, Michael Smith wrote > After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise. My basic subscription for the RH 8 channel does not expire until Feb 2004. What will happen to my subscription after 12/31/03? -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Vanecek
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:25:05 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote > On Tuesday 25 March 2003 17:05, Michael Smith uttered: > > After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise. > > Again, I point you to the "At least 12 months" No where does it say > you get 12 months, and 12 months _only_ f

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 23:22, Mirabella, Mathew J uttered: > Windows can learn from open source and linux / unix... but Unix and linux > sure can learn from the user interface issues of windows... Linux is ahead > on many important things... it just lacks the few things i mentioned in my > last p

Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 07:34, Mike Vanecek uttered: > My basic subscription for the RH 8 channel does not expire until Feb 2004. > What will happen to my subscription after 12/31/03? Entitlements can be passed from one system to another, or from one release to the next. So if you install R

Subject: Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Marcie Laux
Message: 13 Subject: Re: Red Hat 9 From: Joe Klemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 25 Mar 2003 22:17:54 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 18:29, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > While I agree some of the decisions Red Hat has made have been > necessary and even go

Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 07:38, Mike Vanecek uttered: > Under this new scheme of things, what is contained in rawhide, RH 9? rawhide is, and always will be, an alpha/beta package dumping grounds, continuing the development of OSS. These packages may/may not appear in a later release or errata

Re: keyboard problem: alt gr key

2003-03-26 Thread Sebastian Bauer
William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 wrote: Please upgrade your kernel to the latest errata, or , at least to 2.4.18-19.8.0. The trouble is with Speakup. http://linux-speakup.org/ I *believe* that RH has found a way to fix this. I posted a request for non-English keyboard users to te

Re: RedHat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:00:05AM -0500, David Yates wrote: > Doesa anyone know if RedHat 9 breaks all of my old Loki games, unreal > tournament/2003, and quake3? How can we? Red Hat Linux 9 hasn't been released yet! Why don't you ask again in a couple of weeks? -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN,

Re: help partitioning

2003-03-26 Thread Jay Crews
Michael Smith writes > > You _must_ have winxp installed _first_. I'm not exactly sure why, but > that's said everywhere. Then just create a 256 swap partition, and use > the rest for the / partition. (Use Disk Druid to partition) It's "easiest" to install XP first. Not necessarily a must. L

IPv6 router?

2003-03-26 Thread seong 323
-- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

IPv6 router?

2003-03-26 Thread seong 323
im currently using RH8 as my server and i try to implement IPv6 router in the server. After i had make changes to the config files and verify that the IPv6 protocol is workable i try to connect two clients to the server which has two network adapter. When i try to ping from 1 client to the server

Re: scp batch, what am I missing?

2003-03-26 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 06:25:27AM -0500, Dave wrote: > I've generated the keys, copied the .pub key to the other machine and > renamed it authorized_keys in the .ssh directory of the same userid. > > However when attempting to either ssh, or batch scp, I am still > prompted for the password.

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Brent Fox
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 18:29, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > You cannot expect a > company or joe user to upgrade their operating system every year > (which is now necessary given the 12 month limit on bug/security > fixes). You also cannot expect Red Hat to provide errata forever on a product that our

problem w/ "redhat-config-packages"

2003-03-26 Thread Cameron Mura
Hello, I'm wondering if you could help me with a problem I'm having while trying to re-install packages from the RH 8.0 (psyche) distribution (or point me to another source of help). Basically, I'm trying to (re)install (or over-write if they're already installed) several packages using the "r

problem w/ "redhat-config-packages"

2003-03-26 Thread Cameron Mura
*** SORRY for the possible double post -- I accidentally sent this email from a non-subscribed account just moments ago *** Hello, I'm wondering if you could help me with a problem I'm having while trying to re-install packages from the RH 8.0 (psyche) distribution (or point me to another sour

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Jack Bowling
** Reply to message from JD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 05:55:54 -0800 > "Linux vs Windows" now is just about choosing between being a > rouge-American or a normal member of the world citizen. Ya know, I usually find Deb trolls in here amusing. But ones that can't spell always make

OT Fax questions

2003-03-26 Thread Harry Putnam
Summary: I'm aware how to send faxes with several different pieces of software including efax. Where one uses the OS and PC as fax machine. I want to know if anyone knows how to use a freestanding fax from RH8. That is, my wife has a `hp 0fficejet 145' (fax, copy, scan, print) One of those

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this > issue, but it includes all of what i essentially think on the topic. > Please correct me if i am wrong on any particular technical issue. This is a very interesting

RE: problem w/ "redhat-config-packages"

2003-03-26 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
I don't know what causes your problem, but if you have enough space, you can either copy all packages from CDs to directory and use 'redhat-config-packages --tree=/path/to/packages' command or put the iso images of your RH cdroms into one directory and use 'redhat-config-packages --isodir=/path' co

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On 25 Mar 2003, Michael Smith wrote: > I think you made some very good points. I would only like to stress the > fact that: [...] > 2) linux has, and probably (even though we don't like to admit it) > always will be a more complex operating system. I don't know why anyone would not admit

RE: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > and yes i agree that the linux net and web and ftp and networky stuff is far bettter > than windows as i eluded to in my post. Please wrap your lines. > And although i do agree that linux and unix systems are a bit more complex than >

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Smith
That's debatable. I'm in the middle of taking the MCSA, and let me tell you, you just have to know where to get to the complexities. Most people haven't even heard of Microsoft Management Console, the advanced Registry Editor, etc. Microsoft just keeps those complexities away from the general user.

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Javier Gostling
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:01:10PM +1000, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > I know that more immediate support with hardware is likely to be better > for windows because most hardware like sound cards etc are comercial in > nature, and thus usually come with windows drivers as a default. e.g. > creativ

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread dballester
Sorry, I'm not agree. More debatable. A lot of this tools has been developed by Microsoft under pressure/demand of big customers who had no way to solve monitoring/customization of his own servers. This developed tools has been converted into standard tools from NT 4 to 2000. Regards Michae

RE: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
> > in windows, graphics and sound are supported right away. > just install > > the drivers if you need to and often you don't have to even > do that... > > and it all works. I have heard of very few problems with > windows in the > > same way as those with red hat on this issue. > > S

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Smith
I'm talking about things like the Microsoft-Management-Console (mmc) regedt32, etc. I'm taking (currently) the administrating Microsoft Windows 2000 Pro. -Michael On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 09:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, I'm not agree. > > More debatable. A lot of this tools has been develop

k3b cdrdao

2003-03-26 Thread Marek
Hi k3b 0.75 had the option to set the cdrdao driver manually to generic-mmc for example, i am unable to do this with the 0.8.X versions. It chooses auto and in setup and config i don't see an option to do this. any way out ? -- /Marek /Pawinski.net ###

Re: problem w/ "redhat-config-packages"

2003-03-26 Thread Cameron Mura
Hi Pavel, Thanks for the tip. I tried your suggestion (>redhat-config-packages --tree=/u1/cmura/ISOs/, which is where the disc1-->5 iso's are located), but this doesn't help... Well, at least the "redhat-config-packages" application opens properly, but when I check the packages to install (for ex

Re[2]: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread ghhalley
I am sysadmin for Linux, Windows, and Apple systems. Its very wrong to say one is more or less complex. Apple and MS hide most of the complexity from the user, but in reality their codes are longer and more confusing/complex. Linux, in general, is simpler. Examples in mind including deleting pr

Re: OT Fax questions

2003-03-26 Thread Arend
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Harry Putnam wrote: > Summary: > I'm aware how to send faxes with several different pieces of > software including efax. Where one uses the OS and PC as fax > machine. > > I want to know if anyone knows how to use a freestanding fax from RH8. > > That is, my wife has

Double Messages

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Smith
Anyone getting doubles of all the posts? I changed my subscription to a different e-mail and still had problems... -- Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

KDE Launching Konqueror on automount of CD

2003-03-26 Thread Charles Curley
1) How do I turn off launching of Konqueror when a CD-ROM is automounted? 2) How do I allow autofs to continue to run but disallow it automounting the CD-ROM? My /etc/auto.master looks like so: # $Id: auto.master,v 1.2 1997/10/06 21:52:03 hpa Exp $ # Sample auto.master file # Format of thi

Re: Linux vs Windoze

2003-03-26 Thread Marcie Laux
Ok guys and gals, why are we even debating this ridiculous topic on a Redhat 8 mailing list? If you want windoze then find a windoze mailing list,, that will offer you the support that you can get here and all over the web from tons of techies. When I added myself to this list it was to be part

safe to up2date 8.0 sys to glibc 2.3.2? what breaks?

2003-03-26 Thread Randall J. Parr
I seen several postings that imply allowing RHN up2date to install the glibc 2.3.2 set of updates will break an RH 8.0 system. Does this break RH 8.0 supplied packages or only non-RH-supplied packages? Does anyone have a list of things that will break? Even more important does anyone have a lis

[psyche] safe to up2date 8.0 sys to glibc 2.3.2? what breaks?

2003-03-26 Thread Raul Acevedo
The only thing I know that will break is wine. If you use CodeWeavers CrossOver products, those will also break because they are based on wine. Other than that, I'm not aware of any problems. Raul Randall J. Parr wrote: > I seen several postings that imply allowing RHN up2date to install the

Re: problem w/ "redhat-config-packages"

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:37:30 -0800, Cameron Mura wrote: > I'm wondering if you could help me with a problem I'm having while > trying to re-install packages from the RH 8.0 (psyche) distribution (or > point me to another source of help). > > Basica

Re: moving var

2003-03-26 Thread Stephen Carville
On Tuesday March 25 2003 09:43 am, Marek wrote: > Hi > > I would like to move my /var dir to some free space i have on a drive. > How would i achieve this ? Copy the contents of /var to the new location. Change to / Drop to single user mode Unmount /var Mount the new location as /var Change /

quick question mozilla spellchecker

2003-03-26 Thread Stephen Mah
I just installed a spellchecker from http://spellchecker.mozdev.org, but I don't think it properly installed. I don't see the "spell" icon. I'm running Mozilla 1.3. Did anyone get this working? -regards steve -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/

Re: moving var

2003-03-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Stephen Carville wrote: > On Tuesday March 25 2003 09:43 am, Marek wrote: > > Hi > > > > I would like to move my /var dir to some free space i have on a drive. > > How would i achieve this ? > > Copy the contents of /var to the new location. > > Change to / > > Drop to sing

Re: Double Messages

2003-03-26 Thread Danial Howard
Michael Smith wrote: Anyone getting doubles of all the posts? I changed my subscription to a different e-mail and still had problems... Yes, I got doubles yesterday. I haven't noticed doubles today. -- Danial M. Howard IT Systems Programmer, Computing and Communications Idaho State University, Poc

Re: Double Messages

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Smith
I've been getting it since thursday... On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 11:44, Danial Howard wrote: > Michael Smith wrote: > > Anyone getting doubles of all the posts? I changed my subscription to a > > different e-mail and still had problems... > > Yes, I got doubles yesterday. I haven't noticed doubles to

Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:09, Michael Smith wrote: > That's debatable. I'm in the middle of taking the MCSA, and let me tell > you, you just have to know where to get to the complexities. Most people > haven't even heard of Microsoft Management Console, the advanced > Registry Editor, etc. Microsof

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Creating and releasing errata costs developer time, QA time, > documentation time, and RHN/FTP bandwidth. Some people seem to be under > the impression that our cost of doing errata is zero, but it just isn't > so. Our resources

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 13:36, Kevin Waterson wrote: > eg: If I have a 7.3 installation and the errata stops > for public release. How then can updates be limited to > paying customers only if the source code must be available > under the GPL? > > Kind regards > Kevin Nothing stops you from dow

Re: safe to up2date 8.0 sys to glibc 2.3.2? what breaks?

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Vanecek
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:29:12 -0800, Randall J. Parr wrote > I seen several postings that imply allowing RHN up2date to install > the glibc 2.3.2 set of updates will break an RH 8.0 system. > > Does this break RH 8.0 supplied packages or only non-RH-supplied packages? > > Does anyone have a list

SV: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Tomas Larsson
> -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Joe Klemmer > Skickat: den 26 mars 2003 21:50 > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ämne: Re: Linux vs Windows > /SNIP > But this is the RH 8 list and none of this is really topical. /SNIP But what is "topic

Re: [psyche] safe to up2date 8.0 sys to glibc 2.3.2? what breaks?

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 14:32, Raul Acevedo wrote: > The only thing I know that will break is wine. If you use CodeWeavers > CrossOver products, those will also break because they are based on > wine. Other than that, I'm not aware of any problems. FWLIW, it only seems to break the crosso

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 16:36, Kevin Waterson wrote: > I am curious as to how the updates will be released? > As this is open source, surely the source code must > be available to all. > How will this be handled? > > eg: If I have a 7.3 installation and the errata stops > for public release. How th

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nothing stops you from downloading a 8.0 or a 9 .src.rpm and rebuilding it for > 7.3. yes the source is there, but there is no guarentee that the end package > will work as designed on 7.3. There are some system changes th

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Brent Fox
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 16:36, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, > Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Creating and releasing errata costs developer time, QA time, > > documentation time, and RHN/FTP bandwidth. Some people seem to be under > > the impression that our cost

Re: SV: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 16:43, Tomas Larsson wrote: > But what is "topical" > Surely a discussion of pros and cons between MS 2K/XP and RH8/Linux is > topical. > Or maybe the topic should be RH8 vs Win XP/2K. The list here is actually the RH 8 User Support list but it's unmoderated so, whil

ULOGD and iptables -j ULOG?

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Vanecek
I would like to log iptable -j LOG to something like local5 rather than to messages. However, based on my reading of the doco I do not see a way to change the logging facility for iptables. The iptables man talks about a -j ULOG. However, searches for information on how to use it (with specific ex

Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Vanecek
Mozilla 1.3 release notes say that it is only compatible with java compiled with GCC 3.2 which is available from the Blackdown project. However, they also say a version with GCC 3.2 is also rumored to be available from Sun sometime soon. I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs installed. I have looked at the j

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 14:04, Kevin Waterson wrote: > Yes, I can see that. But where would the new, updated, packages be stored? > If a spec file was changed in another package, it too would need to be > released under the GPL Same places they are stored now, in the updates/ directory of Red H

Source Code

2003-03-26 Thread Derrick Brown
Where can I find the source code for syslog. I, for some reason, cannot seem to find it on the CDs. Thank You, Derrick Brown -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Tom Diehl
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, > Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nothing stops you from downloading a 8.0 or a 9 .src.rpm and rebuilding it for > > 7.3. yes the source is there, but there is no guarentee that the end package > > will wo

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We won't release errata or updates for 7.3 after the End Of Life period > arrives. With the RHL line, there's no distinction between paying > customers and unpaid customers once the product goes EOL. Ok, so if 9.0 goes EOL, I

Re: Printer Drivers

2003-03-26 Thread Cliff Kent
I check: http://www.linuxprinting.org/ for printer information... before I purchase or install. Cliff Kent -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Source Code

2003-03-26 Thread Tom Diehl
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Derrick Brown wrote: > Where can I find the source code for syslog. > I, for some reason, cannot seem to find it on the CDs. Look on the cds for sysklogd-1.4.1-10.src.rpm. HTH, -- .Tom"Nothing would please me more than being able to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Source Code

2003-03-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 14:16, Derrick Brown wrote: > Where can I find the source code for syslog. > I, for some reason, cannot seem to find it on the CDs. CD-4:sysklogd-1.4.1-10.src.rpm -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/) W

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Tom Diehl
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, > Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We won't release errata or updates for 7.3 after the End Of Life period > > arrives. With the RHL line, there's no distinction between paying > > customers and unpaid custome

Re: Source Code

2003-03-26 Thread Norman Gaywood
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:16:18PM -0600, Derrick Brown wrote: > Where can I find the source code for syslog. > I, for some reason, cannot seem to find it on the CDs. % rpm -qf /etc/syslog.conf sysklogd-1.4.1-10 So it's in (modulo where you keep the src.rpm files): ... 8.0/en/os/i386/SRPMS/sysk

Re: moving var

2003-03-26 Thread Stephen Carville
On Wednesday March 26 2003 12:24 pm, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Stephen Carville wrote: > > On Tuesday March 25 2003 09:43 am, Marek wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I would like to move my /var dir to some free space i have on a drive. > > > How would i achieve this ? > > > > Copy t

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Brent Fox
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:38, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, > Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We won't release errata or updates for 7.3 after the End Of Life period > > arrives. With the RHL line, there's no distinction between paying > > customers and unpaid

RE: Source Code

2003-03-26 Thread Derrick Brown
Thank you all for curing my temporary insanity Derrick Brown - CCNA NetSys Technologies, Inc. 281.558.0999 x103 -Original Message- From: Norman Gaywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Source Code On Wed,

Re: moving var

2003-03-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Stephen Carville wrote: > On Wednesday March 26 2003 12:24 pm, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > just a thought, but would it be possible to unmount and remount > > /var in one operation using the "remount" option of the mount > > command? > > > > after that's done, you could al

Re: ULOGD and iptables -j ULOG?

2003-03-26 Thread Miguel M
Anyone have any ideas on how I can get the -j LOG action put the results in /var/log/packets rather than as kernel in /var/log/messages? Hi Mike! A very simple example that you can later integrate to your firewall. Watch out for the size of /var/log/packets: # touch /var/log/packets # echo "kern.d

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:38:11AM +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, > Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We won't release errata or updates for 7.3 after the End Of Life period > > arrives. With the RHL line, there's no distinction between paying > > customer

Re: quotas on nfs mounted filesystems.

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Wardle
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:54, Aaron Konstam wrote: > We have a series of machines that share the same nfs mounted user > directories. This nfs mounted filesystem has quotas enabled on the > server and one can indeed run quota on the server to find out your > quota. But on the clients the running is

RE: Linux vs Windows

2003-03-26 Thread Mirabella, Mathew J
Ok I have to revise some of my articulations on this issue. My first post was a bit rambelling, and was not as precise as it could be. To address a few points... >MS Windows is *perceived* as "more intuitive" is because there >are so many people who were already in contact with it I do actually a

Re: ULOGD and iptables -j ULOG?

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Vanecek
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:13:51 -0600, Miguel M wrote > >Anyone have any ideas on how I can get the -j LOG action put the > >results in /var/log/packets rather than as kernel in /var/log/messages? > > Hi Mike! > > A very simple example that you can later integrate to your firewall. > Watch out for t

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Brent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you're using the Enterprise line, you're not using RHL 9. You're > using one of the RHEL products (AS, ES, or WS). They are two different > product lines. ahh, this is where I was getting lost > We do make the source availab

Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:25, Tom Diehl wrote: > Once a product is EOL there are not going to be any new updated packages > unless someone other than Red Hat makes them. It's likely that some of the RH engineers will be making rpms unofficially as individual developers, too. -- Farewe

Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 26 March 2003 05:01 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote: > Mozilla 1.3 release notes say that it is only compatible with java > compiled with GCC 3.2 which is available from the Blackdown project. > > However, they also say a version with GCC 3.2 is al

Re: k3b cdrdao (Psyche-list digest, Vol 1 #1182)

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Pang
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:31:35 +0200 > From: Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: k3b cdrdao > > Hi > > k3b 0.75 had the option to set the cdrdao driver manually to generic-mmc > for example, i am unable to do this with the 0.8.X versions. It chooses > auto and in setup and config i don't see a

Sendmail running but not accepting

2003-03-26 Thread Thomas Chamtieh
I just ran up2date on a newly installed system. All the updates installed without any erros except one thing. Sendmail was running perfect and accepting emails without any problems. After the update, sendmail is running fine, but it refuses any connection from anywhere!! Any ideas? Thanks, -Tho

Re: Sendmail running but not accepting

2003-03-26 Thread Daniel Tan
maybe iptables is running and blocking it use nmap to test whether port 25 is blocked? try telnet 25 to telnet to smtp port - Original Message - From: "Thomas Chamtieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:04 PM Subject: Sendmail running but not accep

Re: Sendmail running but not accepting

2003-03-26 Thread Justin Zygmont
sounds like your /etc/mail/sendmail.cf got replaced during the upgrade for some reason, you might want to check it out. On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Thomas Chamtieh wrote: > > I just ran up2date on a newly installed system. All the updates installed > without any erros except one thing. Sendmail was r

RE: Sendmail running but not accepting

2003-03-26 Thread Thomas Chamtieh
Figured it out, I had to rebuild sendmail.cf and take out the following line: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') This line will only accept emails from the localhost and deny everything else. Thanks, -Thomas > -Original Message- > From: Justin Zygmont [mailto:[EMAIL P

Tripwire - update database fails

2003-03-26 Thread Götz Reinicke
Hallo, today I did a freas install of the latest tripwire rpm from RH 8 (2.3.1-14) and rawhide (2.3.1-17) on two different servers. I followed the instructions of the online reference guide for the set up. The command /usr/sbin/tripwire -m u -r /var/lib/tripwire/report/mail-20030326-161019.twr

Re: Sendmail running but not accepting

2003-03-26 Thread Jason Dale
I am not sure if you have done all of this before, so I will mention it just in case ;) Check your /etc/mail/sendmail.mc file for the following; dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') Make sure the line above is commented out. If it's not, add the 'dnl' and then use the m4 prog