[OT] Is carbon-offsetting just eco-enslavement?

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/3788/ Is Liberalism a mental disorder? You Bet! 2008 Presidential Campaign Gear Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group ___

[OT] The UN Poisons thousands of Bangladeshis

Good Job! http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_01/uk/planet.htm 2008 Presidential Campaign Gear Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group ___ Post Messag

More web service misery

Hi Foxgang I have managed to gety somewhere with web services on m XP box. It all seems to work fine and I can register on another machine and call the methods. But... It is to run on a windows 2003 server. It seems that Microsoft in their wisdom are trying like mad to force us to use .net, and the

Re: More web service misery

We have one running happily on WS2003 (not SBS). We use West-wind though ... There's stuff on the West-wind Wiki and message board archives re this issue, AIR. Al wrote: > Hi Foxgang > I have managed to gety somewhere with web services on m XP box. It all seems > to work fine and I can register

RE: More web service misery

They are going to use an SBS box as an external web server? If so make sure that you are on a good call out rate as, whilst you can, it's not recomended as there is far too much risk with all the other things running on it. Aargh! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on

RE: More web service misery

Its not quite the case. In fact this server o/s was left over because it didn’t work too well speed wise as a normal server. Its only being used for the one task which is to run a web service. Overkill but its available without further purchase. I also use 2003 as a test bed here. May as well used

RE: More web service misery

I did take a look on west wind for soap and 2003 issues. I fould a white paper that was supposed to be on the subject but was of little help. Thanks though A bit more info on the error. I can now after removing the mapping and rebooting, see the wsdl file in a browser and not a load of squares. I c

RE: [NF] 2GB Expansion Card for Rx4715

Why not just partition the card using Windows? Toss it in a reader and attach it to a XP box, then use the disk manaegement snap-in to create a couple of partitions on it. I've done this with my old Palm devices and it worked nicely. David Smith Systems Administrator Doan Family of Dealerships (5

RE: [NF] M$ Office Pro 2K7 - License count?

I agree with Adam and Tracy, but why doesn't the Exec go out and buy the new computer and Office 2K7? Does the Exec have a problem with that? v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Nicholas, list the TOP 3 most obvious assumptions, please? I'm just dense, not as smart as you in spotting the casually obvious. v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

ROTFLMAO... v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Wednesday, Septembe

RE: [OT] Separated at Birth? Spooky.

Real scary v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince Teachout Sent: Wednesday, Septem

Re: [NF] M$ Office Pro 2K7 - License count?

Yes, he'll probably purchase an upgrade version of Office 2K7. He wouldn't have to purchase the upgrade if the version that my wife purchased already had 3 licenses however. They could have saved lots of money if they had standardized on: OpenOffice $0 or StarOffice $69 ... compared to ... M$ O

[OT] Is carbon-offsetting just eco-enslavement?

So what else is new. The left is always in the 'do as I say, not as I do' mode... and so many people with nothing else going on in their lives latch on to their pronouncements to give their lives meaning. Because of that, they try to screwup the rest of us and the poor folks in the Third World

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Are you really serious or just pulling my leg? - Original Message - From: "Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ProFox Email List" Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 7:50 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Defending Marriage > Nicholas, list the TOP 3 most obvious assumptio

[OT] Global Warming lie of the day

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/09/global_warming_lie_of_the_day_1.html 2008 Presidential Campaign Gear Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group _

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Nicholas Geti wrote: > Are you really serious or just pulling my leg? > I think he's serious. Start with the statement that marriage is for the procreation and protection of children. Items to consider. 1) Should we divorce couples who fail to have children after a mandated period of time?

Re: [OT] Global Warming lie of the day

On Thursday 06 September 2007 09:29, Michael Madigan wrote: > http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/09/global_warming_lie_of_the_day_1 >.html Hi Michael! Good one! Thanks. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

On Thursday 06 September 2007 09:10, Nicholas Geti wrote: > Are you really serious or just pulling my leg? Hi Nicholas! It is an interesting question in light of your comment about losing count of the assumptions. I would think that you counted at least three before losing count, just share th

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Marriage was designed for procreation, however, the author doesn't suggest that baron couples divorce(although they should stop being annoying). --- Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nicholas Geti wrote: > > Are you really serious or just pulling my leg? > > > I think he's serious.

[OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of global warming?

How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of global warming? Fewer icy road deaths Fewer bums will freeze to death in their cardboard boxes Fewer people will die on ski slopes. Greater sno-cone sales 2008 Presidential Campaign Gear Thorough

Re: [OT] Global Warming lie of the day

Michael Madigan wrote: > http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/09/global_warming_lie_of_the_day_1.html Uhmm o-ky. The global warming "liars" say that if it gets warmer, heart attacks increase. The "debunker" gleefully points to science which says that if temperatures greatly dro

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

On 9/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marriage was designed for procreation, however, the > author doesn't suggest that baron couples > divorce(although they should stop being annoying). Wasn't aware there was much aristocracy in the US. A+ jml

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Procreation existed long before marriage unless you are making an assumption on Intelligent Design and Adam & Eve that it all started there and before them there was no procreation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 06

Re: [OT] Global Warming lie of the day

One thing he didn't seem to make clear is the semantics of it all. Heart Disease is not increased, heart attacks are, on extreme days. However, that's only because the body isn't used to it. Increase the average temperature and what is considered extreme will also be ratcheted up. I sm not awar

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Michael Madigan wrote: > Marriage was designed for procreation, however, the > author doesn't suggest that baron couples > divorce(although they should stop being annoying). > What about Duke couples? Get it? Baron? Duke? Hahahahahaha. Oh, I slay me.

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Technically, the author should have said, "marriage is designed for raising children, not procreating" Any ghetto dweller can create a kid and certainly none of them require marriage. --- Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Procreation existed long before marriage unless you > are making

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

What a maroon. LOL --- Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Marriage was designed for procreation, however, > the > > author doesn't suggest that baron couples > > divorce(although they should stop being annoying). > > > > > What about Duke couples? > Get i

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Michael Madigan wrote: > Marriage was designed for procreation, however, the > author doesn't suggest that baron couples > divorce(although they should stop being annoying). > Humping was designed for procreation. Marriage was designed as a way to keep 2 parents around long enough to raise a

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Jean Laeremans wrote: > On 9/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Marriage was designed for procreation, however, the >> author doesn't suggest that baron couples >> divorce(although they should stop being annoying). >> > > Wasn't aware there was much aristocracy in the US.

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Michael Madigan wrote: > Technically, the author should have said, "marriage is > designed for raising children, not procreating" Correct, he SHOULD have. He should have re-phrased other things, as well. It was a lousy article. ___ Post Messages to:

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Oh, but there is! v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans Sent: Thursday, Se

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Sure I'm serious, I thought it would be easy for you? v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

On Thursday 06 September 2007 10:05, Vince Teachout wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Technically, the author should have said, "marriage is > > designed for raising children, not procreating" > > Correct, he SHOULD have. He should have re-phrased other things, as > well. It was a lousy article

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Pete Theisen wrote: > Catholics speak and write for and to each other. Given the assumption of the > Catholic world view, it was the typical pep-talk sermon sort of thing. > > "Lousy" is not quite apt to describe it, or any of their other material. I > would call it "parochial". Nope. It's lousy

Starting and then stopping VFP9.exe with a prg

Howdy all, Hope this email finds everyone well - roll on the weekend! I'm starting vfp9.exe with a prg that I want VFP to run at startup. The last command in the prg is: quit but the program just returns to the command window, and I have to type, "quit" again. Is this by design? Cheers, Gar

[OT] Popcorn Lung Patient Inhaled Fumes Daily By MARCUS KABEL

How can someone eat 2-3 bags a days? http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/09/05/ap4086837.html?partner=email David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of t

Re: Starting and then stopping VFP9.exe with a prg

On 9/6/07, Garry Bettle wrote: > Howdy all, > > Hope this email finds everyone well - roll on the weekend! > > I'm starting vfp9.exe with a prg that I want VFP to run at startup. > > The last command in the prg is: > > quit > > but the program just returns to the command window, and I have to > ty

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Pete, Very good observation and 'parochial' is more accurate. v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of global warming?

On 9/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of > global warming? > > Fewer icy road deaths > Fewer bums will freeze to death in their cardboard > boxes > Fewer people will die on ski slopes. > Greater sno-cone sales No more penguins. -- P

Re: [OT] Popcorn Lung Patient Inhaled Fumes Daily By MARCUS KABEL

On Thursday 06 September 2007 12:30, David Crooks wrote: > How can someone eat 2-3 bags a days? > > http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/09/05/ap4086837.html?partner=email Hi David! Easy. It only takes 20 minutes or so to eat a bag. If you sit there coding 8 hours a day you would just take a hand

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

On Thursday 06 September 2007 13:13, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > Pete, > > Very good observation and 'parochial' is more accurate. Hi Stephen! Thanks. I used to work for the Archdiocese of Detroit, a professional parochialist, or something. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of global warming?

Penguins smell really bad. --- Paul Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of > > global warming? > > > > Fewer icy road deaths > > Fewer bums will freeze to death in their cardboard > > boxes >

RE: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of globalwarming?

On Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:07 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >Penguins smell really bad. Yeah, and they funny as well: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0488539/ David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://le

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of global warming?

On Thursday 06 September 2007 14:06, Michael Madigan wrote: > Penguins smell really bad. Hi Michael! The cartoon ones aren't so bad. Then there is Jessica Penguin . . . -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leaf

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of global warming?

Paul Hill wrote: > On 9/6/07, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of >> global warming? >> >> Fewer icy road deaths >> Fewer bums will freeze to death in their cardboard >> boxes >> Fewer people will die on ski slopes. >> Greater sno-cone

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Yeah. We have to watch out for those Barons and Baronesses from the UK. - Original Message - From: "Michael Madigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ProFox Email List" Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Defending Marriage > Marriage was designed for procreation, ho

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

I would hate to be marooned on an island. - Original Message - From: "Michael Madigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ProFox Email List" Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Defending Marriage > What a maroon. LOL > > > --- Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of globalwarming?

Maybe we'll feed them some environmentalists. --- Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also no more grizzly bears. A good show by Nova > demonstrates the > relationship between global warming and the four > main types of food supply > for the grizzlies living in the greater Yellowstone >

Re: [OT] The UN Poisons thousands of Bangladeshis

Michael Madigan wrote: > Good Job! > > http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_01/uk/planet.htm > This is a better job! http://www.marvinmarshall.us/TowersB.jpg ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/li

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits of globalwarming?

Also no more grizzly bears. A good show by Nova demonstrates the relationship between global warming and the four main types of food supply for the grizzlies living in the greater Yellowstone environment. As winter approaches bears move higher in the mountain to eat the seeds of the yellow pin

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:14 PM, Dave Crozier wrote: > Well, after an 18 hour flight, one lost bag, 2 delayed flights and an > argument with British Airways because my seat entertainment centre > didn’t > work along with my seat’s inability to stay in an upright position > I finally > arrived here

FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

Well, after an 18 hour flight, one lost bag, 2 delayed flights and an argument with British Airways because my seat entertainment centre didn’t work along with my seat’s inability to stay in an upright position I finally arrived here in Alpharetta. It’s warm, sunny (well not now as it’s about 11:00

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

On 9/6/07, Kevin Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, Atlanta is really only made up of one road. It just winds back on > itself and changes names every 2 miles! Ah, so when I tell my friend how to get up here to visit tomorrow, I can tell her to take Peachtree, and almost certainly be correct

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

Dave Crozier wrote: > Well, after an 18 hour flight, one lost bag, 2 delayed flights and an > argument with British Airways because my seat entertainment centre didn’t > work along with my seat’s inability to stay in an upright position I finally > arrived here in Alpharetta. It’s warm, sunny (well

RE: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

My favorite part of Atlanta is the street names are all Peach. As I mentioned to Kevin a couple days ago, I really wish I could be there. Atlanta is really a great town with fantastic hospitality. Home of the Weather Channel and Coca-Cola, and FoxForward. Three great organizations that should b

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

On Thursday 06 September 2007 20:14, Dave Crozier wrote: > Well, after an 18 hour flight, one lost bag, 2 delayed flights and an > argument with British Airways because my seat entertainment centre didn’t > work along with my seat’s inability to stay in an upright position I > finally arrived here

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

They let you into the country? --- "Dave Crozier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, after an 18 hour flight, one lost bag, 2 > delayed flights and an > argument with British Airways because my seat > entertainment centre didn’t > work along with my seat’s inability to stay in an > uprigh

RE: [OT] Defending Marriage

Big Assumption would you give us proof of this? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 07 September 2007 06:14 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Defending Marriage "it isn't discrimination that causes suicides amon

RE: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

I have to say I cant stand the place. Its so boring. Only one as bad I come across is Dallas. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Atlanta is one of the most beautiful cities in the country. Of course, it is mostly new, than

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Blacks have a lower suicide rate than whites, so it isn't discrimination that causes suicides among homos. http://www.postsecondary.org/archives/previous/132603SUICIDE2.pdf --- Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Others have mentioned a few. Here are some more: > > 1. First paragr

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

Thanks for the warm regards Rick. We'll just have to find another occasion to get you down to Atlanta sometime. Yes, Atlanta is really only made up of one road. It just winds back on itself and changes names every 2 miles! -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.ne

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits ofglobalwarming?

I think the bears would lose their appetite over the smell. --- Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not enough of them. Besides too small; only good for > a snack. > > - Original Message - > From: "Michael Madigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ProFox Email List" > Sent: Thursday,

Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits ofglobalwarming?

Not enough of them. Besides too small; only good for a snack. - Original Message - From: "Michael Madigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ProFox Email List" Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [OT] How come nobody ever talks about the benefits ofglobalwarming? > Maybe we

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

Yes, from downtown, you can take Peachtree (in this case its Peachtree Industrial Blvd) up to Alpharetta ... but of course it changes names many times on the same road. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net Garrett Fitzgerald wrote: > Ah, so when I tell my fri

Re: FoxForward - Finally Arrived in Atlanta

Ed Leafe wrote: > On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:14 PM, Dave Crozier wrote: > > >> Well, after an 18 hour flight, one lost bag, 2 delayed flights and an >> argument with British Airways because my seat entertainment centre >> didn’t >> work along with my seat’s inability to stay in an upright position

Re: [OT] Defending Marriage

Others have mentioned a few. Here are some more: 1. First paragraph combines "Western cultural and legal history", "proponents want to skip discussion about when life begins", and "most homosexual activists want to skip the argument about when life begins" These are random statements thrown ou