Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:57:
* toganm--- via Postfix-users :
Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is
listed
in any rbl sites. For one it is listed in Abusix and my server is
rejected it as a result
What makes you believe the
Am 07.03.23 um 18:57 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
* toganm--- via Postfix-users :
Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is listed
in any rbl sites. For one it is listed in Abusix and my server is rejected it
as a result
What makes you believe
Hello.
I found the issue. It seems I had the list address saved as a contact,
so Thunderbird was displaying Postfix Users. I removed the contact and
it's displaying the poster name.
See screenshot.
Thank you.
MatthewM
___
Postfix-users ma
On 3/7/2023 12:27 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Reviewing logs I notice many soft bounces from the new list. Some
emails from the new list have been accepted and I don't understand
what the differences are. I have not seen these types of errors
before and don't understa
toganm--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is listed
> in any rbl sites.
If you really were in mailing business for some time you would know how RBLs
work: They react, they do not read crystal balls!
Regards,
M
c" as an umbrella-term for various 'security'
facilities.
* sarcasm
--
Regards =dn
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2023-03-07 at 13:27:41 UTC-0500 (Tue, 07 Mar 2023 13:27:41 -0500)
postfix--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Reviewing logs I notice many soft bounces from the new list. Some
emails from the new list have been accepted and I don't understand
what the differences are. I hav
> On Mar 7, 2023, at 1:14 PM, Robert Schetterer via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Am 07.03.23 um 18:57 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
>> * toganm--- via Postfix-users :
>>> Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is listed
&g
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Michael Grimm via Postfix-users :
>> toganm--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is listed
>>> in any rbl sites.
>>
>> If you real
> On Mar 7, 2023, at 11:37 AM, postfix--- via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> OpenDMARC is segfaulting. That's what 'signal 11' means. Postfix fails to
>> get an answer to its end-of-body milter call because of the segfault closing
>> the other end of th
Am 07.03.23 um 20:37 schrieb postfix--- via Postfix-users:
OpenDMARC is segfaulting. That's what 'signal 11' means. Postfix fails to get
an answer to its end-of-body milter call because of the segfault closing the
other end of that socket. That failure results in Postfix s
That works, but I have the list in contacts for a reason! So I can
remember the address when I need to post.
On 3/7/2023 1:26 PM, Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello.
I found the issue. It seems I had the list address saved as a contact,
so Thunderbird was displaying Postfix
>>>>> "mailmary---" == mailmary--- via Postfix-users
>>>>> writes:
> Unfortunately I've seen this crash as well, its actually quite
> frequent in my case and I'm using a newer version of OpenDMARC than
> you:
> # opendmarc -V
>
b.com/fastmail/authentication_milter
works nicely with postfix, is an active project, and is well tested (by
Fastmail in production)
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault (so
far ;-)
Good luck.
_____
(By Robert Gernhardt)
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 3/7/23 15:28, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
"mailmary---" == mailmary--- via Postfix-users
writes:
Unfortunately I've seen this crash as well, its actually quite
frequent in my case and I'm using a newer version of OpenDMARC than
you:
# opendmarc -V
opendma
On March 7, 2023 11:37:53 PM UTC, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
wrote:
>On 3/7/23 15:28, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
>>>>>>> "mailmary---" == mailmary--- via Postfix-users
>>>>>>> writes:
>>
>>> Unfortunate
Am 07.03.23 um 20:32 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
On Mar 7, 2023, at 1:14 PM, Robert Schetterer via Postfix-users
wrote:
Am 07.03.23 um 18:57 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
* toganm--- via Postfix-users :
Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 07:42:56AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
wrote:
> - The key material is 4096 Bit and it was brought to my attention there's a
> bug / missing functionality (?) in opendmarc which results in the program
> being unable to handle keys at siz
On 9/03/23 08:11, Peter wrote:
On 8/03/23 15:46, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote:
For Debian, if someone can find/test patches, I can get them into
Debian's package. I assume other distributors are similar. Feel free
to update the Debian bug with information. It's unfo
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault (so
far ;-)
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian?
>>
>> rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault
>> (so
>&g
If there’ a pull request to get it into the current “develop” branch of
opendmarc, I have the privs to merge it.
-Dan
> On Mar 8, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Peter Ajamian via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 9/03/23 08:11, Peter wrote:
>> On 8/03/23 15:46, Scott Kitterman via P
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for
debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMAR
to rewrite more headers, any help in disabling this?
Regards,
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 3/8/2023 3:19 PM, SysAdmin EM via Postfix-users wrote:
I am administering a Postfix that uses sender_canonicals to do a
rewrite of the header from but I need to disable that option.
I have commented the sender_canonical file but when reloading the
configuration I try to send an email and
>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
>>>>> writes:
> On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> So what's the option for a more
On 3/8/23 16:02, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
Here some quick notes from my configuration (related to SPF/DKIM/DMARC checking,
i.e. when receiving e-mails):
SPF and DKIM are enabled by default, and at least I didn't need to have any
local config (which would go in local.d/{spf
Michael via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-09 11:57:
On Monday, 6 March 2023 17:08:49 CET, Wietse Venema wrote:
This week, the Postfix mailing lists will be migrated from Majordomo
at
Cloud9.net to Mailman at Sys4.de.
[...]
what a coincidence!
https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup
Michael via Postfix-users:
> wietse,
>
> On Monday, 6 March 2023 17:08:49 CET, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This week, the Postfix mailing lists will be migrated from Majordomo at
> > Cloud9.net to Mailman at Sys4.de.
> > [...]
>
> what a coincidence!
Let me help r
On 3/8/23 17:44, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
OK, this is very useful information that's not obvious from the
documentation. I have taken a leap of faith and made the tiny handful
of Postfix configuration changes necessary to let Rspamd handle all of
DKIM, DMARC, SPF inste
Michael wrote in
<0d3709b8-72ae-4e54-a8a5-5a82f3b09...@hemathor.de>:
|On Thursday, 9 March 2023 15:29:01 CET, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
|wrote:
|> Let me help remind you that your email address has been out there
|> for a while. Here are some samples from the postfix-users
postfix--- via Postfix-users:
> Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing list
> emails?
> The problem I see is many people will hit reply in their email client which
> will create an email from them to the author, bypassing the mailing list.
> Unless t
n milter_header_checks vs header_checks.
Is there a way to actually log the full header in this case through postfix?
Thanks
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4pxdmb1f8fzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|postfix--- via Postfix-users:
|> Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing \
|> list emails?
|> The problem I see is many people will hit reply in their email client \
Dnia 9.03.2023 o godz. 13:34:39 postfix--- via Postfix-users pisze:
> Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing list
> emails?
> The problem I see is many people will hit reply in their email client which
> will create an email from them to the author, b
Hi Peter.
The Reply-To has always been the original poster for 10+ years. No sense
changing it now. :)
Matthew
On 3/9/2023 1:08 PM, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 10/03/23 07:34, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing
Aleksandr Stankevic via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a milter that, as part of the job, adds an X-Test-Tracking header
> with a 76 char length string.
> Then, in postfix, i've got a milter_header_checks which uses WARN to log
> this to logs, like:
> /^X-Tes
n't see any benefits with ARC-signing for this list, but
I'll accept whatever the list admin decides.
Best regards,
Gerald
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230309195933.ga16...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 9.03.2023 o godz. 13:34:39 postfix--- via Postfix-users pisze:
|> Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing \
|> list emails?
|> The problem I see is many people will hit reply
Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-09 21:07:
The Reply-To has always been the original poster for 10+ years. No
sense changing it now. :)
its just not safe to dkim sign
if maillists stop breaking dkim it would be lots better
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0
ing message is resigned. However, some sites may
wish to remove these headers by setting this to ‘yes’.
I do not request any changes to this list, just wanted to mention other options.
Best regards,
Gerald
_______
Postfix-users mailin
I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject tag
was desired, but would [postfix] have been that much more distracting, without
adding the obvious third-grader label that might better be held by qmail?
-Dan
___
Postfix
icons, .. or whatever .. what i heard .. i do not
use them.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
___________
I cant agree more.I personally, would appropriate changing the "P-U" subject // Jonathan On Mar 9, 2023 22:47, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
> I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject tag was
rejected
by mta before reaching mailman, so a mailman-only DKIM signature
does not seem less trustworthy than all the additional ARC info to me.
But if it may help gmail recipients like Peter said and it's not
causing problems ...
Best regards,
Gerald
______
Gerald Galster via Postfix-users:
> > This list uses Mailman configuration settings, not handcrafted code.
> > If people believe that it is worthwhile to change the Mailman
> > implementation or the DMARC spec, then I suggest that they work
> > with the people responsible
Peter via Postfix-users:
> On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject
> > tag was desired, but would [postfix] have been that much more distracting,
> > without adding the obvious th
n nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Dnia 9.03.2023 o godz. 21:39:10 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
> |With changing From: to point to the list itself and adding Reply-To:
> |pointing to the author this behaviour hasn't changed. I'm still replying to
> |the author when I press R and to the list w
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230309222044.ga19...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 9.03.2023 o godz. 21:39:10 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|>|With changing From: to point to the list itself and adding Reply-To:
|>|pointing to the author this behaviour hasn't changed. I'm s
Friday, March 10, 2023, 9:09:02 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Peter via Postfix-users:
>> On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>> > I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject
>> > tag was desired, but wou
Wietse, as a non-native English-speaker: are you aware that “p-u” is a childish
declaration that something stinks?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 9, 2023, at 2:10 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Peter via Postfix-users:
>>> On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Maho
yet.
Just out of curiosity it would have been nice to know why he made
that choice.
Best regards
Gerald
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Peter via Postfix-users:
> I think that [postfix] or [postfix-users] and [postfix-devel]
> [postfix-announce] are just fine, but if you want shortened versions,
> might I suggest:
>
> [pf] [pf-dev] [pf-ann]
Changed to: [pfx], [pfx-dev], [pfx-ann]
On 3/9/23 18:41, Roger Klorese via Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse, as a non-native English-speaker: are you aware that “p-u” is a childish
declaration that something stinks?
But are we REALLY all eight years old?
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Peter via Postfix-users:
> > I think that [postfix] or [postfix-users] and [postfix-devel]
> > [postfix-announce] are just fine, but if you want shortened versions,
> > might I suggest:
> >
> > [pf] [pf-dev] [pf-ann]
>
>
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 05:09:02PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> If I'd change anything I would delete the '-' in the middle of the
> current tag.
I'm all in favour, though I also be happy with [U], [D], an
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:14:31AM -0500, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> >> If I'd change anything I would delete the '-' in the middle of the
> >> current tag.
> >
> > I'm all in favour, though I also be happy with [U], [D], and [A]. :-)
of my case by logging the information I need on the
milter side and then merging the logs.
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 10:13 PM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Aleksandr Stankevic via Postfix-users:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a
Friday, March 10, 2023, 5:54:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't at all concerned about that, rather the less horizontal
> space any tag takes, more subject I see without horizonal scrolling in
> one-message per line mailbox presentations. I was al
Dnia 10.03.2023 o godz. 18:18:50 Phil Biggs via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> Likewise, To keep my mail client's threaded view sane I resorted to using
> header_checks:
>
> /^Subject: \[pfx\] (.*)$/ REPLACE Subject: $1
What a mail client has problem with threading because of
help me ? I dont know what more info i
need to send, when i get this info i add it.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Bye
Best. Adrian.
__
i-Pi Sp. z o.o.
ul. Norwida 10
56-416 Twardogóra
tel: +48 783 314 404
mail: a...@i-pi.pl
W dniu 10.03.2023 o 11:24, mailmary--- via Postfix-users pisze:
Hello,
Are you using OpenDMARC? if you do, then its because OpenDMARC is broken and
crashes on some type
pamd_protocol_http_reply: regexp statistics: 0 pcre regexps scanned, 4
regexps matched, 163 regexps total, 79 regexps cached, 0B bytes scanned
using pcre, 6.08k bytes scanned total
Best, Adrian.
W dniu 10.03.2023 o 11:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 10.03.23 11:3
Am 10.03.2023 um 13:01 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
In the old days I used the tags to filter my messages and place them in the
right mailbox. With the advent of DMARC I stopped that and turned to using
List-Id:-headers as filter trigger. They are invisible, they don't re
to:dmarc-...@gmx.net; adkim=r;aspf=r; fo=1
They all have "p=none" so they probably have no delivery issues to
mailing lists.
Just my thought though...
Thanks
Corey H
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubs
Am 10.03.23 um 12:30 schrieb Corey Hickman via Postfix-users:
I saw some people using email addresses like yahoo, AOL, mail.ru to post
messages to the lists (such as debian-user, postfix-user etc).
I am thinking those addresses which have the strictest DKIM setup are
not suitable to send a list
ress which at least has no "p=reject"
in their DKIM policy.
I am sorry for the typos. What I meant is DMARC, not DKIM. :)
sorry,
Corey
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
domain1.com and domain2.com do a rewrite of the from by
no-re...@mydomain.com.
Any helps¿??
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ed.
>
> I would like to add a condition for you to rewrite the from when it does
> not match a condition.
>
> Example,
>
> If the from is not domain1.com and domain2.com do a rewrite of the from
> by no-re...@mydomain.com.
>
> Any helps¿??
>
_______
* Mal via Postfix-users [230310 03:23]:
>
>
> On 10/03/2023 5:24 pm, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I was also quite happy with
> > no tags at all.
>
> +1 no tags
I wholeheartedly agree. The subject tag hinders, rather than helps,
reading list mail.
> * Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users :
>
>> * Gerald Galster via Postfix-users > <mailto:list+post...@gcore.biz>>:
>> I just wrote that because p@rick (sys4 AG) asked on the mailop mailinglist
>> 2023-02-17 "Should mailing list messages be DKIM
or 200 ( more preferred :P ).
Done, in Postfix 3.8. I also updated a similar limit in the smtp
header/body checks.
Wietse
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
SysAdmin EM via Postfix-users:
> Good days, request help, is it possible to use conditions in the
> sender_canonical file? we are migrating an entire system and some customers
> do not have our SPF added.
>
> I would like to add a condition for you to rewrite the from when it doe
On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 1:52:47 AM EST Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-
users wrote:
> * Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users :
>
> ...
>
>
> > For Debian, if someone can find/test patches, I can get them into Debian's
> > package. I assume other distributors a
On Friday, March 10, 2023 7:04:30 AM EST Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
wrote:
> * Gerald Galster via Postfix-users :
>
> > >>> This list uses Mailman configuration settings, not handcrafted code.
> > >>> If people believe that it is worthwhile to chang
On 2023-03-10 at 05:59:00 UTC-0500 (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:59:00 +0100)
Adrian Huryn via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Thanks for reply.
Logs from rspamd
[...]
2023-03-10 11:54:43 #31829(rspamd_proxy) <71bd42>; lua;
greylist.lua:348: greylisted until "Fri, 10 Mar 2023 1
* Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users :
That would be great. I started dkimpy-milter for two reasons: I wanted to
experiment with the new DKIM crypto types that lead to RFC 8463 and there
didn't seem to be much activity with opendkim maintenance (this is, of course,
ironic given how well
Hi.
On Fri Mar 10, 2023 at 14:57:41 +, Cooper, Robert A via Postfix-users wrote:
> I posted about the List-ID changing three days ago, but it seems to have
> gotten lost in the prefix discussion. for the record, I like list prefixes.
> It's easier to filter on subject than o
https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/multimap.html
Rspamd is quite complex and there are many options.
Your issue is not related to postfix.
Best regards,
Gerald
_______________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
* Cooper, Robert A via Postfix-users [230310 09:59]:
> I posted about the List-ID changing three days ago, but it seems to
> have gotten lost in the prefix discussion. for the record, I like
> list prefixes. It's easier to filter on subject than on headers that
> may or may no
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for
debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't
segfault (so far
similar for dkimpy-milter ...
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 3/8/23 15:30, Scott Techlist via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault (so
far ;-)
On 3/10/23 11:13, Curtis Maurand via Postfix-users wrote:
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't
segfault (so far ;-)
I've been running rspamd for nearly a year and I've been very happy with
i
'hardest' part is that my pip-installed pkgs don't notify on maintenance
updates!
o/
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 17:35 +0200, mailmary--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Looking at the opendkim/opendmarc right now, they appear dead over the past 2
> years or so, which is sad really.
>
It's not sad at all. It's a testament to the stability of the project.
Sure, b
Matthias Fechner wrote in
:
|Am 10.03.2023 um 13:01 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
|> In the old days I used the tags to filter my messages and place them \
|> in the
|> right mailbox. With the advent of DMARC I stopped that and turned \
|> to using
|> List
Gernhardt)
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
> I don't need tags.
Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
devs, not for a knitting circle, so I think it is fair to assume we
sub
* Jim Popovitch via Postfix-users:
> On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 17:35 +0200, mailmary--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Looking at the opendkim/opendmarc right now, they appear dead over
>> the past 2 years or so, which is sad really.
>
> It's not sad at all. It's a
On 3/10/23 13:54, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
I don't need tags.
Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
devs, not f
> On Mar 10, 2023, at 10:59 AM, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> * Jim Popovitch via Postfix-users:
>
>> On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 17:35 +0200, mailmary--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at the opendkim/opendmarc right now, they appear
* Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
> > I don't need tags.
> Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
> the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
>
permission) a new mailing
list spun up on dayjob’s existing infra that we can use to get going TODAY.
Please contact me privately.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
* Robert A. via Postfix-users Cooper:
> Some of us don't have a choice and are stuck with MS mail products due
> to work policies. while OWA does now support header filtering, that
> has not always been the case.
So you are saying that even Microsoft has finally seen the light.
1101 - 1200 of 7981 matches
Mail list logo
