Blacks have a lower suicide rate than whites, so it isn't discrimination that causes suicides among homos.
http://www.postsecondary.org/archives/previous/132603SUICIDE2.pdf --- Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Others have mentioned a few. Here are some more: > > 1. First paragraph combines "Western cultural and > legal history", > "proponents want to skip discussion about when life > begins", and "most > homosexual activists want to skip the argument about > when life begins" > These are random statements thrown out without any > linking them together in > one thought. > > 2. How does this author know whether "most > homosexual activists want to skip > the arguments about when life begins". > > 3. What has the argument about when life begins have > anything to do with > homosexuals wanting to form a union and call it > marriage. I have never even > heard this argument being used by proponents of > homosexual unions. This > argument is used by pro-life people, not > homosexuals. > > 4.. Second paragraph. "The law severely restricts > who can and can't marry". > So what. It is a law not an ipso facto decree by > some ethereal being. It is > a man-made rule and can be changed if enough people > want it so. This is an > example of circular reasoning. It is true because it > is true. > > 5. "And marriage necessarily has to be > discriminatory. The definition has to > exclude..." My question is why does it have to > exclude various parties. See > item 4 above. > > 6. "its definition has to exclude other pairings > from claiming the benefits > given to married couples." Why does it have to > exclude other pairings? If > enough people want to pass a law giving these same > privileges to others, so > be it. Whether you call it "marriage" or a "civil > union" is irrelevant. The > benefits can be assigned by a new law. > > 7. Too much baloney in the next few paragraphs. So > skipping down to "Doctors > advertise heavily in homosexual publications, etc, > etc." Don't know where > the author gets this "fact". I don't know that any > of my doctors have even > advertised, let alone put ads in these publications. > The author will have to > back up this statement. > > 8. "Doctors advertise because homosexuals routinely > injures its > participants." That is a wild statement. What kind > of injuries? I know some > homosexuals in the church where my wife works. They > are caring, helpful > people. > > 9. "Homosexuals suffer higher rates of depression > and suicides" This may be > true but it would not have anything to do with being > one; if society puts > pressure and discriminates against any group, > naturally they are going to be > depressed. I'll bet that blacks have more depression > than whites just based > on discrimination. > > 10. Women's different sensibilities put a natural > check on the sexual > appetites of men. What a crock of BS. I could go on > at length refuting this > statement. Just one possibility: I guess he thinks > that women don't enjoy > sex. > > Well, Stephen, I don't intend to waste any more of > my time on this useless > drivel. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:14 AM > Subject: RE: [OT] Defending Marriage > > > > Sure I'm serious, I thought it would be easy for > you? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > 2008 Presidential Campaign Gear <http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/2772083> Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group <http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/mikes_horse_racing/> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
