Although MRSETS is surely important, for me CTABLES would be much more urgent
Matthias Am Fr., 19. Nov. 2021 um 21:04 Uhr schrieb ft gmail <public....@gmail.com>: > Thanks for the answers. I was just curious as I used this feature in > survey analysis when I had access to SPSS and I was not not sure if I > had not overlooked an addition. > > As Ben intends to work on CTABLES I can only support this idea. I > remember people say on the SPSS list that CTABLES was the module that > sold most. > > - ftr > > On 19/11/2021 18:42, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > The MULT RESPONSE procedure isn't available yet. If you want it, then > > the most helpful thing to do would be to provide a few examples of > > syntax and data plus the expected output. > > > > I'm currently finishing up the MATRIX procedure. After that, I was > > planning to go on to CTABLES, but there's no reason I couldn't work on > > MULT RESPONSE instead. > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:07 AM ft gmail <public....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I asked this question 6 years ago and got the answer that > unfortunately, up to then PSPP wasn't really able to handle multiple > response questions, a standard in survey research. > >> > >> Has anything advanced since then ? > >> > >> Thanks in advance > >> ftr > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I found the MRSETS command which allows to analyse multiple reponse > questions; But the MULT RESPONSE command has not yet been implemented, > according to the manual. So how to analyse mult response questions ? What > can you do with MRSETS when you have no Mult response frequencies or tables > ? > >> > >> Or do I miss something ? > >> > >> And what does the cryptic sentence mean (manual p.113) > >> > >> Otherwise, multiple response sets are currently used only by third > party software. > >> > >> Could you please be more specific ? Which third party software do you > mean ? > >> > >> - ftr > >> > >> > >
