Richard Kaye wrote: > http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPRuntimeDLLConcordance~VFP > > Also a useful reference point. And Paul McNett was on the bleeding edge for > running VFP under WINE back in the day so you might want to search for his > comments on the subject. > > -- > rk > > -----Original Message----- > From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On > Behalf Of GaryT > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:07 AM > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Runtime Filename VFP5.0a
Thanks Richard, That site contains information on VFP7, 8 and 9. Mine is VFP5a. But, that raised another big question. Is it worth upgrading? I was using VFP6 at work in 1998-9 and I don't recall any major differences or improvements. If there were any they must have been quite subtle and that raised the question of what could MS do to make version 7 or 8 or 9 a lot better? My memory suggests that after David Fulton retired they lost interest in even pretending to want to maintain VFP. Or, to start from the beginning, is Version 7, 8 or 9 still on the shelves? If yes, what is the current price? I did some Googling and found so much VFP material - it was staggering. But, found no prices yet; lots more Googling to follow in the next little while. Yes, I know Paul is around, I see his name flash past regularly. Long time since we last talked though - perhaps I had better jump on the phone. I have heaps of catching up to do. Thanks again, Richard. GT _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4e7b63ba.3060...@melbpc.org.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
