I never had the problem in 5. It was 6 that caused all my problems
Al
-Original Message-
On 9/22/11 3:33 PM, Dan Covill wrote:
> There was one BIG difference in VFP6. It pretty much worked, which was
> not true of 5.
VFP5 was known affectionately by me as VFPc5 ;)
Although IIRC the c0
On 9/22/11 3:33 PM, Dan Covill wrote:
> There was one BIG difference in VFP6. It pretty much worked, which was
> not true of 5.
VFP5 was known affectionately by me as VFPc5 ;)
Although IIRC the c005 fatal errors didn't mostly go away until VFP7.
Paul
___
On 09/22/11 09:35, GaryT wrote:
> Thanks Richard,
> That site contains information on VFP7, 8 and 9. Mine is VFP5a.
> But, that raised another big question. Is it worth upgrading?
> I was using VFP6 at work in 1998-9 and I don't recall any major
> differences or improvements. If there were any th
On 9/22/2011 12:41 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> If you search the Fox wiki site for runtime, you'll find info for earlier
> versions. (Don't know how I managed to miss the version in the subject...)
>
> If you plan on running in Vista/W7, I'd recommend going right to 9 assuming
> you can find a copy
Paul McNett wrote:
> On 9/22/11 9:35 AM, GaryT wrote:
>> Yes, I know Paul is around, I see his name flash past regularly. Long
>> time since we last talked though - perhaps I had better jump on the
>> phone. I have heaps of catching up to do.
>
> Gary, great to see you around here again!
>
> Pa
On 9/22/11 9:35 AM, GaryT wrote:
> Yes, I know Paul is around, I see his name flash past regularly. Long
> time since we last talked though - perhaps I had better jump on the
> phone. I have heaps of catching up to do.
Gary, great to see you around here again!
Paul
22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Runtime Filename VFP5.0a
> Subject: Runtime Filename VFP5.0a
Thanks Richard,
That site contains information on VFP7, 8 and 9. Mine is VFP5a.
But, that raised another big question. Is it worth upgrading?
I was using VFP6 at work in
Richard Kaye wrote:
> http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPRuntimeDLLConcordance~VFP
>
> Also a useful reference point. And Paul McNett was on the bleeding edge for
> running VFP under WINE back in the day so you might want to search for his
> comments on the subject.
>
> --
> rk
>
> -Origi
Richard Quilhot wrote:
> You might be able to get a copy here:
> http://www.foxpert.com/runtime.htm
>
> Rick Q
> quilh...@gmail.com
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:07 AM, GaryT wrote:
>
[snip]
>> Can someone please tell me the name of the runtime file, so that I can
>> begin the search through
On 9/22/2011 11:10 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
> On 9/22/11 8:06 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
>> As I recall, Paul actually did get it working for the most part.
>
> VFP7 was the best version to work with in WINE, back in the day...
That was the last version before the EULA changed (or was it
On 9/22/11 8:06 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> On 9/22/2011 8:31 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
>> http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPRuntimeDLLConcordance~VFP
>>
>> Also a useful reference point. And Paul McNett was on the bleeding edge for
>> running VFP under WINE back in the day so you migh
On 9/22/2011 8:31 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPRuntimeDLLConcordance~VFP
>
> Also a useful reference point. And Paul McNett was on the bleeding edge for
> running VFP under WINE back in the day so you might want to search for his
> comments on the subject.
>
As
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPRuntimeDLLConcordance~VFP
Also a useful reference point. And Paul McNett was on the bleeding edge for
running VFP under WINE back in the day so you might want to search for his
comments on the subject.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun..
You might be able to get a copy here:
http://www.foxpert.com/runtime.htm
Rick Q
quilh...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:07 AM, GaryT wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I was an active participant in all incarnations of the Fox mailing
> lists, from when they began right through to 1999 when I took
14 matches
Mail list logo
