I do have some understanding of the packager vs. developer situation, yes,
but didn't know there was a known bug in 0.8.5 that is so serious in
Windows, so the explanation is very appreciated.
Just to be clear, I'm not actually advocating recommending 0.8.5
specifically (I thought that's what the
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:42:08PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
> On 3/2/2016 1:35 PM, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
> > Am 02.03.2016 um 20:26 schrieb John Darrington
> > :
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
> >
> > 2 Then, as a first post-release task, let's repla
On 3/2/2016 3:48 AM, Matej Kovacic wrote:
> I mean this is not a decision for a dice. It is a decision the project
> manager shoud do. There should be no democracy here.
Sorry to be late in responding, I didn't see Friedrich's OP (about using
dice to settle the concern about the labeling of untes
Mark,
Maybe you understand this very well, but I think a better way to think
about this is that the PSPP team releases a release of PSPP (which is
source code) and then platform-specific "packagers" release binaries for
their platform, possibly making decisions along the way. For example,
Friedri
Harry, this is helpful Thanks!
-Alan
On 3/2/2016 3:53 PM, Harry Thijssen wrote:
> Hi
>
> First I don't want to be part of the ongoing discussion.
> Just to inform you:
>
> The MSWindows installer displays a readme file on the screen during
> installation.
>
> The second line in this readme b
Hi
First I don't want to be part of the ongoing discussion.
Just to inform you:
The MSWindows installer displays a readme file on the screen during
installation.
The second line in this readme box states:
*This is a new MSWindows build of the PSPP master branch as of the date
this binary was
On 3/2/2016 1:35 PM, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
> Am 02.03.2016 um 20:26 schrieb John Darrington :
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
>
> 2 Then, as a first post-release task, let's replace the existing splash
> screen with an startup window
> which must be ac
I've attached a screenshot of what I think is a much better solution (to
change the website). I think this simple change would alleviate the need
for any messages in the application (though still wouldn't object to
"(unstable)" or "(development)" in the title bar, just not a long
instructional mess
> Am 02.03.2016 um 20:26 schrieb John Darrington :
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
>
> 2 Then, as a first post-release task, let's replace the existing splash
> screen with an startup window
> which must be acknowledged. Then we don't need to have any
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
> Am 02.03.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Ben Pfaff :
>>
>> Why can't the user see it at startup?
>>
>> The output window is (at least on the window manager I use) below the
data window, unless
>
> Am 02.03.2016 um 20:00 schrieb Ben Pfaff :
>>> Perhaps PSPPIRE should raise the output window, then.
>>
>> That would then be the first really negative functional impact of this
>> warning that John planned.
>> There are good reasons why the windows are raised as they are today.
>
> What are
+1. I agree with every each point of Matej.
(I have no such eloquence as Winston Churchill had.)
Cheers,
Zoltán
On 2016-03-02 10:48, Matej Kovacic wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
What do you think?
Yes, but is it a really true random number generator behind? What
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
>
> > Am 02.03.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Ben Pfaff :
> >>
> >> Why can't the user see it at startup?
> >>
> >> The output window is (at least on the window manager I use) below the data
> >> window, unless
> >> explicitly rai
> Am 02.03.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Ben Pfaff :
>>
>> Why can't the user see it at startup?
>>
>> The output window is (at least on the window manager I use) below the data
>> window, unless
>> explicitly raised. Typically, a user will only raise that window, when she
>> explicity
>> has i
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:09:16AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:46:52PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 06:37:49AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > I su
Hey Matej,
> Yes, but is it a really true random number generator behind? What kind
> of algorithms are used? Or is it used hardware based RNG? If so, which
> provider?
you may convince yourself...: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyH41QXFbUU
and we could watch it via livestream next saturday at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> What do you think?
Yes, but is it a really true random number generator behind? What kind
of algorithms are used? Or is it used hardware based RNG? If so, which
provider?
:-)
I mean this is not a decision for a dice. It is a decision the pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
