Nicholas Geti wrote: > Are you really serious or just pulling my leg? > I think he's serious.
Start with the statement that marriage is for the procreation and protection of children. Items to consider. 1) Should we divorce couples who fail to have children after a mandated period of time? 2) Should we disallow marriage to couples planning not to have children, or to couples medically incapable of having children? 3) If adaption is mentioned as an option for the above, then couldn't "certain other" couples adopt, as well, thus satisfying the requirment? Talk amongst yourselves. I'm verklempt. Talk. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
