if the
size limit is globally applied. Whereas with dovecot you can use the quota
plugin that allows for per user control, allowing different users to have
different sizes.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send
Most hosting providers block outbound traffic to port 25 by default. A
simple telnet to outside port 25 can verify it quickly.
Regards
On 2024-09-30 23:20, Jarosław Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
W dniu pon, 30.09.2024 o godzinie 09∶52 -0400, użytkownik Steve Matzura
via Postfix-users
On 19/09/24 21:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
(128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519_kyber768 server-signature
On 7/11/24 09:48, Hua Young via Postfix-users wrote:
Nope. smtps (port 465) and submissions (port 587) are two separated
services defined in master.cf. Their use will not affect each other.
"smtps" is the old name for "submissions" and both refer to 465.
"submission
print("DUNNO") # REJECT, PERMIT, DUNNO
sys.stdout.flush()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
in log I get:
Nov 28 13:54:15 mx postfix/smtpd[2953675]: warning: missing attribute
action in input from private/testowy
Nov 28 13:54:16 mx postfix/sp
rver,
fastmail will add dkim via their domain (messagingengine.com) and this
message can pass through gmail's check.
i am just not clear, can dkim be applied to not only the sender domain
but also any other domains?
Thanks.
_______
Postfix-users mai
e an example of what it should look like?
--
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
sys.stdout.write("action=DUNNO\n\n")
sys.stdout.flush()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
...
W dniu 28.11.2024 o 13:57, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
I have some problem with comunications postfix + python
in main.cf:
...
smtpd_restriction_classes=testowy
tes
Hi
I'm trying to write something like DMARC in Python to reject if the from
and return-path for the selected domain are different
Because these similar solutions like vrfydmn (in Perl) are not very
user-friendly
W dniu 28.11.2024 o 13:57, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
I have
about doing something at
the milter level in postfix. Or maybe you know some other solution?
How is it supposed to work?
If @domain.ltd in return-path and from: is dfferend then Reject "non
allowed"
--
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-
W dniu 20.11.2024 o 12:53, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 20.11.24 11:48, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
I have a specific problem - yes, I can solve it with opendmarc and
opendkim, and score in spamassassin but that's out of the question -
I only need to domain in &q
W dniu 20.11.2024 o 12:06, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users pisze:
* natan via Postfix-users:
If @domain.ltd in return-path and from: is dfferend then Reject "non
allowed"
That kind of rejection can be realised easily using milter-regex [1].
Simply combine "envfrom" and
ostfix.org
...
ServerName www.postfix.org
ServerAlias postfix.org
...
And like Victor said, add the domain root to the SSL cert.
This is all less than 5 minutes of banging on the keyboard.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To u
On 17/11/24 03:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 05:04:32PM +1100, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
Is default_extra_recipient_limit not limiting the number of
recipients in a
given message ?
On 16/11/24 17:12, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote
How can I setup recipient rate limit in postfix? or via a milter?
This setting should be against local users in our system.
Thank you.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le
On 16/11/24 11:25, jeff--- via Postfix-users wrote:
How can I setup recipient rate limit in postfix? or via a milter?
This setting should be against local users in our system.
Thank you.
you can put
default_extra_recipient_limit = 50
in main.cf & pos
to be, then no. The SMTP/email transaction was aborted before they
ever had the chance to tell your server who (From:) or to whom (To:) the
email was going to be for.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an
November 15, 2024 at 5:18 AM, "Wietse Venema via Postfix-users"
mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org?
> >
> I'm not running the DNS or www service anymore. The work would need
> to be done by Ralph (web) and sys4.de staff (DNS).
>
Is the list hoste
On 15/11/24 10:02, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users:
On 11/14/24 4:12 AM, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
I have been notified about datacenter maintenance which will disrupt
access to www.postfix.org. Maintenance is planned for 2024-11-27 between
On 01/12/2024 23:49, Kenneth Porter via Postfix-users wrote:
I recommend installing etckeeper. I disable the setting to do
auto-backups before package updates (yum or apt) and the nightly
auto-backup so that all commits require me to explicitly set a change
comment. (So I remember why I made
On 01/12/2024 22:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Note that alias_maps are recursive only if the result of alias
expansion matches mydestination.
That was it, thank you. I previously had:
myhostname = mail.example.com
mydomain = example.com
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost
November 13, 2024 at 10:11 PM, "Wietse Venema via Postfix-users"
mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org?to=%22Wietse%20Venema%20via%20Postfix-users%22%20%3Cpostfix-users%40postfix.org%3E
> wrote:
>
> natan via Postfix-users:
>
> >
> > Hi
> > Thenx
On 16/11/24 16:38, Hua Y via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-11-16 13:05, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 11:31, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 11:25, jeff--- via Postfix-users wrote:
How can I setup recipient rate limit in postfix? or via a milter?
This setting should be
, is there any other easy way?
Thanks.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 16/11/24 11:31, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 11:25, jeff--- via Postfix-users wrote:
How can I setup recipient rate limit in postfix? or via a milter?
This setting should be against local users in our system.
Thank you.
you can put
default_extra_recipient_limit = 50
in
On 16/11/24 16:52, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 16:38, Hua Y via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-11-16 13:05, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 11:31, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 11:25, jeff--- via Postfix-users wrote:
How can I setup recipient rate limit in
On 16/11/24 16:58, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 01:38:25PM +0800, Hua Y via Postfix-users wrote:
default_destination_rate_delay = 3
default_extra_recipient_limit = 50
works for small setups . . .
Can you please explain the two options a bit more?
For the
On 16/11/24 17:00, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 04:52:24PM +1100, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
Yes - default_destination_rate_delay sets how many seconds between sending
messages,
Even for non-SMTP transports or internal relaying, ... not a good idea
On 16/11/24 17:12, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 05:04:32PM +1100, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16/11/24 16:58, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 01:38:25PM +0800, Hua Y via Postfix-users wrote
Hello,
what is the purpose of “saved” queue (/var/spool/postfix/saved)?
Which daemon are using it? When and How?
Thanks
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
tfix/vmailbox1,
hash:/var/data/etc/postfix/vmailbox2
virtual_minimum_uid = 100
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
smtpd_tls_key_file = XXsmtpd_tls_loglevel = 1smtpd_tls_received_header = yessmtpd_use_tls = yessmtputf8_enable = notls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandomvirtual_transport = XXThanks & Regards_______________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ail has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
s thereof.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ress, e.g., a DNS
RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an RCODE of 0 (NOERROR)
in a reply containing no answers, was returned. This prevented
completion of the evaluation. A later attempt is unlikely to
produce a final result.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by A
sv
PidFile /var/run/opendkim/opendkim.pid
SignatureAlgorithm rsa-sha256
UserID opendkim:opendkim
Socket inet:12301@localhost
Can you see amy problem?
Thanks
On 03/12/2024 12:56, Bluejay Adametz via Postfix-users wrote:
Is it possible to upgrade O
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 05.12.24 12:32, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Maybe change
from:
cleanup unix n - y - 0 cleanup
to:
cleanup fifo n - y - 0 cleanup
But I don't
Thanks for your work.
Is it safe to upgrade from postfix 3.7 to 3.9?
regards
On 2024-12-05 06:10, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Postfix stable release 3.9.1, and legacy releases 3.8.7, 3.7.12,
3.6.16 [An on-line version of this announcement will be available
at https
Hi
In process list I sow always milter
mailregx 42670 16.6 0.0 920172 6000 ? Ssl 11:19 2:54
/usr/bin/milter-regex -c /etc/postfix/milter-regex.conf -u mailregx -G
postfix -p /var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 11:34, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
Today i run
=
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized >>>
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized >>>
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
among IP adresses in
TrustedHosts file.
After I added my laptop's IP address to TrustedHosts file, the emails were sent
with DKIM signature.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
___
Postfix-users ma
Victor,
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 19:46 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:28:55AM +0100, Tobi via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > since this weekend we have the issue that our postfix seems to be
> > unable to verify TLS certs presented
Hi Victor
think you push my to the right path :-)
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 22:51 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Tobi via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > Is that preventing mail delivery, or just noise in the logs?
>
n 12 with latest updates. Did Microsoft mess it or
do we mess it?
Anyone else experiencing such issues with MS atm?
Kind regards
tobi
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
policy for Microsoft.
Thanks @Victor for your support
Cheers
tobi
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 22:51 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Tobi via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > Is that preventing mail delivery, or just
!
Reg
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2024/12/26 22:15, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Cowbay via Postfix-users:
Postfix adds a missing (Resent) Message-ID, Date, or From header
when a message is received as an original or resent submission, not
when it receives a message from a remote MTA (for some definition
of 'r
vance.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Dear postfix users group,
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, or if this is a nonsensical
question.
But it seems to me that discarding the exact end-user device IP from
e-mails sent via any authenticated path is going to be a common scenario
in today's more privacy aware age.
Ye
On 2/4/25 4:15 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Ellie via Postfix-users:
The submission configurations as distributed have
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
which will reject mail without SASL login.
Wietse
Thank you so much for the
On 2/3/25 11:56 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
master.cf:
submission .. .. .. .. .. .. .. smtpd
-o { header_checks = pcre:{{/^Received:/ IGNORE}} }
...other -o options...
submissions .. .. .. .. .. .. .. smtpd
-o { header_checks = pcre
On 4/02/25 09:53, Emmanuel Seyman via Postfix-users wrote:
* Josh Good via Postfix-users [31/01/2025 00:37] :
There were community-provided RPM packages of Postfix for Red Hat 6.2
(Classic), as noted in the original post for this thread, but none of
them seems to have survived on any publicly
On 2/3/25 11:56 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
If this is for messages submitted on port 587 (submission) or 465
(smtps or submissions), then you can simply delete all Received:
message headers, because there shuold be only one.
Thanks so much for your helpful response! I wonder
On 2/4/25 2:25 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Though one might want to be prepared to encounter more friction for
outbound mail lacking all upstream Received headers. These tend to
be classed more "spammy".
This made me curious, and I've checked a bunch of inco
ion source IP's in case one
were to add relaying?
Or is waiting for the new `smtpd_hide_session_info` the only answer?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2/4/25 4:50 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Yes you did. You forgot to start line 16 with a space or tab.
Wietse
Oops, how silly, sorry! Okay, I think I got it:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o { header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix
On 2/4/25 7:07 PM, Ellie via Postfix-users wrote:
Sorry for me perhaps bugging this again! I pondered how I could possibly
be using the wrong file, but I can't think of anything.
To rule out that pcre is the issue, I installed all versions of pcre and
pcre2 both 16 and 32 that Alpine
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 05:09:52PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> I will implement Ellie's request, and move the Postfix 3.10 code
> freeze up by a few days.
>
> smtpd_hide_session_info (default: no)
>
> Hide SMTP session info from the Received: message
fit to
leaving a stripped out header at all? What is the use of a header that simply
tells you that the server delivering a piece of mail received that mail.
Logically assumed already. Is there another benefit I am not aware of?
_______
Postfix-users
xample would the following be valid?
user-1 192.x.x.1 OK
user-1 2001:x:x:x::AB OK
user-1 2001:x:x:x:: REJECT
user-1 192.x.x REJECT
That is, using a multi-line rule?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
_____
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2/4/25 7:00 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
You forgot to "postfix reload", or you edited the wrong master.cf
file.
What is the output from:
postconf -Mf submission/inet
It should show the new header_checks setting.
These master.cf sttings override main.cf so
On 2/4/25 19:48, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
What did Postfox log at 18:06:46 - postfix/submission/smtpd or postfix/smtpd?
Wietse
I sent a test mail to a throwaway account now, and found the according
log entry! The one you wanted was gone since I happened to have reboot
On 2/5/25 12:29 AM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
I might have misunderstood the point of this as im jumping in late, but
there is both `header_checks` and `smtp_header_checks`.
That seems very promising, I tried to put it into practice right now:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o
ep in.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2/5/25 5:57 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
The following is now part of Postfix 3.10, which is back in the
code freeze stage.
Thank you so much for working on this, this is amazing!!
Regards,
ell1e
___
Postfix-users mailing list
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 11:06, Allen Coates via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> In my access lists I have found that 0.0.0.0/0 matches every IPv4
> address, and ::/0 matches every IPv6 address.
>
> (Unless, of course you are expressly testing for a spec
tfix/bounce[7327]: 3EA9481A40: sender non-delivery notification:
30DB081A5A
Ubuntu 24.04
Postfix version 3.8.6 (on the old server it was 3.4.13)
Dovecot 2.3.7.2
MySQL Ver 15.1 Distrib 10.11.8-MariaDB
SQL-related main.cf items:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost
relay_domains =
Thank you so much for the in-depth response!!
On 2/6/25 7:10 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
You should not prepend the header with multi-recipient deliveries,
because that is a privacy problem.
I wonder, what happens with your config in this case? Would it omit the
X-Original-To
Dear postfix users community,
Sorry for asking another beginner question. I've seen solutions online
for this, but only one with caveats.
One of my setups involves a forwarding SMTP that handles external
domains, that then forwards them to some other internal mailbox on a
different ma
On 2/6/25 7:10 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
You can force this witH;
/etc/postfix/master.cf
relay .. .. .. .. .. .. smtp
flags=O
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
relay_destination_recipient_limit = 1
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
/etc/postfix/transport
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:14:36PM +0100, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Hey.
>
> I have read something about DANE.
>
> I have seen very different recommendations.
>
> I have decided to give it a shot.
>
> But I figured that "someone" here
ed only check the TXT record's version "id"
> against the cached value.
Again a good argument for "mta-sts" is stupid and DANE should always be
preferred :-)
Cheers
tobi
On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 14:30 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09,
This is the body of the email.
.
QUIT
07:26:37.896587 IP 10.10.71.29.25 > 10.10.70.112.45550: Flags [.], ack 2727,
win 350, options [nop,nop,TS val 2462916748 ecr 2077930140], length 0
E..4?.@.
G.___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix
m/to DHL
Cheers
tobi
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ostmap[24258]: fatal: table
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_default_map.cf: query error: Resource
temporarily unavailabl
I cannot set charracter utf8mb4 in database - probbaly only in one table...
Is it possible to force Postfix not to force utf8mb4?
--
_____
brary: OpenSSL 3.2.2 4 Jun 2024)
If this is a hacking attempt is it anything to be worried about? Are they
just banging their head on the wall?
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-use
On 15/12/24 23:34, Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-12-15 09:44, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
With systemd logging, logs are by default lossy (rate-limits too tight
and many users don't notice until it is too late). Also logging is
System-wide "default
til the
package maintainers build against a newer SSL?
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
cannot be stopped from working.___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ility.
later version of Postfix
What minimum version should i shot for?
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hello
I saw that when messages sent to duck.com for forwarding, duck.com will
remove the original DKIM info from headers, to protect the sender
privacy.
I am just curious how to remove that DKIM in postfix?
Thank you.
___
Postfix-users mailing
do not believe Postfix itself has that feature built in.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
k :-)
Kind regards
tobi
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
check the status of
dovecot. During this period, no letters will be lost or rejected altogether.___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
t;= TLSv1.3), and I don't care about
optimal performance at the moment.
My request does not refer to general things like ssh or fail2ban, only to
Postfix. Do you have any ideas?___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
W dniu 12.12.2024 o 15:00, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 02:40:29AM +0100, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
I upgrade from postfix-3.7.x to postfix-3.9.x (Almalinux and repo GT-plus)
and i get problem
Dec 11 23:58:31 smtp2 postfix/postmap[24258]: warning
On 15/12/24 03:32, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
By design, all Postfix programs can fail, and therefore must retry.
If the cleanup daemon fails, the pickup daemon must retry. Likewise,
if a delivery agent or bounce daemon fails, the queue manager must
retry. Also, queue files may be
Hi
In the case you are talking about it would be every time and this
happens sporadically
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 11:50, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users pisze:
* natan via Postfix-users :
Hi
Today i run setup postfix+milter-regex.sock
Some times in log I get:
tail -f /var/log/mail.log |grep
t via Postfix-users pisze:
* natan via Postfix-users :
Hi
Today i run setup postfix+milter-regex.sock
Some times in log I get:
tail -f /var/log/mail.log |grep milter
Dec 5 11:23:03 mx-node2 postfix/cleanup[45922]: warning: connect to Milter
service unix:/var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock: No such fi
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 13:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 05.12.24 12:32, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Maybe change
from:
cleanup unix n - y - 0 cleanup
to:
cleanup fifo n - y - 0 cleanup
But I don't know if it
On 22/12/24 02:54, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote:
However, there are other mechanisms being developed, for example OAUTH2,
which, in terms of Cyrus SASL, does not work with saslauthd at all,
I don't see why it wouldn't.
so
needs direct integration within postfix in
On 22/12/24 03:19, Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users wrote:
What's worth mentioning is that PLAIN/LOGIN also requires cleartext
password storage - on the client side.
This is not entirely true. It is possible for a client to store
passwords in an encrypted db which is decrypted with it
On 22/12/24 19:53, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote:
22.12.2024 03:39, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 22/12/24 02:54, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote:
However, there are other mechanisms being developed, for example OAUTH2,
which, in terms of Cyrus SASL, does not work with
` and Postfix, while
`s_client` to `s_server` works in principle.
But maybe I'm missing something.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
options. You can if you
wish extend the list
Thanks, this worked.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
crypt/live/example.com/privkey.pem
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
Is there something to improve?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] ehlo=1 starttls=0/1 commands=1/2
and I'm wondering if this was my fault or their fault, and should I roll back
my openssl version.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-
901 - 1000 of 7869 matches
Mail list logo
