Although MRSETS is surely important, for me CTABLES would be much more
urgent
Matthias
Am Fr., 19. Nov. 2021 um 21:04 Uhr schrieb ft gmail :
> Thanks for the answers. I was just curious as I used this feature in
> survey analysis when I had access to SPSS and I was not not sure if I
> had not
Thanks for the answers. I was just curious as I used this feature in
survey analysis when I had access to SPSS and I was not not sure if I
had not overlooked an addition.
As Ben intends to work on CTABLES I can only support this idea. I
remember people say on the SPSS list that CTABLES was the
The MULT RESPONSE procedure isn't available yet. If you want it, then
the most helpful thing to do would be to provide a few examples of
syntax and data plus the expected output.
I'm currently finishing up the MATRIX procedure. After that, I was
planning to go on to CTABLES, but there's no reason
A number of things have advanced. Bugs have been fixed. I can recall
that Ben's worked on understanding the SPSS output format and, more
recently the matrix language.
But I don't think PSPP has been racing to feature parity with SPSS and
I'm not aware that work in supporting multiple response
