On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 17:18, Jyan-Min Fang wrote:
> On 18 Jul 2003, Piero Calucci wrote:
>
> > Upgrading to mozilla-1.0.2 broke completely galeon for me, and a lot of
> > plugins too. Anyone had the same problem?
> >
> > Piero
>
> same here. new mozilla broke many plugins. like java (1.4.1) plug
On 18 Jul 2003, Piero Calucci wrote:
> Upgrading to mozilla-1.0.2 broke completely galeon for me, and a lot of
> plugins too. Anyone had the same problem?
>
> Piero
same here. new mozilla broke many plugins. like java (1.4.1) plugin, even
though it shows up on about plug-ins page, it doesn't wo
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon, March 31, 2003 8:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:34:53 +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote
>
> &g
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:34:53 +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote
> Hmm, actually I have both java 1.4.1_02 from Sun and blackdown.org
> and the plugin works fine. I haven't done any special steps to make
> it work. I just unpacked the blackdown.org jre to /usr/java/ dir and
> made a symbolic link to a
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sun, March 30, 2003 8:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:16:46 +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote
>
>
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:16:46 +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote
>
> Did you copy the plugin file to mozilla plugins dir? I think it is important
> to create a symbolic link to a plugin and not to copy the file. Also
> do you use a plugin from mozilla directory or netscape4 directory?
Yes,
[EMAIL PR
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sat, March 29, 2003 5:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:34:08 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote
> >
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:34:08 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 28 March 2003 04:02 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> > Did not work for me. My guess is that I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs from
> > java.sun installed. However, the blackstone is for j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 28 March 2003 04:02 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Did not work for me. My guess is that I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs from
> java.sun installed. However, the blackstone is for j2sdk-1.4.1-01.
> Installation details shown below. The java plugin shows
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:38:52 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 26 March 2003 05:01 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > Mozilla 1.3 release notes say that it is only compatible with java
> > compiled with GCC 3.2 which is available from the Blac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 05:01 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Mozilla 1.3 release notes say that it is only compatible with java
> compiled with GCC 3.2 which is available from the Blackdown project.
>
> However, they also say a version with GCC 3.2 is al
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue, March 25, 2003 7:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Realplayer plugin
>
>
> Y Makki wrote:
>
> >Hello
> >
> >I have the exact same problem after installing
> Mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_gtk2.
>
Y Makki wrote:
Hello
I have the exact same problem after installing Mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_gtk2.
Another problem I started seeing after upgrading Mozilla is
mplayer-plugin leaves the video on top even after the video ends or is
closed, only way is to close all open Mozilla windows.
On Mon, 2003-03-2
Hello
I have the exact same problem after installing Mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_gtk2.
Another problem I started seeing after upgrading Mozilla is
mplayer-plugin leaves the video on top even after the video ends or is
closed, only way is to close all open Mozilla windows.
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:36, Ant
Around about 13/03/2003 14:46, Jason Dale typed ...
You can get many types of MUA's of which Mozilla can be one,
and you also get other programs like evolution, etc.
Eh? One of us is confused :-) Where does sendmail mbox file format
come into it?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rm -f .signature
[EMA
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Mozilla Personal Address Book Corrupted
> Around about 13/03/2003 12:30, Alessandro Oliveira typed ...
> > I know that this is not psyche specific, but I have a user that has an
> > address book corru
Around about 13/03/2003 12:30, Alessandro Oliveira typed ...
I know that this is not psyche specific, but I have a user that has an
address book corrupted, is there any way to recover at least part of it ?
The .mab files /are/ text, but not exactly friendly! Your best bet
is probably the moz n
What type of mail user agent program are you using?
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Alessandro Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:30 PM
Subject: Mozilla Personal Address Book Corrupted
> Hi guys,
>
> I know that this is not psyche
Kevin Farmer wrote:
Hi All.
I am fairly new to Linux. I have my modem configured and working but I
cannot figure out how to get Mozilla to automatically activate the modem
when it is launched. Right now I have to activate and deactivate the
modem by going to: System Tools --> Network Devic
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Kevin Farmer wrote:
>Hi All.
>
>I am fairly new to Linux. I have my modem configured and working but I
>cannot figure out how to get Mozilla to automatically activate the modem
>when it is launched. Right now I have to activate and deactivate the
>modem by going to: Sys
hi jay
yes i can see the realplayer plugin in the list.
quadir.
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Jay Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:49:43PM -0700, Kareemullah Quadir wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am using RH 8 with Mozilla 1.3b. I downloaded RealPlayer8 rpm and
> > installed it. I copied t
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:49:43PM -0700, Kareemullah Quadir wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am using RH 8 with Mozilla 1.3b. I downloaded RealPlayer8 rpm and
> installed it. I copied the rpnp.so and raclass.zip to my
> /usr/local/mozilla/plugins directory. when i try to play streaming audio
> in mozill
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:36:59 -0600
>From: Aaron Konstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Mozilla or Netscape?
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:33:02PM -0800, Ilona wrote:
>> I'm a newb
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:33:02PM -0800, Ilona wrote:
> I'm a newbie to Linux and was wondering what people prefered and
> advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla and if mozilla wich
> version to use 1.0.2 or 1.2? From what I could see it seemed that they
> had two separate numbering sche
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tue, February 11, 2003 4:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mozilla or Netscape?
>
>
> I'm a newbie to Linux and was wondering what people prefered and
> advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla and if mo
Ilona wrote:
I'm a newbie to Linux and was wondering what people prefered and
advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla
As you know, Netscape 7.x and Mozilla 1.x use the same rendering engine.
But there are key things that make Mozilla the best choice for me.
First, Mozilla includes som
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:33:02PM -0800, Ilona wrote:
> I'm a newbie to Linux and was wondering what people prefered and
> advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla and if mozilla wich
> version to use 1.0.2 or 1.2? From what I could see it seemed that they
> had two separate numbering sche
I found mozilla to be more sluggish that netscape 4.x. Otherwise mozilla
would be a great choice.
On 10 Feb 2003, Ilona wrote:
> I'm a newbie to Linux and was wondering what people prefered and
> advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla and if mozilla wich
> version to use 1.0.2 or 1.2?
> advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla
Mozilla is my choice by far. The recent Netscape builds have been based
on the Mozilla core code.
> which version to use 1.0.2 or 1.2? From what I could see it seemed
that they had two separate numbering schemes going so i couldn't figure
out the
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:09, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- Y Makki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Has anyone tried these versions, specifically from
> > this location?
> > Thanks.
>
> I've tried the mozilla version 1.3a, but I wouldn't
> trust them anywhere except from mozilla.org (I'
--- Y Makki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone tried these versions, specifically from
> this location?
> Thanks.
I've tried the mozilla version 1.3a, but I wouldn't
trust them anywhere except from mozilla.org (I'm
currently using 1.3a compiled with Xft and it works
perfect.)
=
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 19:25, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> -- Original Message ---
> From: Dave Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RedHat 8.0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 25 Jan 2003 07:45:48 -0600
> Subject: Re: Mozilla 1.2.1
> > I had a simil
-- Original Message ---
From: Dave Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RedHat 8.0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 25 Jan 2003 07:45:48 -0600
Subject: Re: Mozilla 1.2.1
> On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 05:54, Marek wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Anyone expie
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 05:54, Marek wrote:
> Hi
>
> Anyone expierenced problems with mozilla crashing after entering a url
> and hitting enter ? Thought it was Squid but disabled it and the same
> problem.
I had a similar problem, and it turned out that I didn't have Java
installed. The plugin w
Figured it out. It was a option under the advanced settings
Brian
Brian York wrote:
<>
I am using mozilla to connect through imap to and exchange server. I got
all the messages in the inbox but none of the other folders and i have
rules set to send messages into folders other than the inbo
Around about 20/01/2003 18:02, Mark C typed ...
In evo, I can create several accounts, but just disable them, so when I
go to compose a mail, I can choose who it will come from, in Mozilla you
cannot seem to do this.
'Tis exactly the same in Moz - from the mail window, open mail &
account set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==> "wh" == Wade Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wh> Folks, I have a strange problem. I updated RH8 to the latest
wh> packages and to Mozilla 1.2.1 xft (mozilla-1.2.1-0_rh8_xft).
wh> All seemed OK until this morning. When I went to start
wh> mozilla, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==> "wh" == Wade Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wh> Folks, I have a strange problem. I updated RH8 to the latest
wh> packages and to Mozilla 1.2.1 xft (mozilla-1.2.1-0_rh8_xft).
wh> All seemed OK until this morning. When I went to start
wh> mozilla, it
==> "wh" == Wade Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wh> Folks, I have a strange problem. I updated RH8 to the latest
wh> packages and to Mozilla 1.2.1 xft (mozilla-1.2.1-0_rh8_xft).
wh> All seemed OK until this morning. When I went to start
wh> mozilla, it would not start initia
-- Original Message ---
From: Wade Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:29:45 -0500
Subject: Mozilla 1.2.1 fails to start
> Folks,
>
> I have a strange problem. I updated RH8 to the latest packages
> and to Mozilla 1.2.1 xft (mozilla-1.2.1-
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:40, John Lowell wrote:
Iain Buchanan wrote:
This should get you through it
1. If you right-click on the icon and select 'Properties' you will
notice a button labelled 'Select Custom Icon'. Click it and you will
notice that the default path is
FYI,
I had to rm /tmp/MCOP-userid to get things to work in a non-root account.
These two play, but do not display a control panel. They also stop the music
(close plugger) correctly when changing tabs or exiting.
http://www.mm-vanecek.com/card_embed.html
http://www.mm-vanecek.com/card_embed2.htm
Mike Vanecek wrote:
-- Original Message ---
From: Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:09:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
Mike Vanecek wrote:
I have made the source pretty simple:
http://www.mm-vanecek.com/card_embed
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:40, John Lowell wrote:
> Iain Buchanan wrote:
[snip]
> > If you want some help with these steps let me know.
> >
> I would, in fact, appreciate having help duplicating the steps you've
> taken in solving this problem. While I knew what type of file was
> involved in thi
-- Original Message ---
From: Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:09:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > I have made the source pretty simple:
> >
> > http://www.mm-vanecek.com/ca
Iain Buchanan wrote:
I tried putting it on the desktop like you mentioned and had the same
results - I couldn't resize it. I also noticed it looked 'blurry' so I
thought I'd give it some further investigation (why not!) I noticed it
was a bitmap (in /usr/share/pixmaps) so I thought maybe nautil
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 14:56, John Lowell wrote:
> Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
> > you could add it to the panel.
> >
>
> I'd thought of that, Iain. I'm afraid I'm so used to launching e-mail
> clients from desktop icons that to launch one from a panel would almost
> seem like self-abandonment. Noth
Iain Buchanan wrote:
you could add it to the panel.
I'd thought of that, Iain. I'm afraid I'm so used to launching e-mail
clients from desktop icons that to launch one from a panel would almost
seem like self-abandonment. Nothing can be done about the desktop icon?
John Lowell
--
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 13:29, John Lowell wrote:
[snip]
>
> So what can be done about this disproportion? Must I hide the fact that
> Mozilla Mail is my e-mail client by removing it from the desktop and,
> when no one is looking, go to Gnome Menu -> Extras -> Internet and run
> it from there?
yo
-- Original Message ---
From: Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:09:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > -- Original Message ---
> > From: Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Mike Vanecek wrote:
-- Original Message ---
From: Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:27:20 -0500
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
I have made the source pretty simple:
http://www.mm-vanecek.com/card_embed.html
http://www.mm-v
Mike,
>> I use Gnome <<
As did I - until recently.
It seems that if I install both desktops and the applications for both
on my rh8 workstation, I'm able to pick the applications I prefer on
either desktop. I don't expect them all to work, but I'm pleased with
what does work.
For example gal
-- Original Message ---
From: Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:27:20 -0500
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:31:49PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> [quoted from another message]
> > >
-- Original Message ---
From: Cliff Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:24:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> Hi Mike,
>
> A google for "html bgsound" lead me to:
>
> http://www.htmlcodetutorial.c
-- Original Message ---
From: Ade Olonoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 Jan 2003 08:22:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> > Do you have a recommendation for a wysiwyg http editor that writes code that
> > is generic enough for al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:27:20 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:31:49PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> [quoted from another message]
> > > > > height=50 loop="2" autostart="true"> > > src="mvsbirth_files/birthday.mid"
> > > loop=2>
Hi Mike,
A google for "html bgsound" lead me to:
http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/sounds/_BGSOUND.html
I know nothing else about the site, but it says in part:
> ... Before you read any further about this tag, please read the
> section about background sounds, which discusses how to combine this
Keith Morse wrote:
You don't have to set the mailbox_command option to use procmail. If
you create a $HOME/.forward file with something like this:
|exec /usr/bin/procmail
Then, postfix will honor it and forward mail to procmail. If you use
the mailbox_command, then it forces postfix to use
> Do you have a recommendation for a wysiwyg http editor that writes code that
> is generic enough for all browsers (other than gedit)?
Mozilla's Composer works really well, and will be sure to generate pages
that are viewable in the Mozilla browser. I also haven't had a problem
with it generatin
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> -- Original Message ---
> From: Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:20:53 -0500
> Subject: Re: Postfix (was Re: Mozilla & Sound)
>
[some snippage occurred h
-- Original Message ---
From: James McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 Jan 2003 13:24:07 +0930
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 13:01, Craig White wrote:
> > Perhaps you should find http editor that doe
-- Original Message ---
From: Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 Jan 2003 20:31:49 -0700
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:02, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > Out of box RH 8 with all RHN updates, Gnome desktop,
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 13:01, Craig White wrote:
> Perhaps you should find http editor that doesn't write code that only
> works on IE (Front Page is what was used).
>
> There are differences between javascript and j-script and I think you
> have just run smack dab into one of them.
Dunno how
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:02, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Out of box RH 8 with all RHN updates, Gnome desktop, Mozilla (installed
> plugger and add-ins [Xanim, java, etc. - what a pain!]).
>
> Page with background sounds do not play them:
>
>
>
>
> MikeV's Home Page
>
>
>
>
> This url plays the b
-- Original Message ---
From: Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:20:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Postfix (was Re: Mozilla & Sound)
> Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> >I assume /etc/rc.d/init.d/postfix start/stop works?
>
Mike Vanecek wrote:
>I assume /etc/rc.d/init.d/postfix start/stop works?
Yes.
>Two quick questions:
>
>I assume that I have to turn this on to use procmail? Anything else
>that I
>need to worry about with postfix and procmail?
>
>#mailbox_command = /some/where/procmail
>#mailbox_command = /som
-- Original Message ---
From: Tommy McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:08:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:59, Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> > Quite right, mia culpa ... went brain de
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:59, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Quite right, mia culpa ... went brain dead. Been trying to get postfix to
> accept mail all day with no luck and am getting dizzy going around in circles.
> I may ask for help later on that one.
>
> Thank you, you have been very helpful.
>
>
-- Original Message ---
From: Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:58:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:05:54PM -06
-- Original Message ---
From: Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:23:01 -0500
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 03:01:17PM -0600, Mike Va
-- Original Message ---
From: Dave Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RedHat 8.0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 12 Jan 2003 13:49:19 -0600
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 10:54, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > I have thought about 1.2.1. I
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 10:54, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> I have thought about 1.2.1. I have read that one needs to remove 1.0.1 first.
> What happens to all the plug-in additions (plugger, java!!!, and so on0 when
> one rpm -e 1.0.1? I have a ton of work to get those plug-ins to work.
>
> Also, I have r
-- Original Message ---
From: Alan Peery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:18:12 +
Subject: Re: Mozilla & Sound
> Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> >Out of box RH 8 with all RHN updates, Gnome desktop, Mozilla (installed
> &g
Mike Vanecek wrote:
Out of box RH 8 with all RHN updates, Gnome desktop, Mozilla (installed
plugger and add-ins [Xanim, java, etc. - what a pain!]).
You should consider downloading Mozilla 1.3a (or is it 1.2.1 for Linux?)
from www.mozilla.org--they have RPMs available for easy install. Whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 11:56 am, David Sudjiman wrote:
> Thx Michael, You've been my saviour!
>
> Of course, i did rpm -q --redhatprovides libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 but
> nothing happens, well it showed no package provides
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:56:19PM +0700, David Sudjiman wrote:
> Thx Michael, You've been my saviour!
>
> Of course, i did rpm -q --redhatprovides libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 but
> nothing happens, well it showed no package provides
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 and was not compat...
>
> Yes, it was c
Thx Michael, You've been my saviour!
Of course, i did rpm -q --redhatprovides libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 but
nothing happens, well it showed no package provides
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 and was not compat...
Yes, it was compat...rpm but how do you get the that name?
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Michael F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 10 January 2003 08:48 pm, David Sudjiman wrote:
> OK, that's it! I just don't know where can I found
>
> # rpm -ivh /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/mozilla-1.0.1-24.i386.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 05:38, Pete Peterson wrote:
> I haven't figured out how to make java, javascript and a couple plugins work
> with galeon or konqueror, so I'm not anxious to switch browsers.
> Unfortunately, I *need* java/javascript to use some of our internal web
> pages.
>
If you've got th
--- pete peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions...
np
> I don't THINK there's a networking problem;
> everything else
> seems normal and it's hard to imagine why a
> networking
> problem would affect mozilla and not konqueror or
> galeon.
Sorry, I didn't follow the wh
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:06:40 -0800, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- efcarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pete Peterson wrote:
>> > Mozilla runs painfully slowly on my RH 8.0
>> machine. Clicking on a link
>> > takes 30-40 seconds to bring up the new page.
>> During this time, "top"
>> > shows m
--- efcarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pete Peterson wrote:
> > Mozilla runs painfully slowly on my RH 8.0
> machine. Clicking on a link
> > takes 30-40 seconds to bring up the new page.
> During this time, "top"
> > shows mozilla using 96% CPU time.
>
> Have you checked to see if you don't
Pete Peterson wrote:
Mozilla runs painfully slowly on my RH 8.0 machine. Clicking on a link
takes 30-40 seconds to bring up the new page. During this time, "top"
shows mozilla using 96% CPU time.
Have you checked to see if you don't have multiple instances of mozilla
runing? IE. ps aux|less
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
What are apropriate forums (mailing lists, news groups, ...)
for discussing mozilla, for its users?
Try checking out http://www.mozilla.org, and you'll find several
newsgroups if you use the news reading feature of Mozilla to search for
them. Since "moz" is a re
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:19:08AM -0500, pete peterson wrote:
> This copy had been running for about a day. I restarted it some
> time yesterday to see if that would help the speed; it didn't.
>
> The memory cache was set to 4096 KB and the disk cache was set
> at 5 KB. Clearing the caches
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:53:33 +, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:38:53AM -0500, Pete Peterson wrote:
>>
>> Mozilla runs painfully slowly on my RH 8.0 machine. Clicking on a
>> link takes 30-40 seconds to bring up the new page. During this
>> time, "top" shows mozilla using 96
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:38:53AM -0500, Pete Peterson wrote:
>
> Mozilla runs painfully slowly on my RH 8.0 machine. Clicking on a
> link takes 30-40 seconds to bring up the new page. During this
> time, "top" shows mozilla using 96% CPU time.
How long has mozilla been running? I notice som
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 05:46:35PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 13:10, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> > > There's a show-stopper in RH 8.0 for me that I haven't seen discussed.
> > > Mozilla and galeon display incorrectly my Schwab
On 15 Dec 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 13:10, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> > There's a show-stopper in RH 8.0 for me that I haven't seen discussed.
> > Mozilla and galeon display incorrectly my Schwab account web page.
> > A little graph of stock prices is missing. As far as
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 13:10, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> There's a show-stopper in RH 8.0 for me that I haven't seen discussed.
> Mozilla and galeon display incorrectly my Schwab account web page.
> A little graph of stock prices is missing. As far as I can tell, this
> is an "HTML Advanced Chart",
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 04:10:14PM -0500, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> Two screenshots of the same page with mozilla and netscape are at:
> http://datix.2y.net/mozilla/mozilla.png
> http://datix.2y.net/mozilla/netscape.png
>
> Can anyone guess what's wrong?
> Can anyone suggest where to loo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Dec 2002 21:41:16 -0500, David Colburn wrote:
> Mozilla has suddenly slowed to a crawl and now won't load at all.
>
> I changed no settings.
>
> Help? Thanks! doc
See whether any mozilla-bin processes are still running and need be
killed b
--- Jose Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What are apropriate forums (mailing lists, news
> groups, ...)
> for discussing mozilla, for its users?
Have you checked out mozilla.org to see what they
recommend?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
__
Stephen Mah wrote:
mozilla version 1.0.1-26
Does the Linux version of the newsreader support threading of the
messages? That function seems to be turned on by default, on the
windows version.
Yes, click on the icon to the left of the Subject column. If you've
messed with the column settin
>Message: 13
>Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:28:00 -0800
>From: Stephen Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: Oracle Corporation
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Mozilla questions
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Also, I'm unable to create local folders. I'm using Imap to connect to
>the corportate mai
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:20:56AM +, Neil Loffhagen wrote:
> When What?
> On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 09:07, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > When
My excuses for this slip of the finger. I should have selected
abort instead of send.
Alexander
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
When What?
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 09:07, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> When
--
Neil Loffhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C-W-Services
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Margaret_Doll wrote:
One of my students installed RedHat 8.0 on his system. Then he
applied the latest patches using the Redhat Network Alert program. Now
when he opens mozilla, it flashes up on the screen and then disappears.
I have "rpm -Fvh" on the mozilla rpms for mozilla which he
Robert Kleemann wrote:
I guess no one else has run into this. I'll enter a bug into bugzilla.
I have experienced similar problems with mozilla. I have both a
hp5simx and a newer hp 8500. When I tried to print the following:
http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm (found from the php.net home page)
I guess no one else has run into this. I'll enter a bug into bugzilla.
Robert.
At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:57:07 -0800,
Robert Kleemann wrote:
>
> Mozilla printing to an HP Laserjet 4L fails by printing a bunch of
> blank pages before the actual page.
>
> I've tried the hp ljet driver (2 leading bl
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
