On 6/6/20 10:54 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> Yes. This. Though I do think that having a casual and constant reinforcement
> that black == bad helps people justify their racist beliefs.
No it doesn't and black doesn't equal bad, although dark does... and for
good reason, because darkness hides things an
il
that is still queued.
To enable this feature, specify a non-zero time value (an integral
value plus an optional one-letter suffix that specifies the time unit).
Time units: s (seconds), m (minutes), h (hours), d (days), w (weeks).
The default time unit is h (hours).
--
ning_time will notify the current status to the user? or it will
> warn the user and stop processing that mail?
It tells the message has not been delivered yet, and that the system will
continue to try (until max queue lifetime is reached).
--
Regards,
Ruben Laban
Systems and Network
ng: owner-test,
owner-hangout-outgoing: owner-hangout,
#owner-test-request:owner-test,
owner-hangout-request: owner-hangout,
#owner-test:root,
owner-hangout: ruben,
The /etc/majordomo file show this
# $log -- Where do I write my log?
#
$log = "/var/lib/majordomo/
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >
> > > Aliases look like this
> > >
> > > majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper m
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:18:10PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > Aliases look like this
> >
> > majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
>
> This script will run
On 01/22/2010 05:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> If I recall correctly, the wrapper program needs to be installed
>> set-uid, and it needs to be configured at compile time with the
>> right uid/gid info
On 01/22/2010 01:18 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
>
>> Aliases look like this
>>
>> majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
>>
> This script will r
s taking some time for me to get my dense head through its
basic set up. But one thing I think I need to do right away is get
SORBS or something like it to deny access from blackholed domains? What
is the most straight forward way of doing that. It seems that there is
more than one approach.
In sendmail I used to just add it to the access database.
Once I slow down the spambots, I think I'll end a large number of problems.
Ruben
>
>
> .
>
>
e time and point you in the right
direction.
And for that, I'm grateful and thank you for your time!
Ruben
What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
different methods, but I'm left puzzled as to the best means of doing
this.
Ruben
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www
How do I get postfix to reject mails "From" my own domains coming from
outside the local network?
Ruben
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, p
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> > Von: Ruben Safir
> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from loc
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:46:18PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 6:30 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
> >services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
> >different methods, but
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> > Von: Ruben Safir
> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from loc
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:23:11PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> >>
> >> Original-Nachricht
> >>>Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:32:57PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 23-Feb-10 17:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >How do I get postfix to reject mails "From" my own domains coming from
> >outside the local network?
>
> This is a FAQ, and a complicated one.
>
> Are you t
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:00PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 23-Feb-10 20:48, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >This is getting philophical and I just don't care. Mail From our domain
> >has to originate from OUR domain. No exceptions.
>
> Then you've already been given th
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:23:11PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> >>
> >> Original-Nachricht
> >>>Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
>
27;d like to reject it at the mail server if either is spoofed and it is
> not originating from my local hosts on the internal network.
>
Actually, thing about this, that might not be a good idea and I doubt it
is even in the envelope.
Ruben
> Ruben
>
> > >
> > >smtpd
red somehow, but no,
> there is no "dns:" map type implemented in Postfix (yet). See
> http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.html for map types overview.
Though, using a custom TCP-based table, one could implement such a feature
rather easily I'd say.
--
Regards,
Ruben Laban
Systems and Network Administrator
ISM eCompany
I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
How do I block email with this on the From line
>From cpa...@mrbrklyn.com Tue Nov 16 03:59:34 2021
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Received: from bizcloud-linmaxt
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:57:28AM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:55:03PM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
> > us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
> >
> > How do I block email with this on
On 11/16/21 19:57, raf wrote:
> This only applies the check for email that isn't coming
> from your own networks/users.
Sorry - I misunderstood. Thanks I will study this
Reuvain
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proport
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:56:12AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 23:55, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
> >us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
>
> local envelope sender should be rejected in port 25, no real users
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:56:12AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 23:55, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
> >us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
>
> local envelope sender should be rejected in port 25, no real users
>
I want to add a domain for the office in addition to my current domain.
I've done this before, following the outline in:
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#canonical
using
[ruben@www2 ~]$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf|grep mydest
mydestination = www.domain1.com, www2.domain
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:19:49PM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:52:23AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > I want to add a domain for the office in addition to my current domain.
> >
> > I've done this before, following the outlin
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:20:09AM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:20:31AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:19:49PM +1100, raf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:52:23AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> > > smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
> >
> > Can't this be done with tls withouth dovecot or sasl?
>
> Authentication is needed by Dovecot for IMAP access
> to read email. So it should be available for use by
> Postfix as we
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > > > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> > > > > smtpd_
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:14:34AM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> > > wrote:
> >
>
> I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't
> understand your statement that "It is hitting on port
> 587" I'm not sure what you mean by "It".
It means that thunderbird, outside the network, is reaching across the
internet and tickling port 587 on postfix and it doesn't care... it
still
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:41:55PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-01-11 at 19:58:09 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:58:09 -0500)
> Ruben Safir
> is rumored to have said:
>
> >>
> >>I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't
> >>understand your s
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:47:04AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > >
> > > I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't
> > > understand your statement that "It is hitting on port
> > > 587" I'm not sure what you mean
how to control rules for 587? Is that controlled by the
submission init n - n - - smtpd
??
>
> > Ruben Safir:
> > > I agree, but I don't know how to control rules for 587?
> > > How do I tell it to do something only on port 587?
> >
>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:43:11AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse:
> > I think it is a mistake to enforce Spamhaus for clients that connect
> > to port 578. Clients on port 25 must authenticate.
>
> Ruben Safir:
> > I agree, but I don't know how to control
I am sorry, that is wrong. I am getting main and master confused.
This is in main
www2:/etc/postfix # grep "^smtpd" main.cf
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname,
regexp:/etc/postfix/helo.regexp, permit
smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/e
> -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
>
I don't need the milter I assume?
> Wietse
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:36:34AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
> >
>
> I don't need the milter I assume?
>
I have this line as well, which I think might be wrong
smtp inet n - n - - smtp
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:47:05AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > UNDER main.cf I have this:
> >
> > smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining, permit
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:50:11PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 18.01.22 10:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >I am sorry, that is wrong. I am getting main and master confused.
> [...]
>
> >THIS is in Master
> >www2:/etc/postfix # grep "smtpd" master.c
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:50:11PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 18.01.22 10:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > >I am sorry, that is wrong. I am getting main and master confused.
> > [...]
How do I kn
Is this an error?
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o syslog_name=postfix/submission
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_recipient_r
Sorry not main, in master
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:51:31PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> Is this an error?
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o syslog_name=postfi
I am really lost as to why dovecot is not authenticating
I have
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
in main.cf
and
# Postfix smtp-auth
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
mode = 0666
user = postfix
group = postfix
}
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf
I want it to authenticate on su
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 12:37:00AM -0600, Rob McGee wrote:
> On 2022-01-22 21:53, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >Sorry not main, in master
> >
> >On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:51:31PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >>Is this an error?
> >>
> >>smtp ine
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 12:33:57PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-01-22 at 23:00:55 UTC-0500 (Sat, 22 Jan 2022 23:00:55 -0500)
> Ruben Safir
> is rumored to have said:
>
> >I am really lost as to why dovecot is not authenticating
> >
> >I have
> >
&g
= yes
- Nothing about certificates or keys.
So now I am wondering if I am even doing this correctly. The server
looks like this:
flatbush:[ruben]:~$ nmap mail2.boroparkmd.com
Starting Nmap 7.92 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2022-02-06 23:59 EST
Nmap scan report for mail2.somewehre.com xx
automated systems with root access are inherently not secure
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that LetsDNS release 1.0 is now available and
> ready for public use.
>
> Website: https://letsdns.org
> GitHub : https://github.com/LetsDNS/le
any way I can block all bagels using access
2022-08-09T22:38:19.695815-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: 2251E16403D:
from=,
size=9363, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2022-08-09T22:39:09.275352-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: ECA0316403D:
from=,
size=9442, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2022-08-21T08:02:44.863644-0
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2022-08-21 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > any way I can block all bagels using access
> >
> > 2022-08-09T22:38:19.695815-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: 2251E16403D:
> > from=,
> > size=9363, nrcpt=1
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2022-08-21 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > any way I can block all bagels using access
> >
> > 2022-08-09T22:38:19.695815-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: 2251E16403D:
> > from=,
> > size=9363, nrcpt=1
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 07:26:25AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2022-08-22 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> >> You could use a check_sender_access restriction with a regular
> >> expression like thi
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:46:14PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Ian Evans:
> > > Food for thought from the co-author of OAuth and oEmbed. How easy would it
> > > be for Postfix/Postscreen configs/docs to, say, refer to allow/deny lists?
> >
> > Easily, if they can be acessed vi
On 6/6/20 10:54 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> Yes. This. Though I do think that having a casual and constant reinforcement
> that black == bad helps people justify their racist beliefs.
No it doesn't and black doesn't equal bad, although dark does... and for
good reason, because darkness hides things an
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:43:08PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 2020-06-07 14:46, Laura Smith wrote:
> >> The point here is
> >> that maybe this is just a small, insignificant, easy change that could
> >> be done that might make black folks feel less excluded and more
> >> interested in parti
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 02:06:14AM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Ralph and Nicolas - I fully agree with you both.
>
> While I can somehow understand American fixations on political correctness,
It is not American. It is a small group of international fanatics... in
general.
> I find it highly
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Fulvio Scapin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> With a prospective of non-native English speaker, I believe that,
> political correctness aside, a name which does not involve a cultural
> reference for the related function to be understood is a welcome
> change since
I'm sorry
I failed to get the last message. Please resend
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2
I'm sorry to bother everyone
Any clue why this is happening from the cointalk.com domain
I am locked out of the forum :)
2021-01-05T03:11:38.999012-05:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[26176]: NOQUEUE:
reject: RCPT from 23-111-188-110.static.hvvc.us[23.111.188.110]: 450
4.1.8 : Sender address rejected: Domai
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:02:08AM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2021-01-05 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > Any clue why this is happening from the cointalk.com domain
> > I am locked out of the forum :)
> >
> > 2021-01-05T03:11:38.999012-05:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[26176]
I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
Final-Recipient: rfc822; cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
Original-Recipient: rfc822;cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.3
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; delivery temporarily suspended: Host or
domain name
not found. Name service
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:38:57AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
> > Or
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:27:52PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2021, at 11:38, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >
> >>I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
> >>
> [...]
&
>
> however, the "allow" and "deny" clearly say something, while for
> understanding what does "white" and "black" mean, you must have some
> background (or, worse, prejudice).
>
However, those are regular Enlgish words that now get mixed up with the
technology making it harder to communicate w
coming outside the
nextwork?
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http:/
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:27:10PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Can't I get postfix to bounce this when it is coming outside the
> > nextwork?
>
> Yes, but then you would not receive the following email:
>
> Received: by mrbrkly
(root) is not a valid
return address.
Oct 14 06:13:06 some_server.com majordomo[21883] {root@some_server.com (root)}
ABORT Majordomo@some_server.com: root@some_server.com (root) is not a valid
return address.
Oct 14 06:13:55 some_server.com majordomo[21897] {ruben@some_server.com (Ruben
Saf
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 05:17:20PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:27:10PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Ruben Safir:
> > > > Can't I get postfix to bounce this when it is coming outside the
> > > > nex
Hi
I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no
trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking
3 hours to turn over messages. And I don't have this problem
with normal email, just when I use mailman. DNS is running on the same machine.
What can cause the list
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:43:36AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no
> > trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking 3
> > hours to turn over messages. A
/anvil[4893]: statistics: max
connection count 1 for (smtp:118.68.122.152) at Oct 30 07:00:42
2015-10-30T07:10:12.364858-04:00 www postfix/anvil[4893]: statistics: max cache
size 3 at Oct 30 07:02:16
q^C
I didn't make a logging change? Or i didn't think so. Any clues where to
debug th
Can aanyone clarify what this means? it is happing a lot on my mail server
Feb 19 14:09:31 www postfix/smtpd[6978]: warning: 70.14.214.162.list.dsbl.org:
RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=70.14.214.162.list.dsbl.org type=A: Host not found, try again
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:18:20PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/19/2016 1:11 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > Can aanyone clarify what this means? it is happing a lot on my mail server
> >
> > Feb 19 14:09:31 www postfix/smtpd[6978]: warning:
> > 70.14.214.162.list.dsbl.
On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 07:29 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>>
>> No, I mean I send messages and they don't show up for a half hour even
>> in the postfix logs
>
>
> Assuming Mailman 2.1.x, the usual cause of this is a backlogge
On 02/28/2016 05:46 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 02:26 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>> On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>>
>>> If there are more than one or two files in the out/ queue, and if the
>>> smtp log has successive entries of the form
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:29:21PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > What can c
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:41:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Seems that mailman is unable to send messages to postfix fast enough
>
> When Mailman is falling behind, what is the number of SMTP deliveries
> per second from Mailman to Postfix?
>
>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 07:37:34PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Feb 28 17:17:18 2016 (29233)
> > smtp
> > to hangout for 10 recips, completed in 69.241 seconds
>
> What is the Postfix logging that starts around 17:16:09 and that
> ends aroun
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:46:40AM +, Richard wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:07:19 -0500
> > From: Ruben Safir
> >
> > Ah - ok I'm learning something at least..
> >
> > Mostly some address bounces, cruft from the list 4 l
Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable security
risk? I think not, but I want to double check
On 02/28/2016 10:51 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 01:34 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I think we can fix your issue fairly simply.
>>
>> Please, a
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:41:39AM +0100, Christian Kivalo wrote:
> On 2016-02-29 08:43, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable
> >security
> >risk? I think not, but I want to double check
>
> That looks sensi
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously I've made a big error somewhere, but I can't
track it down
Sep 19 22:52:36 www postfix/error[11778]: 26479161244:
to=, orig_to=, relay=non
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:42:01AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:58:17PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
> > the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 03:13:51AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2014, at 20:58 , Ruben Safir wrote:
> > I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
> > the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
> > localhost.com. Obvi
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 05:28:28AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 01:05:43AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:42:01AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:58:17PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >
ems recieving mail without IP4 addresses?
> Clearly, distros cannot be trusted to adopt my safety nets, and
> therefore there will be no such safety nets in the future.
>
eh - spoken out of anger
Do it reverse, ship it with broken settings.
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:02:21PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
> RedHat calls "postfix set-permissions" and "postfix upgrade-configuration"
> in RPM %post scripts
What? postfix wasn't absorbed into systemd?
How is that possible?
Ruben
--
So many i
> > :) well, we people from brooklyn sometimes need to be told twice.
>
> I hope twice was enough. Add a correct "mydomain" setting to
> main.cf.
>
Yes and thanks for the explaination and the fix.
Ruben
> --
> Viktor.
--
So many immigrant group
>
> That will work. Another solution is setting append_dot_mydomain=no,
> so that user@localhost will become u...@localhost.com.
>
Yes - I am confused by this a little bit. Why would postfix want to add
a dot com to any outgoing email?
Ruben
--
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKE
ct it?
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Developme
WHat are some suggsted methods of whitelisting with postfix.
I am throwing in the flag and want to prevent email to me without my
specific permision, and to bounce the rest.
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
lowed through.
I'm sure this has been asked a few times. It just seems this mailing
list in not well listed by search engines any longer.
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:54:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
> > be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it
> > set up at the moment s
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:54:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Ruben Safir:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
> > > be sent out
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > I get this when sending email to the new domain
> >
> > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE:
> > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.
I got this email, which I thought I set up postfix to block
>From ru...@mrbrklyn.com Wed Feb 6 06:26:12 2019
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Received: from mail.isentia.asia (mail.mediabanc.ws [203.223.144.88])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) wi
postfix can do this without further infrastructure
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:53:38AM -0800, Lucius Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 08:44:40PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > I got this email, which I thought I set up postfix to block
>
> Setup SPFi (SPF hardfail) , DKIM,
99 matches
Mail list logo
